16
Interaction Between Magnetism and Superconductivity Jeremie Doehla Adviser: Dr. Goran Karapetrov Department of Physics Drexel University June 4, 2013

Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation slides for my oral qualifying exam for PhD candidacy at Drexel University.

Citation preview

Page 1: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Interaction Between Magnetism and

Superconductivity

Jeremie Doehla

Adviser: Dr. Goran Karapetrov

Department of Physics

Drexel University

June 4, 2013

Page 2: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Magnetism

Ferromagnetism● Spontaneous spin

alignment

● Long range order

Diamagnetism● Negative magnetic

susceptibility

● Perfect diamagnetism = Meissner effect

Page 3: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Superconductivity

● Perfect diamagnet

● Long range order

● BCS theory

– Low temperature

– Absence of magnetic field

● Type I

● Type II – vortex state

Page 4: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Ferromagnetic-Superconductor Hybrids

● A superconducting state may be induced by a magnetic field.

Applied Magnetic Field

Fre

e E

nerg

y (F

)

Page 5: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Proximity Effect

● When in contact with a normal or ferromagnetic material there is a penetration of the cooper pairs into said material.

● Ginzburg-Landau Equation:

Page 6: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

KxFe

2-ySe

2

● New materials (2008)

● Each phase may have a different magnetic order

● 1 phase found to be superconducting

● KFe2Se2-z

● K2Fe4Se5

● Two structures of KFe2Se2

(different charge orderings)

● And Others

FeSe KFe2Se

2

Page 7: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

KxFe

2-ySe

2: Crystal Growth

● Step 1: FeSe(vapor self transport)

● Step 2: KFe2Se

2

(from melt)

● Post annealing/ quenching

● Contamination concerns

Page 8: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

KxFe2-ySe2: Characterization

● Why is it a superconductor?

● How do the different phases interact with each other and behave independently?

Techniques:● X-Ray Diffraction

● Resistance

● Hall effect

● Magnetization

Page 9: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

CharacterizationX-Ray diffraction:

● Crystal structure characterization

● Different crystal phases will have different characteristic peaks

Resistivity:

● CDW

● Varies greatly with stoichiometry

Page 10: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

CharacterizationHall Effect

● Charge carrier

● FeSe has been found to have a change in the sign of the hall effect

Magnetization

● Hc1, Hc2, magnetic susceptibility

Page 11: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Conclusion

KxFe

2-ySe

2

● Behavior of each phase individually

● Interaction between the different phases

In General● Why high temperature

superconductors form

● Further investigate the fundamental relationship between magnetization and superconductivity

Page 12: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

References● Ashcroft and Mermin. Solid State Physics. Brooks, Belmont, CA, 1976.● A. I. Buzdin. Proximity eects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures. Reviews of modern physics, 77, July

2005.● T.-L. Xia D. M. Wang, J. B. He and G. F. Chen. Eect of varying iron content on the transport properties of the

patassium-intercalated iron selenide k(x)fe(2-y)se(2). Physical Review B, 83, 2011.● Bing Shen Zhen-yu Wang Chun-Hong Li Fei Han, Huan Yang and Hai-Hu Wen. Metastable superconducting state in

quenched k(x)fe(2-y)se(2). Philosophical Magazine, 92, July 2012.● Kuo-Wei Yeh Ta-Kun Chen Tzu-Wen Huang Phillip M.Wu Yong-Chi Lee Yi-Lin Huang Yan-Yi Chu Der-Chung Yan Fong-

Chi Hsu, Jiu-Yong Luo and Maw-Kuen Wu. Superconductivity in the pbo-type structure alpha-fese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(38), September 2008.

● M. Decroux-O. Fischer G. Remenyi H. W. Meul, C. Rossel and A. Briggs. Observation of magnetic-eld-induced superconductivity. The American Physical Society, 53(5), July 1984.

● V. Jaccarino and M. Peter. Ultra-high-eld superconductivity. Physical Review Letters, 9(7), October 1962.● Genda Gu J M Tranquada Jinsheng Wen, Guangyong Xu and R J Birgeneau. Interplay between magnetism and

superconductivity in iron-chalcogenide superconductors: crystal growth and characterizations. Reports on Progress in Physics, 74, September 2011.

● Hirano Kamihara, Watanabe and Hosono. Iron-based layered superconductor la[o(1-x)f(x)]feas(x = 0.05-0.12). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 130, March 2008.

● Charles Kittel. Introduction to Solid State Physics. John wiley and Sons, Inc., USA, 2005.● I. F. Lyuksyutov and V. L. Pokrovsky. Ferromagnet-superconductor hybrids. Advances in Physics, 54(1), 2005.● Ksenofontov Felser Xu Zandbergen Hor Allred Williams Qu Checkelsky Ong McQueen, Huang and Cava. Extreme

sensitivity of superconductivity to stoichiometry in fe1+delta se. Physical Review B, 79, January 2009.● Davin J. Morgan and J. B. Ketterson. Asymmetric ux pinning in a regular array of magnetic dipoles. Physical Review

Letters, 80(16), April 1998.● A.C. Rose-Innes and E.H. Rhoderick. Introduction to Superconductivity. Pergamon Press Ltd., Elmsford, New York,

1978.● T. Terashima T. Yakabe Y. Terai M. Tokumoto A. Kobayashi H. Tanaka S. Uji, H. Shinagawa and H. Kobayashi.

Magnetic-eld-induced superconductivity in a two-dimensional organic conductor. Letters to nature, 410, April 2001.● Applied Superconductivity and Cryoscience Group. Lectures on superconductivity. Technical report, University of

Cambridge.● S. H. Yu S. Avci Z. L. Xiao H. Claus J. Schlueter V. V. Vlasko-Clasov U. Welp U. Patel, J. Hua and W. K. Kwok. Growth

and superconductivity of fese(x) crystals. Applied Physics Letters, 94, 2009.● Zhi Li Peng Deng Kai Chang Ke He Shuaihua Ji Lili Wang Xucun Ma Jiang-Ping Hu Xi Chen Wei Li, Hao Ding and Qi-

Kun Xue. Kfe(2)se(2) is the parent compound of k-doped iron selenide superconductors. Physical Review Letters, 109, 2012.

Page 13: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Acknowledgments

● Petra Husanikova● Christopher Brown● Joey Lambert● Erica Smith

Page 14: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Sample carrier design

● Needs to fit down the central shaft of dewar

● Space considerations

● Thermal considerations

● Vacuum considerations

● Electrical contacts

– Sensors

– Utility● Replaceable parts

Page 15: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Sample carrier design

● Still a work in progress

● Temperature sensor

● Heating

● Electrical leads

Page 16: Drexel Oral Qualifying Exam Presentation

Crystal Growth and Measurements done

(although, not related to KxFe2-xSe2)● CuxTiSe2

● Iodine vapor transport

● Grown on Temple's campus(same place we will grow KxFe2-xSe2)

Measurements:● Resistance vs.

temperature

Temperature (K)

Res

ista

nce

mea

sur e

d