55
IMAGING OF ENLARGED LYMPH NODE. Head and Neck Imaging. Ehab Abo-Ulfotouh Helal. Lecture Of Radio-Diagnosis.

Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

IMAGING OF ENLARGED LYMPH NODE.

Head and Neck Imaging.Ehab Abo-Ulfotouh Helal.

Lecture Of Radio-Diagnosis.

Page 2: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

An oval-shaped organ of the immune system.

Distributed widely throughout the body.

Linked by lymphatic vessels.

Lymph nodes act as filters for foreign particles.

Become enlarged in various conditions.

Lymph Node structures:

Page 3: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Lymph Node structures:

Page 4: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Radiological anatomy:

Page 5: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Radiological anatomy:

Page 6: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Radiological anatomy:

Page 7: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Radiological anatomy:

Page 8: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Head and neck carcinomas are the sixth most common malignancy reported worldwide.

LN metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in patients with head and neck carcinoma.

The major goals of diagnostic imaging in these patients is accurate prediction of LN metastasis.

Not only for the planning of appropriate treatment but also for monitoring the treatment response.

Imaging of enlarged LN on head and neck:

Page 9: Imaging of enlarged lymph node
Page 10: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Size: The size of LN

cannot be used as the sole criterion in DD.

An increase in LN size on serial examinations.

Changes in the size of malignant nodes.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 11: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Nodal Borders& margins:

Metastatic nodes have sharp borders.

Due to tumor infiltration and reduced fatty deposition within LN .

Increased acoustic impedance difference between LN and the surrounding tissues.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 12: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Reactive nodes usually show un-sharp borders.

Un-sharp borders due to edema & inflammation of surrounding soft tissue.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 13: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Shape Feature: Malignant and TB

nodes round.

Reactive and normal nodes usually oval.

The L/S ratio was used to characterize this feature.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 14: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Medulla Ratio & distribution:

If the difference between 2 parts was less than 30%.

This node was considered absence of medulla.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 15: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

The distances from each edge to the centroid of the medulla were measured.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 16: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Echogeneity: Homogeneous hypo-

echoic pattern with preserved echo-genic hilum mainly observed in benign nodes.

Heterogeneous and anechoic patterns with loss echogenic hilum are observed in metastatic nodes.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 17: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Normal and reactive nodes predo-minantly hypo-echoic.

Metastatic nodes

may be hypo or mixed hypo and eccenteric hyper-echoic component.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 18: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Vascular Pattern: Normal and reactive

lymph nodes tend to have central hilar vascular pattern.

club- or Y-shaped and extended from the extra-nodal area into deep portion of the node.

May be appear as apparently a-vascular lesion.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 19: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Metastatic and lympho-matous nodes usually show peripheral or mixed vascularity.

The presence of peripheral vascularity strongly suggesting of a pathologic process.

Sonographic Feature of Cervical Lymph Nodes:

Page 20: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Nodal parenchyma exhibited homogeneous and low echogenicity.

Regular margin and oval or flattened in shape.

The hilum was identified as a highly echogenic structure in the central part of the node.

On power Doppler, usually hypovascular or has hilar vascular pattern.

U/S Feature of reactive LN:

Page 21: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Ill defined margin of enlarged LN.

Central decreased echogenicity.

Loss hilum.

On power Doppler, increase peripheral vascularity.

U/S Feature of suppurative LN:

Page 22: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Nodal parenchyma exhibited inhomogeneous low or mixed echogenicity.

Irregular margin with round shape.

Sharp borders.

Loss of normal hilar echogenicity.

On power Doppler sonograms, has peripheral or mixed vascular pattern.

U/S Feature of metastatic LN:

Page 23: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

U/S Feature of metastatic LN:

Page 24: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

CT SCAN: scanning orientation was parallel to the

Frankfurt horizontal line.

Start point at skull base down to the level of aortic arch.

3 mm in thickness.

A collimation of 3 mm, a pitch of 1:1, a matrix of 512x512, a display field of view of 23 cm, 120 kVp, and 200 mA.

CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING:

Page 25: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Was carried out after an IV bolus injection of contrast material 100 mL (2 mL/kg of body weight), at a rate of 1.0 mL/sec.

Started scanning 80 sec after the start of contrast medium injection.

Completed in 50–60 sec after the start of scanning.

The scanning period (80–140 sec after the start of contrast medium injection) was confirmed to be the time when the lymph node showed appropriate contrast enhancement against neck muscles.

CT SCAN:

Page 26: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

A. short- and long-axis diameters of the node:

Short-axis diameter: was used as a size criterion. Average short-axis lengths of nodes at level I: 7

(reactive) and 11 mm (metastatic). Level II: 7 (reactive) and 13 mm (metastatic). Level III, VI and V: 6 (reactive) and 10 mm

(metastatic).

A long axis diameter of more than 10 mm plus a long-to-short-axis ratio of less than 1.6, suggesting metastatic node.

CT scan criteria:

Page 27: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

CT scan criteria:

Page 28: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

B. Assessment of changes in the internal architecture:

The presence or absence of necrosis, We considered an area of low attenuation (10–18 HU) to be evidence of nodal necrosis.

The margin, categorized as well or ill defined.

Enhancement pattern, described as homogeneous or heterogeneous .

CT scan criteria:

Page 29: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

CT scan criteria:

Page 30: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Discrete, smooth and well-defined kidney or cigar shaped soft-tissue structures .

The hilum composed of fat tissue attenuation.

No necrosis.

Homogenous and uniform, enhancing criteria and attenuation.

CT feature of Non metastatic nodes:

Page 31: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Rounded shape with ill defined margin.

The long-to-short axis ratio decreases.

Eccentric cortical hypertrophy.

Central necrotic content.

Heterogeneous enhancing pattern.

CT feature of metastatic nodes:

Page 32: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Ill defined peripheral enhancing thick wall.

Intra-nodal septation.

Central hypo-dense non enhancing fluid collection.

Marked stranding of adjacent fat ?cellulitis.

CT feature of suppurative nodes:

Page 33: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Conventional MRI criteria used in clinical imaging studies are morphologic criteria including:

A. Maximum short axial diameter. B. Presence of necrosis and loss of LN hilum. C. Heterogeneous enhancement and peri-nodal infiltration.

A size criterion and presence of necrosis are relatively objective.

But the other criteria are less objective and dependent on the interpretation of the radiologist.

MR imaging of Benign and Malignant Nodes:

Page 34: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

2D-Single-Shot Diffusion-Weighted Echo Planer Imaging (ss DWEPI ) has been applied to head and neck imaging.

DWEPI provides a quantitative measurement of the ADC of water protons in tissue.

ADC value can be used to differentiate malignant LNs from benign LNs.

Can be a marker for prediction and early detection of chemo-radiation therapy response.

DWEPI also can be used for the early detection of recurrence.

MR imaging of Benign and Malignant Nodes:

Page 35: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Axial DW images of cervical lymph nodes were obtained by using a neurovascular array coil.

The sequence was repeated for two different values of gradients (b = 500 and 1000 s/mm2).

The section thickness was 5 mm.

Was performed with a matrix of 128 /128, field of view of 24 cm, and an intersection gap of 1 mm.

To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, the sequence was repeated four times for each imaging.

MR imaging of Benign and Malignant Nodes:

Page 36: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Hilum Structure of the Nodes:

The hilar fat, has high-intensity area on T1WIs and a low-intensity area on fat suppressedT2WIs.

The vessels may be evident in the hilum on T1WIs and fat suppressed T2WIs.

MR Imaging analysis:

Page 37: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Was lost at a metastatic nodes.

Narrowed or also lost in nodal lymphomas.

Preserved hilum was noted on benign LN.

MR Imaging analysis:

Page 38: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Margins of the Nodes: T1-weighted and fat suppression

imaging was good for the depiction of nodal margins.

Nodal margins blending into surrounding tissue were found in metastatic nodes.

Irregular margins were found in lymphomas.

Regular borders were found on benign nodes.

MR Imaging analysis:

Page 39: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Parenchymal architecture: Metastatic nodes frequently

exhibited heterogeneous architecture of the parenchyma on T1- or fat-suppressed T2-weighted.

Metastatic nodes contained hypo to intermediately intense areas indicative of cancer cell nests and interstitial fibrous tissue.

With or without central hyper-intense areas indicative of liquefaction necrosis on fat-suppressed T2.

MR Imaging analysis:

Page 40: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

MR Imaging analysis:

Page 41: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Basically lymphomas exhibited homogeneous

architecture.

Heterogeneous architecture of the nodal ymphomas was significantly low compared with metastatic nodes.

heterogeneity in the nodal architecture may be due to the presence of necrotic areas.

Associated with narrowed hilum and blood vessels inside, which were depicted as so-called small-vessel sign.

MR Imaging analysis:

Page 42: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

MR Imaging analysis:

Page 43: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

The ADC of metastatic nodes equal to or greater than 0.73 × 10–3 mm2/sec.

ADC of the Nodes:

Page 44: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

On lymphoma, it had an ADC equal to or less than 0.51 × 10–3 mm2/sec.

Due to increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio and hyper-cellularity.

Reduce the extracellular matrix and the diffusion space of water protons in the extracellular and intracellular dimensions.

ADC of the Nodes:

Page 45: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

ADC of the Nodes: The ADC of benign nodes (0.652 ± 0.101 × 10–3 mm2/sec).

Page 46: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

PET using the radio-labeled glucose analog 18F-FDG has great importance in lymph node imaging.

PET supplies a semi-quantitative metabolic characterization of tissues that may help to predict tumor behavior.

The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET for identification of lymph node metastases on a neck level-by-level basis were higher than those of CT/MRI.

The incorporation of functional information derived from PET has the potential factor to improve prognostic stratification and treatment planning for patients.

PET and PET/CT of the Neck Lymph Nodes:

Page 47: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Negative prognostic factors were noted including: A- Extra capsular spread (ECS).

B- Close or positive margins.

C- Peri-neural invasion.

D- Poor differentiation of tumor depth, and the number of metastatic neck lymph nodes.

PET and PET/CT of the Neck Lymph Nodes:

Page 48: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Patients were instructed to fast for 6 h before the PET study. 18F-FDG was administered intravenously. For PET/CT scans, oral contrast was administered to

patients during the uptake time. No IV contrast material was administered for CT scans. Head to mid thigh scans were obtained for all patients. PET and CT images were acquired 50 min after the injection

of 18F-FDG. PET, CT, and fused PET/CT images were available for review

and were displayed in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. PET data were displayed as non-corrected and attenuation-

corrected images as well as in a rotating MIP.

PET and PET/CT of the Neck Lymph Nodes:

Page 49: Imaging of enlarged lymph node
Page 50: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

Area of increased 18F-FDG uptake with intensity higher than that of surrounding tissues and did not correspond to the physiologic bio-distribution of the radiotracer, were defined as positive.

18F-FDG activity only in areas of the physiologic tracer bio-distribution or no sites of increased uptake were considered negative.

The highest activity within a region of interest was measured.

The standardized uptake value (SUV) was determined as the highest activity concentration per injected dose per body weight (kg).

PET and PET/CT of the Neck Lymph Nodes:

Page 51: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

18F-FDG uptake was graded visually on the following 5-point scale:

0-definitely benign, no uptake.

1-probably benign, 2.3 (range, 1.4–4.0).

2-equivocal, 2.6 (range, 1.4–4.4).

3-probablymalignant, 3.5 (range, 2.1–7.9).

4-definitely malignant, 6.6 (range, 2.6–24.5).

SUV of 3.1 was used as the cutoff for positive PET results.

PET and PET/CT of the Neck Lymph Nodes:

Page 52: Imaging of enlarged lymph node
Page 53: Imaging of enlarged lymph node
Page 54: Imaging of enlarged lymph node
Page 55: Imaging of enlarged lymph node

THANK YOU