16
DIALOGIC ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT 1. INOC-Meeting, May 29-30, 2015 in Wiesloch, Germany MICHAEL ROEHRIG

1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

DIALOGIC ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT 1. INOC-Meeting, May 29-30, 2015 in Wiesloch, Germany

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Page 2: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT RELOADED

1. Some useful Frameworks about

Leading / Enabling Change

2. Dialogic Organization Development:

A New Generative Image

3. Amplifying Change:

Organizing for “Planned Emergence”

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Page 3: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

A DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES

l Strategy l Structure l Processes l Tools

Michael Roehrig, 2012

What?

JOINT INSPIRATION

l Purpose l Function l Reason for Being

Why?

PREFERED FUTURE

l Joint Vision l Desired Future l Strategic Advantage

What for?

CULTURAL CAPABILITIES

l Identity l Values l Behavioral Patterns l Skills

How?

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

What matters Now?

NOWNESS

l Mindfulness l Transparency l Real-time Feedback

1

Page 4: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

CONTEXT AWARENESS IN DECISION MAKING

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

l Different contexts require different patterns of decision making and acting

l Most change contexts today are complex

l The decision logic for complex situations is: Probe, Sense, Respond

l Traditional decision making, based on analysis and results hardly works in these situations

COMPLICATED COMPLEX

OBVIOUS CHAOTIC

Sense Analyze Respond

Probe Sense Respond

Sense Categorize Respond

Act Sense Respond

GOOD PRACTICE EMERGENT

BEST PRACTICE NOVEL

Disorder

Source: modified from Snowden/Boone: A Leader‘s Framework for Decision Making, 2007

1

Page 5: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

TWO PARADIGMS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Programmatic / Diagnostic

„Unfreeze – Move - Refreeze“ (Lewin)

Linear thinking

Top-down approach

„Closing gaps”

Hierarchy, control

Rational, technical topics

Tell, Sell, achieve „Buy-in“

Dealing with “resistance”

Project organization, nominations

Detailed planning: roadmap and milestones

Which results will our measures produce?

Deliverables

Controlling, Audits and Data

Learning from Experience

Consultant as expert and executor

Emergent / Dialogic

„Freeze – Adapt - Unfreeze“ (Rowland)

Systemic Thinking

Can start anywhere in the system

„unfolding potential”

Influence and snowball effect

Social, political, psycho-dynamic topics

Co-create, “embody” the new

Different qualities / energies in the system

Networks, communities, forums, dialogue circles

Big picture and next step(s)

Which effect will our activities have?

Inspired action, probes and prototypes

Change in mindset and relations

Learning from the emerging future

Consultant as facilitator and reflection partner

Michael Roehrig, 2012

1

Page 6: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

APPROACHES TO LEADING CHANGE

CO-CREATED PRE-DEFINED

l Initiatives l Programs, Tool Kits

l Self organized l Few “hard

rules”

l Competency Building l Learning Architectures l Dialogue Platforms

l Tell/Sell l Roll-Outs

“I can manage change”

“Launch enough and something will stick”

“I can only create the conditions for change to happen”

“I trust my people to solve things with us”

Source: adapted from Transcend Consultancy 2010

DIRECTIVE EMERGENT

SELF- ASSEMBLY

MASTER- FUL

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

1

Page 7: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

U-PROCESS AND LEVELS OF LISTENING

Voice of fear

Open will

Voice of cynicism

Open heart

Voice of judgment

Open mind LISTENING 2 From outside

Disconfirming (new) data

“Downloading” Habits of judgment

Reconfirming old habits and judgments

Factual Noticing differences

LISTENING 3 From within

Empathic Emotional connection

LISTENING 1 From habits

LISTENING 4 From source

Generative From the future wanting to emerge

Source: adapted from Otto Scharmer, 2015

Seeing through another person‘s eyes

Connecting to an emer- ging future whole: Shift in identity and self

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

1

Page 8: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

EXAMPLES OF DIALOGIC INTERVENTIONS

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

1. Art of Convening (Neal and Neal)

2. Art of Hosting (artofhosting.org)

3. Appreciative Inquiry (Cooperrider)

4. Charettes (Lennertz)

5. Community Learning (Fulton)

6. Complex Responsive Processes (Stacey, Shaw)

7. Conference Model (Axelrod)

8. Coordinated Management of Meaning (Pearce & Cronen)

9. Cycle of Resolution (Levine)

10. Dynamic Facilitation (Rough)

11. Engaging Emergence (Holman)

12. Future Search (Weisbord)

13. Intergroup Dialogue (Nagada, Gurin)

14. Moments of Impact (Ertel & Solomon)

15. Narrative Mediation (Winslade & Monk)

16. Open Space Technology (Owen)

17. Organizational Learning Conversations (Bushe)

18. Participative Design (M. Emery)

19. Peer Spirit Circles (Baldwin)

20. Polarity Management (Johnson)

21. Preferred Futuring (Lippitt)

22. REAL Model (Wassermann & Gallegos)

23. Real Time Strategic Change (Jacobs)

24. Reflexive Inquiry (Oliver)

25. Re-Description (Storch)

26. Search Conference (Emery & Emery)

27. Six Conversations (Block)

28. SOAR (Stavros)

29. Social Labs (Hassan)

30. Solution Focused Dialogue (Jackson & McKergow)

31. Sustained Dialogue (Saunders)

32. Syntegration (Beer)

33. Systemic Sustainability (Amadeo & Cox)

34. Talking stick (pre-industrial)

35. Technology of Participation (Spencer)

36. Theory U (Scharmer)

37. Visual Explorer (Palus & Horth)

38. Whole Scale Change (Dannemiller)

39. Work Out (Ashkenas)

40. World Café (Brown & Issacs) Source: Bushe & Marshak, 2015

2

Page 9: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

Source: modified from Bushe & Marshak, 2015

COMMON THEMES IN DIALOGIC ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT

Bushe & Marshak propose the following common change processes that the Dialogic OD mindset is particularly attuned to, and that the successful Dialogic OD consultant will knowingly or intuitively mix and match a variety of methods in order to maximize the likelihood that one or all will be present:

1. A Disruption in the Ongoing Social Construction of Reality is stimulated or engaged in a way that leads to a more complex Reorganization.

2. A Generative Image is introduced or surfaces that provides new and compelling alternatives for thinking and acting. A generative image is a combination of words, pictures, or other symbolic media that provide new ways of thinking about social and organizational reality.

3. A Change to one or more Core Narratives takes place. The dialogic mindset assumes that transformational change is not possible without the emergence of new, socially-agreed-upon narratives that explain and support the new reality and possibilities, endorsed by those presently or historically in power and authority.

2

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Page 10: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

ENABLING EMERGENCE

Unfolding Change:

• A disturbance, a disruption interrupts the current patterns of organizing • The system differentiates, new ideas and distinctions emerge • New sense making and coherence emerges in the interaction of the

system elements, encompassing a higher level of complexity

Source: adapted from Holman, 2013

2

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Illustration by Steven Wright

Page 11: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

DIAGNOSTIC AND DIALOGIC MINDSETS (IDEAL TYPES)

Diagnostic OD Dialogic OD

Ontology Positivism, objective reality Interpretive, constructionist social reality

Organizations are Open systems Dialogic networks

Emphasis on Behavior and results Discourse and generativity

Change is Planned, episodic, more developmental

Emergent, continuous and iterative, more transformational

Consultants Stay apart at the margins, partner with

Are immersed with, part of

Change Processes Hierarchical, start at top, work down

Heterarchical, start anywhere, spread out

Sou

rce:

Bu

she

& M

arsh

ak, 2

01

5

2

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Page 12: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

PREMISES OF DIALOGIC OD

1. Reality and relationships are socially constructed.

2. Organizations are meaning-making systems and continuously self-organizing.

3. Language, broadly defined, matters and creating Change requires changing conversations.

4. Participative inquiry and engagement to increase differentiation before seeking coherence.

5. Transformational change is more emergent than planned.

6. Consultants are a not apart but a part of the process.

Source: Schwendenwein, modified from Bushe & Marshak, 2015

2

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Page 13: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

SOME TOUCHPOINTS OF DIALOGIC OD

Ro

ehri

g, m

od

ifie

d f

rom

Bu

she,

20

13

2

WHAT AND HOW WE

THINK

DECISIONS & ACTIONS

SHARED ASSUMPTIONS

& SENSE-MAKING

ELEMENTS OF STRUCTURE & ENACTED

CULTURE

A

Generative Image

Increase differen-tiation

Identify new actions that lead to new results

Help embed new elements in the system

Instigate “productive Irritation”

Nurture mindfulnes

s & self-observation

Make mental models

transparent

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

Page 14: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

AMPLIFYING CHANGE – ORGANIZING FOR “PLANNED EMERGENCE”

Michael Roehrig, 2014

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

INSPIRE

l Instigate strategic dialogue

l Create a frame and a spirit of inquiry

l Establish strategic agenda and guiding questions

l Give permission and encouragement to explore

MODEL

l Encourage small scale initiatives and experimentation (explorative, entrepreneurial)

l Encourage/ensure involvement of key stakeholders

l Identify what works

NURTURE

l Amplify what works

l Engage different energies and qualities in the system

l Check Alignment of new solutions with strategy and culture

EMBED

l Adapt structures and processes to support the New

l Identify lessons learnt for ongoing change

l Publicly appreciate and value successes

3

Page 15: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

IMPLICATIONS

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

What resonates in you? Agreement? Doubts? News? Empathy?

Generative seeds?

What qualities of leadership in organizations would this approach require?

How would we arrange change processes? What would be different?

How can we ensure broad involvement and engagement?

Which organizational design, which governance is needed if change is the

new normal?

How can Coaching help in this?

Page 16: 1. INOC Meeting - Dialogic Organization Development

REFERENCES

MICHAEL ROEHRIG

• Bushe, Gervase R. & Marshak; Robert J.: Dialogic Organization Development - The Theory and Practice of Transformational Change, 2015

• Bushe, Gervase R. & Marshak; Robert J.: Dialogic Organization Development in: Jones, B. & Brazzel, M. (eds): The

NTL Handbook of Organization Development, 2nd Ed., 2013 • Forchhammer, Lorenz S. & Straub, Walter: Verändern – Change Praxis für Entscheider und Führungskräfte, 2013

(Unternehmensentwicklung im Korridor) • Holman, Peggy: A Call to Engage in: OD Practitioner, Winter 2013, Vol. 45, No. 1 • Rowland, Deborah & Higgs, Malcolm: Sustaining Change – Leadership that Works, 2008 • Scharmer, C. Otto & Käufer, Katrin: Leading from the Emerging Future – From Ego-System to Eco-System

Economies, 2013 • Scharmer, C. Otto: Theory U – Leading from the Future as it Emerges, 2009 • Snowden, D. & Boone, M.: A Leader‘s Framework for Decision Making, in: Harvard Business Review, November

2007

Get in touch: www.michaelroehrig.de (website currently available in German)