Upload
patrick-treacy
View
1.232
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FDA HIV Facial
LipoatrophyStudy Design
• Multi-center, prospective, open-label trial of 100 subjects at 3 sites:– Stacey Silvers, MD New York, NY
– Joseph Eviatar, MD New York, NY
– Michael Echavez, MD San Francisco, CA
• Grade 3 or 4 facial lipoatrophy
3 Months 6 Months 12 Months 18 Months
12 months after touchup30 Months0 Months
Initial TreatmentPhase
Follow-up Phase
Baseline
Follow-on Study
4.7 cc 1.8 cc 2.4 cc
Average Initial Volume6.5cc
Efficacy Criteria
• Primary Endpoint:
– Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
assessment at 3 months
• Secondary Endpoints:
– GAIS assessment at 6 months
– Cheek skin thickness at 3 and 6 months
Patient Demographics
Balanced distribution
of all skin types
Balanced distribution of
lipoatrophy severity
Fitzpatrick Skin Type Scores n=100
I
3% II
13%
III
33%
IV
21%
V
13%
VI
17%
Fitzpatrick Skin Type Scores n=100
I
3% II
13%
III
33%
IV
21%
V
13%
VI
17%
HIV-Associated Facial Lipoatrophy
Severity Ratings n=100
,
,
, I., 0%
II.,
48%
IV.,
13%
III.,
39%
HIV-Associated Facial Lipoatrophy
Severity Ratings n=100
,
,
, I., 0%
II.,
48%
IV.,
13%
III.,
39%
Type IV.13%
Type III.39%
Type II.48%
GAIS ResultsThrough 18 Months
3 Monthsn=100
6 Monthsn=98
(before touch up)
12 Monthsn=98
(6mo after touch up)
Improved
Much
Improved
Very Much
Improved
No Change
Worse
2%
72%
26%
--
--
7%
86%
7%
16%
53%
31%
--
--
18 Monthsn=94
(12mo after touch up)
38%
44%
10%
9%
--
100% of Patients Improved through 12 Months
91% of Patients
maintain
Improvement
Baseline Month 6
Month 12 Month 18
40 yo
Male
Total Volume
8.0 ml
Representative Study Images
(12 months after touch-up)
Baseline Month 6
Month 12 Month 18
41 yo
Male
Total Volume
15.9 mL
Representative Study Images
(12 months after touch-up)
Baseline Month 6
Month 18Month 12
50 year old
male
Total volume
17.2 ml
Representative Study Images
(12 months after refinement)
Mean Cheek Thickness Measurement
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Baseline 3 Months 6 Months 12 Months 18 Months
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Baseline 3 Months 6 Months 12Months
18Months
p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Left SideRight Side
Cheek Thickness Increase
99%
97%
98%
100%
99%
“Yes” at 12 months
98%
96%
98%
100%
99%
“Yes” at 6 months
99%98%
Do you have more confidence in your
appearance since receiving the Radiesse treatment?
95%91%Is your emotional wellbeing
better since receiving Radiesse treatment?
98%98%Do you feel more attractive
since receiving the Radiesse treatment?
99%100%Has the Radiesse treatment
been beneficial to you?
99%99%Would you recommend Radiesse treatment?
“Yes” at 18 months
“Yes” at 3 months
Patient SatisfactionThrough 18 Months
Safety – Adverse Events
• Typical Adverse Events Reported:
• Edema
• Ecchymosis
• Erythema
• Pruritis
• Pain
• No product related serious adverse events
• No Granulomas
• Most AE’s resolved within 1-2 weeks
ADVERSE EVENTS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Edem
aEch
ymos
is
Oth
ers
Eryth
ema
Pain
Prurit
isH
emat
oma
Gra
nulo
ma
Nod
ule
Infe
ctio
n
Nec
rosi
sN
eedl
e Ja
m%
of
Pati
en
ts w
ith
Even
tSafety – Adverse Events
HIV Lipoatrophy StudyConclusions
• Radiesse is safe
– No reports of serious adverse events
– Minor AE’s resolved within 7 days
• Radiesse is effective
– 100% of patients were improved through 12 months
– > 90% of patients were improved through 18 months
demonstrating 1 year longevity
– All primary and secondary endpoints were met
– > 90% patient satisfaction through 18 months
Study Overview
• Objective: To assess the radiographic appearance of Radiesse when injected into the soft tissues of the face
• 58 patients treated in Vancouver, Canada by Dr. Alastair Carruthers– 28 patients: Long-term facial lipoatrophy (>12 Months)
– 15 patients: Short-term facial lipoatrophy (<1 Month)
– 15 patients: Short-term nasolabial fold (<1 Month)
• Images sent to blinded independent evaluators in New York, directed by Dr. Marc Liebeskind
Long-Term Facial LipoatrophyPost-12 Month
Injection
Volume Added: 9.1 ml
Pre-12 Month Injection
Initial Volume Injected: 25.0 ml
Radiographic Findings
Summary
• Radiesse is not consistently evident on X-ray
• Radiesse is clearly visible on CT Scan
– Distinctly separate from bone
– For facial soft tissue applications, Radiesse is visible
bi-laterally (not typical of an adverse clinical finding)
– Radiesse volume dissipates over time
• No evidence that Radiesse migrates
• Radiesse as a radiographic material does not
pose a safety concern