14
Women in engineering…STEM UPDATE

We can do it!

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: We can do it!

Women in engineering…STEM UPDATE

Page 2: We can do it!
Page 3: We can do it!

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Female and Male Enrollments in Bachelor Programs

Female Male

Page 4: We can do it!

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Engineering Program Enrollments

Female Male

Page 5: We can do it!

0.00

10,000.00

20,000.00

30,000.00

40,000.00

50,000.00

60,000.00

70,000.00

80,000.00

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

BS Engineering Graduates

Female Male

Page 6: We can do it!

F-Test Two-Sample for Variances for Female/Male Engineering Enrollments

Female Male

Mean 77540.9 357088.4

Variance 34636651.66 330967692.5

Observations 10 10

df 9 9

F 0.104652667

P(F<=f) one-tail 0.001239377

F Critical one-tail 0.314574906

F-Test Two-Sample for Variances for Females/Male Engineering Graduates

Female Male

Mean 13214.1 55259.2

Variance 365124.5444 22255400.18

Observations 10 10

df 9 9

F 0.01640611

P(F<=f) one-tail 5.45187E-07

F Critical one-tail 0.314574906

Page 7: We can do it!

The P test and the F test fail meaning the means are significantly different for the Females entering four year programs with the intent to complete engineering as Males. The difference follows to the number of women that actually graduate in an engineering field.

Page 8: We can do it!

Male GraduatesFemale GraduatesMale EnrollmentsFemale Enrollments

6000000

5000000

4000000

3000000

2000000

1000000

0

Dat

a

Boxplot of Female Enrol, Male Enrollm, ...

Page 9: We can do it!

R² = 0.5911

0

50

100

150

200

250

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Women Employed as Engineers

Page 10: We can do it!

R² = 0.42

1,500

1,550

1,600

1,650

1,700

1,750

1,800

1,850

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Men Employed as Engineers

Page 11: We can do it!
Page 12: We can do it!

Women are still paid 20 to 50% less than men in STEM positions.

Women are still considered primary caretakers at home. 67% of women in STEM that stay do not have children at home (Strasser, 2014).

Leadership in STEM companies still believe women will never be as capable as men in the same position (Strasser, 2014).

Bias still persistent at the undergraduate level. Professors do not think women are capable of sustaining a STEM career (Chang, 2014).

Page 13: We can do it!

Women are more likely to finish an engineering program than the number of men that enroll.

This means its not a math or science ability issue

Its interest or perspective future

If we paid women equally as men for the same output then more women might stay in the career field.

The harsh engineering and science environment is degrading to both men and women in the career field.

Page 14: We can do it!

Chang, K. (2014). New York Times. Retrieved from

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/science/bias-persists-against-

women-of-science-a-study-

says.html?_r=0&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1421596975-

/zcIYxdjaWvBJmzvUhtpqw

National Science Foundation. (2014). National Science Foundation.

Retrieved from

http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/minwomen.cfm

Society of Women Engineers. (2014). Retrieved from

http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/swe/nationalsurveyengineering/

index.php?startid=20&qs=retention+study#/24

Strasser, A. R. (2014). Think Progress. Retrieved from

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/02/13/3287861/women-

leaving-stem-jobs/

US Department of Education. (2014). Retrieved from STEM:

http://www.ed.gov/stem

US Department of Labor. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/