28
+ Human-to-Dancer Interaction Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation David A. Shamma Renata M. Sheppard JürgenSchible

Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Human-to-Dancer

Interaction

Designing for

Embodied

Performances in a

Participatory

Installation

David A. Shamma

Renata M. Sheppard

JürgenSchible

Page 2: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Autonomous Expressionism by me

Shamma, D. A. Autonomous expressionism: a framework for installation directed network

arts. International Journal of Arts and Technology 2, 1 (2009), 62–81.

Page 3: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Media is often consumed and reused

Page 4: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+We actually do this in an everyday

context

Page 5: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Mobisprayby JürgenSchible

Page 6: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Remix for everyone

Page 7: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Telepresence in Dance by Renata Sheppard

Page 8: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Need Feedback? Add motion.

Page 9: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Ecosystem

Page 10: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Laban Movement Analysis

Page 11: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Dancers

Christy Funsch Erin Mei-Ling Stuart NolSimonse

Page 12: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Graffiti Dance

Allow people to create political/news charged graffiti

Allow local and world images and texts

Simplify the technology, focus on the work

Have Meaningful and Observable Phenomena: not random or

free flowing. Movement from dancers to reflect activity on the

projection. (Think Richard Coyne Tuning)

Have Professionals in a close interaction with participants

Score Creation from Log Analysis (which didn’t quite happen)

Page 13: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Berkeley Art Museum 2010

Page 14: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Dancing via a public display

Page 15: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Rehearsal

Page 16: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Performance

Page 17: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Controlling Relationships

Page 18: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Controlling Relationships

We can’t quite see the relationship between

what were doing and what the dancers

are doing but I think that might be the idea

of it. If you knew, if you could directly see

the connection between the dancing and

the controlling then you might start to try

to manipulate it. But right now we cant

quite do that. (A1)

Page 19: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Who’s in control?

Page 20: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Who’s in control?

They thought we were controlling the

images, once they learned that they

were controlling it was interesting to

see their delight in that and how it

brought them to a new place of play

with the phones and then they got a

little bit more engaged and excited.

(D3)

Page 21: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Body Moving

Page 22: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Body Moving

“I want to just start moving my

body so much even though I

know it doesn’t make a

difference.” (A3)

Page 23: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Not afraid

Page 24: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Not afraid

I think this audience was definitely

not afraid of approaching us to

find out how everything worked,

ya the seemed to enjoy figuring

out they could make us do stuff.

(D1)

Page 25: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Amateur-to-Professional interaction

Page 26: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Amateur-to-Professional interaction

We worked really close to the

people watching the performance

and installation and we were able

to hear their own responses to

what was going on. (D3)

Page 27: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+Movement is not a proxy.

Page 28: Human to Dancer Interaction: Designing for Embodied Performances in a Participatory Installation

+ Thanks!To my fellow artists (Renata

&Jürgen). Also to our amazing

dancers Christy Funsch,

NolSimonse, and Erin Mei-Ling

Stuart; their contribution, advise, and

patience during many a rehearsal

section.