Upload
ctsi-at-ucsf
View
1.975
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Best Practices inClinical Study Recruitment
Nariman A. Nasser, DirectorParticipant Recruitment Service
Performing Initial Analyses
Study DesignSite-specific protocols for study-specific and SOC
proceduresPlacebo arms, excessive inclusion/exclusion criteria
Site-specificStaff resourcesLocation(s): accessibility, interoperability, features /
disadvantages
Competing Trials
Planning & Budgeting
Screen Failure Rate
Budget for the unexpectedDesign revisions Increased production & shipping costs over timeProtocol revisions impacting recruiting
methods/materials
Implementing the Plan
Staged approach
Multiple simultaneous advertising efforts
Plan on changing your plan – analyze relatively often
Communication PlanSponsor/Site StaffPrimary contactsSecondary contacts
Identify screening appointment schedule workflow, tools and conflicts
Ensuring High-Quality Participants
Start by casting a wide netThink about a wide number of things or people when choosing the
thing or person you want*
Don’t skip the prescreening step
Ask the right questions at the right stage of the recruitment process
*Idioms by The Free Dictionary
Monitoring Progress
Set realistic expectations up front
Identify benchmarks for success/failure
Simple tracking tools go a long way
Receiving logs & reports is not enough – they have to mean something and be actionable
Managing Enrollment Underperformance
Create competition among sites, coordinators and investigators to increase momentum and foster enthusiasm
Communicate underperformance before it becomes insurmountable
Be supportive in providing possible resources and solutions
Ensure nonperformance consequences are communicated prior to starting recruitment
Have a backup plan/resource
Ensuring Participants Are Well-Informed
Public opinion drives policy
Passionate advocates are essential“If you have more than 50
percent of patients saying their chances are better than
average of avoiding some harm or obtaining some benefit, they are being
unrealistically optimistic because you can’t say that
most people are above average.”
Parker-Hope, Patients with Unrealistic Expectations, The New York Times, March 7 2011
Understanding Participant Needs
Work/family obligations
Travel constraints
Financial incentives
Desire for information/sense of community
Expectations of coordinated care
Lack of insurance/comparison to SOC
Keeping Communication Open
Press releases
Local media
Patient newsletters
Direct patient/study staff communication via email or telephone
Post-study satisfaction surveys, newsletters, study drug updates
Create a centralized service to facilitate the enrollment of research participants into UCSF clinical studies
Assume a large part of the burden of recruitment efforts
Provide expertise in recruitment materials development
Ensure materials meet regulatory guidelines and requirements
Offer an economy of scale for many recruitment activities
Use established vendor relationships
Increase the volume of high quality volunteers
Facilitate a wider catchment and more robust networks
Recruitment Analysis and Planning
Robust recruitment planAnalysis of recruitment landscape
Protocol complexities, procedures, SOCCompeting studiesGeographic/demographic populationMarketing & Outreach methodologies
Suggested strategiesTimelinesBudgets for suggested strategies
Cohort ID and Direct Mail
Identify cohorts from inpatient medical records (UCare and ThREDS)ICD-9 codesDemographics
CHR modification
Coordinate data extract services from ARS
Print and mail direct mail letters to cohort
Future Services/Resources
Recruitment Plan ImplementationCentralized call center, text messaging, online
screenersMarketing & outreachReferral networks
Searchable database of actively recruiting studies – matching
Real-time recruitment from EMR