27
Implementation of an D2L Course Template across an Entire State System Gary Storts Tennessee Board of Regents

D2L Fusion 2008

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: D2L Fusion 2008

Implementation of an D2L Course Template across an Entire State System

Gary StortsTennessee Board of Regents

Page 2: D2L Fusion 2008

The governing body for the Public Colleges and Universities of Tennessee

47 Institutions

180,000 Students

Tennessee Board of Regents

Page 3: D2L Fusion 2008

A state-wide collaborative online program across all 47 institutions within the state.

Started in 2001

More than 400 different courses.

Offering more than 800 sections

Enrollments of more than 15,000

Regents Online Degree Program

Page 4: D2L Fusion 2008

Course Proposals are initiated by faculty from across the system.

Courses being developed have already been approved at the institution developing the course.

Proposal goes through an RODP Curriculum Committee & Subcommittee

Course Approved

How Does it Work?

Page 5: D2L Fusion 2008

Course Syllabus is approved by an RODP Curriculum Committee

Course must fit an approved design template

All sections are taught from the same copy of the course.

How Does it Work?

Page 6: D2L Fusion 2008

RODP & D2L Training Required

Course Template provided to Instructor

Course must pass RODP Quality Review

How Does it Work?

Page 7: D2L Fusion 2008

Course put into inventory and offered through all institution’s registration systems

Developing Institution guaranteed the first 6 sections being taught.

How Does it Work?

Page 8: D2L Fusion 2008

Students must be accepted to a TBR institution through normal process.

Students choose a Home Institution

Enroll through Home Institution, regardless of where course is being taught from.

Home Institution grants degree or certificate

Students Enrolling

Page 9: D2L Fusion 2008

Sections show up as one RODP section in Registration software.

Designated with an “R” ie, R-50 All students are placed into one enrollment

section. Students are broken into multiple sections

just before the beginning of semester Limited to 25 students per section.

Enrollment Process

Page 10: D2L Fusion 2008

Developing Institution paid $6,000 Developing Institution guaranteed the first 6

sections being taught. Teaching Institution receives Tuition Students Home School receives FTE Teaching Institution receives 30% of RODP

course fee.

Financial Aspects

Page 11: D2L Fusion 2008

The RODP led to a common calendar across all colleges and universities in the system.

Interesting Outcome

Page 12: D2L Fusion 2008

Courses are filled with students from different schools, taught by different faculty from different schools

Created a need for consistency of design and content across all sections

Need for a Template

Page 13: D2L Fusion 2008

WebCT

Template consisted of specific tools and color design.

Faculty not restricted in the presentation of their content

Where did we start?

Page 14: D2L Fusion 2008

WebCT contract expiring in Dec of 2007

Statewide RFP for a Course Management

Three CMS’s consideredAngelBlackboard/WebCTDesire2Learn

Desire2Learn

Page 15: D2L Fusion 2008

Conversion of WebCT Content required considerable reworking of content into D2L

State had been looking at the Quality Matter Initiative

Desire2Learn Opportunity

Page 16: D2L Fusion 2008

A peer-based review process of online courses that focuses on the design of courses, as it relates to the success of students.

Has an extensive 40 point rubric for the evaluation tool.

Supported by academic research in the area of online education.

Quality Matters

Page 17: D2L Fusion 2008

Quality Matters

www.qualitymatters.org

Page 18: D2L Fusion 2008

Quality Matters Model$250 for Lead Reviewer$150 for two (2) additional Reviewers

$550 per course to Review

$550 x 400 = $220,000 over 3 years.

QM was too expensive!

Page 19: D2L Fusion 2008

Conrad (2002) found that learners judge instructors … on how clearly online course materials present the details of the course. A well organized course with a clear overview … clear timeline…

Swan (2001 cited clear and consistent course structure as one of three factors which “contribute significantly to the success of asynchronous online courses.”

Quality Matters Research

Page 20: D2L Fusion 2008

Navigational instructions make the organization of the course easy to understand.

◦ Lanicki and Liegle (2001); Swan (2001); Shriathudding, Hassan & Landoni (2003)

Quality Matters Research

Page 21: D2L Fusion 2008

There is a statement introducing the content to the course and how student learning is structured.

A self-introduction by the instructor is appropriate

Students should understand what it is that they are about to learn.

Quality Matters Research

Page 22: D2L Fusion 2008

Required Elements Course Information Course Description Welcome Calendar list all course

due dates Grade book complete Grade book linked to

assessments Instructions

Getting Started Module

Content in Sample Module Format

Use of the title “Module

Multiple forms of Assessment

Dropbox linked to gradebook.

Quiz dates in quiz tool

Page 23: D2L Fusion 2008

Getting Started Module

Page 24: D2L Fusion 2008

Overview Learning Objectives Key Words and Terms Content Assessments Additional Resources Reflection/Summary

The RODP Sample Module

Page 25: D2L Fusion 2008

Getting Started Module

Page 26: D2L Fusion 2008

Allowed us to separate content (academic freedom) from course design.

RODP Template

Page 27: D2L Fusion 2008

Gary Storts

[email protected](615) 366-3938

Questions?