Upload
nptimes
View
101
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“Fundraising?Use these words,
not those”October 8, 2014
Host: NonProfit TimesConducted by: Herschell Gordon Lewis
Interlocutor: Paul Clolery
Fund raising folklore:Ours is a dignified world,
existing peacefully outside the roiling seas of
commerce.
Fund raising reality:Ours is a business whose very nature makes it at least as competitive as commerce … and very
probably more so.
If you’re a professional writer who wants to
increase effectiveness and impact, don’t look
for big differences. Look for hidden sources
of power drainage or apparently minor touches such as…
The professional copywriter knows how
3differs from
three(Little touches such as
this separate the professional from the
dilettante)
THECLARITY
COMMANDMENT
One element should drive every professional communication you create, from this moment forward:
The Clarity Commandment:
When you choose words and phrases for
force-communication,clarity is paramount.
Don’t let any other component of the
communications mix interfere with it.
Sorry, you won’t hear them during this
diatribe:• Paradigm• Proactive• Win-win• Game plan• 24/7• Fast track• Customer-
centric
• At the end of the day
• Core competency• Think outside the
box• Knowledge-based• On the same
page
Avoid these words in force-communication
messages:
• quality• service• value• needs (as noun)
•“Remember,”• What’s more• Your partner in…
•When it comes to…
What is a more emotional word or
phrase than:• commence• utilize• omit• receive• we would like to• large• you incur no risk• circular• donate
• purchase• fortunate• requested• I write concerning• we shall• error• perhaps• however• humorous
What is the difference between:
• autumn and fall• at last and
finally• sexy and sensual• nude and naked• made and
manufactured• manufactured by
and built by
• right now and at once
• reply and respond• insincere and not
sincere• eager and anxious• audience and
viewers• died and passed
away
Word use:Replace… with…must have toamong one ofutilize useperhaps maybebuy acquirepurchase ownspendallocatereceive get
Most impact-improving rules are
as simple as this one:
Replace passive voice with active
voice
Are you establishing a relationship as you ask for funds? Passive voice
adds distance for no beneficial reason:
“A reply from you would be appreciated.”
“We really do want your reaction.”
What is right…
and what is wrong…with this approach
to envelope treatment
?
Right: Provocative
copy and colors match the season.
Wrong:When a
prospect doesn’t
respond, a different
approach is in order.
If you’re a professional writer who wants to
increase effectiveness and impact, you know that synonyms aren’t
identical. For example, you know the
difference between “Can you…” and “Will
you…”:
Which has the most impact?► Can you help us?► Will you help us?
► Will you help these kids?► Help me.
► Help me, PLEASE.Or is it none of the above?
The answer will make sense to you in about 30 minutes.
Would you ask people to…
•give•donate•contribute•bestow•bequeath
YOU are in command of the reaction to your
words:“Attention, seniors: We are conducting a clinical
trial for…”“Attention, seniors: A
research organization is conducting a clinical
trial for…”
YOU are in command of the reaction to your
words:
“In the event of your death...”
“If you should die....”
YOU are in command of the reaction to your
words:
“You’re headed for trouble.”
“Are you headed for trouble?”
(Some rules for use of questions coming up.)
YOU are in command of the reaction to your
words:
Undocumented immigrant
Illegal alien
Which of these should produce better results?
• Every 60 seconds, 23 children die from malnutrition and preventable diseases.•This is Eric. His sister starved to death two days ago. Eric is next.
Would you use the word
Eschew?
When you could writeTurn your back on
?
WARNING:The typical recipient of your message, whether mail or
online or print or broadcast, doesn’t share your
knowledge of the “in-talk” that may be common inside
your office.Write within the recipient’s
experiential background, not yours.
A quick look at some of the
weapons in our arsenal:
The carrier envelope has just one purpose
(other than preventing the contents from falling out into the
street):
to get itself opened.
Two questions:1. Which of these is more likely to be
opened?2. What would the comparative attitude be
at the moment of opening?
Two questions:1. Will the typical recipient look at this envelope copy with suspicion?2. Does the “Multiply” line help or
hurt?
Saying too muchon the envelope
can damage response.
A quick look at the key selling
element of direct mail – the letter:
Some logicaland ridiculously
simple rulesfor
effective letter-writing
(and much email):
Keep your first sentence
short.
No paragraphslonger than
seven lines.
Single spacethe letter.
Double spacebetween paragraphs.
In a letter longer than one page,
don’tend a paragraph at the
bottom of any page except the last.
(Why?)
Don’tsneak up
on the reader.
Fireyour biggest gun
first.(Imperative for e-mail.)
Tired of “Dear Friend”?Try one of these:
• Good morning!• Hi.• Dear Colleague,• Dear Tennis Nut,• Dear Fellow Tennis Nut,• This will be a good day, [NAME]!• If you’re like I am, [NAME]…
(When should you useonly the first name?)
How doesHi.
Differ fromHi!?
The p.s. should reinforce one of the key
selling motivatorsor mention an extra
benefit ---one which doesn't
require explanation.
A quick look at online
fundraising:
An absolute rule of online fundraising:
Make responseno-brainer
easy.
In general,local
not-for-profit organizations do
considerably better with e-mail solicitations than
nationalnot-for-profit organizations.
Why?
Two reasons:1. The message can be
“from” a known individual.2. You have far less
guesswork in predetermining the best demographic, both
proved and unproved.
Did you know…•Adding the recipient’s name to the “Subject” line usually increases response.•Whether a produced message or straight text pulls best depends on individual and specific circumstances.•There is no point in sending “teaser” e-mail.
Astute fund raisers report success when e-mailing existing donors
with “Emergency!” messages.
E-mailing cold lists with the wrong words can
be frustrating, unprofitable, and the cause of hate-mail.
Can (and should) you use e-mail either to tell a potential donor a direct mail appeal is
coming…and/or…
to remind a potential donor after sending a direct mail
appeal?
Can (and should) you use e-mail either to tell a potential donor a direct mail appeal is
coming…and/or…
to remind a potential donor after sending a direct mail
appeal?
YES to both.
This online
message grabs
attention by putting emphasis on a non-donation
factor
A quick look at print as possible
fundraising media:
In print media,you have
one to three secondsto grab and hold
the reader’sattention.
Don’t waste that time.
What is the difference in impact between “While you read this” and “Even as you read this”? “providing relief” and “giving
relief”?Every word either contributes to
impact or marches in place.
Awareness
is a major key to
initiating the
response factor.
BUT…
Would you regard this as the optimum way to generate response?
You have time today to analyze fundraising
messages you’re working on now and
waiting for your fingertips to produce
improvement…and a lifetime for your fingertips to use what
you’re picking up today.
Pick up and use this -- Information optimizing:
Directing or changing the reader’s or viewer’s or listener’s perception without changing the
facts.
Information optimizing…
When should you useasterisks
(*)in fund raising copy?
Information optimizing…
When should you useasterisks
(*)in fund raising copy?
Never.
Information optimizing:
Questions are automatically
reader-involving.
Note the difference:
You won’t stand by and let it happen.
Will you stand by and let it happen?
(Note, too: The choice is NOT automatic.)
A fund raising example:— Why I am sending you this message:— Why am I sending you this message?
The psychological impact of the headings is in no
way parallel, even though the words are identical.
Information optimizing:
Transforming a command into a
question not only dissipates latent antagonism but
promotes rapport.
Requests for donations should be described in terms of the potential donor’s
capability…NOT
the organization’s financial goals.
An absolute truism of force-communication:
Specificsoutpull
generalizations.
Please do agree:21st century fund raising demands more than the
classic true but worn“We need help”
approach.And examples are more involving than statistics.
The superiority of examples over
statistics:
Statistics = cold-blooded, no involvement.
Examples = warm-blooded, involvement.
First pass:If treated early, 75% of
those children who have this deadly disease can be saved.
Second pass:Innocent children die from this disease. With early treatment,
three out of four will live. Third pass:
This deadly disease is killing innocent children. With early treatment we can save three
precious lives, of four we're now losing.
Fourth pass:We lost Jimmy today. His parents knew his precious days were numbered. But
Mary, Karen, and Billy all will live. We were able to start
their treatment early enough to save them.
Which text is most likely to generate response?
Why?
And aswe end,
some more
words…
Quick list of “no-no” words:
•unfortunately•many of you•enroll•annual•hopefully•survey
•needy•giver•support•expense•budget•serve
Power words (depending on circumstances):
•outrageous•hope•opinion•advisor• free•dare
•win•demand• forget•unwanted•never•dead
A few words that can bring serendipitous response:
•relief•support•benefit/ beneficial•celebrate•hero
•reward•culture•pain•pleasure•expand/ expansion
Let’s use two of those serendipitous words for this get-
together:•It’s a pleasure to wrap this up.•It’s a relief to wrap this up.
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????
Questions?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????