30
Insti tuti onal l y approved research : addi ng to entrepreneurshi p educati on and venture creati on value and dimension Melanie Fedri and Khanjan Mehta [email protected] . [email protected] Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship Program Penn State University

Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

I n s t i t u t i o n a l l y

a p p r o v e d

r e s e a r c h :

a d d i n g

t o

e n t r e p r e n e u r s h i p

e d u c a t i o n a n d

v e n t u r e c r e a t i o n

value and dimension

Melanie Fedri and Khanjan Mehta

[email protected] . [email protected]

Humanitarian Engineering and

Social Entrepreneurship Program

Penn State University

Page 2: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

What do we want?“”

Page 3: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

innovative, entrepreneurial

students and ventures

R i g h t ?

We w a n t

Page 4: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

innovative, entrepreneurial

students and ventures

Wh a t w e r e a l l y

w a n t a r e t h e mo s t

Page 5: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

student engagement in

institutionally approved research

O n e w a y t o f o s t e r

g r e a t e r

e f f e c t i v e n e s s i s

Page 6: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

What kind of institutionally

approved research are we

talking about?

Page 7: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

T h e k i n d t h a t

is designed to

engage students

is approved by your institutional review

board, making it

ethical and publishable

meets multiple, creatively approached needs

and interests

Page 8: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

Why institutionally

approved research?

Page 9: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

‘‘

4 years

5 advising faculty

Papers--

30 published

9 in review

30+ in process

1 It can be done!

Page 10: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

Adds rigor

Furthers research agenda

Builds and scales up advances in field

Creates brick-in-the-wall

2 From faculty perspective

Page 11: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

3 From student perspective

Attunes to context

Relays lessons learned

Creates brick-in-the-wall

Builds resume

Page 12: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

“I'm definitely excited about my

research because I want to see my

project completion, and I want to

see our venture to completion.”

Page 13: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

“If we wouldn‟t have had to fill out

IRBs and think about our projects

beforehand, and really have to

apply what we learn, I don't think

that for me the take-home

message would have been as

strong.”

Page 14: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

“Going through a process where

you're actually working a real world

application, for people who are

actually going to be using it, and

hearing their feedback, was a lot of

fun and definitely helpful.

You ask, „How do I design this to

meet my customer's needs, not just

to get a minimum grade?‟”

Page 15: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

c o mmu n i t

i e s

f a c u

l t y

i n s t i t u t

i o n s

s t u d

e n t s

I A R

addresses

multiple interests321 + +

Page 16: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

e n t r e p r e

n e u r s h i p

d e s i g nr e s e a r

c h

I A R

develops students‟

skills321 + +

Page 17: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

What are some

examples?

Page 18: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

E x a c t r e s e a r c h

d e p e n d s o n

practical needs of the venture

bigger questions that spark

intellectual curiosity

Page 19: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

Research continuum:

Page 20: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

M a t e r i a l s

d a t a b a s e

Page 21: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

D e s i g n o f

l o w c o s t (X )

Page 22: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

A c c e s s t o

c a p i t a l

Page 23: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

M a s h a v u

r e l i a b i l i t y

s t u d y

Page 24: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

G l o b a l J u g a a d

C o m m o n s :

T H E O R E T I

C A L

P R A C T I C A

L

Page 25: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

Challenges:

Mentors/incentives

Journal timelines

Increasing quality

Time

Page 26: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

Meeting challenges:

Use IRB process as systematic mentor

Leverage resources

Page 27: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

Why engage students in

institutionally approved

research?

Wrapping up—

Page 28: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

innovative, entrepreneurial

students

Develop

Page 29: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

innovative, entrepreneurial

ventures

Create

Page 30: Open2012 undergrad-research-adding-value

brick-by-brick

Accelerate and advance our field