14
Masaya Watanabe (s1170044) Technical Communication Laboratory University of Aizu February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 1

Watanabe presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Watanabe presentation

Masaya Watanabe (s1170044) Technical Communication Laboratory

University of Aizu

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 1

Page 2: Watanabe presentation

}  Introduction }  Problem }  Method ◦  Participants ◦  Data Collection ◦  Research Tool

}  Results }  Discussion }  Conclusion and Future Work

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 2

Page 3: Watanabe presentation

}  What is the meaning of Metacognition? Metacognition is defined as "cognition about

cognition", or "knowing about knowing.“ For my research, I looked into the different

strategies readers used for comprehension of the English text.

}  Further, the purpose was to see the extent to which

readers used global reading strategies, problem-solving strategies and support reading strategies.

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 3

Page 4: Watanabe presentation

}  How do people use cognition and metacognition in an EFL learning context?

}  Research Purpose: Whether and to what

extent are EFL readers aware of their metacognitive reading strategies on the web, while analyzing a website in the target language?

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 4

Page 5: Watanabe presentation

}  59 EFL readers of the University of Aizu (age group: 18 – 20 years) took part in the

study. The participants initially took part in an extensive web analysis exercise followed by self-reporting of multiple reading strategies used for website analysis (Belize tourism website) in English.

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 5

Page 6: Watanabe presentation

Belize English Travel Site

}  1st: Participants used the English travel site.

(They tried to understand the English content in the website and navigation and completed usability questionnaires on web access patterns, learning, navigation, text-graphics content etc.)

}  2nd: Participants answered the

Metacognitive Awareness of Learning Strategies (MARSI) questionnaire.

}  3rd: Statistical analysis of data on three metacognitive sub-scales (global reading strategy, problem-solving strategy and support-reading strategies) and reporting.

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 6

Page 7: Watanabe presentation

}  This is a questionnaire called "Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI 1.0) ."

}  Maximum Value is 5. }  Minimum Value is 1.

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 7

Page 8: Watanabe presentation

}  This questionnaire can be divided into 3 groups.

◦  Global Reading Strategy(GLOB Subscale)

◦  Problem Reading Strategy(PLOB Subscale)

◦  Support Reading Strategy(SUP Subscale)

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 8

Page 9: Watanabe presentation

}  Question 1 and 19: showing relatively higher values

}  Mean Value : 3.024

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 9

3.83

3.54

2.14

3.42

2.76

2.95

3.31

3.71

2.36 2.36

3.39

2.95

2.56

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

4.2

1 3 4 7 10 14 17 19 22 23 25 26 29

Mea

n Va

lue

Question in GLOB Subscale

Page 10: Watanabe presentation

}  Question13: Maximum value in all strategies (Strategies: I adjust my

reading speed according to what I’m reading.)

}  Mean Value of PLOB Subscale: 3.574

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 10

3.71

3.2

4.08

3.64 3.54

3.14

3.83

3.44

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

4.2

8 11 13 16 18 21 27 30

Mea

n Va

lue

Question in PROB Subscale

Page 11: Watanabe presentation

}  Question 28: Minimum

value in all strategies (Strategies: I ask myself

questions I like to have answered in the text.)

}  Mean Value of SUP

Subscale: 2.762

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 11

2.39 2.31

3.05

2.69 2.66

3.14 3.24

3.34

2.05 2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

4.2

2 5 6 9 12 15 20 24 28

Mea

n Va

lue

Question in SUP Subscale

Page 12: Watanabe presentation

}  Most – used Type: Problem Solving Strategy

}  KEY TO AVERAGES: ◦  3.5 or higher = High ◦  2.5 – 3.4 = Medium ◦  2.4 or lower = Low

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 12

3.02

3.57

2.76

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8

3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8

4 4.2

GLOB PLOB SUP

Mea

n Va

lue

in e

ach

subs

cale

Subscale Type

Page 13: Watanabe presentation

}  This research helped in forwarding direct evidence of how far readers are aware of their use of metacognitive reading strategies.

}  Future Work ◦  Use of screen capture software to support MARSI

data. ◦  Use of eye-tracking data to verify thought

processes and action sequences. ◦  Use of other formal usability testing methods.

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 13

Page 14: Watanabe presentation

February 2013 Senior Thesis Presentation 14