55

NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation for Network Biology SIG 2013 by Vuk Janjic, Imperial College London, UK. “A Journey to the Core of Human Disease”

Citation preview

Page 1: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic
Page 2: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Outline

Background

MethodsDataConstructing the networksGraphletsK-core decomposition

The Core DiseasomeTopological uniquenessFunctional annotationDrug targetsComputing the Core Diseasome

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected]

Page 3: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Outline

Background

MethodsDataConstructing the networksGraphletsK-core decomposition

The Core DiseasomeTopological uniquenessFunctional annotationDrug targetsComputing the Core Diseasome

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected]

Page 4: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Background

I A LOT of system-level biological data due to advances inbiotechnology

I We’re looking for a “core subnetwork” of the humanprotein-protein interaction (PPI) network in which genes (theirprotein products) involved in a multitude of diseases reside

I No a priori knowledge of genes’ involvement in disease and byusing k-core decomposition

I Other studies have used a similar approach, but with adifferent goal in mind

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 1/17

Page 5: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Background

I A LOT of system-level biological data due to advances inbiotechnology

I We’re looking for a “core subnetwork” of the humanprotein-protein interaction (PPI) network in which genes (theirprotein products) involved in a multitude of diseases reside

I No a priori knowledge of genes’ involvement in disease and byusing k-core decomposition

I Other studies have used a similar approach, but with adifferent goal in mind

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 1/17

Page 6: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Background

I A LOT of system-level biological data due to advances inbiotechnology

I We’re looking for a “core subnetwork” of the humanprotein-protein interaction (PPI) network in which genes (theirprotein products) involved in a multitude of diseases reside

I No a priori knowledge of genes’ involvement in disease and byusing k-core decomposition

I Other studies have used a similar approach, but with adifferent goal in mind

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 1/17

Page 7: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Background

I A LOT of system-level biological data due to advances inbiotechnology

I We’re looking for a “core subnetwork” of the humanprotein-protein interaction (PPI) network in which genes (theirprotein products) involved in a multitude of diseases reside

I No a priori knowledge of genes’ involvement in disease and byusing k-core decomposition

I Other studies have used a similar approach, but with adifferent goal in mind

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 1/17

Page 8: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Outline

Background

MethodsDataConstructing the networksGraphletsK-core decomposition

The Core DiseasomeTopological uniquenessFunctional annotationDrug targetsComputing the Core Diseasome

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected]

Page 9: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Data

# of nodes # of edges ReferenceProtein-protein 11,100 56,708 HPRD, BioGRID

Genetic 274 281 BioGRIDDisease-gene 561 / 4,004 4,029 Disease Ontology

(diseases/genes)

Table: Interaction data

Janjić V. & Pržulj N., Molecular BioSystems, 8, 2614-2625 (2012).

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 2/17

Page 10: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 11: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 12: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 13: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

2-node

graphlet

4-node graphlets3-node graphlets

5-node graphlets

G0 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8

0

1

2

34

5 6

7

8

10

11

9

13

12

14

G9 G10 G11 G12 G13 G14 G15 G16 G17 G18 G19

G20 G21 G22 G23 G24 G25 G26 G27 G28 G29

15

16

17

18

20

21

19

22

23

25

26

24

29

30

28

27

32

31

33

34 36

37

38

35 39

42

40

4143

44

46

48

47

45

50

49

52

53

51 54

5557

58

56 59

61

60

63

64

62

6567

66

68

69

70

71

72

Figure: Graphlets with automorphism orbits.

Pržulj N., Bioinformatics, 23, e177-e183 (2007).

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 14: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 15: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 16: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 17: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 18: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.53 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 19: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

3-core

2-core

1-core

Figure: A three-level deep k-core decomposition of a network.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 20: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.5 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 21: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.5 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 22: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Constructing the networks

Table: Basic network properties for our four networks

H-ALL H-SIM REST CORENumber of nodes 11,100 1,706 8,227 88Number of edges 56,807 8,655 24,730 865

Clustering coefficient 0.125 0.173 0.102 0.462Diameter 13 9 16 3

Radius 7 5 8 2Avg. degree 10.23 10.14 4.53 19.65

Avg. path length 3.69 3.48 4.5 1.87

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 3/17

Page 23: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Outline

Background

MethodsDataConstructing the networksGraphletsK-core decomposition

The Core DiseasomeTopological uniquenessFunctional annotationDrug targetsComputing the Core Diseasome

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected]

Page 24: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Topological uniqueness

Maxim um EC = 10.52%

Algorithm executions 1-4,000

Edg

e c

orr

ectn

ess (

%)

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 4/17

Page 25: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

I Statistics performed using:I hypergeometric testI H-ALL as the background modelI Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate correction for

multiple hypothesis testing

I Enriched Molecular Function Gene Ontology (GO) termsI enzyme binding, transcription factor binding, transcription

regulator activity, DNA binding, promoter bindingI Enriched Biological Process GO terms (mostly regulatory)

I positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process,positive regulation of cellular biosynthetic process, response toorganic substance, regulation of cell proliferation, positiveregulation of gene expression

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 5/17

Page 26: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

I Statistics performed using:I hypergeometric testI H-ALL as the background modelI Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate correction for

multiple hypothesis testingI Enriched Molecular Function Gene Ontology (GO) terms

I enzyme binding, transcription factor binding, transcriptionregulator activity, DNA binding, promoter binding

I Enriched Biological Process GO terms (mostly regulatory)I positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process,

positive regulation of cellular biosynthetic process, response toorganic substance, regulation of cell proliferation, positiveregulation of gene expression

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 5/17

Page 27: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

I Statistics performed using:I hypergeometric testI H-ALL as the background modelI Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate correction for

multiple hypothesis testingI Enriched Molecular Function Gene Ontology (GO) terms

I enzyme binding, transcription factor binding, transcriptionregulator activity, DNA binding, promoter binding

I Enriched Biological Process GO terms (mostly regulatory)I positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process,

positive regulation of cellular biosynthetic process, response toorganic substance, regulation of cell proliferation, positiveregulation of gene expression

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 5/17

Page 28: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

Table: Regulation of cell death and apoptosis enrichment.

regulation of cell death regulation of apoptosis(GO:10941) (GO:42981)

H-ALL 8.9% 8.8%H-SIM 19.9% (p = 8.59× 10−60) 19.8% (p = 1.13× 10−59)REST no enrichment no enrichmentCORE 32.1% (p = 6.93× 10−10) 29.8% (p = 1.1× 10−8)

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 6/17

Page 29: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

I Top 1% hubs contain only 9 (out of 185) apoptosis annotatedproteins

I These 9 are evenly split between H-SIM and REST (5 are inH-SIM and 4 in REST)

I Cell death has no annotated proteins in the top 1% of hubs.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 7/17

Page 30: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

I Top 1% hubs contain only 9 (out of 185) apoptosis annotatedproteins

I These 9 are evenly split between H-SIM and REST (5 are inH-SIM and 4 in REST)

I Cell death has no annotated proteins in the top 1% of hubs.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 7/17

Page 31: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

I Top 1% hubs contain only 9 (out of 185) apoptosis annotatedproteins

I These 9 are evenly split between H-SIM and REST (5 are inH-SIM and 4 in REST)

I Cell death has no annotated proteins in the top 1% of hubs.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 7/17

Page 32: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Functional annotation

I Could the Core Diseasome be capturing genes causal todiseases for which we generally have no effective cure,including cancer, hematologic diseases, neurodegenerativediseases, progression of viral and HIV infection?

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 8/17

Page 33: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Driver genes

I Genetic interactions are increasingly starting to show that avery small number of genetic changes may trigger diseaseonset. These mutations are usually called driver mutations.

Ashworth A. et al., Cell, 145, 30–38, (2011).

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 9/17

Page 34: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Driver genes

I We verify that CORE genes:I are enriched in genetic interactions (GIs)

I 22 of them participate in 21 GIs within CORE (p = 10−16)I 32 of them participate in 100 GIs total (including 59 genes

outside of core)

I capture 15 driver genes (both known and predicted).

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 10/17

Page 35: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Driver genes

I We verify that CORE genes:I are enriched in genetic interactions (GIs)

I 22 of them participate in 21 GIs within CORE (p = 10−16)I 32 of them participate in 100 GIs total (including 59 genes

outside of core)I capture 15 driver genes (both known and predicted).

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 10/17

Page 36: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Driver genes

SIN3A

NCOR1

HDAC5

PMLGATA1

CTBP1

SUMO1

RUNX1

SMARCB1SMARCC1

UBE2I

ETS1

DAXX

RUNX2

SMARCA4

CEBPA MYOD1

SMAD3

RARA

HDAC4

NCOR2SP1

EP300

HDAC3

RXRA

MYC

TP73

CEBPB

KAT2BJUN

CREBBPBRCA1

SMARCA2

SMAD4

POLR2A

STUB1SMAD2

NCOA2

CCND1

CDKN1A

HIF1A

MDM2

PARP1

CSNK2A1

RELA

CAV1

ABL1

HSPA8

HSPA4

UBC

HSP90AA1

PAK1

EGFR

RAF1

MST1R

ERBB2

KHDRBS1

CASP3

CHUK

CTNNB1

ESR1

FOXO1RB1AKT1

AR ESR2

PTPN11LYN

PTK2B CRK

CRKL

KIT

CBL

PTPN6

PLCG1

LCKJAK2

PIK3R1INSR

BCR

EPOR

IRS1

SHC1

PTPN1

IGF1R

PTK2

BCAR1

PXN

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 11/17

Page 37: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Drug targets

I Amongst the 22 genes participating in genetic interactionswithin CORE, there are 11 drug targets linked to 116 distinctdrugs (p = 8.64× 10−5)

MDM2MDM2

JUNJUN

RB1RB1

ARAR

SMAD2SMAD2

NCOA2NCOA2

KAT2BKAT2BCCND1CCND1

ESR1ESR1

CTNNB1CTNNB1

CREBBPCREBBP

I Out of these 11 drug targets, 3 aretargeted by 23 or more drugs:ESR1 is targeted by 61 differentdrugs, AR by 40, and NCOA2 by23. (the p-value of any targetbeing hit by more than 22 drugs is0.0017)

I 2 known driver genes in CORE aredrug targets: RB1 and CTNNB1

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 12/17

Page 38: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Drug targets

I Amongst the 22 genes participating in genetic interactionswithin CORE, there are 11 drug targets linked to 116 distinctdrugs (p = 8.64× 10−5)

MDM2MDM2

JUNJUN

RB1RB1

ARAR

SMAD2SMAD2

NCOA2NCOA2

KAT2BKAT2BCCND1CCND1

ESR1ESR1

CTNNB1CTNNB1

CREBBPCREBBP

I Out of these 11 drug targets, 3 aretargeted by 23 or more drugs:ESR1 is targeted by 61 differentdrugs, AR by 40, and NCOA2 by23. (the p-value of any targetbeing hit by more than 22 drugs is0.0017)

I 2 known driver genes in CORE aredrug targets: RB1 and CTNNB1

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 12/17

Page 39: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Drug targets

I Amongst the 22 genes participating in genetic interactionswithin CORE, there are 11 drug targets linked to 116 distinctdrugs (p = 8.64× 10−5)

MDM2MDM2

JUNJUN

RB1RB1

ARAR

SMAD2SMAD2

NCOA2NCOA2

KAT2BKAT2BCCND1CCND1

ESR1ESR1

CTNNB1CTNNB1

CREBBPCREBBP

I Out of these 11 drug targets, 3 aretargeted by 23 or more drugs:ESR1 is targeted by 61 differentdrugs, AR by 40, and NCOA2 by23. (the p-value of any targetbeing hit by more than 22 drugs is0.0017)

I 2 known driver genes in CORE aredrug targets: RB1 and CTNNB1

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 12/17

Page 40: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Computing the Core Diseasome

Breast cancer

Prostate cancer

Leukemia

Yersinia infection

Adenovirus infection

Rheumatoid arthritis

Embryoma

Alzheimer's disease

Systemic scleroderma

Lymphoma

Parkinson disease

Melanoma

Colon cancer

Brain tumor

Eating disorder

CoreDiseasome

(88 genes)

H-ALL Core(17 genes)

H-SIM Core(12 genes)

Linked via

57 intermediary genes

and 175 edges

Linked via

57 intermediary genes

and 175 edges

BCL2

BCL3

CARM1

CASP8

E2F1

GNB2L1

HSF1

IKBKB

AHR

ARNT

CSK

GAB2

HIPK2

MEN1

NG1

JAK1

KAT5

KRT18

MAPK14

MDM4

RBBP4

SMARCE1

TSC2

MYB

NCK1

NEDD9

PIAS3

SKI

SOS1

BCL2

BCL3

CARM1

CASP8

E2F1

GNB2L1

HSF1

IKBKB

AHR

ARNT

CSK

GAB2

HIPK2

MEN1

NG1

JAK1

KAT5

KRT18

MAPK14

MDM4

RBBP4

SMARCE1

TSC2

MYB

NCK1

NEDD9

PIAS3

SKI

SOS1

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 13/17

Page 41: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Outline

Background

MethodsDataConstructing the networksGraphletsK-core decomposition

The Core DiseasomeTopological uniquenessFunctional annotationDrug targetsComputing the Core Diseasome

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected]

Page 42: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

I Cardio-vascular disease (CVD)

I Interlogous Interaction Database (I2D), Jurisica Lab @Toronto

I around 15,000 nodes and 173,000 interactions (60,000predicted interactions)

I Study identifies 10 “Key CVD proteins” via clustering methodsI All 10 “key” CVD proteins captured by k-core decomp. of:

I the whole PPI network (p = 10−11)I induced CVD network (p = 10−10)

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 14/17

Page 43: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

I Cardio-vascular disease (CVD)I Interlogous Interaction Database (I2D), Jurisica Lab @

TorontoI around 15,000 nodes and 173,000 interactions (60,000

predicted interactions)

I Study identifies 10 “Key CVD proteins” via clustering methodsI All 10 “key” CVD proteins captured by k-core decomp. of:

I the whole PPI network (p = 10−11)I induced CVD network (p = 10−10)

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 14/17

Page 44: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

I Cardio-vascular disease (CVD)I Interlogous Interaction Database (I2D), Jurisica Lab @

TorontoI around 15,000 nodes and 173,000 interactions (60,000

predicted interactions)

I Study identifies 10 “Key CVD proteins” via clustering methods

I All 10 “key” CVD proteins captured by k-core decomp. of:I the whole PPI network (p = 10−11)I induced CVD network (p = 10−10)

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 14/17

Page 45: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

I Cardio-vascular disease (CVD)I Interlogous Interaction Database (I2D), Jurisica Lab @

TorontoI around 15,000 nodes and 173,000 interactions (60,000

predicted interactions)

I Study identifies 10 “Key CVD proteins” via clustering methodsI All 10 “key” CVD proteins captured by k-core decomp. of:

I the whole PPI network (p = 10−11)I induced CVD network (p = 10−10)

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 14/17

Page 46: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

SMARCC1

ETS1

SMARCB1

RUNX1

SMARCA4

RUNX2

NCOR1

SMAD3

CTBP1

HDAC5

KAT2B

GATA1

UBE2I

SIN3A

JUN

MYOD1

PML

SUMO1

ESR2

EP300HDAC4

NCOR2

RXRA

CREBBP

CHUK

DAXX

ESR1

RB1

CASP3

CSNK2A1

SMAD4

MYC

SMAD2

HSP90AA1

HSPA8

ABL1

UBC

CAV1

SMARCA2

LCK

EGFR

KHDRBS1

RAF1

MST1R

PTPN6

PAK1

ERBB2

STUB1

JAK2

POLR2A

TP73

HSPA4

CEBPA

BRCA1

CEBPB

AR

AKT1

CTNNB1

PARP1

NCOA2CCND1RELA

HIF1A

HDAC3

RARA

MDM2

CDKN1A

FOXO1

SP1

KIT

CBL

CRKL

PLCG1EPOR

PXN

BCAR1

PTK2

IGF1R

PTPN1

IRS1

SHC1INSR

LYN

PTK2BCRK

PTPN11

PIK3R1

BCR

8 Key CVD genes

8 validated CVD gene predictions

2 non-valdated CVD gene predictions

11 drug targets

5 driver gene

Sarajlic, A. et al., PLoS One, in press (2013)

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 15/17

Page 47: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Outline

Background

MethodsDataConstructing the networksGraphletsK-core decomposition

The Core DiseasomeTopological uniquenessFunctional annotationDrug targetsComputing the Core Diseasome

Key cardio-vascular disease genes

G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected]

Page 48: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

G-protein coupled receptors

I New unpublished interaction network of human G-proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs) from Štagljar Lab (U-of-T)

I The whole GPCR network is basically a signal transduction“backbone” of the human PPI network — it’s wiring allows itto quickly reach all parts of the interactome

I The “core” of this GPCR network has 68 interactions between25 proteins

I Its “core” proteins primarily expressed in brain, and involved ina range of personality and behavioural disorders:

I attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, weight gain, bipolardisorder, antipsychotic agent-induced weight gain, attentiondeficit disorder / conduct disorder / oppositional defiantdisorder, schizophrenia, weight loss, obesity, mood disorders,tardive dyskinesia, and personality traits.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 16/17

Page 49: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

G-protein coupled receptors

I New unpublished interaction network of human G-proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs) from Štagljar Lab (U-of-T)

I The whole GPCR network is basically a signal transduction“backbone” of the human PPI network — it’s wiring allows itto quickly reach all parts of the interactome

I The “core” of this GPCR network has 68 interactions between25 proteins

I Its “core” proteins primarily expressed in brain, and involved ina range of personality and behavioural disorders:

I attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, weight gain, bipolardisorder, antipsychotic agent-induced weight gain, attentiondeficit disorder / conduct disorder / oppositional defiantdisorder, schizophrenia, weight loss, obesity, mood disorders,tardive dyskinesia, and personality traits.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 16/17

Page 50: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

G-protein coupled receptors

I New unpublished interaction network of human G-proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs) from Štagljar Lab (U-of-T)

I The whole GPCR network is basically a signal transduction“backbone” of the human PPI network — it’s wiring allows itto quickly reach all parts of the interactome

I The “core” of this GPCR network has 68 interactions between25 proteins

I Its “core” proteins primarily expressed in brain, and involved ina range of personality and behavioural disorders:

I attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, weight gain, bipolardisorder, antipsychotic agent-induced weight gain, attentiondeficit disorder / conduct disorder / oppositional defiantdisorder, schizophrenia, weight loss, obesity, mood disorders,tardive dyskinesia, and personality traits.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 16/17

Page 51: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

G-protein coupled receptors

I New unpublished interaction network of human G-proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs) from Štagljar Lab (U-of-T)

I The whole GPCR network is basically a signal transduction“backbone” of the human PPI network — it’s wiring allows itto quickly reach all parts of the interactome

I The “core” of this GPCR network has 68 interactions between25 proteins

I Its “core” proteins primarily expressed in brain, and involved ina range of personality and behavioural disorders:

I attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, weight gain, bipolardisorder, antipsychotic agent-induced weight gain, attentiondeficit disorder / conduct disorder / oppositional defiantdisorder, schizophrenia, weight loss, obesity, mood disorders,tardive dyskinesia, and personality traits.

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 16/17

Page 52: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

We’ve seen that. . . (i.e., take-home messages)

I A sub-network of the human PPI network exist, such that it’stopology is unique within that context and it captures diseasegenes, driver genes and their drug targets

I ...and it can be obtained purely computationallyI Usability of the “core” approach in identifying therapeutically

relevant regions of the interactome in two case studies —Cardiovascular disease and G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 17/17

Page 53: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

We’ve seen that. . . (i.e., take-home messages)

I A sub-network of the human PPI network exist, such that it’stopology is unique within that context and it captures diseasegenes, driver genes and their drug targets

I ...and it can be obtained purely computationally

I Usability of the “core” approach in identifying therapeuticallyrelevant regions of the interactome in two case studies —Cardiovascular disease and G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 17/17

Page 54: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

We’ve seen that. . . (i.e., take-home messages)

I A sub-network of the human PPI network exist, such that it’stopology is unique within that context and it captures diseasegenes, driver genes and their drug targets

I ...and it can be obtained purely computationallyI Usability of the “core” approach in identifying therapeutically

relevant regions of the interactome in two case studies —Cardiovascular disease and G-protein coupled receptors

Imperial College London Vuk Janjić [email protected] 17/17

Page 55: NetBioSIG2013-Talk Vuk Janjic

Questions...