3
International Journ Internat ISSN No: 245 @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www A Study on Karthick Department of Computer Ap ABSTRACT Mobile Robot competitions are vi distribution of science and engine worldwide public but are also brilliant and comparing unlike research policies how today’s study challenges of In Autonomous Mobile Robots are being f Autonomous Driving competition that the Portuguese Robotics Open annual m competition. Keyword: Mobile robot, micro m navigation, ball collection, robot socc robotics research programs, rough terr motion planning, Little Dog, RRT, reach RRT, transverse linearization. INTRODUCTION Mobile robot competitions are for over 2 have motivated generations of student and amateurs alike, while overwhelm amount of research subsidy and own ti Oppositions provide a goal together wit performance quantity, while wides coverage allows participants to present t wider environment. So it is time to tak and reflect on the research result of events. In the next sections, we will take at three major international m competitions. In the order of their creati are Micro mouse Contest, AAAI M Competition, and RoboCup Robot So competitions this is reflected by guessi environments in early competitions, competitions take place in more open early robot competitions already challenging robots against each other, w robots work together for a common ta been introduced a few years ago. nal of Trend in Scientific Research and De tional Open Access Journal | www.ijtsr 56 - 6470 | Volume - 2 | Issue – 6 | Sep w.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 6 | Sep-Oct n Mobile Robotics in Robotics k Vishal. K, Dr. S. Venkatesh Kumar pplications, Dr. Sns Rajalakshmi College of Arts Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India ital way for eering to the way of testing s. It is discuss ntelligent and fingered by the takes place in mobile robotics mouse, office cer, RoboCup, rain, bounding, hability-guided 20 years. They ts, researchers ming enormous ime and effort. th an objective spread media their work to a ke a look back a number of e a nearer look mobile robot ion dates these Mobile Robot occer. In robot ing very strict , while later spaces. Some played two while multiple ask have only Odometry Odometry is the broadly method for mobile robot lo short-term exactness, is lo high sampling rates, the odometry is the integration information over time, wh abundant meeting of errors The resulting errors can be two groups: systematic errors non-systematic errors Non-systematic errors are tho communication of the flo Typically, when a mobile ro with a hybrid odometry/landm SYSTEMATIC ERRORS Measurement of Odometry E One important but infrequentl mobile robotics is the quant odometry errors. Absence of actions for the quantificatio results in the poor standardiza and single reports on odo scientific communications Measurement of Non-System Borenstein and Feng [1995] b for calculating non-systemati called extended UMBmark comparison of different conditions, though the m systematic errors is less use strongly on the floor features. evelopment (IJTSRD) rd.com p – Oct 2018 2018 Page: 872 s s & Science, used direction finding ocating; it provides good ow-cost, and allows very e fundamental idea of n of incremental motion ich leads certainly to the s. e categorized into one of s ose that result from the oor with the wheels. obot system is installed mark navigation. Errors ly addressed difficulty in titative measurement of well-defined calculating on of odometry errors ation of mobile platforms ometric correctness in matic Errors both proposed a method ic errors. This method, k, can be used for robots under similar measurement of non- eful because it depends

A Study on Mobile Robotics in Robotics

  • Upload
    ijtsrd

  • View
    18

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Mobile Robot competitions are vital way for distribution of science and engineering to the worldwide public but are also brilliant way of testing and comparing unlike research policies. It is discuss how todays study challenges of Intelligent and Autonomous Mobile Robots are being fingered by the Autonomous Driving competition that takes place in the Portuguese Robotics Open annual mobile robotics competition. Karthick Vishal. K | Dr. S. Venkatesh Kumar "A Study on Mobile Robotics in Robotics" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-6 , October 2018, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd18649.pdf Paper URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/other/18649/a-study-on-mobile-robotics-in-robotics/karthick-vishal-k

Citation preview

Page 1: A Study on Mobile Robotics in Robotics

International Journal of Trend in

International Open Access Journal

ISSN No: 2456

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com

A Study onKarthick Vishal.

Department of Computer Applications, Dr.

ABSTRACT Mobile Robot competitions are vital way for distribution of science and engineering to the worldwide public but are also brilliant way of testing and comparing unlike research policies. It is discuss how today’s study challenges of Intelligent and Autonomous Mobile Robots are being fingered by the Autonomous Driving competition that takes place in the Portuguese Robotics Open annual mobile robotics competition. Keyword: Mobile robot, micro mouse, office navigation, ball collection, robot soccer, RoboCup, robotics research programs, rough terrain, bounding, motion planning, Little Dog, RRT, reachabilityRRT, transverse linearization. INTRODUCTION Mobile robot competitions are for over 20 years. They have motivated generations of students, and amateurs alike, while overwhelming enormous amount of research subsidy and own time and effort. Oppositions provide a goal together with an objective performance quantity, while widespread media coverage allows participants to present theirwider environment. So it is time to take a look back and reflect on the research result of a number of events. In the next sections, we will take a nearer look at three major international mobile robot competitions. In the order of their creatioare Micro mouse Contest, AAAI Mobile Robot Competition, and RoboCup Robot Soccer. In robot competitions this is reflected by guessing very strict environments in early competitions, while later competitions take place in more open spaces. Someearly robot competitions already played two challenging robots against each other, while multiple robots work together for a common task have only been introduced a few years ago.

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)

International Open Access Journal | www.ijtsrd.com

ISSN No: 2456 - 6470 | Volume - 2 | Issue – 6 | Sep

www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 6 | Sep-Oct 2018

n Mobile Robotics in Robotics

Karthick Vishal. K, Dr. S. Venkatesh Kumar Department of Computer Applications, Dr. Sns Rajalakshmi College of Arts & Science,

Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Mobile Robot competitions are vital way for distribution of science and engineering to the worldwide public but are also brilliant way of testing and comparing unlike research policies. It is discuss how today’s study challenges of Intelligent and

ous Mobile Robots are being fingered by the Autonomous Driving competition that takes place in the Portuguese Robotics Open annual mobile robotics

Mobile robot, micro mouse, office navigation, ball collection, robot soccer, RoboCup, robotics research programs, rough terrain, bounding, motion planning, Little Dog, RRT, reachability-guided

Mobile robot competitions are for over 20 years. They have motivated generations of students, researchers and amateurs alike, while overwhelming enormous amount of research subsidy and own time and effort. Oppositions provide a goal together with an objective performance quantity, while widespread media coverage allows participants to present their work to a wider environment. So it is time to take a look back and reflect on the research result of a number of events. In the next sections, we will take a nearer look at three major international mobile robot competitions. In the order of their creation dates these

mouse Contest, AAAI Mobile Robot Competition, and RoboCup Robot Soccer. In robot competitions this is reflected by guessing very strict environments in early competitions, while later competitions take place in more open spaces. Some early robot competitions already played two challenging robots against each other, while multiple robots work together for a common task have only

Odometry � Odometry is the broadly used direction finding

method for mobile robot locating; it provides good short-term exactness, is lowhigh sampling rates, the fundamental idea of odometry is the integration of incremental motion information over time, which leads certainly to the abundant meeting of errors.

� The resulting errors can be categorized into one of two groups: • systematic errors • non-systematic errors

Non-systematic errors are those that result from the communication of the floor with the wheels. Typically, when a mobile robot system is installewith a hybrid odometry/landmark navigation. SYSTEMATIC ERRORS Measurement of Odometry ErrorsOne important but infrequently addressed difficulty in mobile robotics is the quantitativeodometry errors. Absence of wellactions for the quantification of odometry errors results in the poor standardization of mobile platforms and single reports on odometric correctness in scientific communications Measurement of Non-Systematic ErrorsBorenstein and Feng [1995] both proposefor calculating non-systematic errors. This method, called extended UMBmark,comparison of different robots under similar conditions, though the measurement of nonsystematic errors is less useful because it depends strongly on the floor features.

Research and Development (IJTSRD)

www.ijtsrd.com

6 | Sep – Oct 2018

Oct 2018 Page: 872

Robotics

shmi College of Arts & Science,

Odometry is the broadly used direction finding robot locating; it provides good

term exactness, is low-cost, and allows very high sampling rates, the fundamental idea of odometry is the integration of incremental motion information over time, which leads certainly to the

s. The resulting errors can be categorized into one of

systematic errors

systematic errors are those that result from the communication of the floor with the wheels. Typically, when a mobile robot system is installed with a hybrid odometry/landmark navigation.

Measurement of Odometry Errors One important but infrequently addressed difficulty in

quantitative measurement of odometry errors. Absence of well-defined calculating actions for the quantification of odometry errors results in the poor standardization of mobile platforms and single reports on odometric correctness in

Systematic Errors Borenstein and Feng [1995] both proposed a method

systematic errors. This method, extended UMBmark, can be used for

comparison of different robots under similar conditions, though the measurement of non-systematic errors is less useful because it depends

Page 2: A Study on Mobile Robotics in Robotics

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com

Inertial Navigation Inertial navigation uses gyroscopes and accelerometers to measure rate of rotation and acceleration. Measurements are integrated once to yield position. Inertial navigation systems have the benefit that they are self-contained, that is, they don't need external references. Inertial sensors are thus mostly unsuitable for accurate positioning over an extended period of time. Accelerometers Test results from the use of accelerometers for mobile robot navigation have been generally poor. The University of Michigan it was found that there is a very poor signal-to-noise ratio at lower accelerations. Accelerometers also suffer from extensive drifthey are sensitive to uneven ground because any disturbance from a perfectly horizontal position will cause the sensor to detect a component of the gravitational acceleration. Micro mouse Contest This report from the first "Amazing MicroMaze Contest" demonstrates the enormous media interested in the first mobile robot competition. The academic response was also overwhelming. Over 6000 entries followed the announcement of Don Christiansen [5], who originally suggested the contest. The task is for a robot mouse to drive from start to goal in the fastest time. Rules changed somewhat over time, in order to allow exploring the whole maze and then compute the shortest path, while also counting exploration time at a reduced factor. AAAI Mobile Robot Competition At the end of the 1980s, the micro mouseoutlived itself and the robotics research community was losing interest. The problem was solved and did not provide any new challenges. RoboCup The Robot World Cup Initiative (RoboCup) is anattempt to intelligent robotics research by providing a typical problem where wide series of technologies can be integrated. For this purpose, RoboCup chose to use soccer game, and organized an world cup known as The Robot World Cup Soccer Games and Conferences. GLOBAL POSIONING SYSTEM (GPS) � The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a

revolutionary technology for outdoor navigation.

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456

www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 6 | Sep-Oct 2018

Inertial navigation uses gyroscopes and accelerometers to measure rate of rotation and acceleration. Measurements are integrated once to yield position. Inertial navigation systems have the

contained, that is, they don't need external references. Inertial sensors are thus mostly unsuitable for accurate positioning over an

Test results from the use of accelerometers for mobile robot navigation have been generally poor. The University of Michigan it was found that there is a

noise ratio at lower accelerations. Accelerometers also suffer from extensive drift, and they are sensitive to uneven ground because any disturbance from a perfectly horizontal position will cause the sensor to detect a component of the

This report from the first "Amazing Micro-Mouse Contest" demonstrates the enormous media

interested in the first mobile robot competition. The academic response was also overwhelming. Over 6000 entries followed the announcement of Don Christiansen [5], who originally suggested the contest.

for a robot mouse to drive from start to goal in the fastest time. Rules changed somewhat over time, in order to allow exploring the whole maze and then compute the shortest path, while also counting

mouse contest had outlived itself and the robotics research community was losing interest. The problem was solved and did

The Robot World Cup Initiative (RoboCup) is an attempt to intelligent robotics research by providing a typical problem where wide series of technologies can be integrated. For this purpose, RoboCup chose to use soccer game, and organized an world cup known as The Robot World Cup Soccer Games and

GLOBAL POSIONING SYSTEM (GPS) The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a revolutionary technology for outdoor navigation.

� GPS was developed as a Joint Services Program by the Department of Defence.

� The system comprises 24 satellites (including three spares) which transmit encoded RF signals. Using advanced trilateration methods, groundbased receivers can compute their position by measuring the travel time of the satellites' RF signals, which include satellites' momentary location.

� This intentional degradation in positional accuracy to around 100 meters (328 ft) worst case is termed selective availability (SA)

Fractional Availability of Signals: � The dynamic test was found by

instrumented van over different types of territory. � The various routes were chosen so that the GPS

receivers would be subjected to a wide variety of obstructions.

� Large trucks, underpasses highway signs, buildings, foliage, as well as small cfound on the interstate and rural highway driving routes.

AUTONOMOUS DRIVING COMPETITION RULES The Autonomous Driving competition aims at promoting developments in devices, techniques and systems usable for vehicle autonomous driving either in restricted areas or, hopefully in the future, larger public spaces, such as pathways, roads and parks. Therefore, the challenge comprises a path with an 8shaped configuration simulating a road, which, for the last version of the competition, defines a tstreet about 1.5 m wide. Background The problem of fast movement over tough terrain has been an active research topic in robotics, beginning with the seminal work by Raibert in the 1980s). The research can be roughly divided into two categories. The first category uses knowledge of the robot mand environment within a motion planning framework. Little Dog Model An essential component of any model based planning approach is adequately accurate identification of the system dynamics. Obtaining an accmodel for Little Dog is challenging owing to subtleties in the ground interactions and the dominant effects of motor saturations and transmission dynamics.

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

Oct 2018 Page: 873

GPS was developed as a Joint Services Program by the Department of Defence. The system comprises 24 satellites (including three spares) which transmit encoded RF signals. Using advanced trilateration methods, ground-based receivers can compute their position by measuring the travel time of the satellites' RF

information about the satellites' momentary location. This intentional degradation in positional accuracy to around 100 meters (328 ft) worst case is termed selective availability (SA)

Fractional Availability of Signals: The dynamic test was found by driving an instrumented van over different types of territory. The various routes were chosen so that the GPS receivers would be subjected to a wide variety of

Large trucks, underpasses highway signs, buildings, foliage, as well as small canyons were found on the interstate and rural highway driving

AUTONOMOUS DRIVING COMPETITION

The Autonomous Driving competition aims at promoting developments in devices, techniques and systems usable for vehicle autonomous driving either n restricted areas or, hopefully in the future, larger

public spaces, such as pathways, roads and parks. Therefore, the challenge comprises a path with an 8-shaped configuration simulating a road, which, for the last version of the competition, defines a two-way

The problem of fast movement over tough terrain has been an active research topic in robotics, beginning with the seminal work by Raibert in the 1980s). The research can be roughly divided into two categories. The first category uses knowledge of the robot mand environment within a motion planning framework.

An essential component of any model based planning approach is adequately accurate identification of the system dynamics. Obtaining an accurate dynamic

Dog is challenging owing to subtleties in the ground interactions and the dominant effects of motor saturations and transmission

Page 3: A Study on Mobile Robotics in Robotics

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com

Motion Planning Algorithm Here we can formulate the problem of finding a feasible trajectory from an initial condition of the robot to a goal region defined by a desired location of the COM. Reach ability-guided RRT Overview Sample based planning methods such as the RRT can be very fast for certain applications. However, such algorithms depend on a distance metric to determine distance from which would invalidate the use of a proper Euclidean distance metric that assumes a smooth continuous space of actions. The idea of Reachability can be an exclusively powerful concept for sample based planning in the background of macro actions, as the accessible region does not have to be native to its parent node. Simulation Results It is presented three modifications toimplementation of the RRT to plan boundingwith Little Dog: (1) a simple motion primitive;reach ability guidance; and (3) task-space biasing. Each of these components could be implemented separately, but they worked particularly well when combined. CONCLUSION Mobile robotics is a big opportunity for robotics research. They create student interest and inspire them to work dedicated on their projects. Competitions create media interest and may even generate additional funds from external sources. The practical solutions students find for all the small problems ontheir way to a competition will teach them more skills than a lecture ever can. So it is actually a good idea to participate in a robot competition, provided that the individual research goals are covered by the particular event.

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456

www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 6 | Sep-Oct 2018

Here we can formulate the problem of finding a ectory from an initial condition of the

robot to a goal region defined by a desired location of

Sample based planning methods such as the RRT can be very fast for certain applications. However, such

end on a distance metric to determine distance from which would invalidate the use of a proper Euclidean distance metric that assumes a smooth continuous space of actions. The idea of Reachability can be an exclusively powerful concept

nning in the background of macro actions, as the accessible region does not have to be

It is presented three modifications to the standard implementation of the RRT to plan bounding motions

(1) a simple motion primitive; (2) space biasing.

of these components could be implemented they worked particularly well when

Mobile robotics is a big opportunity for robotics esearch. They create student interest and inspire them

to work dedicated on their projects. Competitions create media interest and may even generate additional funds from external sources. The practical solutions students find for all the small problems on their way to a competition will teach them more skills than a lecture ever can. So it is actually a good idea to participate in a robot competition, provided that the individual research goals are covered by the particular

REFERENCE 1. Farrell, J. L., 1976, “Integrated Aircraft

Navigation.” Academic Press, New York, NY, ISBN 0-12-249750-3.

2. Feng, L., Fainman, Y., and Koren, Y., 1992, “Estimate of Absolute Position of Mobile Systems by Opto-electronic Processor,” IEEE Transactions on Man, Machine and Cybernetics, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 954-963.

3. Fleury, S. and Baron, T., 1992, “Absolute External Mobile Robot Localization Using a Single Image.” Proceedings of the 1992 SPIE Conference on Mobile Robots, Boston, MA, Nov. 18-20, pp. 131-143.

4. Fukui, I., 1981, “TV Image Processing to Determine the Position of a Robot Vehicle.” Pattern Recognition, Vol. 14, pp. 101

5. Getting, I. A., 1993, “The Global Positioning System,” IEE Spectrum, December, pp. 36

6. Gothard, B. M., Etersky, R.1993, “Lessons Learned on a LowNavigation System for the Surrogate SemiAutonomous Vehicle.” SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 2058, Mobile Robots VIII, pp. 258

7. Gould, L., 1990, “Is Off-Wire Guidance Alive or Dead?” Managing Automation, May, pp

8. Roger Allan, The amazing microthey won, IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 1979, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 62-65

9. John Billingsley, micro mousebattle in Europe, Practical Computing, Dec. 1982, pp. 130-131

10. T. Bräunl, B. Graf, Robot Soccer Vision, Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Singapore, Nov. 1998, pp. 14-23

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

Oct 2018 Page: 874

, 1976, “Integrated Aircraft Navigation.” Academic Press, New York, NY,

Feng, L., Fainman, Y., and Koren, Y., 1992, “Estimate of Absolute Position of Mobile Systems

electronic Processor,” IEEE Transactions ybernetics, Vol. 22, No. 5,

Fleury, S. and Baron, T., 1992, “Absolute External Mobile Robot Localization Using a Single Image.” Proceedings of the 1992 SPIE Conference on Mobile Robots, Boston, MA, Nov.

TV Image Processing to Determine the Position of a Robot Vehicle.” Pattern Recognition, Vol. 14, pp. 101-109.

A., 1993, “The Global Positioning System,” IEE Spectrum, December, pp. 36-47.

M., Etersky, R. D., and Ewing, R. E., 1993, “Lessons Learned on a Low-Cost Global Navigation System for the Surrogate Semi-Autonomous Vehicle.” SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 2058, Mobile Robots VIII, pp. 258-269.

Wire Guidance Alive or Dead?” Managing Automation, May, pp. 38-40.

Roger Allan, The amazing micro mice: see how they won, IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 1979, vol. 16, no.

micro mouse - Mighty mice battle in Europe, Practical Computing, Dec. 1982,

T. Bräunl, B. Graf, Robot Soccer with Local Vision, Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Singapore, Nov. 1998, pp.