31
FILE MANAGER Searching an optimal file manager for end user LE Hoang Nhi

For Gnome 3.0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

FILE MANAGER

Searching an optimal file manager for end user

LE Hoang Nhi

Why do we need an optimal file manager?

Beginning with the music player, every body agree with me that Songbird, Banshee, Rhythmbox manage the music file better than Xmms.

So I want to manage all my multimedia (music, video, photo...) in a media center like this way.

Final, I want to have an application to manage all my documents (multimedia, docs...) by this modern file manager.

File Browser # Panel Filter

Old file manager:

File browser (FB)

Modern file manager:

Panel filter (PF)

I call the old and modern file manager that's File browser and Panel Filter. I don't talk about a specific software but about whole characters specified of many softwares.

Plan

What are different from File browser and Panel filter? Folder tree # Multi-tag tree

Manual classification # Auto Filter

Searching # Filtering

Close # Connecting

Appearance: inflexible # flexible

Some other characters

Some illustration of Panel Filter New File Manager candidates

Why do we need a multi-tag?

I want to save a file in my computer. Ex: the picture nearby.

I hesitate to save it in one of among of folders: opensource, funny, party...

It's difficult for me to find it late if I don't remember in where I saved it.

I can do it easily by multi-Tag.

FOLDER TREE # Multi-TAG TREE

FB organizes files by FOLDER TREE:

Saving your file in one folder on your folder tree.

You need many folders for all.

PF organizes files by Multi-TAG TREE:

Saving your file (not in folder but) in one or more tags, suggested by Tag Tree or smart Tag.

You need only one database for all (all in “My Documents”)

Manual classification # Auto Filter

In FB, the files are saved and classified manually in the folder suggested such as: Music, Pictures, Videos, Documents

In PF, just put all files in “My Documents” with tag! Don't worry. It classifies automatically all files by application and many other characters.

Nemo

Nautilus

Searching # Filtering

FB search files by “Search”

PF may be find files by multi-character before searching.

Ex: Filter by : time, tag, rate, application, genre, people...

Close # Connecting

FB is close. It knows only local files.

PF can connect to internet and other devices.

Appearance

FB's appearance is inflexible

PF allows the user to modify his appearance alike Songbird ;)

SUMMARY

FILE BROWSER File organization:

FOLDER TREE Manual classification

Search by “find”

Close Inflexible appearance

PANEL FILTER Organization:

Multi-TAG TREE Automatic filter by

multi-character Search by “Filter and

dynamic search” Open and connecting Flexible appearance

Some other PF's characters

The modern file manager has also some characters:

Cross platform (run in Linux, Mac, Windows...) Multi application support (not support only

music or photo but all of music, photo, video, documents...)

Plug-in such as: lyric for a song, all information about a movie...

...

Some illustration of Panel Filter

Multimedia file manager: Songbird, Banshee, Rhythmbox, ITunes, Windows media player...

Photo file manager: F-spot, Picasa, Windows Gallery...

Collection: Gcstar File manager: Nemo, Nautilus, Dolphin...

and Finder (I never used, but its screenshots are great)

Songbird

Banshee

Rhythmbox

ITunes

Windows Media player

F-Spot

Picasa

Windows Gallery

Gcstarhttp://www.gcstar.org/

Nemo http://www.iola.dk/nemo

Nautilus

Dolphin

FINDER

New File manager candidates

Now, we haven't got a File Manager open source software which reach all Panel Filter's characters. I choose some candidates: Nautilus, Dolphin, Banshee, Songbird, Rhythmbox, F-spot, Nemo, Gcstar. Let compare them.

Software Platform App-Support Plug-in Panel Filter

Nautilus Linux All No No

Dolphin Linux All I don't know I don't know

Banshee Linux, Windows Music, Video Yes Yes

Songbird Linux, Windows Music Yes (great) YesRhythmbox Linux Music Yes (no much) YesF-spot Linux Photo Yes YesNemo Linux Almost No Yes (but only app. and time filter)Gcstar Linux, Windows Many Yes (great) YesWe Need All All Yes (many, many)Yes (with many characters)

Which for?

So I hope that the developer of these candidates integrate all Panel Filter's characters to their softwares.

ZXC232's contributions

We can't remove folder tree immediately. So we should maintain 2 view modes by option: View by folder and View by tag

Open, Save, Save as... of all File manager applications need have 2 these modes.

Auto-tag for old data (ex: by indexing of Google desktop search)

Thanks zxc232 for your ideas, my friend.

Which for?

http://dvhart.com/content/blog/dvhart/linux/file_management_idea_from_john_stultz

File management applications (rhythmbox, f-spot, etc) as top level storage locations:

http://www.gnome.org/~federico/docs/2008-GUADEC/html/index.html

Document-centric GNOME

You can find another ideas like this for GNOME:

I love Gnome!So If we want to have a “radically changing its user model or taking advantage of new technologies” for Gnome 3.0,

That's here: A new file manager for all files.

Who are pioneers?

I see in the website of Songbird, they talk about themselves : “Pioneers of the Inevitable”. That's right.

Is Panel Filter a Inevitable?

If yes, who are pioneers?