23
Open Peer Review Emily Ford Urban & Public Affairs Librarian Portland State University

Open Peer Review

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Open Peer Review

Open Peer Review

Emily FordUrban & Public Affairs LibrarianPortland State [email protected]

Page 2: Open Peer Review

WHAT IS PEER REVIEW?

Page 3: Open Peer Review

WHAT IS THE GOAL OF PEER REVIEW?

Page 4: Open Peer Review

“…Depending on its environment, peer reviewing can differ as to its purposes, participants, process, and product. In qualitative research, peer review may also be used to improve a research proposal or project's trustworthiness.”

-Chenail, R. (2008). Peer Review. In Lisa M. Given (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (pp. 605-607).

“…the goal of peer review is to make good and defensible judgments rather than to have high reliability…”

-Mark,M. & Chua, P. (2005). Peer Review. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Evaluation. (p. 301).

Page 5: Open Peer Review

Submission

Review

Publication

Peer Review Process

Page 6: Open Peer Review

Taweed Manzoorflic.kr/p/4w7zdcCC-BY

Open Review

Page 7: Open Peer Review

Rob Cottinghamflic.kr/p/8FbWsQCC-BY-NC

Page 8: Open Peer Review

Before

During After

Before & During Pics in Public Domain: 1.usa.gov/1LkVhjS

Tony Websterflic.kr/p/vK44SYCC-BY

Page 9: Open Peer Review

BeforeF1000ResearchIn the Library with the Lead Pipe

Page 10: Open Peer Review

DuringBioMed CentralPeerJAtmospheric Chemistry & Physics

Page 11: Open Peer Review

AfterPLoS OneBMJ

Page 12: Open Peer Review

WHO DOES THE REVIEWING?

Page 13: Open Peer Review

Author identified reviewers

EditorsAuthor-supplied reviewersEditor-supplied reviewers

Expert PEERJ Community MembersAcademic EditorsScientific Community

RefereesEditors

Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics

ReviewersEditors

ReviewersEditors

Page 15: Open Peer Review

Before After

Before Pics in Public Domain: 1.usa.gov/1LkVhjS

Tony Websterflic.kr/p/vK44SYCC-BY

Page 16: Open Peer Review

Submission

Review

Publication

Open Peer Review Process

Submission

Review

Publication

OR

Page 17: Open Peer Review

Gideon Burtonflic.kr/p/5P2D9wCC-BY-SA

Page 18: Open Peer Review

FOR YOU, WHAT ARE THE PROS?

Page 19: Open Peer Review

FOR YOU, WHAT ARE THE CONS?

Page 20: Open Peer Review

Open Peer Review

Pro• Reviewer accountability• Better reviews• Enhances discourse for readers• Provides for developmental

writing & research relationship• Timeline to publish/reviews• Transparency in editorial

decision-making• Reviewers’ acknowledgment

for work• Discourse among reviewers

Con• Protects against implicit

bias• Recruiting reviewers• Adoption Barriers• Hard to manage (?)

Page 21: Open Peer Review

WHAT WOULD IT TAKE FOR YOU TO PARTICIPATE?

Page 22: Open Peer Review

Author identified reviewers

EditorsAuthor-supplied reviewersEditor-supplied reviewers

Expert PEERJ Community MembersAcademic EditorsScientific Community

RefereesEditors

Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics

ReviewersEditors

ReviewersEditors

Page 23: Open Peer Review

Garry Knightflic.kr/p/7qw7ivCC-BY