15
MERCURY MAGAZINE EVALUATION Ama Charles-Adarkwa

Mercury evaluation6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mercury evaluation6

MERCURY MAGAZINE EVALUATION

Ama Charles-Adarkwa

Page 2: Mercury evaluation6

1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

• Mercury was influenced by Kerrang’s forms and conventions

• Kerrang always has a banner above the masthead

• Kerrang often has their cover model(s) partly obscuring the masthead

• Interesting main coverline which clearly includes the model(s) credit

• Bar code with the issue’s date, price, and the magazine’s website

• Tilted coverline rebels against normal magazine conventions, but follows Kerrang conventions

Page 3: Mercury evaluation6

1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

• I mainly drew ideas from these two example contents pages: NME (far left) & Kerrang (far right)

• Side bar on the right including page numbers and article titles

• A title which confirms that it is a contents page

• Letter from the editor in the top left hand corner

• Feature article/DPS image larger than the others

Page 4: Mercury evaluation6

1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

• Set colour scheme

• Unusual text-box opacity

• Conventional layout

• More image than text

Page 5: Mercury evaluation6

2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?

•No obvious social groups/stereotypes

•Independent of adults

•Wider variety of music genres

Page 6: Mercury evaluation6

3. What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?

Good- Might want to monopolise.Bad- Might end up competing with themselves

(Kerrang, Q and Mercury too similar)

Good- Mercury is definitely their genre just a slight alteration.

Good- Niche in the marketBad- Contrasting target audiences.

Bad- Not suitable (wrong genre & wrong target audience)

BAUER MEDIA CH Publications

NatMag Future PLC

Page 7: Mercury evaluation6

4. Who would be the audience for your media product?

•People interested in a variety of music genres

•Members of the music industry

•Aspiring musicians

•Social Grade B-D

•16-25 year olds

•Both genders

Page 8: Mercury evaluation6

5. How did you attract/address your audience?

•Eye-contact with the reader

•Appropriate cover model

•Free giveaways

•Stylised fonts

•Mentioning bands and lyrics

Page 9: Mercury evaluation6

5. How did you attract/address your audience?

•Eye-contact with the reader

•Appropriate cover models

•Competitions

• Interesting articles

•Direct address

Page 10: Mercury evaluation6

5. How did you attract/address your audience?

•Feedback from readers

• Informal, colloquial language

•Colours that aren’t too feminine or masculine

•More image than text

•Appropriate models

Page 11: Mercury evaluation6

6. What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?

Page 12: Mercury evaluation6

6. What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?

Page 13: Mercury evaluation6

7. Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?

Page 14: Mercury evaluation6

7. Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?

Page 15: Mercury evaluation6

Thanks for listening.Any questions?