Upload
jpm66
View
1.057
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given to the Mendon-Upton Regional School Committee on October 21, 2013. The presentation details the district's MCAS results in English language arts, mathematics, and science for every grade level. It also displays the accountability rating for every school based upon the performance that the Massachusetts DESE (Department of Elementary & Secondary Education) has established.
Citation preview
Mendon-Upton Regional Mendon-Upton Regional SchoolsSchools
2013 MCAS Results &Accountability Status
Presentation to the Mendon-Upton Regional School
CommitteeOctober 21, 2013
Purpose of Presentation
Provide a broad overview of MCAS performance of the district in relationship to the State in ELA, Math, and Science
Provide a context for MCAS results by examining similar districts’ performance
Clarify the state’s accountability system model
Identify areas that pose a challenge and plans to address those challenges
Strengths
District Math scores improved 5% from 2012 to 2013
District ELA scores improved 3% from 2012 to 2013
Grade 3 ELA scores improved 7 % from 2012 to 2013
Grade 3 Math scores improved 15% from 2012 to 2013
Grade 8 Math scores improved 14% from 2012 to 2013
Grade 10 Math scores improved 7% from 2012 to 2013
English Language Arts District MCAS Results
ALL Grades ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
3rd Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
4th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
5th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
6th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
7th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
8th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
10th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
MathematicsDistrict MCAS Results
ALL Grades Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
3rd Grade Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
4th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
5th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
6th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
7th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
8th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
10th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
Science, Technology & Engineering District MCAS Results
5th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
8th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
10th Grade Biology : MURSD vs. State
% of students proficient or higher
Massachusetts’ Accountability System for Schools
Accountability Classifications
• Based on the premise of halving achievement gap by 2017
• Uses CPI (Composite Performance Index) metric• Also uses PPI (Progress & Performance Index)
factors such as moving students to higher categories, SGP, and graduation/dropout rates
• Schools classified as Level 1-5 based upon achievement of target CPI goals for all students and each subgroup based upon multiple years of ELA and math MCAS data as well as PPI factors
• Whatever the lowest rating is for any school within the district, that must be the rating for the district
Proficiency Gap Narrowing Targets for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce In
dex
(CPI
)
Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce In
dex
(CPI
)
Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Clough Math (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough Math (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Level 3
Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Level 1
Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Miscoe ELA (All Grades 5-8)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Targets & 2013 Results- Miscoe ELA
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Miscoe Math (All Grades 5-8)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Targets & Results- Miscoe Math
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Level 2
Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Nipmuc ELA (Grade 10)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Targets & Results - Nipmuc ELA
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Nipmuc Math (Grade 10)
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Proficiency Gap Targets & Results - Nipmuc Math
Com
posi
te P
erfo
rman
ce I
ndex
(C
PI)
Level 1
Comparison to Neighboring Comparison to Neighboring DistrictsDistricts
District
ELAProficient or
HigherMath Proficient
or Higher
Science Proficient or
HigherBellingham 73% 59% 60%
Blackstone-Millville 68% 61% 56%
Douglas 71% 61% 59%
Grafton 78% 73% 67%Hopedale 80% 69% 64%
Hopkinton 87% 81% 80%
Mendon-Upton 81% 72% 70%
Milford 71% 62% 64%
Northbridge 65% 50% 52%Sutton 72% 63% 60%
Uxbridge 65% 58% 53%
Comparison to like districts Comparison to like districts (DART)(DART)
District ELA Proficient or higher
Math Proficient or higher
Science and Tech Proficient or higher
Georgetown 76% 68% 57%Groton-Dunstable 84% 77% 81%
Hanover 82% 69% 65%Ipswich 82% 69% 65%
Lynnfield 90% 79% 74%Mendon-Upton 81% 72% 70%
Nashoba 83% 80% 70%Newburyport 82% 71% 71%North Reading 83% 76% 70%
Norwell 90% 76% 81%Scituate 86% 82% 71%
Tyngsborough 79% 71% 66%
Challenges Over the past four years, some grades and
subgroups are showing progress in ELA and math MCAS, while others are static or declining
Our high needs subgroup scores are lower than the aggregate- the major driver is the results of our special education students
More students need to move from proficient to advanced
Writing is an identified area in need of improvement
Math proficiency rates take a dip in 5th grade
Immediate Action Steps
Schools have analyzed disaggregated data at all levels and developed action plans
Writing committee formed and research begun on writing resources and programming
Curriculum mapping process launched, team trained in Rubicon Atlas
Vertical conversations on curriculum have begun
Academic Support grant to assist with secondary interventions for high need students
Future Action Steps
Data—Educators need more training in data analysis protocols
Curriculum—Align curriculum to the Common Core StandardsVertically align curriculum using Rubicon Atlas system
High Needs SubgroupIncrease training in inclusive instructional practices for all teachersIncrease use of comprehensive data to target interventions
Targeted Investments
Curriculum Development—Time, training and support
Writing Program—Resources and professional development
Increase Non-fiction resources at elementary level
Coaching model for literacy and mathematics