Upload
knoldus-software-llp
View
1.171
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Implicit Conversion and Parameters in Scala
Piyush MishraSoftware Consultant
Knoldus software LLP
Topics Covered
Why Implicit are needed
Implicit conversions
Rule for Implicit
Where Implicit are tried
Implicit Parameters
Debugging Implicit
Why Implicit are needed
There’s a fundamental difference between your own code and libraries of other people
you can change or extend your own code as you wish
but if you want to use someone else’s libraries, you usually have to take them as they are.
They are also used in resolving type check errors.
So in order to use others library as yours you use implicit conversions and parameters
Implicit ConversionOne of the central collection traits in Scala isRandomAccessSeq[T], which describes random access sequences over ele-ments of type T.
Java’s String class does not inherit from Scala’sRandomAccessSeq trait.
Implicit Conversion
In situations like this, implicits can help. To make a String appear to be a subtype of RandomAccessSeq, you can define an implicit conversion from String to an adapter class that actually is a subtype of RandomAccessSeq
implicit def stringWrapper(s: String) =new RandomAccessSeq[Char] {def length = s.lengthdef apply(i: Int) = s.charAt(i)}
scala> stringWrapper("abc123") exists (_.isDigit)res0: Boolean = true
Rules For Implicit
Implicit definitions are those that the compiler is allowed to insert into a program in order to fix any of its type errors .
Implicit conversions are governed by the following general rules.
Marking Rule
Only definitions marked implicit are available. The implicit keyword is used to mark which declarations the compiler mayuse as implicits. we can use it to mark any variable, function, or objectDefinition.
implicit def intToString(x: Int) = x.toString
The compiler will only change x + y convert(x) + y if convert is marked as implicit. The compiler will only select among the definitions you have explicitly marked as implicit.
Scope RuleAn inserted implicit conversion must be in scope as a single identifier, or be associated with the source or target type of the conversion
The Scala compiler will only consider implicit conversions that are in scope. To make an implicit conversion available, therefore, you must in some way bring it into scope
Non-Ambiguity Rule An implicit conversion is only inserted if there is no other possible conversion to insert.
If the compiler has two options to fix x + y, say using either convert1(x) + y or convert2(x) + y, then it will report an error and refuse to choose between them.
Explicits-First RuleWhenever code type checks as it is written, no
implicits are attempted.
The compiler will not change code that already works.
One-at-a-time Rule
Only one implicit is tried. The compiler will never rewrite x + y to convert1(convert2(x)) + y.
Doing so would cause compile times to increase dramatically on erroneous code .
Naming an implicit conversion.object MyConversions {
implicit def stringWrapper(s: String):
RandomAccessSeq[Char] = ...
implicit def intToString(x: Int): String = ...
}
import MyConversions.stringWrapper
... // code making use of stringWrapper
In this example, it was important that the implicit conversions had names,
because only that way could you selectively import one and not the other.
Where implicits are triedThere are three places implicits are used in theLanguage
conversions to an expected type.
conversions of the receiver of a selection.
implicit parameters.
Implicit conversion to an expected type
def printWithSpaces(seq: RandomAccessSeq[Char]) = seq mkString " "
println(printWithSpaces("Hello"))
Converting the receiversuppose you write down obj.doIt, and obj does
not have a member named doIt. The compiler will try to insert conversions
before giving up. In this case, the conversion needs to apply to the receiver,
obj. The compiler will act as if the expected “type” of obj were “has a
member named doIt.
Interoperable with new typesclass Rational(n: Int, d: Int) {
def + (that: Rational): Rational = ...
def + (that: Int): Rational = ...
}
scala> 1 + oneHalf
<console>:6: error: overloaded method value + with
alternatives (Double)Double <and> ... cannot be applied
to (Rational)
1 + oneHalf
scala> implicit def intToRational(x: Int) =
new Rational(x, 1)
intToRational: (Int)Rational
scala> 1 + oneHalf
res6: Rational = 3/2●
Simulating new syntaxThe other major use of implicit conversions is to simulate adding new syntax.
Recall that you can make a Map using syntax like this:
Map(1 -> "one", 2 -> "two", 3 -> "three")
Have you wondered how the -> is supported? It’s not syntax! Instead, -> is
a method of the class ArrowAssoc, a class defined inside the standard Scala preamble (scala.Predef)
Implicit parametersThe remaining place the compiler inserts implicits is within argument lists.
The compiler will sometimes replace someCall(a) with someCall(a)(b),
or new SomeClass(a) with new SomeClass(a)(b), thereby adding a missing parameter list to complete a function call.
For example, if someCall’s missing last parameter list takes three parameters, the compiler will supply them implicitly
Debugging implicitsSometimes you might wonder why the compiler did not find an implicit
conversion that you think should apply. In that case it helps to write the conversion out explicitly. If that also gives an error message, you then know why the compiler could not apply your implicit
scala> val chars: List[Char] = "xyz"
error: type mismatch; java.lang.String("xyz") required: List[Char]
scala> val chars: List[Char] = stringWrapper("xyz")
error: type mismatch;
found java.lang.Object with RandomAccessSeq[Char]
required: List[Char]
val chars: List[Char] = stringWrapper("xyz")
Scala QuickPimpPatternclass ListFirstTen[T](xs: List[T]) { def
firstTen: List[T] = xs.slice(0, 9)
}
implicit def listToFirstTen[T](xs: List[T]) = new ListFirstTen[T](xs)
println(List(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12).firstTen)
Thank you