Upload
dallasholmes
View
2.253
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Peer EvaluationPeer Evaluation … …How How to Join the USU Extension to Join the USU Extension
Witness Protection ProgramWitness Protection Program
Dr Dallas L. HolmesDr Dallas L. Holmes
Continuing Education ECEA Faculty Continuing Education ECEA Faculty Workshop, Workshop,
Roosevelt, UtahRoosevelt, Utah
April 15, 2005April 15, 2005
It’s all about Feeling Good and teaching excellence!
So Doc, What Have So Doc, What Have You Learned in Your You Learned in Your
33 Years With 33 Years With Extension ?Extension ?
Sage Words of AdviceSage Words of Advice
or the possibilities ofor the possibilities ofsurviving in a T&P surviving in a T&P
frenzy!frenzy!
Nothing increases Nothing increases your golf score like your golf score like
a witness!a witness!
SCORE SCORE CARDCARD
You must learn from the You must learn from the mistakes of others. You mistakes of others. You
cannot possibly live longcannot possibly live longenough to make them all enough to make them all
yourself.yourself.
- - Sam LevensonSam Levenson
Instruction Instruction Can Be Can Be ImprovedImproved Through Through
Evaluative FeedbackEvaluative Feedback
The The Very ThoughtsVery Thoughts of of Colleagues as Peer Colleagues as Peer Evaluators Arrive!Evaluators Arrive!
Peer Evaluation Peer Evaluation Should Not Should Not be a Disruptive Experiencebe a Disruptive Experience
in the Classroomin the Classroom
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you are a mile away from them and
you have their shoes.
Peer Evaluator
Rule #1
Consistency and Comparability Consistency and Comparability is Enhanced When the Peer is Enhanced When the Peer
Evaluator Evaluator Uses the Approved Uses the Approved Extension Evaluation ToolExtension Evaluation Tool
USU Extension Peer USU Extension Peer Evaluation Form – Evaluation Form – “The “The
Plan”Plan”Part I - PEER EVALUATION FORM Part I - PEER EVALUATION FORM
FORFOR
CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDIT CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDIT COURSESCOURSES
• Instructor Instructor • Date of VisitDate of Visit• Program TitleProgram Title• Length of Time of Visit Peer EvaluatorLength of Time of Visit Peer Evaluator
USU Extension Peer USU Extension Peer Evaluation Form – Evaluation Form – “The “The
Plan”Plan”
Part II – REVIEW OF Part II – REVIEW OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS (some of the following may not be (some of the following may not be used).used).
• Marketing MaterialsMarketing Materials• Instructional or Course OutlineInstructional or Course Outline• Instructional MaterialsInstructional Materials• Evaluation ProceduresEvaluation Procedures• Probable ImpactsProbable Impacts
USU Extension Peer USU Extension Peer Evaluation Form – Evaluation Form – “The “The
Plan”Plan”Part III - COMMENDATIONS:Part III - COMMENDATIONS:• Suggestions for Improvement:Suggestions for Improvement:• Signature of EvaluatorSignature of Evaluator• Build Your T&P File with the Build Your T&P File with the
EvaluationEvaluation
Consider the Consider the importance of importance of
instructional feedback instructional feedback by looking at life by looking at life
through the through the windshield, not the windshield, not the rear-view mirror. rear-view mirror.
--Byrd BaggettByrd Baggett
You’ve got to be You’ve got to be willing to give up willing to give up good to get great good to get great
- - Kenny RogersKenny Rogers
Consider Your Consider Your Value in the Value in the MarketplaceMarketplace of of Students/PeersStudents/Peers
Review Review Instructional Instructional
MaterialsMaterials
Organization of SubjectOrganization of Subject
•Was the format Was the format appropriate? appropriate? •Were objectives shared with Were objectives shared with learners? learners? •Did the instructor get the Did the instructor get the attention attention of learners early? of learners early? •If so, how?If so, how?
Did the Instructor Did the Instructor Demonstrate Instructional Demonstrate Instructional
Mastery?Mastery?
Peer Evaluators and Those Peer Evaluators and Those Evaluated Must Realize Evaluated Must Realize That That OneOne Time Evaluations, Time Evaluations,
Although Seemingly Efficient May Although Seemingly Efficient May Not Tell the Whole StoryNot Tell the Whole Story
When Appropriate, When Appropriate, Review the Marketing Review the Marketing
MaterialsMaterials for the for the Course Being Course Being
EvaluatedEvaluated
Review the Review the Instructional Course Instructional Course Outline… Outline… A Reality A Reality
Check!Check!
Evaluation Evaluation Procedure… Procedure…
The Evaluator May Use an The Evaluator May Use an Analytic/Synthetic Analytic/Synthetic
ApproachApproach
Did the Instructor…Did the Instructor…
1.1. Discuss points of view other than Discuss points of view other than their own .their own .
2.2. Contrast implications of various Contrast implications of various theories.theories.
3.3. Discuss recent developments in Discuss recent developments in the field .the field .
4.4. Present origins of ideas and Present origins of ideas and concepts .concepts .
5.5. Give references for more Give references for more interesting and interesting and involved points .involved points .
6.6. Present facts and concepts and Present facts and concepts and related related fields .fields .
7.7. Emphasize conceptual Emphasize conceptual understanding .understanding .
On Any Given Day On Any Given Day Evaluators Must Realize Evaluators Must Realize that the Presentation that the Presentation
May Not Go As PlannedMay Not Go As Planned
Did the instructor…Did the instructor…
8.8. Explain clearly .Explain clearly .
9.9. Seem well prepared .Seem well prepared .
10.10. Give lectures that are easy Give lectures that are easy to take notes in .to take notes in .
11.11. Show care and precision in Show care and precision in answering questions.answering questions.
12.12. Summarize major points .Summarize major points .
13.13. State objectives for each State objectives for each class session .class session .
14.14. Identify what they consider Identify what they consider important .important .
Instructor-Group Instructor-Group InteractionInteraction
15.15. Encourage class discussion Encourage class discussion 16.16. Invite students to share their knowledge Invite students to share their knowledge
and and experiences experiences 17.17. Clarify thinking by identifying reasons for Clarify thinking by identifying reasons for
questions questions 18.18. Invite criticism of their own ideas Invite criticism of their own ideas 19.19. Know if the class is understanding them or Know if the class is understanding them or
not not 20.20. Know when students are bored or confused Know when students are bored or confused 21.21. Have interest and concern in the quality of Have interest and concern in the quality of
their their teachingteaching 22.22. Have students apply concepts to Have students apply concepts to
demonstrate understandingdemonstrate understanding
Good Instructors Pay Close Good Instructors Pay Close Attention to the Needs of Attention to the Needs of
Their StudentsTheir Students
Instructor-Individual Instructor-Individual Student InteractionStudent Interaction
23.23. Have a genuine interest in students. Have a genuine interest in students.
24.24. Are friendly toward students. Are friendly toward students.
25.25. Relate to students as individuals. Relate to students as individuals.
26.26. Recognize and greet students out of Recognize and greet students out of class. class.
27.27. Are accessible to students out of class. Are accessible to students out of class.
28.28. Are valued for advice not directly Are valued for advice not directly related to the related to the course. course.
29.29. Respect students as persons.Respect students as persons.
Dynamism/EnthusiasmDynamism/Enthusiasm
30.30. Are dynamic and energetic persons. Are dynamic and energetic persons.
31.31. Have an interesting style of Have an interesting style of presentation.presentation.
32.32. Seem to enjoy teaching. Seem to enjoy teaching.
33.33. Are enthusiastic about their subject.Are enthusiastic about their subject.
34.34. Seem to have self-confidence. Seem to have self-confidence.
35.35. Vary the speed and tone of their Vary the speed and tone of their voice. voice.
36.36.Have a sense of humor.Have a sense of humor.
Milton Hildebrand, Robert C. Wilson, Evelyn R. Dienst (l971) Milton Hildebrand, Robert C. Wilson, Evelyn R. Dienst (l971) Evaluating University TeachingEvaluating University Teaching, Center , Center for Research and Development in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley.for Research and Development in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley.
So What is the So What is the Probable Probable ImpactImpact of This Course of This Course Upon the Lives of the Upon the Lives of the Students Enrolled? Students Enrolled?
The so what questionThe so what question … …
Was relevance Was relevance demonstrated? demonstrated?
• Did instructor link content with Did instructor link content with application? Did the instructor application? Did the instructor develop a conclusion? develop a conclusion?
• Were stated objectives met? Were stated objectives met? • Did instructor encourage student Did instructor encourage student
responsibility for further learning? responsibility for further learning?
Comments and Comments and Instructor Instructor DialogueDialogue
Evaluation can be Daunting Evaluation can be Daunting to Those Being Evaluatedto Those Being Evaluated
Peer Evaluation
Review
Evaluators Must Realize Evaluators Must Realize That There Are Inherent That There Are Inherent
Instructional Style Instructional Style DifferencesDifferences
If It At First You Don’t If It At First You Don’t Succeed, Redefine Succeed, Redefine
Success… Or At Least Success… Or At Least Consider Another OpinionConsider Another Opinion
Faculty Response to Faculty Response to the Evaluation… the Evaluation… How How Do I Document this Do I Document this
Evaluation Evaluation Experience?Experience?
Documentation & Citation Documentation & Citation StandardsStandards
T&P BinderT&P Binder• Use committee members for this process.Use committee members for this process.• Obtain 2-3 Peer review teaching evaluations annually.Obtain 2-3 Peer review teaching evaluations annually.• Use the format suggested in the teaching format from Use the format suggested in the teaching format from
the T&P manual when being evaluated by a reviewer.the T&P manual when being evaluated by a reviewer.• Include the Peer Evaluation Visit forms for each Include the Peer Evaluation Visit forms for each
evaluation.evaluation.– typed (not handwritten) and signed by the evaluator.typed (not handwritten) and signed by the evaluator.
• Make sure the review is held when you are teaching Make sure the review is held when you are teaching your clientele, not when you are teaching one another. your clientele, not when you are teaching one another.
• Place these in section F of the T&P binderPlace these in section F of the T&P binder• A list of those who have conducted reviews should be A list of those who have conducted reviews should be
included as part of this section. Prepare a list of peer included as part of this section. Prepare a list of peer evaluators. evaluators.
Citation StandardCitation Standard
Citation standardCitation standard• Holmes, D. L. (2001). Report of peer Holmes, D. L. (2001). Report of peer
evaluation for Dr. (faculty) teaching evaluation for Dr. (faculty) teaching Integrated Life Science 1350, Integrated Life Science 1350, an evening an evening course taught at the Roosevelt Center.course taught at the Roosevelt Center.
• Bills, B. D. (2002). Report of peer Bills, B. D. (2002). Report of peer evaluation for Dr. (faculty) teaching evaluation for Dr. (faculty) teaching Integrated Life Science 1350, Integrated Life Science 1350, and and evening course taught at the Roosevelt evening course taught at the Roosevelt Center.Center.
Well There You have it…Well There You have it…
Peer Evaluation 101Peer Evaluation 101
You can now pick up your “witness You can now pick up your “witness protection program ID card” from protection program ID card” from
any CE Executive Director!any CE Executive Director!