Upload
george-s-ferzli
View
1.731
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
How to Treat Recurrence after TEP
George S. Ferzli, M.D., F.A.C.S.Professor of Surgery
SUNY Health Sciences CenterBrooklyn New York
George Al-Khoury,M.D.
THREE OPTIONS
– Open inguinal approach– TAPP– TEP
Repair of recurrences after endoscopic repair
Study Cases Primary TEP Repair
Felix 1998 34 11 TAPP 29Open 4
Knook 1999 34 9 TAPP
Leibl 2000 46 0 TAPP
Chowbey 2003 6 6 TAPP 4
Tamme 2003 23 23 TEP 2TAPP 3Open 18
Richards 2004 8 0 TEP 1Open 7
Ferzli 2004 12 12 TEP
Repair of recurrences after endoscopic repair
Study Cases Primary TEP Repair
Felix 1998 34 11 TAPP 29Open 4
Knook 1999 34 9 TAPP
Leibl 2000 46 0 TAPP
Chowbey 2003 6 6 TAPP 4
Tamme 2003 23 23 TEP 2TAPP 3Open 18
Richards 2004 8 0 TEP 1Open 7
Ferzli 2004 12 12 TEP
Repair of recurrences after endoscopic repair
Study Cases Primary TEP Repair
Felix 1998 34 11 TAPP 29Open 4
Knook 1999 34 9 TAPP
Leibl 2000 46 0 TAPP
Chowbey 2003 6 6 TAPP 4
Tamme 2003 23 23 TEP 2TAPP 3Open 18
Richards 2004 8 0 TEP 1Open 7
Ferzli 2004 12 12 TEP
EERPE after TEP/TAPP
• Stolzenburg et al. (2005)
• 750 cases of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)
• 14 had prior laparoscopic hernia repair– 8 TEP (2 bilateral)– 6 TAPP
Stolzenburg J. et al: EERPE in patients with prostate cancer and previous laparoscopic inguinal mesh placement for hernia repair. World J Urol 23:295-299, 2005.
EERPE after TEP/TAPP
• 1 conversion to transperitoneal approach– Prior bilateral TEP
• 2 bladder injuries managed intraoperatively– 1 prior TAPP– 1 prior TEP
• 1 inferior epigastric vessel injury
Stolzenburg J. et al: EERPE in patients with prostate cancer and previous laparoscopic inguinal mesh placement for hernia repair. World J Urol 23:295-299, 2005.
EERPE after TEP/TAPP
• More technically challenging – Access into extraperitoneal space
• Port placement modification
– Dissection of extraperitoneal space• Lymph node dissection is not recommended on
side or previous mesh placement• Recognize and manage complications early
• EERPE after TEP/TAPP is feasible for the experienced surgeon
Stolzenburg J. et al: EERPE in patients with prostate cancer and previous laparoscopic inguinal mesh placement for hernia repair. World J Urol 23:295-299, 2005.
TEP after TEP14-year experience
• September 1991 to September 2005
• 1526 TEP procedures done– 1156 male patients– 786 unilateral / 370 bilateral– 141 for recurrence (12.2%)– 21 of 141 recurrence were after prior TEP
TEP after TEP14-year experience
• 22 TEP after contralateral TEP– Primary hernia repair 13 months – 12 years
prior– Mean operative time 36 min (20 – 100)– Mean age 56 years (35 – 84)
TEP after TEP14-year experience
• 21 TEP after TEP– After 1995– 18 indirect hernias– 3 direct hernias– Mean operative time 47 min (31 – 120)– Mean age 52 years (29 – 79)
Results
• No bladder injuries– 1 suspected but none found– Jackson Pratt drain placed
• No bowel injuries
• No blood transfusions
• No preperitoneal hematomas
• No mortalities
• All discharged on the day of surgery
RESULTS
• Peritoneal tears– 7 of our patients (33%)– 1 leading to conversion
• 7 required ligation of epigastric vessels– 1 patient’s bleeding led to conversion due to
obscured operative field
Conversions to open
• 5 of 21 cases (24%)
• Reasons to convert:– Space of Retzius cannot be opened (3) – Peritoneal tear causes loss of working space
(1)– Bleeding obscures operative field (1)
PATIENT POSITION
BLUNT FINGER DISSECTION
LIMITED SPACE
7 STEPS
CARDINAL RULES
TOTAL ANATOMY
MESH PLACEMENT
EPIGASTRIC VESSELs
• NEED a drawing with epigastric vessels and hernia medial and lateral and also that if there is a hernia then there is no adhesions
INDIRECT
INDIRECT 2
DIRECT
Lipoma
Video tapes
Conclusion
• TEP after TEP is a feasible option
• Steep learning curve for TEP because of unfamiliar anatomy
• Key to successful TEP is knowledge of the anatomy
• Mastery of the anatomy recommended before attempting TEP after TEP
Conclusion 2
TEP technique – indirect hernia
• Management of sac– Invaginate and reduce– Transect and close proximal end
• Management of cord– Total parietalization with posterior wall is
necessary
TEP technique – indirect hernia
• Cord structures dissected in direction perpendicular to the structures
• Medial approach:– Sweep cord structures posteromedially while holding
sac superolaterally
• Lateral approach:– Pivot hernia sac medially and posteriorly, while
sweeping cord posterolaterally
• Alternate between medial and lateral approaches
TEP technique – direct hernia
• Redundant thickened transversalis and peritoneal sac are demarcated by rolled edge or fold
• Gentle traction and counter traction
• Rarely requires sharp dissection
• Clean adherent tissue off edge of hernia defect
To reduce hernia recurrence
• Mesh must fully cover all potential hernia defects
– Internal inguinal ring– Femoral canal– Hesselbach’s triangle– Obturator canal
TEP after TEP
• Blunt finger dissection and camera dissection– Keep camera in midline as anterior as possible– Dissection plane is anterior to old mesh
• Limited visualization– Small working space: Retzius and contralateral space
does not open up– Pubic tubercle obscured from view by adhesions– Branches of epigastric vessels ligated– External palpation and pulling on testicle to help
orientation
TEP after TEP
• Sharp dissection without cautery• Loss of anatomical landmarks• Epigastric vessels lead to the hernia
– Direct hernia medial to epigastric vessels– Indirect hernia lateral to epigastric vessels– If there is a hernia there will be no adhesions around
it.
• Dissection of sac as described for primary repair• Oversize Mesh placement
Repair of recurrences after endoscopic repair
• Small case series • Technical choices
– Open tension-free Lichtenstein repair– TAPP
• Some have concluded that TAPP is the only possible endoscopic repair choice for these hernias– Liebl et al. (2000) – Felix et al. (1998)
TEP after TEP
• Technical concerns– Prior preperitoneal mesh placement
• Open and laparoscopic
– Re-entry of preperitoneal space limited– Experience of urologists and vascular
surgeons– Some cases impossible – Steep learning curve
TEP after TEP
• Tamme et al. (2003)• 5203 TEP repairs over 7.5 years• 29 of these recurred (0.6%)
– Recurrence rate of first 2 years 1.8% (n = 15/825) – Subsequent recurrence rate 0.3%
• 2 of 29 recurrences treated with TEP after TEP
• TEP recommended for recurrent hernias – but no specific comment on TEP after TEP
Tamme C. et al: TEP: Results of 5203 hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 17:190-195, 2003.
TEP after lower abdominal surgery
• Paterson et al. (2005)• Retrospective review• 47 patients with inguinal hernia• Prior lower abdominal surgery
– 20 appendectomy– 10 lower midline– 18 suprapubic– 5 paramedian
TEP after lower abdominal surgery
• TEP repairs for all 47 hernias– 35 unilateral – 12 bilateral
• 2 conversions to open• No complications• No early or late recurrences
• TEP can be carried out safely in the presence of scars from previous lower abdominal surgery
Paterson H. et al: Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair in patients with previous lower abdominal surgery. Hernia June 24, 2005.
TEP after TEP14-year experience
• Cause of recurrence– Missed hernia – Migration of mesh
TEP technique
• Positioning– Supine, slightly flexed, slight Trendelenburg– Arms tucked– Monitor at feet
• General endotracheal anesthesia• Rectus fascia incision over left or right
rectus muscle• Blunt extraperitoneal finger dissection in
midline toward pubic symphysis
TEP technique
• 3 ports– 10-mm infraumbilical camera port– 2 lower midline 5-mm ports
• CO2 insufflation to 10 mm Hg
• 10-mm 30-degree operative scope
• 5-mm trocars inserted under vision
• Sharp lysis of adhesions without cautery
TEP technique
• Anatomical landmarks– Midline pubic symphysis – Cooper’s ligament– Hesselbach’s triangle– Transverse abdominis muscle
• For better visualization– Divide small branches of epigastric vessels– Maintain excellent hemostasis