13
Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations ARTEL Workshop 2013, Paphos, Cyprus Birgit Krogstie, Andreas Schmidt, Christine Kunzmann, John Krogstie, Simone Mora

Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at ARTEL 2013, co-located with ECTEL 2013, Paphos, Cyprus

Citation preview

Page 1: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in

Organizations

ARTEL Workshop 2013, Paphos, Cyprus

Birgit Krogstie, Andreas Schmidt,Christine Kunzmann, John Krogstie, Simone

Mora

Page 2: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

http://spironto.de 2

Motivation

Reflection is a key activity for workplace learning

Current approaches to understanding and supporting reflection focus on the individual and the team level

It remains challenging how reflection is embedded into organizational knowledge development

Sep 2013

Page 3: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

3

Knowledge Maturing

Knowledge Maturing is a promising perspective on explaining knowledge development across the scopes of the individual, the team, and the organizational level

It also clearly differentiates between artefacts and the knowledge they (try to) represent

Goal: Linking individual and team reflection perspectives

developed within MIRROR with the knowledge maturing model (originally

developed in MATURE, now further developed in LAYERS)

Sep 2013

Page 4: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

http://spironto.de 4

Knowledge Maturing

Sep 2013

Page 5: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

http://spironto.de 5Sep 2013

Page 6: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

http://spironto.de 6

Propositions

1. Expertise moderates knowledge maturing through reflection

2. The maturity of knowledge used in reflection moderates the reflection process

3. Discrepancies between knowledge elements trigger reflection and thereby affect knowledge maturing

Sep 2013

Page 7: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

http://spironto.de 7

Examples

Examples of reflective learning in two care homes

Rose Garden Care Home Two days observations Three in-depth interviews with carers Care principles are explicit in a flower-model of care

Community Care Home Semi-structured interview Prior contact to the care home Characterized by high degree of stability

Sep 2013

Page 8: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

8

1. Expertise and Knowledge Maturing

Relationship to care principles in the Rose Garden Care Home

Carer 1: (new to the care home) learns care principles by heart to be prepared for

management inquiries seeking to learn from others how to apply them

Carer 3: (senior carer) aware of trade-offs and conflicts in practice debates with management, thereby actively

contributing to developing the collective knowledge about „doing the right thing“ further

Sep 2013

Page 9: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

9

2. Maturity and Reflection

Community Care Home Relevance of documentation requirement is a

recurring topic for reflection, which is unproductive Legal requirements presented as standardized

knowledge on good care But: this view is not shared

Problem: Artefact (legal requirements) mixes two different

purposes and associate knowledge maturity: delivering good care and compliance

Pretended maturity indicates non-changeability

Rose Garden Care Home Care principles as mature knowledge Scaffolds everyday practice, and provides a shared

point of referenceSep 2013

Page 10: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

10

3. Discrepancies

Individual – collective knowledge Senior nurse observes new carers and reflects

about her strategies for onboarding them

Artefact – collective knowledge Care plan vs. (collective) knowledge about a

resident Reflection leads to changes of the care plan

Another example Documentation requirements (what needs to be

documented) Vs. Knowledge what is useful

Sep 2013

Page 11: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

11

Implications for design

Example: Note taking app for carers in the Rose Garden care home that is using the care model as a conceptual anchor

Prop. 1: Introduce different levels of contribution Beginners: learning care principles Experienced: linking experiences to discover

discrepancies Prop. 2: Allow for promotion of notes to higher

level of maturity Prop. 3: Allow for explicit between experiences,

collective knowledge (care model) and artefacts to discover discrepancies Add additional aspects such as personhood, time,

consentSep 2013

Page 12: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

12

Conclusions

Knowledge Maturing is a useful framework to embed reflection models into the overall organizational knowledge development

Propositions Individual expertise influences the quality of

reflection processes. The maturity of knowledge involved in reflection

sessions influences reflection processes. Discrepancies between individual & collective

knowledge as well as artefacts are triggers for reflection.

Combinations of these perspective can enrich both reflection models and models of organizational knowledge developmentSep 2013

Page 13: Linking Reflective Learning and Knowledge Maturing in Organizations

http://spironto.de 13

Team

Birgit Kroegstie, NTNU, [email protected]

Andreas P. Schmidt, Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences, [email protected] 

Christine Kunzmann, Pontydysgu, [email protected] 

John Krogstie, NTNU, [email protected]

Simone Mora, NTNU, [email protected]

Sep 2013