Upload
cisco-data-center
View
641
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1Cisco Confidential 1© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Tony Harvey
Cisco Power Case Study
Senior Product Manager SSVPG
June 2012
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 2
Overview• Multi-billion dollar organization experiencing significant datacenter growth
• Based on growth the current datacenter and service design would rapidly fill the existing facility
• The project was to build a private cloud with the following goals:1) Reduced cabling
2) Reduced power consumption
3) Reducing physical server deployment time frames
4) Increased server density/better floor space utilization
5) Faster service deployment
6) Increased service availability
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 3
Existing POD Design
• POD
• 800 sq ft
• 40 Server Cabinets
• 100kW Power
• 240-320 Servers
• EDA - Equipment Distribution Area
• 6 – 8 Servers per Cabinet
• ~2.5kW Power Cabinet
• 24x CAT 7a Copper Ports to HDA
• 24x LC Fibre Ports every third cabinet to storage MDA
• HDA - Horizontal Distribution Area
• 120x CAT 7a Copper & 48x LC Fibre to MDA
• 128x analog and 32x serial KVM ports to MDA
• 4x telecom relay racks
• 2x server access switches (2x 10GbE & 312 GbE ports)
• 1x Utility Switch(2x 10GbE, 312 GbE ports)
Main Distribution Area
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 4
High Density POD
• POD
• 800 sq ft
• 40 Server Cabinets
• 280kW Power
• ~1280 Servers
• Micro POD EDA - Equipment Distribution Area
• 32 Servers per Cabinet/ 160 Per Micro POD
• ~7kW Power Cabinet
• 8-16x CAT 7a Copper to HDA
• 72-96x LC Fibre Ports to HDA
• HDA - Horizontal Distribution Area
• 48x CAT 7a Copper & 48x LC Fibre to MDA
• 2x telecom relay racks
• 2x Optional storage/legacy server racks
• 2x server access switches (N5K)
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 5
POD Design Comparison
POD Type Cabinets/POD
Sq footage Power/ POD Servers/ POD Servers/ sq foot
Power/ Server
Power/ Cabinet
Low Density
40 800 ft2 100 kW 280 0.35 / ft2 357 watts 2.5 kW
High Density
40 800 ft2 280 kW 1,280 1.6 / ft2 219 watts 7.0 kW
Change 0% 0% 180% 350% 350% (39%) 180%
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 6
Service Deployment
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 7
Issues• Traditionally IT divided into separate areas
Network
Servers
Storage
• Changes to installed base required sign-off by all 3
• New installs required additional sign-off by Facilities
• Physical connection layout dictated a servers role
• Each team dedicated to maximizing the effective use of their own assets but little co-ordination on providing the most effective service
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 8
UCS: Embedded AutomationIntegrated, Policy-Based Infrastructure Management
Server Policy…
Storage Policy…
Network Policy…
Virtualization Policy…
Application Profiles…
Subject Matter Experts Define Policies1
StorageSME
ServerSME
NetworkSME
Policies Used to Create
Service Profile Templates
2
Service ProfileTemplatesCreate Service Profiles
3
Associating Service Profiles with Hardware Configures Servers
Automatically
4
Unified Management
Server NameUUID, MAC, WWN
Boot InformationLAN, SAN ConfigFirmware Policy
Server NameUUID, MAC, WWNBoot InformationLAN, SAN ConfigFirmware Policy
Server NameUUID, MAC, WWNBoot InformationLAN, SAN ConfigFirmware Policy
Server NameUUID, MAC, WWNBoot InformationLAN, SAN ConfigFirmware Policy
Server NameUUID, MAC, WWNBoot InformationLAN, SAN ConfigFirmware Policy
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 9
VDI Users
Servers Needed – 140 Peak
Rapid Re-provisioningVDI Servers In Use
7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:000
50010001500200025003000
• Significant amounts of unused server capacity in off-hours
• UCS Service Profiles enable dynamic H/W re-provisioning
• Servers can repurposed to other jobs
• Compute farm
• Sell unused capacityCustomer use example: http://www.chrisatkinson.com/?p=81
7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:000
50
100
150
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 10
Results• Current implementation of 400 servers
Power Saved = 55.2kW
$48,355 per annum
• Full POD – 1280 servers176.6kW power saved
$154,736 per annum
2,800 sq feet of floor space
Total Cable Savings $90,000.
4380 Cat7a cables at $20 per cable
72 LC Fibre Cables at $75 per cable
• Provisioning Time20:1 reduction in provisioning time
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 11
Thank you.