37
Christchurch: A Leadership Incubator?” [email protected] 1 Canterbury Family Violence Reference Group December 5th 2014

Christchurch - a leadership incubator? Dec 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Christchurch: A Leadership Incubator?”

[email protected]

1

Canterbury Family Violence Reference Group December 5th 2014

2

3

Chris Jansen

4

“if we are looking for shifts in collective impact across

communities and organisations, lets not develop leaders within one organisation…

….lets develop leaders together from across the network so the learning process can create the

collaboration and collective impact we are looking for….

….rather than reinforcing the silos we are in…”

An appreciative critique of Promoting Better Public Services Leadership,

Professor Brad Jackson 2012, p. 38

6

9 www.ideacreation.org

.

.

.

Hierarchies and Beauracracies “the organisation”

11 www.ideacreation.org

Networks, movements and living systems

.

.

.

Leaders vs leadership? Position of a leader vs action of leadership

Hierarchies and Networks

14 www.ideacreation.org

???

The Starfish and the Spider…

The unstoppable power of leaderless organisations Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom

15

Centralised Decentralised

16

Adaptive leadership: fostering networks of self organisation

Conditions for self organisation Leadership role

1. an attractor - motivated by 1. Explore and articulate shared vision

threat or opportunity and values

2. independent agents 2. Proactive mentoring of individuals

3. interactions with neighbours 3. Foster interaction and shared learning

4. decentralised control 4. Distribute power + decentralise control

17 www.ideacreation.org

Machine Living organism

Hybrid?

+Efficient, reliable, ordered +innovative, responsive, open

-Inflexible, slow to respond -messy and spontaneous

18 www.ideacreation.org

.

.

.

Focus on growing networks of leadership rather than individual leaders

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

20

Adaptive leadership: fostering networks of self organisation

A hybrid?

22

23

Social labs are platforms for addressing complex social challenges… - They are social. - They are experimental. - They are systemic.

Determined collaboration

around a compelling

purpose ignites possibilities

“How can we be sure that in 5 years, we can be

even more proud of our vibrant, diverse and resilient communities across wider Canterbury?”

(as opposed to “Do you remember how fantastic

our communities used to be in 2013?”)

Mapping a polarity - impacts

• Define the challenge

• Name the poles (the two extremes)

• Brainstorm the upsides & downsides of each pole

• Upsides – benefits of focusing on this value

• Downsides – harmful effects of focusing on this value to the neglect of its pair

• Suggested order l-, r+, r-,l+

27 www.thinkbeyond.co.nz

Healthy, Thriving Organisation

Failing Organisation

Short-term Long-term

• Continuity

• Grounded

• Consistency

• Clear core ideology

• New directions

• Expanding

possibilities

• Freedom

• Lack of freedom

• Stagnation

• No new ideas being

generated

• No continuity

• Chaotic confusion over

what is happening

and Stability Change

Mapping a polarity - actions

• Identify early warning signs and list these in measurable terms

• Brainstorm all the actions you could take to stay above the line. Identify the ones that will add most leverage and record these as action steps

• Discuss how you will use this to manage the polarity

29 www.thinkbeyond.co.nz

Healthy, Thriving Organisation

Failing Organisation

Short-term Long-term

• Focus on what you

do well & amplify it

• Articulate what we

stand for

• Monitor key result

areas (dashboard)

• Clear targets, plans &

accountabilities

• Complaints of “being

stifled”

• No new ideas being

researched/developed

• Try lots of stuff and

keep what works

(bullets before

cannonballs)

• Celebrate

successes

• Fail safely

• Complaints of

“mixed messages”

• Complaints of things

“falling through the

cracks”

• Projects late or not

completed at all

• Ideas created but no

targeted actions

• Continuity

• Grounded

• Consistency

• Clear core ideology

• New directions

• Expanding possibilities

• Freedom

• Lack of freedom

• Stagnation

• No new ideas being

generated

• No continuity

• Chaotic confusion over

what is happening

Action Steps Action Steps

Early Warnings Early Warnings and Stability Change

EDEM682 Transforming Education in Canterbury 60 principals and teachers, scoping and designing prototypes

for co-teaching, student agency, learning re-design, community engagement etc

“A network of passionate and talented professionals transforming education”

“Connecting change catalysts across a community centred health system”

“Getting our city back on its feet”

34

“Connecting, growing and unleashing agents of social change”.

35

“Building collective capacity across the Canterbury NGO sector to

design and implement collective

projects to respond to emergent

community needs and

opportunities.”

Hybrid?

36 www.ideacreation.org

Prototyping a hybrid approach

1. Shift from ‘either-or’ thinking to ‘both-and’ thinking.

2. Create space by embedding emergent mechanisms into structure

3. Build a customised learning incubator

4. Navigate and negotiate pathways for adoption of innovation

Keeping in contact….

[email protected]

www.ideacreation.org

www.leadershiplab.co.nz

37