Click here to load reader
Upload
mlo825
View
132
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BRIBERY &IMPROPERLY DETERMINING
A WINNER
Kevin Desprez, L4, 2013
Grounds for agreeing on a result
• A player “really needs” to win/draw– Concession against reward.
• Result is favorable to both– Intentional Draws, Split and Concession, etc.
• Result is unfavorable to both– Double-eliminating Draw (on the Bubble for Cut or Prizes).
Drawing a Match
• Tournaments have inherent logistical restraints.– Noone wants to go back home at 3am
• Question 1: Best-of-1 or Best-of-3?– Best-of-1 means no SB, more variance => Best-of-3 was chosen
• Question 2: Time-limit or not?– A 90+ minute match is no fun for the others => Time-limit
• Question 3: In-game Tiebreaker or draw?– Clock doesn’t fit real life, Life is very unfair and orientates strategy.
• Drawing had to be implemented.– Not a choice, but a necessity
Intentional Draw (ID)
• Existence of draws and a mutually beneficial may encourage players to draw.– Play/Draw Top8 rule was created to mitigate this.
• Making ID illegal puts pressure on judges.– Not a good option.
• Still, IDs are often badly perceived by newer players (sometimes called Cheating)– 3-point win tried to fight against IDs but wasn’t nearly enough.
– Play/Draw rule made IDs less interesting and encourages play
Conceding
• If conceding was illegal, players could simply not kill opps until end of round to win 1-0.
• Forcing players to kill opps is unenforceable.
• Therefore Conceding a game had to be legal.
• Conceding a match followed, for the sake of consistency.
Legally Drawing/Conceding
• No coercition– Physical, Giving cards back, Giving a ride back, etc.
• No incentive– Money, Packs, Split, Upcoming concession, etc.
• Decision based on Magic strategy only– Dice, Coin, Arm-wrestling, Rock-Paper-Scissors, etc.
• Lots of things make a result agreement illegal! Much fewer ways to make it happen legally!
Why are B&IDaW illegal?
• They impact more than one match.– A concession favors one player over another.
• Conceding is ok for in-match strategic reasons
• Strategy is the only thing that should affect the results of a tournament.
• “All players could just do the same” is not a valid argument, as it’s not about in-match strategy but about gaming the system.
One penalty: Disqualification
• DQ is very logical after assessing risks/rewards
• Two main realistic reasons for B&IDaW:
– Draw means no TopX
– Draw means no prizes
• If “Drawing” means “Tournament Ending”, then the penalty must mean more than that!