52
The Survey for the New San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge December 1 st , 2008 ASCE Dallas Branch Meeting

Sfobb Dec08

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sfobb Dec08

The Survey for the New San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge

December 1st, 2008

ASCE Dallas Branch Meeting

Page 2: Sfobb Dec08

Presentation Topics

An Introduction to the Project Key Bridge Components Geodetic Surveying and Tectonic

Considerations Transition Span OBG’s Footings (T1 & E2) SAS Tower SAS OBG’s

Page 3: Sfobb Dec08

Project Limits

San Francisco

Oakland

Treasure Island

Yerba Buena Island

Page 4: Sfobb Dec08

Introduction The New Bridge

Designed by Ty Lin and Moffett Nichol JV Constructors - American Bridge/Flour JV

Page 5: Sfobb Dec08

SAS Components

Page 6: Sfobb Dec08

Surveying Challenges

Unique single tower design requires extreme survey accuracy

Complex OBG Deck Geometry (e.g., pre-camber)

Primary geodetic control network (Order B) Steel component fabrication tolerances (1 mm

→ 3 mm depending on specific dimensional criteria)

Thus survey accuracies must be 5 x to 10 x better than the tolerances

Page 7: Sfobb Dec08

Project Area sits on a single tectonic plate No discernable scale or rotation seen in the HTDP output Presented Results to Client

HTDP OutputHTDP (version 2.9) OUTPUT

VELOCITIES IN MM/YR RELATIVE TO NAD_83(CORS96)

EE-75LATITUDE = 37 49 25.53939 N NORTH VELOCITY = 24.11 mm/yrLONGITUDE = 122 19 13.74167 W EAST VELOCITY = -19.59 mm/yrELLIPS. HT. = 0.000 m UP VELOCITY = 0.00 mm/yrX = -2697037.344 m X VELOCITY = -8.65 mm/yrY = -4262916.207 m Y VELOCITY = 22.97 mm/yrZ = 3890010.703 m Z VELOCITY = 19.04 mm/yr

RECEIVE RESET 1970LATITUDE = 37 48 36.74206 N NORTH VELOCITY = 25.14 mm/yrLONGITUDE = 122 21 40.44261 W EAST VELOCITY = -20.13 mm/yrELLIPS. HT. = 0.000 m UP VELOCITY = 0.00 mm/yrX = -2700562.314 m X VELOCITY = -8.76 mm/yrY = -4261776.122 m Y VELOCITY = 23.79 mm/yrZ = 3888822.196 m Z VELOCITY = 19.86 mm/yr

Primary Geodetic Control and Related Issues, e.g., Tectonic Motion

Page 8: Sfobb Dec08

Transition Span Survey For Caltrans

USA Steel Fabrication Verification - Portland Transition Spans First Survey Attempt by Others Failed Original Fabricator went out of Business

Page 9: Sfobb Dec08

Conventional Precision Survey Methods

Page 10: Sfobb Dec08

Conventional Network

95% confidence regionsexceed project tolerance (3 mm)

Page 11: Sfobb Dec08

State of the Art Technology

Laser Tracker

Page 12: Sfobb Dec08

Primary Control

Applied Technology Precision prisms Drift nest tools Circle tools Edge tools Hidden point tools Etc.

Page 13: Sfobb Dec08

Leica Laser Tracker and 1.5″ PreciseSphere

Page 14: Sfobb Dec08

Laser Tracker Survey of the Transition Span OBG’s

Page 15: Sfobb Dec08

T1 Footing Survey – Corpus Christi Five Elements

Dimensions Pile Sleeve Radii and Orientation Dowel Locations Location and Axis of 438 Bolt Holes Dowel and Bolt Hole Template

Page 16: Sfobb Dec08

Pile SleeveAnalysis

Page 17: Sfobb Dec08

T1 FootingPile SleeveAlignment and KeyDimensions

Page 18: Sfobb Dec08

T1 FootingOrganizedChaos

Page 19: Sfobb Dec08
Page 20: Sfobb Dec08
Page 21: Sfobb Dec08
Page 22: Sfobb Dec08
Page 23: Sfobb Dec08
Page 24: Sfobb Dec08
Page 25: Sfobb Dec08

T1 Footing Survey – Corpus Christi Use a Laser Tracker Work at Night

Minimize ambient conditions flux Easier access with minimal other work Network based on 63 surveyed dowel

locations

Page 26: Sfobb Dec08

Dowel Survey Results

Page 27: Sfobb Dec08

Template Survey Results

Page 28: Sfobb Dec08

T1 Footing at KOS

Page 29: Sfobb Dec08

T1 Footing Delivery

Page 30: Sfobb Dec08

Driving the Piles

Page 31: Sfobb Dec08

T1Footing inPlace

Page 32: Sfobb Dec08

T1 Footing Installed

Page 33: Sfobb Dec08

ZPMC Fabrication Facility Shanghai

Page 34: Sfobb Dec08

ZPMC

Page 35: Sfobb Dec08

Tower Survey - China Tower FabricationGetting Oriented (no pun intended)

Page 36: Sfobb Dec08

The Basic Tower Design

Page 37: Sfobb Dec08

Tower Mock-up Surveys China Tower/Deck Fabrication – First Survey

The Project Site Steel Fabricator in Shanghai Mock up Survey

• 3 Elevations of the Tower• To Prove Capability• Actual Sections 40 M• Survey for

– Dimensions– Flatness– Orthogonality– Torsion– Alignment

Page 38: Sfobb Dec08

Tower Survey

China Tower Fabrication Survey Using Laser Tracker

Page 39: Sfobb Dec08

Tower Shaft Survey China Tower Fabrication

Performing the Survey

Page 40: Sfobb Dec08

Tower Shaft Survey China Tower Fabrication

Performing the Survey

Page 41: Sfobb Dec08

Control Network and Object Observations Network Design Point Cloud

Maximum Residual found was 0.023mm (0.0009’)

Page 42: Sfobb Dec08

Survey Report (Shaft Dimensions)

Page 43: Sfobb Dec08

Survey Report (Shaft Skin Analysis)

Results Flatness

CI = 0.5 mm

(1/50th inch)

Page 44: Sfobb Dec08

Survey Report (Stiffener Locations and Orthogonality)

Page 45: Sfobb Dec08

Survey Report (Shaft Torsion Analysis)

Page 46: Sfobb Dec08

Alignment at Shaft Splice

Page 47: Sfobb Dec08

OBG Jig Survey Use of jigs to maintain OBG fabrication geometry

Page 48: Sfobb Dec08

Jig Under Construction

Page 49: Sfobb Dec08

OBG Survey

Page 50: Sfobb Dec08

Ice Cream Break

Page 51: Sfobb Dec08

Shanghai Surveys Towill Engineer with Buddy from Shanghai Hash

House Harriers

Page 52: Sfobb Dec08

Thank You