46
z Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation PLANS presented by Tom Sigmund December 18, 2014

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

PLANSpresented by Tom SigmundDecember 18, 2014

Page 2: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

“undermine integrity/reputation of legal professionals”

are we talking about?WHAT

Page 3: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Deferred Compensation Arrangement

An unsecured, unfunded promise to pay to a select group of management or highly

compensated employees

Page 4: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Comes in All Shapes + Sizes

Defined Contribution Plan

Defined Benefit

Plan

Equity-Based Plan

SARs

Stock Options

Phantom Stock Plans

Page 5: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

“undermine integrity/reputation of legal professionals”

does it mean to be non-qualified?

WHAT

Page 6: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Not Subject to Rigid IRC Rules

Vesting requirements

Participation requirements

Eligibility requirements

Coverage requirements

Minimum funding

Page 7: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Not Granted Favorable Tax Treatment

Deduction for contribution

Tax deferral to participant until paid

Tax-free growth

Page 8: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

“undermine integrity/reputation of legal professionals”

do we use it + why?WHEN

Page 9: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Want to compensate key employee(s) in a manner that would be discriminatory if a

qualified plan or which exceeds the benefits that could be provided in a qualified plan.

Page 10: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Incentivize Key Employees

1. Golden Handcuffs

2. Work with a long-term goal to make company more profitable

3. Work with an owner’s mentality

4. Keep those employees happy long term

Page 11: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Buyout

Page 12: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

“undermine integrity/reputation of legal professionals”

is the objective tax-wise +otherwise of these plans?

WHAT

Page 13: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Objective

Avoid complexity of Internal Revenue Code

Custom design plan for each employee in question

Defer taxation of benefits to employee until paid

Avoid ERISA requirements

Page 14: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Avoid ERISA Requirements

Trust/funding

Minimum participation

Vesting

Extensive report/disclosure requirements

Fiduciary obligations

Page 15: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

“undermine integrity/reputation of legal professionals”

Informal

FUNDING

Page 16: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Use of life insurance

Rabbi trust

Creditor Claims

Page 17: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

“undermine integrity/reputation of legal professionals”

IRC§409A

Page 18: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Legislation enacted in response to Enron debacle

Page 19: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

409A Requirements (if not exempt)

Timing of deferrals by employee

Designation of time and form of payment

Permissible payment events

Extension of deferral

Separation pay

Page 20: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Permissible Payment Events

Disability

Death

Change of Control

Unforeseeable emergency

Separation from service

Fixed time

Page 21: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Notable Exceptions

Equity compensation

Short-term deferrals

Separation pay

Page 22: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

PENALTIESfor Non-Compliance

Page 23: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

“undermine integrity/reputation of legal professionals”

Social Security

TAXES

Page 24: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Social Security Taxes

Subject to FICA when no longer subject to substantial risk of forfeiture (as opposed to when paid)

1. Taxable wage base

2. Medicare portion

Page 25: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

RecurringProblems +Complexity

Page 26: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Structuring business-driven compensation arrangements that have no tax motivation.

Example: Executive’s base salary would be defined and paid at the earlier of a specified date or the Company’s closing of a

capital raise in excess of a specified dollar amount.

Page 27: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Severance Arrangements1. Non-compliance tends to occur when the severance

arrangement isn’t designed to fall within the exception of Section 409A.

2. The most common problem is the failure to include the 6-month delay rule and the impact of release delivery requirements that would impermissibly allow an executive to potentially affect the year of payment.

Page 28: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Restricted Stock Unit1. Vesting when executive reaches retirement age but at the time of

grant the executive has already reached retirement age or will at a point early enough in the award period that the restricted stock units don’t qualify under the short-term deferral rules.

2. When Restricted Stock Unit does not meet short-term deferral exception, failure to include the 6-month delay provision or acceleration in the event of a change of control that doesn’t comply with the definition found in 409A.

Page 29: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Due diligence reviews of target company compensation and benefit arrangements.

Page 30: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

In merger and acquisition, target executive wants to be paid out under his deferred compensation agreement that

requires severance from service but the acquiring corporation wants to retain the executive. Often the change

of control/termination rule needs to be relied on.

Page 31: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Section 409 basically adds additional costs and time to transactions that it applies to without accomplishing much, if anything, of significance. Almost no one ends up paying the excise tax and most transactions occur

almost exactly as before.

Page 32: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Modifications to the terms of stock options and whether or not such a modification is treated as a

modification under 409A which could cause a problem if the stock value has gone up since its grant.

Page 33: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Practitioners that spend large portions of their day thinking about 409A frequently struggle to come to conclusions and then often do not agree with each other when they do so. Sometimes the best that can be done is to identify risks,

positions, stress points and uncertainty.

Page 34: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

The rules for payment at a specified time or a fixed schedule, require payment on date or dates that are

nondiscretionary and objectively determined at the time the amount is deferred. Therefore, they cannot generally be

based on the occurrence of an event.

Page 35: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

There has been little change in the prevalence of non-qualified deferred compensation plans

and the popularity has been steady.

Page 36: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Anti-acceleration rules put limitations on de-risking in the non-qualified deferred compensation arena (as opposed to the

qualified plan arena).

Page 37: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Anti-acceleration rules put limitations on de-risking in the non-qualified deferred compensation arena (as opposed to the

qualified plan arena).

Page 38: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

The requirements of 409A can cause impediments to succession

planning during the transition period.

Page 39: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

409A Can Impact Reimbursement Arrangements1. If a relocation package is available over multiple years,

the amounts available in a later year cannot depend on what was spent, reimbursed or incurred in an earlier year.

2. The payment of reimbursements cannot depend on a payment trigger that is not permissible under 409A (e.g., when the current residence is sold).

3. Acceleration or further deferral of payments must comply with 409A unless an exception applies.

Page 40: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

RECENTDevelopments

Page 41: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

On February 25, 2014 the IRS issued final regulations clarifying the meaning of “substantial risk of forfeiture” under IRC §83. In summary, the IRS stated that “further,

Treasury and the IRS believe that these regulations should not be modified to state that an involuntary

separation from service without cause may qualify as a substantial risk of forfeiture under §83.”

RECENT Developments

Page 42: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

IRS Field Attorney Advice (FAA 20134301F) on employee bonus deductions.

If bonus plan states that the employer retains the right to eliminate or modify the bonuses at any time prior to

payment, the all events test is not met.

RECENT Developments

Page 43: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

U.S. Department of Treasury, Semi-Annual Regulatory Agenda Release (5/23/14). Among items scheduled for release are:

1. A final rule on the definition of “highly compensated employee.”

2. A final rule on further guidance on the application of §409A to non-qualified deferred compensation plans.

3. Combining correction programs and expanding violations covered.

RECENT Developments

Page 44: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

IRS Initiates Limited Scope Audit of Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Compliance with §409A.

1. IRS has stated it will send information document requests to a limited number of companies (fewer than 50) from a group of large employers that have been previously selected for an employment tax audits.

2. The IRS’s intent is to refine audit techniques and test compliance in three areas.

Initial elections to defer compensation;

Subsequent elections to re-defer compensation; and

Plan distributions and compliance with §409A, including the requirement that distributions to “specified employees” of public companies be delayed for at least 6 months.

RECENT Developments

Page 45: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Proposed Legislation to tax deferred compensation when no longer subject to a

“substantial risk of forfeiture.”

RECENT Developments

Page 46: Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

z

Thank You!

Tom Sigmund, DirectorKegler Brown Hill + [email protected]/sigmund614.462.5462