Upload
easternontariocropconference
View
27
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Crop Rotation Profitability, productivity, and resilience
Jake Munroe
Soil Fertility Specialist (Field Crops)
OMAFRA
Joanna Follings
Cereals Specialist
OMAFRA
Outline
• Diverse crop rotations
• Opportunities for cereals in rotation
• Management of cereals
• Impacts of wheat in rotation
• Economics of cereals in rotation
Live Roots in the Ground
Corn
Soybeans
No Crop
Corn
Soybeans
No Crop
W. Wheat
Corn
Soybeans
No Crop
W. Wheat +Cover Crop
Diverse Crop Rotations
• Increase long-term productivity
• Enhance soil fertility and soil health
• Improve resilience to stress years
• Reduce pest pressure
Challenges include:
• More involved management
• Short-term economic drivers
Ontario Cereals Landscape
Crop Acres 2016 Yield
(bu/ac)
Winter Wheat - SRW ~ 633,000 96
Winter Wheat - HRW ~ 80,000 91
Winter Wheat - SWW ~72,000 100
Spring Wheat ~90,000 53.3
Barley ~95,000 63
Oats ~50,000 84
Spring Grain Mix ~70,000 65.7
Where are we at in the east?
County Winter Wheat Spring Wheat
Lanark 1,446 1,114
Leeds-Grenville - 1,296
Lennox & Addington 3,913 -
Ottawa 5,292 1,679
Prescott & Russell 1,401 5,991
Renfrew 2,422 2,006
Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry
2,033 4,994
Total 16,507 17,080
Ontario 975,000 90,000
Where are we at in the east? County Oat Barley Spring Grain
Leeds – Grenville - 480 992
Ottawa - - 441
Prescott & Russell - 514 1,462
Renfrew 500 - 982
Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry
- 691 1,347
Total 500 1,685 5,224
Ontario 50,000 95,000 70,000
Opportunities for Cereals in Rotation
• Best option for early planting • Residual nitrogen results in lower N requirement
for wheat
• Timely planting • Higher yielding than wheat after soybeans
• Timely planting
• Excellent rotation • Timely planting
• Excellent rotation • When soybean harvest is delayed, wheat planted
later will have lower yield potential
Opportunities for Malting Barley
• Barley now represented by GFO
– 186,500 tonnes
– 147,383 acres
• Craft Brewing Industry
– 224 brewers in 2016, up from 40 in 2009
– 158 breweries have on-site retail stores. • Of those, approximately 153 could be considered small brewers
– 92 additional breweries planned
Current Malt House Capacity
• 2 small malt houses in Ontario – Harvest Hop and Malt, Guelph
• 100 tonne organic malt barley capacity
– Barn Owl Malt, Belleville • 100 tonne capacity
– Two potential malt houses opening in Erin and Windsor
• About 2000 tonnes of ON malt barley going to Canada Malt in Montreal
Malt Demand
• One tonne of finished malt will make 50 hL of beer
– 8 million hL of beer produced in Ontario
• How many acres?
– 160,000 tonnes
– Average yield 1.5-2 ton/ac
– ~80,000 - 100,000 acres of malting barley
Cereals Management
• Variety Selection
• Field Selection
• Planting (date, depth and seeding rate)
• Fertility
• Weed Control
• Fungicides
• Harvest/Storage
Field Selection
• Avoid compaction or rutting
• Select well drained fields & good soil structure, if possible
• Crop rotation
– Following processing peas, edible beans, soybeans or canola best
Planting Date – Spring Cereals
Seeding Date
Wheat Yield (bu/ca)
# Days Difference
Yield Loss per day (bu/ac)
12-Apr 72.5
30-Apr 68.0 18 -0.25
12-May 55.3 12 -1.06
26-May 42.3 14 -0.93
Planting Date – Frost Seeding
Avg Frost Avg Dry Soil
% Yield Increase
Barley 59.6 54.2 10
Oat 128.0 109.7 16.7
Wheat 51.5 36.4 41.5
Falk & Dean, University of Guelph 2004
Seeding Rate Target Plant Population
Crop Plants/sq.m. Seeds/acre (x1000)
Winter Wheat 350-450 1,400-1,800
Barley 250-350 1,000-1,400
Oats 200-300 800-1,200
Mixed Grain 200-350 800-1,400
Spring Wheat 300-400 1,200-1,600
OMAFRA, Pub 811
Fertility
• Previous crop
• Soil type
• Field history – manure
• Yield goal and fungicide use
• Variety – class & lodging potential
• Maximum protein allowed (malting barley)
• P & K soil test
Nitrogen Management
Banks, 2016
Yield (bu/ac) @14.5% Protein %
N Rate (lbs/acre)/ Fungicide
Caramba None Caramba None
0 76.1 71.9 9.6 10.6
60 102.3 87.0 11.9 11.4
90 105.7 94.0 12.4 13.0
120 105.5 99.0 12.0 13.8
60 spring + 60 @Z31-Z32
101.8 105.7 10.8 11.1
150 108.6 99.4 13.4 14.1
75 spring + 75 @ Z31-Z32
101.9 100.8 11.7 11.7
Fungicides
3
7 8
7
9 10
11
3
9 10
13 13
15
18
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
T1 T2 T3 T1 + T2 T1 + T3 T2 + T3 T1 + T2 +T3
90 lbs N
150 lbs N
Yield response bu/ac to Fungicide Strategy and N
Hooker et al, 2012
T1 = Herbicide T2 = Flag Leaf T3 = Flowering
10.8
11.0
11.2
11.4
11.6
11.8
12.0
12.2
12.4
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
80.0
85.0
0 30 60 90 120 150
Yie
ld (
bu
/acr
e)
N Rates
Spring Wheat N Response Curve
With Fungicide
Without Fungicide
Protein
MER-N Fung 130 No Fung 98 Current 63
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
90.0
100.0
110.0
120.0
130.0
140.0
0 30 60 90 120 150
Yie
ld (
bu
/acr
e)
N Rate
Nitrogen X Fungicide Interactions
With Fungicide
Without Fungicide
Protein
MER-N Fung 82 No Fung 67 Current 50
Oat N Response Curve
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
45.0
55.0
65.0
75.0
85.0
95.0
105.0
115.0
125.0
0 30 60 90 120 150
Yie
ld (
bu
/acr
e)
N Rates
Nitrogen X Fungicide Interactions
With Fungicide
Without Fungicide
Protein
MER-N Fung 127 No Fung 100 Current 63
Barley N Response Curve
Confidential 35
Treatment Yield
(bu/ac) Gain
Check (No Sulphur) 90.3 -
5 lbs Sulphur 93.1 2.8
10 lbs Sulphur 94.6 4.4
20 lbs Sulphur 95.2 5.0
Harvest
Harvest Date Yield
(bu/ac)
Test Wt
(lb/bu)
Fusarium
(%)
August 28th 92.5 65.0 0.2
September 6th 87.3 61.8 0.7
Johnson, 2011 – New Liskeard
133c
150b 154 152b
161c
150b
156b 159
156b
183b 178a
186a
157
175a
195a
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
Gra
in Y
ield
(b
u/a
c)
2009 2010 2011
The “Rotation Effect” on corn yields Ridgetown 2009-13
C-C
C
-S
C-S
-W
2012
Note: Mean separation within year (p=0.05)
C-C
C
-S
C-S
-W
C-C
C
-S
C-S
-W
C-C
C
-S
C-S
-W
C-C
C
-S
C-S
-W
2013
Hooker (UG Ridgetown) 41
186
157
175 173b
198
162
184 181a
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
Gra
in Y
ield
(b
u/a
c)
2010 2011
Corn Yields after Wheat +/- Red Clover, Ridgetown 2010-12
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
2012
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
Ave
Hooker (UG Ridgetown) Fertilizer N applied to all plots @ 180 lbs N/ac 43
186
157
175 173b
198
162
184 181a
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
Gra
in Y
ield
(b
u/a
c)
2010 2011
Corn Yields after Wheat +/- Red Clover, Ridgetown 2010-12
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
2012
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
C-S
-W
C-S
-W(r
c)
Ave
Hooker (UG Ridgetown) Fertilizer N applied to all plots @ 180 lbs N/ac 44
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
CCSS CCCC CCBB CCSW CCSWrc CCBrcBrc CCAA AAAA
Mg
Car
bo
n h
a-1
Rotation
Meyer-Aurich et al., 2006
Elora Long-Term Rotation Trial
Ridgetown Long-Term Rotation Trial
Soil organic matter (1995-2006):
1. Wheat-Soy > Corn-Soy-Wheat/CC/CS > Cont. Soy
2. Corn-Soy-Wheat rotation has shown greatest increase in OM in response to N fertilization
Soil Organic Matter
• Diverse crop rotations: – Increase soil microbial populations and
activity
– May increase efficiency of soil microbes
• Old microbial cells and their by-products make up large % of OM
• A balanced mix of residue types can
help build long-term, stable organic matter
Benefits of a Diverse Crop Rotation
• Improved soil health
• More stable yields (and income)
• Reduced N requirements and improved N use efficiency
• Others…?
Putting It All Together
• Diverse crop rotations improve long term yield stability
• Diverse crop rotations can be an effective tool for managing weed, disease and insect pests
• Cereals in rotation provide new management opportunities (e.g. cover crops)
• Cereals add value to the entire farm enterprise
Questions?
Jake Munroe Soil Fertility Specialist (Field Crops)
519-271-9269 [email protected] Twitter: @onfieldcrops
Joanna Follings Cereals Specialist
519-271-8180 [email protected]
Twitter: @jofollings
www.fieldcropnews.com