Upload
hdoornbos
View
224
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ADOPTING CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT – A PRACTICAL VIEWPOINT
Version 1.1 – 15/01/2015
© 2015 - Hervé Doornbos
2 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
INTRODUCTION
Develop and implement service management processes is costly
A process needs to adapt to changing needs of the organization
Process performance must be constantly monitored and corrective actions must be taken to improve it and balance efficiency and effectiveness
To address this practical and operational issue, ITIL framework defines a service lifecycle stage – Continual Service Improvement (CSI) – intended to measure and improve processes and services
3 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT – THE DEEMING WHEEL
William Edwards Deming (1900-1993) & Walter Andrew Shewhart PDSA (Plan Do Study Act) / PDCA
4 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
ITIL IMPROVEMENT MODEL – CSI – STILL THEORETICAL
What is the
vision?
Where are
we now ?
Where do we
want to be?
How do we
get there?
Did we get
there?
How do we keep the
momentum going?
Baseline assessment
Measurable
targets
Service & process improvement
Measurements & metrics
Business vision,
mission, goals
and objectives
Alignment
Implementation
5 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PRACTICAL CSI ADOPTION 1/2 – MEASUREMENT
6 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PRACTICAL CSI ADOPTION 2/2 – IMPROVEMENT CLASSIFICATION
Different types of Improvement Business AS Usual (BAU) Improvements
• Small Improvements
• Ultra Quick Wins / Low Hanging Fruits
• Do not require additional resources
• Executed little by little
Projects Improvement
• Operational Strategic Improvements – Link with Projects Classification
– Approval Authority differs from operational to strategic projects
• Quick Wins … still …
• Requires resources to be allocated for project
Requires culture of improvement
• Training / Awareness
• Suggestion Box
• Regular Meetings
Industrialization of improvement
• Business Case
• Prioritization / Approval
• Project Execution
Sta
rt
7 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER – CSI FACET 1 – THE THREE PILLARS OF CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
Continual Improvement
Educated
Personnel
• Trained to CSI
• Customer focused • SLA aware
• Focused on
improving services
Measurement
Framework
• Metrics • Services
• Processes
• Tools and technology
• Baselines
• Measurement Tools
• Measurement DB
Improvement
Initiative
Lifecycle
Management
• Prioritization Process • Initiatives Sponsors
• Initiatives Owners
• CSI Steering Group • Appoint Sponsors
• Review, Prioritize,
Approve, Defer or
Reject Initiatives
• Review Benefits
Management Commitment
Measurement Culture Projects
8 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER – CSI FACET 2 – YET ANOTHER OVERVIEW OF CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
Launching
point for
Improvement
Operations
Measured
Business As
Usual
Improvement
Opportunity
(Project)
Personnel
Educated
Problem /
Change / …
Management
Prioritization
Process
Improvement
Initiative
(Project Mgt.)
Improvement
Classification
Follow-up Tool
9 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
CSI AWARENESS & TRAINING
Continual Improvement
Educated
Personnel
• Trained to CSI
• Customer focused • SLA aware
• Focused on
improving services
Measurement
Framework
• Metrics • Services
• Processes
• Tools and technology
• Baselines
• Measurement Tools
• Measurement DB
Improvement
Initiative
Lifecycle
Management
• Prioritization Process • Initiatives Sponsors
• Initiatives Owners
• CSI Steering Group • Appoint Sponsors
• Review, Prioritize,
Approve, Defer or
Reject Initiatives
• Review Benefits
Management Commitment
Measurement Culture Projects
10 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
CSI TRAINING – FRAMEWORKS
ITIL CSI 7 steps Problem Management
• Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
Lean / Six Sigma Kanban for services Voice of Customer Statistical Process Analysis DMAIC
Kepner & Tregoe Project Management Prince 2 PMBOK COBIT®5 Implementation
Process Assessment COBIT®5 Assessment TIPA
Service Lifecycle Measure & Improve Global Methodology Business As Usual (BAU) Improvements
Troubleshooting Methodologies
Troubleshooting Methodology Business As Usual (BAU) Improvements Alignment Indicators Methodology similar to ITIL CSI 7 steps
Troubleshooting Methodology PMO
Project & Program Management Project & Program Management Organizational Change
Measurement ISO/IEC 33000 ISO/IEC 33000 applied to ITIL
11 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
CSI TRAINING – LAUNCHING POINT – COBIT®5 EXAMPLE: HOW TO RECOGNIZE AN IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITY?
Launching point for improvement initiatives are either Pain Points or Trigger Event
Typical Pain Points Failure to meet regulatory or contractual
requirements Significant incidents related to IT risk
(e.g. data loss) Service delivery problems IT enabled changes frequently failing to meet
business needs (late deliveries or budget overruns)
Audit findings for poor IT performance or low service levels
Resource waste through duplication or overlap in IT initiatives
Insufficient IT resources IT staff burnout / dissatisfaction Failed IT initiatives Rising costs Perception of low business value for IT investments
Hidden and/or rogue IT spending Multiple and complex IT assurance efforts Senior managers that are reluctant to engage with
specific domains of IT
Relevant Trigger Events Significant technology change or paradigm shift External audit or consultant assessments Change in business operating model or sourcing
arrangements A new business strategy or priority Shift in the market, economy or competitive
position An enterprise-wide governance focus or project New regulatory or compliance requirements Merger, acquisition or divestiture A new CIO, CFO, COO or CEO
12 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
CSI AWARENESS – A COLLABORATIVE & COMMUNICATIVE ORGANIZATION IS THE KEY
The whole company/BU culture must be focused on Continual Improvement Trained Personnel only is not enough
Management Commitment allows for a collaborative organization Collaborative & Communicative Organization supports CSI
Launching
point for
Improvement
Personnel
Educated
Operations
Measured
• Targets / KPIs must be
clearly communicated
• Current situation must be
clearly communicated
From Operational Reporting
To Strategic or Tactical Reporting Kanban Board
Balanced ScoreCard (BSC)
13 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
REPORTING GENERALITIES – MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK, METRICS AND AUDIENCE
Design themes for the reporting audience based on their roles and expressed needs Define the High Value Service Delivery Zone Classify and prioritize metrics based on these themes and their impact on the high value zone
Ex
ecu
tiv
e
Ma
na
gem
ent
Pro
cess
/
Ser
vic
e O
wn
er
Pro
cess
/ S
erv
ice
Ma
na
ger
Roles=Viewpoints • Agile
• Optimized
• Available
• Responsive
• Secure
• Efficient
• Effective
• Quality
• Progress
• Utilization
• Compliant
• MTBI
• Cost per call
• Satisfaction
• Call abandon
• Cycle time
• FCR Rate
• MTTR
• Failed RFC
• RFCs
• FTEs
• CIs
• Incidents
• Problems
• Breaches
• MACs
• Lines of code
• Wait time
• Downtime
KGI
CSF
KPI
KPM
KFM
Bu
sin
ess Im
pa
ct
Strategic
Tactic
Operational
Themes
Dashboards should be designed depending on
This is the Audience View.
themes
stakeholder viewpoints
14 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
OPERATIONAL REPORTING FOR A COLLABORATIVE & COMMUNICATIVE ORGANIZATION
Daily Stand-Up Meeting This short daily meeting allows a team to share information about challenges,
as well as to coordinate efforts to resolve issues
Kanban Board for Services Team Office Visual Cue for objectives, priorities, tasks in progress and work done
To adapt to the workload / type of tasks / team
Objectives
SLA1
SLA2
SLA3
To do next
High priority
Low priority
In progress
Analyze Fix Verify
Team member 1
Team member 2
Team member 3
Done
PB14 PB13
PB12
PB15 PB13
PB1 PB2
PB3
PB4
PB5
PB6
PB7
PB8
PB9
PB10
PB11
15 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
STRATEGIC OR TACTICAL REPORTING – BALANCED SCORECARD FOR A COLLABORATIVE & COMMUNICATIVE ORGANIZATION
For executive management, developing a comprehensive strategy requires to balance between financial and non-financial considerations and apply a measure combination.
The balanced scorecard framework as conceived by Kaplan and Norton, 1996 is presented below. Actual contents of each perspective should be tailored to the specific organizational/unit realities, needs and challenges.
Learning and Growth
Perspective
Internal Process Perspective
Customer Perspective
Financial Perspective
Strategy
• Objectives
• Key Performance Indicators
• Targets • Initiatives
• Objectives
• Key Performance Indicators
• Targets
• Initiatives
• Objectives
• Key Performance Indicators
• Targets
• Initiatives
• Objectives • Key Performance Indicators • Targets • Initiatives
Kaplan and Norton, 1996
16 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
EXAMPLE OF BSC STRATEGY MAP FOR SLM PROCESS A BASE FOR SLM DASHBOARD IMPROVEMENT
Business Contribution
User Satisfaction
and Experience
Operational Excellence
Future Orientation
Business
Value of SLM
process
(User)
Customer
Satisfaction
Service Level
Performance within
optimal costs /
quality / time
Efficient
Implementation
and Improvement
of SLM process
Efficient
SLM Perf.
reports
Staff
Competencies Innovation &
adopting new
Technology
Cost
Effectiveness
Measured
by survey
Measured by % of
business processes
covered by SLA
Workload
(FTE)
% of processes
(services)
meeting SLA
Measured by
Capability
Level of SLM % of failures
in providing
Perf. reports
# of improvement
initiatives
# of training /
awareness sessions,
# of certifications
17 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK
Continual Improvement
Educated
Personnel
• Trained to CSI
• Customer focused • SLA aware
• Focused on
improving services
Measurement
Framework
• Metrics • Services
• Processes
• Tools and technology
• Baselines
• Measurement Tools
• Measurement DB
Improvement
Initiative
Lifecycle
Management
• Prioritization Process • Initiatives Sponsors
• Initiatives Owners
• CSI Steering Group • Appoint Sponsors
• Review, Prioritize,
Approve, Defer or
Reject Initiatives
• Review Benefits
Management Commitment
Measurement Culture Projects
18 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK – HOW THE 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY FITS IN THE SERVICE LIFECYCLE
Shewhart Deming 7 Steps Methodology Service Lifecycle
NORM PLAN Identify = Business Vision = Perspective
Baseline = Position
Define what you will measure = Target = Position = KPI / SLA
Action Plan (Projects) = Plan & Patterns
Service
Design
MONITOR DO Collect data Effectiveness
Efficiency
Satisfaction
Process performance report (collected data)
Service Transition
Service Operation
COMPARE CHECK Analysis Gap
RCA
Improvement opportunities Logged into CSI Register
Present improvement opportunities
Continual Service
Improvement
CONTROL ACT Decides improvement initiatives Service Strategy Service Portfolio Mgt. Business Case
Value
Financial Mgt.
Kotter 5 first steps
SDP
Service Charter
Step #1/8: Increase Urgency
Step #2/8: Build a guiding team
Step #3/8: Get the vision right
Step #4/8: Communicate for buy-in
Step #5/8: Empower action
(Monitor
Control
Loop) (PDCA)
19 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK – 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY FOUNDATION
Practical 7 Steps Process Global Methodology for Improvement on Services / Processes / Technology / Organization…
• Author’s suggestion is to start improving Processes first • Improving processes will lead to improving Services • For organization improvement, COBIT® 5 Framework is easier to use
7 Steps concepts, what does it mean? You cannot manage what you cannot control
• Measurement compared against Targets • Measurement compared against Baselines
You cannot control what you cannot measure • Measure and Reporting in place
– Operational – Tactical – Strategic
You cannot measure what you cannot define • Alignment of objectives with the direction sets
by the governance body (or management in smaller organization unit)
In God we trust,
all others bring data.
(William Edwards Deming)
20 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
APPLYING THE 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY – MEASURE TO CREATE A BASELINE
You don't have a current baseline? Establish a baseline now
Use Historical Data
Operational
Goals
Define what
you can
measure
Define what
you should
measure
Opportunity #1
One of the first improvement activities is to identify
what should be measured (e.g. metrics identified when designing scorecard)
vs. what can be measured
or what currently is being measured
21 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
APPLYING THE 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY – COLLECT AND PROCESS DATA CONTINUOUSLY
Collect data manually if you cannot collect data automatically
Don’t Collect Data You Don’t Use Data Collection is expensive
There is no “R” in ROI if you “R not” using it
Use it or lose it!
Operational
Goals
Define what
you can
measure
Define what
you should
measure
Gather the
data
Process
the data
22 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
APPLYING THE 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY – ANALYZE DATA
Address pain points first Use Paretto
( 80 / 20 )
Low hanging fruit Quick wins
If Data is not used Eliminate it
from data collection
Operational
Goals
Define what
you can
measure
Define what
you should
measure
Gather the
data
Process
the data
Analyze
data
Opportunity #2
23 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
APPLYING THE 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY – IMPLEMENT QUICK WINS
Operational
Goals
Define what
you can
measure
Define what
you should
measure
Gather the
data
Process
the data
Analyze
data
Present
& Use
Information
Implement
Quick Wins
24 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
APPLYING THE 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY – DID WE GET THERE ? – MEASURE THE RESULTS
Utilizing the defined KPIs, the measurement must be compared to the initial baseline
Operational
Goals
Define what
you can
measure
Define what
you should
measure
Gather the
data
Process
the data
Analyze
data
Present
& Use
Information
Implement
Corrective
Action
Opportunity #3
(PIR)
Post-Implementation Review
25 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
APPLYING THE 7 STEPS METHODOLOGY – ALL STEPS TOGETHER – THREE IMMEDIATE IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Operational
Goals
Define what
you can
measure
Define what
you should
measure
Gather the
data
Process
the data
Analyze
data
Present
& Use
Information
Implement
Corrective
Action
Opportunity #1
Opportunity #2
Opportunity #3
26 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
Continual Improvement
Educated
Personnel
• Trained to CSI
• Customer focused • SLA aware
• Focused on
improving services
Measurement
Framework
• Metrics • Services
• Processes
• Tools and technology
• Baselines
• Measurement Tools
• Measurement DB
Improvement
Initiative
Lifecycle
Management
• Prioritization Process • Initiatives Sponsors
• Initiatives Owners
• CSI Steering Group • Appoint Sponsors
• Review, Prioritize,
Approve, Defer or
Reject Initiatives
• Review Benefits
Management Commitment
Measurement Culture Projects
27 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PRIORITIZATION PROCESS – WHEN IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITY BECOMES AN IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE (A PROJECT)
Improvement opportunity
It is a contained piece of work that is aimed at improving processes, and which requires the allocation of resources to implement it. It can be scoped, designed, developed and rolled-out.
Each improvement opportunity must propose a mechanism to monitor itself, measure success, and to plan its own improvement, and/or it should plug into an existing improvement framework.
The overall time spent on the full lifecycle of an improvement should ideally not exceed six months; otherwise, there is a risk of losing momentum, focus and buy-in from stakeholders.
Improvement Initiative
It is an approved improvement opportunity, when prioritization has been done by the CSI Steering Group.
An Improvement initiatives must be tracked in the CSI Register and must use formal change management and project management processes.
SIP
Continual Service Improvement Plan. The SIP is the improvement project which is executed to improve the Service.
Improvement
Opportunity
(Project)
Prioritization
Process
Improvement
Initiative
(Project Mgt.)
Follow-up Tool
28 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PRIORITIZATION PROCESS OVERVIEW
Scope
Limited to the organization in which the process is executed Prioritization should consider all projects in the organization,
even the ones not launched via CSI Phases
Capture Opportunity Create Business Case Prioritize Follow-up – Project (Charter/Design/Implement) Monitor, Evaluate and Sustain Review Benefits
Close (Tool & Relationships)
Must be linked to Projects Follow-up Tool Ideally, linked with Portfolio Mgt. for resource management Prioritize phase
29 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
PRIORITIZATION PROCESS ROLES
Role Description
Improvement Initiative
Requester
Any member of staff involved in raising an Improvement Initiative.
It is everyone’s responsibility to undertake CSI the organization
CSI Manager Is accountable for all activities pertaining to Continual Services Improvement.
The CSI Manager may simultaneously have both role of
‘Prioritization Process’ Owner / Manager .
SIP Owner The person responsible for the delivery of a specific improvement plan (SIP).
He is also responsible for creating charters, and report progress updates.
This role should be held by the improvement project manager.
SIP Sponsor The person accountable for the delivery of a specific improvement plan (SIP).
A Sponsor may hold the role for many improvements.
CSI Steering Group The CSI Steering Group is the highest level of authorization for Improvement Initiatives
in the organization in which the prioritization process is executed.
For example, this group may be comprised of Permanent Members (Head of
organization and Managers of organization ) and Backup Members (appointed by
Permanent Members to replace them).
30 Copyright © Hervé Doornbos 2015. All Rights Reserved
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
20 years of Professional experience.
11 years in Infrastructure Outsourcing Services
Certified ITIL v3 Expert
Areas of Intervention
Skills
20 years of IT Experience
11 years of experience in Infrastructure Outsourcing, with
5 years of experience as a Service Management consultant
Definition and implementation of ITIL processes
Continuous Service Improvement integration into processes
4 years as a Skill Group Manager
9 years as a technical expert
Professional Experience
Career SIDO & ONIC [2 years], Transiciel [2 years], Oracle [5 years], Capgemini [11 years]
ITIL v3 / COBIT v5
IT Service Management
Management
Oracle Expert
IT Service Management
Multi-Sourcing SIAM
Assets, Incident, Problem, Change, Release & Deploy,
Configuration, Continual Improvement, Operational processes
Hervé Doornbos