30
Landscape approaches Change and adaptation in African drylands Session 2: 16H00-17H30 Olive 1

Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

About 1,050 people, including more than 200 official climate change negotiators, attended Forest Day 5 on the sidelines of the 17th UNFCCC Conference of Parties in Durban on 4 December 2011. Participants at the discussion forums were asked to vote on a series of questions pertinent to forestry, climate change and particularly REDD+. These are the results from the afternoon sessions. Forest Day is convened by the Center for International Forestry Research on behalf of the Collaborative Partnership on Forests. The 2011 event was hosted jointly with the Government of South Africa, through the Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries.

Citation preview

Page 1: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Landscape approaches Change and adaptation in African drylandsSession 2: 16H00-17H30

Olive 1

Page 2: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

9%

24%

9%

15%

39%

4%

1 Private sector

2 NGO

3 Government

4 International organisation

5 Academic/Research

6 Other

Breakdown of audience:Choose the option that best characterizes the organization that you are representing at Forest Day 5:

Page 3: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

20%

10%

31%

39%

1 More financing

2 More information

3 More coordination among government agencies

4 Better policies

What is the most important change needed to take climate smart agriculture to scale?

Page 4: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

What is the most important change needed to take climate smart agriculture to scale?

Page 5: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

58%

30%

2%

10%

1 Very important

2 Important

3 Not important

4 Not sure

Given experiences in your country, how would you rate the importance of devolving control over natural resources to local people as a way to improve woodland management in a way which builds resilience to climate shocks?

Page 6: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

57% 38% 80% 40% 73% 67%

29% 49% 50%24%33%

14%

13%20%10%3%

1 Very important

2 Important

3 Not important

4 Not sure

Private sector

NGO

Government

International organisation

Academic/Research

Other

Given experiences in your country, how would you rate the importance of devolving control over natural resources to local people as a way to improve woodland management in a way which builds resilience to climate shocks?

Page 7: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

7%

39%

10%

34%

10%

1 In partnership with forest departments or other government institutions

2 In partnership with community-based institutions

3 In partnership with individuals

4 Any of 1, 2 and 3

5 The private sector is not an appropriate partner

Assuming that rights to woodland resources are clearly defined, which of the following would be the best way to involve the private sector in improving woodland management and landscape restoration?

Page 8: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Assuming that rights to woodland resources are clearly defined, which of the following would be the best way to involve the private sector in improving woodland management and landscape restoration?

Page 9: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

17%

36%

14%

33%

1 Improve access to markets and facilitate private investment

2 Improve access to technical assistance on integrating trees into farming systems

3 Institute a system of payments for environmental services for carbon

4 Implement appropriate tenure policy reform

Which of the following climate investments would most effectively promote adaptation (e.g., by improving household food security) in dry woodlands?

Page 10: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Which of the following climate investments would most effectively promote adaptation (e.g., by improving household food security) in dry woodlands?

Page 11: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Financing opportunities and issues for mitigation

and adaptation Session 2: 16H00-17H30

Olive 2

Page 12: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

29%

36%

11%

5%

18%

1%

1 Private sector

2 NGO

3 Government

4 International organisation

5 Academic/Research

6 Other

Breakdown of audience:Choose the option that best characterizes the organization that you are representing at Forest Day 5:

Page 13: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

3%

4%

80%

7%

6%

1 Only a market-based mechanism

2 Only a non-market based mechanism including development assistance

3 Combination of market and non-market based mechanism

4 A special REDD+ fund

5 Other

Which of the following would be the most appropriate financing mechanisms to facilitate the implementation of REDD+?

Page 14: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

3%3%9%

11%9%

94% 65% 73% 80% 84% 100%

3%13%9%

8%20%16%

1 Only a market-based mechanism

2 Only a non-market based mechanism including development assistance

3 Combination of market and non-market based mechanism

4 A special REDD+ fund

5 Other

Private sector

NGO

Government

International organisation

Academic/Research

Other

Which of the following would be the most appropriate financing mechanisms to facilitate the implementation of REDD+?

Page 15: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

6%

48%

5%

39%

2%

1 Low initially, and gradually increasing in later phases

2 Depends on local and national circumstances

3 Limited

4 Strong

5 Not sure

The involvement of private sector in REDD+ implementation should be:

Page 16: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

3%3%18%6%

34% 53% 46%20% 66% 100%

3%18%11%

63% 41%18% 60%17%

20%

1 Low initially, and gradually increasing in later phases

2 Depends on local and national circumstances

3 Limited

4 Strong

5 Not sure

Private sector

NGO

Government

International organisation

Academic/Research

Other

The involvement of private sector in REDD+ implementation should be:

Page 17: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

23%

25%

11%

41%

1 Risks associated with unclear land and carbon rights

2 Insufficient attention to social co-benefits including benefit sharing

3 Insufficient attention to biodiversity conservation

4 Lack of clarity over who bears liabilities for non-performance, REDD architecture (including MRV), taxation etc.

What are your main concerns related to private sector participation in REDD+?

Page 18: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

25%22%27%20%22%

17%29%18% 60% 17%

8%19%18%

50% 30% 37%20% 61% 100%

1 Risks associated with unclear land and carbon rights

2 Insufficient attention to social co-benefits including benefit sharing

3 Insufficient attention to biodiversity conservation

4 Lack of clarity over who bears liabilities for non-performance, REDD architecture (including MRV), taxation etc.

Private sector

NGO

Government

International organisation

Academic/Research

Other

What are your main concerns related to private sector participation in REDD+?

Page 19: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

37%

13%

22%

10%

18%

1 Facilitating access to markets for forest carbon

2 Promoting technology transfer and new economic alternatives

3 Development of private/public partnerships

4 Supporting REDD readiness projects including human resource development

5 Providing incentives to clarify rights and improve governance

Which of the following would be the main benefit of expanded private sector involvement in REDD+?

Page 20: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Which of the following would be the main benefit of expanded private sector involvement in REDD+?

Page 21: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

1 Reducing emissions from deforestation

2 Reducing emissions from forest degradation

3 Conservation of carbon stocks

4 Sustainable management of forests

5 Enhancement of carbon stocks through afforestation, reforestation and restoration

6 All of the above

Which element of REDD+ would be most attractive to the private sector?

Page 22: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

1 Reducing emissions from deforestation

2 Reducing emissions from forest degradation

3 Conservation of carbon stocks

4 Sustainable management of forests

5 Enhancement of carbon stocks through afforestation, reforestation and restoration

6 All of the above

Private sector

NGO

Government

International organisation

Academic/Research

Other

Which element of REDD+ would be most attractive to the private sector?

Page 23: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

4%

42%

4%

28%

22%

0%

1 Private sector

2 NGO

3 Government

4 International organisation

5 Academic/Research

6 Other

Breakdown of audience:Choose the option that best characterizes the organization that you are representing at Forest Day 5:

Page 24: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

36%

21%

6%

37%

1 Absence of women in adaptation and REDD+ planning and decision making

2 Lack of recognition of women's knowledge, innovations and contributions to natural resources management

3 Lack of climate knowledge among women's organizations

4 Women's limited access and control over land, forests and trees

Which of the following is the most important barrier to gender equitable policies and practices regarding climate change mitigation and adaptation in the forest sector?

Page 25: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

50% 39% 46% 30%

44%10%

50% 8%

17% 100% 46% 60%

1 Absence of women in adaptation and REDD+ planning and decision making

2 Lack of recognition of women's knowledge, innovations and contributions to natural resources management

3 Lack of climate knowledge among women's organizations

4 Women's limited access and control over land, forests and trees

Private sector

NGO

Government

International organisation

Academic/Research

Other

Which of the following is the most important barrier to gender equitable policies and practices regarding climate change mitigation and adaptation in the forest sector?

Page 26: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

11%

24%

25%

35%

5%

1 Mandating representation of women and women's groups in adaptation and REDD+ planning and decision making

2 Raising awareness among policy makers and practitioners of the concrete and unique contribution of women to forest and natural resources management

3 Adopting gender-responsive planning and programming in government agencies and civil society organizations

4 Making land and forest policies and laws gender-responsive

5 Mandating gender auditing of climate finance

Which of the following is the most important action that could be taken nationally to address these barriers?

Page 27: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Which of the following is the most important action that could be taken nationally to address these barriers?

Page 28: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

19%

23%

14%

37%

7%

1 Supporting and strengthening networking between women's groups and climate change organizations

2 Raising awareness among policy makers and practitioners of the concrete and unique contribution of women to forest and natural resources management

3 Supporting climate science training and education programs that incorporate both women's and men's local technical knowledge

4 Supporting and strengthening the implementation of gender-responsive land and forest laws and policies

5 Mandating gender audits of climate-related financial flows

Which of the following is the most important action that could be taken by the international community to enable governments to address barriers to gender equitable policies and practices?

Page 29: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Which of the following is the most important action that could be taken by the international community to enable governments to address barriers to gender equitable policies and practices?

Page 30: Forest Day 5 Voting Results – Afternoon Sessions

Thank you.