98
Teacher Evaluations Using Technology

Teacher evaluations using technology

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation made by Dr. Richard Voltz at the IPA Assistant Principals' Conference on February 8, 2011.

Citation preview

Page 1: Teacher evaluations using technology

Teacher Evaluations Using Technology

Page 2: Teacher evaluations using technology

Goals for Presentation

Page 3: Teacher evaluations using technology

“Think of Students First”

Page 4: Teacher evaluations using technology

To be able to know, describe and inform teachers what is effective

instruction

Page 5: Teacher evaluations using technology

Resources for Teacher Evaluation

• Danielson Frameworks

Page 6: Teacher evaluations using technology

“Fundamental Fairness”

Page 7: Teacher evaluations using technology

Learn how to use technology to

enhance classroom walkthroughs and teacher evaluation

Page 8: Teacher evaluations using technology

Performance Counts Act

Page 9: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 10: Teacher evaluations using technology

Largest PAC donor in Illinois, $1.8M

Page 11: Teacher evaluations using technology

A great teacher and principal for every student.

Page 12: Teacher evaluations using technology

Data systems that tell us if students are on track and principals

and teachers are helping their students adequately progress.

Page 13: Teacher evaluations using technology

College and career ready graduation

standards

Page 14: Teacher evaluations using technology

Four out of five citizens believe it

should be easier for principals to let

ineffective teachers go – even if they

have tenure.

Page 15: Teacher evaluations using technology

Three quarters of citizens believe that

we should base tenure on how

effective a teacher is at getting students to grow academically – not just on seniority.

Page 16: Teacher evaluations using technology

Teacher Evaluation

Page 17: Teacher evaluations using technology

Principal Evaluation

Page 18: Teacher evaluations using technology

Administrators need to do more...

• We need to evaluate teachers better.

• Need accountability systems

• Pressure will be on administrators

Page 20: Teacher evaluations using technology

2009 Urban Institute book.Its conclusion: Firing the least effective 6 to 10 percent of teachers would catapult American kids from near the bottom of the international pack in academic achievement to the top ranks.

Page 21: Teacher evaluations using technology

Widget Effect

Page 22: Teacher evaluations using technology

What does the research say?

Page 23: Teacher evaluations using technology

Linda Darling-Hammond (2010)

• Under half of all teachers receive continuous professional development, mentoring or coaching or engage in peer observation as a result of evaluation.

• Ninety percent of teachers participate in one or two-day workshops or conferences to fulfill professional development requirements

• Professional development should center on

• Student achievement

• Lesson study

• Peer observation and coaching

• Ongoing learning opportunities embedded in practice.

Page 24: Teacher evaluations using technology

NASSP Statement• States and districts should include multiple measures of

performance.

• Evidence of a teacher’s knowledge of subject matter;

• Skill in planning, delivering, monitoring, and assessing students’ learning;

• Skill in developing and maintaining positive relationships with students, parents, and colleagues;

• Knowledge and skill in pedagogical methods to meet the needs of students with an array of learning styles and needs;

• Commitment to students’ learning to their utmost potential

Page 25: Teacher evaluations using technology

Thomas Friedman

“75 percent of young Americans, between the ages of 17 to 24, are unable to enlist in the military today because they have failed to graduate from high school, have a criminal record, or are physically unfit.”

Page 26: Teacher evaluations using technology

Do you need some inspiration to act courageously?

Page 27: Teacher evaluations using technology

QuickTime™ and aJVT/AVC Coding decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 29: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 30: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 32: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 33: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 34: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 35: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 36: Teacher evaluations using technology

Being an effective evaluator is hard!

Page 37: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 38: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 39: Teacher evaluations using technology

School leadership is second only to

classroom teaching as an influence on

pupil learning.Source: International Center for Leadership in Education

Page 40: Teacher evaluations using technology

“Without substantive conversations about real classroom practice, not

much transfer, reflection or application to teaching

practice will occur.”(Hord & Summers, 2008, p. 104)

Page 41: Teacher evaluations using technology

"It is our job to know what is effective teaching practices and to hold

teachers accountable."Dr. Mike Schmoker

Page 42: Teacher evaluations using technology

Do all your teachers?

• Check for understanding?

• Teach the adopted district curriculum?

• Utilize common assessments on a regular basis?

• Provide remediation based on data?

• Engage students?

• Teach bell to bell?

• Have students read, write, and discuss?

Page 43: Teacher evaluations using technology

QuickTime™ and aJVT/AVC Coding decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 44: Teacher evaluations using technology

Would you train teachers to learn how to pass out papers?

Page 45: Teacher evaluations using technology

No Opt Out

Student does not know answer, teacher goes to another student. First

student is called on again to state answer.

Page 46: Teacher evaluations using technology

Do you believe teachers can improve

by watching other excellent teachers?

Page 47: Teacher evaluations using technology

Classroom Walkthroughs

Gather data points on teacher performance and discuss with all teachers.

Look for active engaged student learning.

Look for teachers who require students to read, discuss, and write about what they have read.

Checking for understanding is very important.

Have a common core curriculum and common quarterly assessments.

Page 49: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 50: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 51: Teacher evaluations using technology

Doug Reeves• Classroom walkthroughs can be valuable

if they

• Are not judgmental

• Have the fingerprints of local teachers and administrators all over them

• Provide timely and effective feedback to teachers

• Are used primarily for improving teaching and learning

Page 52: Teacher evaluations using technology

Secretary Duncan“The New Normal: Doing More With

Less”

Page 53: Teacher evaluations using technology

Do not slash instructional timespent on task, eliminate the arts and foreign languages,

abandon promising reforms, and lay offtalented, young teachers.

Page 54: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 55: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 56: Teacher evaluations using technology

Choose Documents from the drop down “more” menu.

Page 57: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 58: Teacher evaluations using technology

Choose “Form” from the

“Create New” menu

Page 59: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 60: Teacher evaluations using technology

Name the form, whatever you name the form that is what it will

be saved as.

You can include text below name to explain purpose of the

form.

Page 61: Teacher evaluations using technology

Determine Purpose

• Staff Development

• Evaluative Purposes

Page 62: Teacher evaluations using technology

Do Not Mix The Two

Page 63: Teacher evaluations using technology

If Staff Development

• Recommend building administrators not participate in their own teachers.

• Determine a focus based on research on good teaching.

• Limit visit to three to five minutes.

• Get in. Get out. Gather 300 or more data points.

Page 64: Teacher evaluations using technology

If Evaluation

• Make it perfectly clear to teachers.

• “When I (building administrator) am doing walkthroughs data could be used for evaluative purposes.”

Page 65: Teacher evaluations using technology

Walkthroughs counter pre-

arranged “teacher observation-evaluation”

process.

Page 66: Teacher evaluations using technology

Determine what data you want to

collect.

Page 67: Teacher evaluations using technology

Examples• Student engaged learning.

• Student centered objective posted and communicated.

• Student knowledge of lesson objective.

• Technology being used.

• What is teacher doing?

• What are students doing?

• Teaching bell to bell?

Page 68: Teacher evaluations using technology

What are you looking

for?

Do you need to explain

the question?

Click on pencil to

edit.

Click here to make

recorder answer this question.

Question possible answers.

Page 69: Teacher evaluations using technology

To add items click on “Add

item” in upper left

corner.

Page 70: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 71: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 72: Teacher evaluations using technology

When sending form make sure you do it from “Form” drop down box, and then “Send form.”

Do not send from spreadsheet.

Page 73: Teacher evaluations using technology

Enter email addresses here

Page 74: Teacher evaluations using technology

Smartphones

iPads or Tablets

Page 75: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 76: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 77: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 78: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 79: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 80: Teacher evaluations using technology

Link to my podcasthttp://bit.ly/IPA-

AP11

Page 81: Teacher evaluations using technology

Voltz T-Square Teacher Evaluation

Process

Page 82: Teacher evaluations using technology

Classroom observation form…

beginning of lesson

What is actually observed.

This half of the paper is what the evaluator actually observes.

Analysis and SuggestionsBeginning of lesson

Begins lesson promptly Review Statement of student

centered objectives Measures student knowledge Prepares appropriate

materials

Actual suggestions for improvement will be stated here for observations.

Page 83: Teacher evaluations using technology

Actual Classroom Observation

2:10 p.m. Students are talking

What is a force?

Push and pull

What is work?

Use force, energy is needed

When you apply force to an object, what happens?

Force is used to move an object

Next unit is machines

What machines have you used this morning?

Toaster, stove, microwave, car, bus, alarm, fan, clock, bike, TV, computer, toilet, light, super-nintendo

• Simple machines have none or one working part

Yes – begins lesson promptlyYes – reviewsNo – gave no student objectivesYes – measures student knowledgeYes – prepares appropriate materials

Teacher calls on students who have hands raised

Calls on Natalie but she offers no answer and teacher goes to another student, next time use the “wait” concept and stay with student and give clues until student answers.

Anecdotal Notes Analysis & Suggestions

Page 84: Teacher evaluations using technology

Classroom observation form…

middle of lesson

What is actually observed.

This half of the paper is what the evaluator actually observes.

Analysis and SuggestionsMiddle of lesson

Teaches to objectives Uses guided practice Re-teaches when appropriate Uses independent practice Varies teaching technique Actively engages all students Involves students equitably Demonstrates appropriate proximity Demonstrates knowledge of subject matter Uses proper transition between activities

Actual suggestions for improvement will be

stated here for observations.

Page 85: Teacher evaluations using technology

Actual Classroom Observation

Simple machine has no or few moving partsAmanda – can I write all items that are simple machines in my home for extra credit.Teacher asks students to get out supplies for assignment in class.Several students do not have supplies.Teacher becomes aggravated at students for not having materials and goes up to one girl’s box of crayons and dumps the crayons on the floor and tells the girl that she had previously been told to better organize her box and to start over now to organize.

Yes - Teaches to objectives No - Uses guided practice No - Re-teaches when appropriate No - Uses independent practice No - Varies teaching technique Yes - Actively engages all students Yes - Involves students equitably No - Demonstrates appropriate proximity No - Demonstrates knowledge of subject

matter No - Uses proper transition between

activities

Student makes comment and teacher ignores. Teacher could have offered to all class or could have re-directed student to task on hand.

You should never embarrass a student in front of all the other students. This was not the only student with an unorganized crayon box. You should have taught organizational skills earlier

Anecdotal Notes Analysis & Suggestions

Page 86: Teacher evaluations using technology

Classroom observation form…

end of lesson

What is actually observed.

This half of the paper is what the evaluator actually observes.

Analysis and SuggestionsEnd of lesson

Assesses student progress Summarizes main points Provides appropriate homework Utilizes full period for instruction Uses consistent and equitable

praise Maintains rapport and respect

with students

Actual suggestions for improvement will be stated here for observations.

Page 87: Teacher evaluations using technology

Actual Classroom Observation

No - Assesses student progress Yes - Summarizes main points No - Provides appropriate homework Yes - Utilizes full period for instruction No - Uses consistent and equitable praise No - Maintains rapport and respect with

students

This student consistently interrupts you, corrects your teaching and you cannot control her behavior. You need to have a personal conference with her and explain your expectations and hold her accountable and apply consisted discipline for infractions.

You could have made this unit much more interesting by bringing in simple machines, by demonstrating the use of a lever, pull nail from wood, etc…

Anecdotal Notes Analysis & Suggestions

•What is a machine?

•What is a simple machine?

•What is a moving part?

•Tess – I didn’t know you had a screwdriver in your kitchen.

•What did you learn today?

•Simple machine

•3 parts to a lever

•Asks several different students what they learned in calls.

•For extra credit you need to make a lever from this handout.

•This will not work with paper, you will have to use cardboard.

•Reminds students to take science papers home tonight.

Page 88: Teacher evaluations using technology
Page 89: Teacher evaluations using technology

The Rest of the “Story”Evaluate all teachers on a regular

basis with daily observations by administrators.

Dismiss “questionable” non-tenure teachers.

Keep the “heat” on teachers who fail to improve.

Instead of going through the State of Illinois “Teacher Dismissal Process” make life “tough” on poor teachers. Force the poor teacher into resigning with

or without a buyout.

Page 90: Teacher evaluations using technology

Reflective Conference

Page 91: Teacher evaluations using technology

Let evidence,not opinion,

author the process

Page 92: Teacher evaluations using technology

Concept of Inter-Rater Reliability

Page 93: Teacher evaluations using technology

Fundamental Due Process

Page 94: Teacher evaluations using technology

Have you shared everything with the

teacher?

Page 95: Teacher evaluations using technology

Parent Comments

Page 96: Teacher evaluations using technology

Discipline Records

Page 97: Teacher evaluations using technology

Drop Ins

Page 98: Teacher evaluations using technology

Student Performance Facts