33
Primary Total Hip Replacement Cemented vs Un cemented

THR cemented vs uncementd

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: THR cemented vs uncementd

Primary Total Hip ReplacementCemented vs Un cemented

Page 2: THR cemented vs uncementd

Total Hip ReplacementTypes ( based on fixation technique )

• Cemented• Un cemented• Hybrid• Reverse hybrid

Page 3: THR cemented vs uncementd

Implant selection

• Patients age• Underlying bone pathology• Type of medullary canal

DORR classification

Page 4: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cemented stems

• Elderly patients , particularly females• Inflammatory and metabolic bone disease• Cylindrical morphology of proximal femur ( DORR C )

Page 5: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cement less stems

• Younger and relatively younger patients• AVN, osteoarthritis, Post traumatic arthritis• Funnel shaped proximal femur ( DORR A )

Page 6: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cemented stem designs

• Taper slip• Composite beam

Page 7: THR cemented vs uncementd

Taper slip design

• Collar less, tapered• Subsidence results in tighter wedging• Shear converted into compressive stresses

Page 8: THR cemented vs uncementd

Composite beam design

• Collared• Rough surface• Co-Chrome (stiff ) stem• Strain on cement mantle reduced

Page 9: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cementing technique

• Broach only technique• Antibiotic cement• Third generation cementing• Uniform cement mantle 2 to 3 mm thick

Page 10: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cement less ( Press fit ) designs

• Tapered• Cylindrical• Anatomic

Page 11: THR cemented vs uncementd

Tapered stem design

First generation• Load femur proximally only• Proximally coated• Tapered AP and ML• No collarSecond generation• Rotational ridges and polished tip

Page 12: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cylindrical stem design

First generation• Cylindrical distally and distal press fit• Extensively porous coated• Usually collaredSecond generation• Better proximal fit• Distal flutes and coronal slots• Polished tip

Page 13: THR cemented vs uncementd

Anatomic stem design

First generation• Better proximal fill and fit• Anteverted necks ( right and left )• Significant thigh pain and osteolysis

Second generation• Bowed tip eliminated• Flattened posterior and lateral sides

Page 14: THR cemented vs uncementd

Types of porous coatingSecondary stability

• Sintering• Diffusion bonding• Plasma spraying

Optimal pore size 100 to 400 µm

Page 15: THR cemented vs uncementd

Interphase dynamics

• Gap should be < 0.5 mm• Micro motion should be < 50 µm

Page 16: THR cemented vs uncementd

Ceramic coating

• Hydroxyapatite • Tri calcium phosphate

• Fills Bone Implant gaps• Bioactive and bio-absorbable

• Particulate disease• Heterotopic bone

Page 17: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cemented acetabular component

All poly cup

• Hypotensive anaesthesia• Good cancellous bed• Proper cement pressurization

Page 18: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cement less acetabular component

• Hemispheric cups with porous coating• Fixation with press fit or screws

Page 19: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cement less acetabular component

• Screw holes eliminated or reduced• Polished inner surface• Improved socket liner conformity and locking

Page 20: THR cemented vs uncementd

Out comes

• Medium and long time Survival rates are good for both types of femoral components

• Pelvic osteolysis is still a problem with both types of cups

• Loosening is a problem with cemented acetabular components after the first decade

Page 21: THR cemented vs uncementd

Technique and time

Cemented THR is technically more demanding

• Blood less field• Cement pressurization• Uniform and homogenous cement mantle

Page 22: THR cemented vs uncementd

Post op. weight bearing

Cemented immediate

Un cemented 4 to 6 weeks immediate if fill and fit is good

Page 23: THR cemented vs uncementd

Peri-prosthetic fractures

• More common with un cemented• More on the femoral side and in elderly

females

• Intra op. fractures 0.3 % ( cemented ) 5.4 % ( un cemented ) ( Mayo clinic registry )

Page 24: THR cemented vs uncementd

Deep infections

No difference between the types-

when Cemented THR is done with antibiotic impregnated cement

Page 25: THR cemented vs uncementd

Dislocations

More common with un cemented due to imperfect version and soft tissue balancing

Page 26: THR cemented vs uncementd

Cost

• Manufacturing cost of un cemented implants is more

• With cemented THR - cement , related equipment, increased operating room time

• Cost difference is $ 300

Page 27: THR cemented vs uncementd

Recent Trends

Swedish Hip Registry 2008 Australian Jt Registry 2009

Page 28: THR cemented vs uncementd

Summary Cemented or un cemented

Elderly patients , particularly females with poor bone quality ----- cemented hip.

Otherwise ------ un cemented hip

Page 29: THR cemented vs uncementd

SummaryUn cemented hips

Implants

Femur Tapered, proximally coated Acetabulum Hemispheric cup without holes

Page 30: THR cemented vs uncementd

SummaryUn cemented hips

• Appropriate implant size• Careful insertion• Primary implant stability with press fit For adequate osseous integration• Literature does not support routine usage of

ceramic coated implants

Page 31: THR cemented vs uncementd

SummaryCemented hips

Implants

Femur tapered, collar less, smooth surface Acetabulum Highly cross linked all poly

Page 32: THR cemented vs uncementd

SummaryCemented hips

• Blood less cancellous acetabular bed• Cement pressurization

• Third generation cementing technique• Uniform, homogenous cement mantle

• Be ware of embolic manifestations in cardio-pulmonary compromised patients

Page 33: THR cemented vs uncementd

Thank you