11
Consultation and better regulation Prof Gary Banks Chair, OECD Regulatory Policy Committee, and Dean ANZSOG Conference on Transparency and Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, The Hague, 16 June 2014

Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation by Gary Banks, Chair, OECD Regulatory Policy Committee, and Dean ANZSOG, Australia and New Zealand School of Government, at the 6th Expert Meeting on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, Opening, The Hague, 16-18 June 2014. Further information is available at http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/

Citation preview

Page 1: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Consultation and better regulation

Prof Gary Banks Chair, OECD Regulatory Policy Committee, and Dean ANZSOG

Conference on Transparency and Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, The Hague, 16 June 2014

Page 2: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

“Adhere to principles of open government, including transparency and participation in the regulatory process …”

2 2

Recommendation 2 of the OECD Council

Page 3: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Why consult/engage?

• Technical reasons −To understand the regulatory problem

−To devise the best solution

• Political reasons −To promote public awareness of the problem

−To build support (trust) for the regulatory solution

3

Page 4: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

When to consult?

• Across the whole ‘regulatory cycle’: −‘problem diagnosis’

−‘options evaluation’

−‘prescription’

−‘ex post review’

4

Page 5: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Who to consult?

• Need interpret ‘stakeholders’ widely − Not just those with most at stake

• Target those who will bear the costs of regulation, as well as those benefitting

5

Page 6: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

• Goal: to optimise the technical and political benefits − Requires ‘real’ listening and learning

− This takes time!

• No single best way: need choose mechanisms and forums that are ‘fit for purpose’

How to consult?

6

Page 7: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Three core design features of Australia’s

‘Productivity Commission’

• Independence −Government funded, but arm’s length from the Executive

−underpinned by Act of Parliament (role, tenure)

• Economy/community-wide perspective −‘to achieve higher living standards for the Australian

Community’

• Transparency −public processes (submissions, draft reports)

−published outputs

7

Page 8: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Some Commission inquiries

• Executive remuneration regulation

• Private health insurance

• Urban Land Planning and zoning

• Water policy and regulation

• Airport regulation

• Retail sector regulation

• Gambling regulation

• Education workforce

• Aged Care policy framework

• Native vegetation regulation

8

Page 9: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Steps in the Commission's Inquiry Process

Reference from Cabinet

PC calls for submissions

Initial consultations and Issues Paper

First round of hearings or roundtables

Draft Report publicly released

Second round of submissions and hearings/roundtables

Final Report to Government (subsequently publicly released)

Cabinet submission by relevant Minister

Decision and implementation

9

Page 10: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Evaluating consultation

• As a ‘process’ − Did it tick the right boxes (RIS)?

• What difference did it make?

10

Page 11: Consultation and better regulation, Gary Banks

Consultation and better regulation

Prof Gary Banks Chair, OECD Regulatory Policy Committee, and Dean, ANZSOG

Conference on Transparency and Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, The Hague, 16 June 2014