Upload
rhona-sharpe
View
28
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Online learning for all? Meeting the needs of all learners
Professor Rhona SharpeOxford Brookes University, UK
For Dublin City University6 May 2015
@rjsharpeelesig.net
Early learner experience research 2005-9
• Uncovered student voices that had not previously been heard
• Analysed experiences holistically
• Showed learners’ powerful relationships with technology and ubiquitous use of social media.
Follow up studies 2009-2012
• Showed great variety in strategies and habits that student adopt.
• Explored digital literacy as a social, cultural practice.
• Introduced us to confident, agile ‘epioneers’.
InStePP
Online learning for all?
• All learning is technologically mediated
• Digital literacies tailored for the disciplines.
• Frameworks for staff and student digital literacy development
• Infrastructure services targeted at learners’ needs.
What questions remain?
1. Learner experiences vary considerably. How can we talk about difference in a meaningful way?
2. How can we design learning experiences that develop the practices and attributes of successful learners?
3. Where do we draw the line between institutional entitlement and enhancement activities?
4. What research methods can we use to keep track of changing student expectations and behaviours?
FE Digital Student Project
Deskresearch
Focus groups
Consultation events
23 sector reports8 peer reviewed articles25 case studies7 institutional documents
220 learners12 focus groups6 further education colleges
6 consultation events300 delegatesLoads of post-its
The Learner and their Context, BectaChris Davies and Rebecca Eynon
Unconnected vulnerable
Mainstream pragmatist
Intensive specialist
enthusiast
For the unconnected
and vulnerable
Their experience is
access-led
“They’re [the Chromebooks] not that good. They’re probably good if you know how to work them properly but I know they’re not that difficult but none of us have been told how to use it.” (Focus group 3, Level 2 learner)
For the intensive and specialist
enthusiast
Their experience is learner-led
“I think we learn more from one another than we do from the tutors.”
(Focus Group 6, Level 2)
For the mainstream pragmatists
Their experience is
tutor-led
Because basically our lessons revolve around using YouTube, just in Sociology, we do the lesson outside of school and then bring it in, so the social media actually really helps with learning.
(Focus Group 5, A Level)
Overview
unconnected vulnerable
Access-led
Assessment of skills is
ongoing
mainstream pragmatists
Tutor-led
Pedagogy –led
Institution-led
Technology used to develop criticality, self- management
intensive and specialist
enthusiasts
Learner-led
Technology-led
Social digital literacy practices are valued and new practices
made explicit
Learners who are:
Experience the digital environment
as:
Best supported where:
Overview
unconnected vulnerable
Access-led
Assessment of skills is
ongoing
mainstream pragmatists
Tutor-led
Pedagogy –led
Institution-led
Technology used to develop criticality, self- management
intensive and specialist
enthusiasts
Learner-led
Technology-led
Social digital literacy practices are valued and new practices
made explicit
Learners who are:
Experience the digital environment
as:
Best supported where:
Overview
unconnected vulnerable
Access-led
Assessment of skills is
ongoing
mainstream pragmatists
Tutor-led
Pedagogy –led
Institution-led
Technology used to develop criticality, self- management
intensive and specialist
enthusiasts
Learner-led
Technology-led
Social digital literacy practices are valued and new practices
made explicit
Learners who are:
Experience the digital environment
as:
Best supported where:
Meetingtheneedsofalllearners
Learnersarechallengedwhen…SuggestionsfromFEDigitalStudentConsultationEvents
Unconnectedandvulnerable Mainstreampragmatists Intensiveandspecialistenthusiasts
Learners’ specific access needs are not
taken into account.
Technologies introduced are unfamiliar.
Social stigma associated with not having
access to technology.
Online submission of assessed work is
mandatory.
Rural areas with reduced bandwidth.
Assumptions are made about learners’ skills. Either assuming skills that are not yet
developed or assuming low expectations of
vulnerable learners e.g. disabled learners frequently make intensive and specialist use of technology.
Induction is limited to Week 1.
Learning Resource Centre is closed.
English/literacy skills are too weak to read
instructions or navigate tools.
Lecturers lack time to experiment, funding to
purchase kit or confidence to try using unfamiliar technologies.
Assessment boards do not support use of technology.
Access to college systems is not available from home.
Technologies used in college are not the same as
those used in life and employment e.g. E stream
rather than YouTube.
Lack of funding limits innovation.
Learners’ attempts to appropriate personal and
social uses of technology for learning purposes are dismissed or ignored.
Learners are not connected e.g. logged out of wifi
after set period.
Infrastructure is not reliable and robust.
Learners are not permitted to use their preferred
hardware and software.
Hardware, software and infrastructure provided by the organisation is not up to date e.g. old
operating systems, slow wifi.
Learner expectations exceed what colleges/providers have the resource to provide.
Learners are not aware of relevant apps support
their study.
Meetingtheneedsofalllearners
Learnersarechallengedwhen…SuggestionsfromFEDigitalStudentConsultationEvents
Unconnectedandvulnerable Mainstreampragmatists Intensiveandspecialistenthusiasts
Learners’ specific access needs are not
taken into account.
Technologies introduced are unfamiliar.
Social stigma associated with not having
access to technology.
Online submission of assessed work is
mandatory.
Rural areas with reduced bandwidth.
Assumptions are made about learners’ skills. Either assuming skills that are not yet
developed or assuming low expectations of
vulnerable learners e.g. disabled learners frequently make intensive and specialist use of technology.
Induction is limited to Week 1.
Learning Resource Centre is closed.
English/literacy skills are too weak to read
instructions or navigate tools.
Lecturers lack time to experiment, funding to
purchase kit or confidence to try using unfamiliar technologies.
Assessment boards do not support use of technology.
Access to college systems is not available from home.
Technologies used in college are not the same as
those used in life and employment e.g. E stream
rather than YouTube.
Lack of funding limits innovation.
Learners’ attempts to appropriate personal and
social uses of technology for learning purposes are dismissed or ignored.
Learners are not connected e.g. logged out of wifi
after set period.
Infrastructure is not reliable and robust.
Learners are not permitted to use their preferred
hardware and software.
Hardware, software and infrastructure provided by the organisation is not up to date e.g. old
operating systems, slow wifi.
Learner expectations exceed what colleges/providers have the resource to provide.
Learners are not aware of relevant apps support
their study.
Meetingtheneedsofalllearners
Learnersaresupportedwhen…SuggestionsfromFEDigitalStudentConsultationEvents
Unconnectedandvulnerable Mainstreampragmatists Intensiveandspecialistenthusiasts
Solutions are developed for learners’ specific needs e.g. portable classrooms, use of
mobiles and tablets, gaming, kindles.
Loan equipment and bursary schemes are in place for e.g. USB dongle, tablets, mobiles,
netbooks, laptops. (Targeted schemes seem
to be more successful than comprehensive roll outs). Include overnight and weekends.
Library and ICT support open all hours.
(Could be combined with teaching half days).
Learners have access to support sessions and ‘how to’ guides and videos. Induction and ongoing support is tailored to the curriculum
and employment.
Good quality online content can be accessed
on a range of devices.
One to one coaching and support is offered. Support builds confidence as well as skills.
Peer learning is offered.
There are opportunities to discuss why
technology is beneficial. Tutors inspire use of technology. Guidance is given on purposeful
use of technology.
Colleges/provider assess learners’ skills in, and access to, digital technology.
Lecturers encourage use of technology to develop relevant skills e.g. criticality, self-management and
skills for employment.
There are clear expectations about technology use, shared by learners and staff.
There is management and strategic support for digital engagement.
Lecturers are well supported by e-learning specialist
teams and tutor technology champions e.g. ideas for
apps to use the classroom.
CPD for ICT offered in INSET days.
Learners are supported in applying their technical skills for learning.
Learning activities are scaffolded with good quality content.
Technology use is embedded into lessons.
Teachers are enthusiastic about technology use.
Technology use is under learners’ control, without restrictions. Learners’ choices are valued and
supported.
Learners are set challenging goals. Opportunities are there for leaners to explore and use
technology independently. Access to social media
sites is permitted.
The college culture and infrastructure is orientated towards mobile, personally owned
and/or loaned devices e.g. can print from wifi, mobile ready websites, cloud file storage, software licenses available for home use, remote
desktop services, charging facilities and secure
storage are provided.
Lecturers are not afraid to learn how to use
technology with learners.
Digital literacy support includes e-safety. Don’t let learners’ ‘saviness’ fool you.
More creative and flexible assessment strategies
e.g. choice of how to present work.
There are good peer support networks. Learners are given the opportunity to mentor other learners
and tools to perform peer assessment.
Learners are involved in decisions about IT purchase and implementation. Decisions are
negotiated.
Meetingtheneedsofalllearners
Learnersaresupportedwhen…SuggestionsfromFEDigitalStudentConsultationEvents
Unconnectedandvulnerable Mainstreampragmatists Intensiveandspecialistenthusiasts
Solutions are developed for learners’ specific needs e.g. portable classrooms, use of
mobiles and tablets, gaming, kindles.
Loan equipment and bursary schemes are in place for e.g. USB dongle, tablets, mobiles,
netbooks, laptops. (Targeted schemes seem to be more successful than comprehensive roll outs). Include overnight and weekends.
Library and ICT support open all hours.
(Could be combined with teaching half days).
Learners have access to support sessions and ‘how to’ guides and videos. Induction and
ongoing support is tailored to the curriculum
and employment.
Good quality online content can be accessed
on a range of devices.
One to one coaching and support is offered. Support builds confidence as well as skills.
Peer learning is offered.
There are opportunities to discuss why
technology is beneficial. Tutors inspire use of technology. Guidance is given on purposeful
use of technology.
Colleges/provider assess learners’ skills in, and access to, digital technology.
Lecturers encourage use of technology to develop relevant skills e.g. criticality, self-management and
skills for employment.
There are clear expectations about technology use, shared by learners and staff.
There is management and strategic support for digital
engagement.
Lecturers are well supported by e-learning specialist
teams and tutor technology champions e.g. ideas for
apps to use the classroom.
CPD for ICT offered in INSET days.
Learners are supported in applying their technical
skills for learning.
Learning activities are scaffolded with good quality content.
Technology use is embedded into lessons.
Teachers are enthusiastic about technology use.
Technology use is under learners’ control, without restrictions. Learners’ choices are valued and
supported.
Learners are set challenging goals. Opportunities are there for leaners to explore and use
technology independently. Access to social media sites is permitted.
The college culture and infrastructure is orientated towards mobile, personally owned
and/or loaned devices e.g. can print from wifi, mobile ready websites, cloud file storage, software licenses available for home use, remote desktop services, charging facilities and secure
storage are provided.
Lecturers are not afraid to learn how to use
technology with learners.
Digital literacy support includes e-safety. Don’t let learners’ ‘saviness’ fool you.
More creative and flexible assessment strategies
e.g. choice of how to present work.
There are good peer support networks. Learners are given the opportunity to mentor other learners
and tools to perform peer assessment.
Learners are involved in decisions about IT purchase and implementation. Decisions are
negotiated.
Meeting the needs of all learners
Don’t assume we are digitally
literate
We need ongoingdevelopment
We want to work with lecturers…
Ask us what we need…
Prepare and support learners to study successfully with learning technology. Learners typically do not have the digital skills that are often associated with the younger generation.
Key Challenges from Digital Student projects
24
. Prepare and support learners to study successfully
with learning technology
Deliver a relevant digital curriculum
Ensure an inclusive student experience
Provide a robust, flexible digital environment
Developing coherent policies for Bring Your Own devices
Engage students in a dialogue about their digital experiences and empower them to make changes
Take a strategic, whole institution approach to the digital student experience
Want to know more?
FE Digital Student Studyhttp://digitalstudent.jiscinvolve.org/wp/fe-and-skills-digital-student-study/
Davies, C. & Eynon, R. (2012) Teenagers and Technology. Routledge.
Developing Learners for a Digital Age Blog http://dlf.brookesblogs.net/
ELESIG. Learner Experience Special Interest Group. www.elesig.net
What questions remain?
1. Learner experiences vary considerably. How can we talk about difference in a meaningful way?
2. How can we design learning experiences that develop the practices and attributes of successful learners?
3. Where do we draw the line between institutional entitlement and enhancement activities?
4. What research methods can we use to keep track of changing student expectations and behaviours?