Upload
jane-secker
View
584
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lecture capture: risky business or evolving open practice
Jane Secker, LSE and Chris Morrison, University of Kent
@jsecker @cbowiemorrison @UKCopyrightLitALT-C Conference 6-9th September 2016
Risky Business?
S.32 Illustration for Instruction
Risky Business, © 1983 Geffen Pictures, Dir. Paul Brickman
What?Why? How?
When? Survey devised by: Jane Secker, Chris Morrison, Philippa Hatch, Alex Fenlon, Charlotte Booth, Carol Summerside, Helen Cargill,
Phil Ansell and Scott McGowan
The issues
• Lecture recording & IPR (intellectual property rights) policies
• Consent from individuals• Dealing with 3rd party
copyright• Wider IPR issues
Full report coming soon from: https://ukcopyrightliteracy.wordpress.com
Yes - my institution has a written policy
29%
No - my institution has no pol-icy or documented approach
to lecture capture31%
Sort of - my institution has a documented ap-proach to lecture cap-ture but it is not ex-pressed as a single
formal policy40%
Does your institution have a policy covering IPR issues with lec-ture recording? (N=33)
Headline findings
Academic consultationFigure 2: Did your institution consult widely with the academic community before introducing a policy or
approach to lecture recording? (n=33)
Responsibility for 3rd party copyright
The lecturer would be expected to observe copyright and can apply to the Copyright Clearance Service for advice.
School Administration Staff
Other
E-learning / VLE team
Compliance Officer / Team
Lecturer/presenter
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
3%
9%
18%
21%
94%
Figure 8. Who takes responsibility for rights issues with content included in lectures? (n=33)
Dealing with third party copyright issues
They must not upload recordings including third party content to the VLE or similar
Other
They should rely on openly licensed / Creative Commons materials only
They must edit problematic content themselves
They must always seek permissions for third party content
They can rely on fair dealing exceptions
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
7%
20%
30%
50%
50%
53%
Figure 10. What advice do you give to lecturers using third party content? (n=30)
Responsibility for third party copyright
Yes3%
No83%
No Answer14%
Figure 11. Do you, or any one else in the university, review lec-turer recordings to identify content that is not permitted under
UK copyright law or university licences? (n=33)
Making staff aware of copyright issues
They are not made aware of these issues
It’s in the staff terms and conditions
They are provided with advice as part of staff induction / training
Information is on the website
They are provided with advice as part of agreeing to use the lecture recording system
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
9%
18%
33%
73%
73%
Figure 9. How are staff made aware of copyright issues that might arise in recording lectures? (n=33)
Wider IPR issues• Automated processes easier, but
awareness of IPR is low (IPAN, 2016)• Variety of attitudes to IPR/risk –
what’s acceptable?• Different issues for some disciplines• Is lecture capture different to other
VLE use?• Lecture capture is too new to be
considered in some policies• General academic resistance to
lecture capture
Policy analysis• Examined 11 institutions
• Compared with Jisc guidance as a benchmark
• Looked only at what was provided (some policies are behind registration walls)
• Created 5 higher level and 12 lower level categories
High level categoriesAppetite for risk
Support and guidance
Institutional control
Open practice
Comprehensiveness of approach
Interim findings
• Variety of approaches• No clear models as yet• Does good policy = good
practice?• Support needs to be clear,
helpful and practical• Institutional culture of risk
could be explored further• Open practice not
widespread
Next steps• Full report to be published soon!
• Talk to Jisc / ALT about improving the current guidance
• Need for flexible approach to help devise policies that support institutional culture and open practice
• IPRs need to be considered as part of wider policies and academics need to be on board
Further reading• IPAN (2016) University IP Policy: Perception
and practice. Available at: http://www.ipaware.net/sites/default/files/IPAN_NUS_University_IP_Policy_v11-2r_online-mainr_28jul16.pdf
• Jisc (2015) Recording lectures: legal considerations. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/recording-lectures-legal-considerations
• Secker, J. & Morrison, C. 2016. Copyright and E-learning: a guide for practitioners, Second Edition. Facet Publishing, London. pp. 103-105.
• Secker, J., Bond, S., & Grussendorf, S. 2010. Lecture Capture: rich and strange, or a dark art? LSE Research Online. Available: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29184
https://ukcopyrightliteracy.wordpress.com
Image CreditsSlide 1: Zero7/2One by Jan Jablunka CC-BY https://flic.kr/p/2j4gn8Slide 2-3: Images from the 1983 film ‘Risky Business’, used under S.32 Illustration for Instruction, © Geffen Pictures, Dir. Paul BrickmanSlide 4: Contracts by NobMouse CC-BY https://flic.kr/p/7b8UG9 Slide 5: Camera operator setting up the video camera by jshawkins CC-BY https://flic.kr/p/7prerhSlides 14, 15, 18 and 19: Clip artSlide 20: Facet Publishing
https://ukcopyrightliteracy.wordpress.com