Upload
christoph-lutz
View
97
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Privacy Concerns and Social RobotsPresenting New Empirical EvidenceNew Friends ConferenceBarcelona, November 3 2016
Christoph Lutz, [email protected] - @lutzid Aurelia Tamò, @a_a_tamo
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 2 Agenda
• Background
• Survey Methods
• Results
• Implications & Outlook
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 3
Background
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 4
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 5
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 6
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 7
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 8
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 9
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 10
Methods
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 11 Data and Method
• Amazon Mechanical Turk survey with 500 individuals
• Respondents based in the United States
• 55% male, 45% female
• Most respondents have some college or a Bachelor’s degree (72%)
• Most respondents are employed (62%) or self-employed (16%) but some other groups as well (students, unemployed, homemaker)
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 12 Robots in Different Social Contexts
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 13 Measurement (1/2)
Informational Privacy Concerns: Social (3 items)Other users… …engaging in identity theft through the robot…hacking into the robot…stalking me via the robot
Informational Privacy Concerns: Institutional (4 items)The robot manufacturer… …insufficiently protecting personal data…tracking and analyzing personal data…selling personal data to third parties…sharing personal data with government agencies
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 14 Measurement (2/2)
Physical Concerns (5 items)The robot… …damaging or dirtying personal belongings, …asking me personal questions…entering areas it shouldn’t access…using items it shouldn’t use
Social Bonding Concerns (4 items)I become too emotionally attached to the robot.I develop too intimate feelings towards the robot.I develop an unhealthy friendship with the robot.I become dependent on the robot.
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 15
Results
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 16
Informational Privacy Concerns: Social (Other Users)
3.04 3.53 2.93
Identity Theft Hacking Stalking
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 17
Informational Privacy Concerns: Institutional (Manufacturer)
3.70 3.71 3.74 3.72
Insufficient Data Protection
Tracking and Analyzing Data
Selling Data Sharing Data withGovernment
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 18 Physical Privacy Concerns: Robot (1/2)
2.56 1.90 2.14
Damaging or DirtyingPersonal Belongings
Asking Personal Questions
Snooping throughPersonal Belongings
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 19 Physical Privacy Concerns: Robot (2/2)
2.40 2.08
Entering Areas ItShouldn‘t Access
Using Items ItShouldn‘t Use
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 20 Bonding Privacy Concerns: Robot - User
1.71
Emotional Attachment
1.36 1.52 2.32
Intimate Feelings UnhealthyFriendship
Dependence
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 21 Summary and Further Findings
Type of Concern Average Value (1-5)Informational Privacy Concerns: Social (Other users)
3.17
Informational Privacy Concerns: Institutional (Manufacturer)
3.72
Physical Privacy Concerns 2.25
Bonding Privacy Concerns 1.73
• High correlations between informational privacy concerns: socialand informational privacy concerns: institutional
• Moderate correlations (0.3) between informational privacyconcerns: institutional and physical privacy concerns
• Low correlations between bonding privacy concerns and otherconcerns
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 22 Summary and Further Findings
• Privacy concerns correlate (weakly but) significantly with users‘ generalattitude towards robots. In particular, access concerns have a negative effect.
• Access concerns reduce users‘ trust in robots – and/or trust reduces users‘ access concerns.
• Interestingly, bonding concerns increase users‘ trust in robots – and/or trustreduces users‘ bonding concerns.
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 23
Implications and Outlook
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 24 Implications
• Privacy concerns about robots are pronounced among respondents
• Necessity to distinguish different types of privacy concerns
• Informational privacy concerns: institutional most pronounced
⇒ Robots manufacturers should think about data protection!⇒ Depiction of robots and AI in popular culture covers aspects most users
don’t worry about (bonding).⇒ Users might underestimate robots’ bonding potential.
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 25 Outlook
• More (empirical) resarch to be done on robots and privacy
• Next step for us: bringing pieces together into a testable model
New Friends 2016 Privacy and Social Robots
Tamò & LutzPage 26
Thank You For Sharing Your ThoughtsNorwegian Business School (BI)Center for Internet & SocietyNydalsvn. 37 / N-0442 Oslo