- 1. Nguyen, Song Huyen Chau, n7665288 Tran, Thi Ngoc Nhung,
n7704119Image from
http://nh121996.edublogs.org/files/2012/06/web20-2eas71n.jpg
2. DefinitionsCharacteristicsKey applicationsMajor risksImage
from
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QE6FSEhJBeY/T1gaIKMjLDI/AAAAAAAAD3g/iV9UJbhVkfw/s1600/web2.jpg
3. Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry
caused by the move to the internet as platform, and an attempt to
understand the rules for success on that new platform. Chief among
those rules is this: build applications that harness network
effects to get better the more people use them. (OReilly,
2006)Image from
http://askatechteacher.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/web2postbubblebubbleboom.gif
4. Web 2.0 is defined as a space that allowsanyone to create and
share informationonline -a spaceforcollaboration,conversation,
andinteraction; a spacethat ishighlydynamic, flexible, and
adaptable. (Coombs , 2007)Image from
http://pgrschoolofeducation.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/web2marketing.jpg
5. Image from
http://yarikson.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/web-20-scheme.png 6.
Image from
http://simpleprocesses.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/web-1-0-and-web-2-02.jpg
7. Image from
http://wemtech.wikispaces.com/file/view/web1vsweb2.png/101172389/web1vsweb2.png
8. Three basic characteristics: the freeing and innovative use of
data the building of virtual applications by drawing from the
present applications and data the participatory role of the user in
whatever format the user wants to work or share.(Miller, 2006)Image
from
http://cf.ltkcdn.net/web-design/images/std/37992-400x300-Web20.jpg
9. A user-centred characteristic classification: Information
sharing (e.g. documents and video) Grassroots mobilization (e.g.
spreading news and opinions) Community building (e.g. meeting new
friends, creating new services) (Kool & van Wamelen, 2008,
cited in Chua, 2010)Image from
http://www.jonathannicholas.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/social-networking.jpg
10. Seven categories of Web 2.0 applications Publishing Platforms
Social Networking Sites Democratized Content Networks Virtual
Networking Platforms Information Aggregators Edited Social News
Platforms Content Distribution Sites(Kami Huyse, cited in
McDermott, 2007) Image from
http://www.connectioncafe.com/assets/blog-images/social-media-logos.jpg
11. The most popular tool-application areas associated with Web 2.0
include:blogs, wikis, RSS, podcasts and videocasts, mashups, social
sharingservices, communication tools, social networks, folksomonies
and tagging, andvirtual worlds.(Kelly, 2008)Image from
http://pixelcoblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/icontexto-drink-web20.png
12. Blogs Wikis Tagging and social bookmarking Streaming media RSS
(Really Simple Syndication) SNS (Social Networking Sites)(Adapted
from Anderson, 2007; Harris, 2008)Image from
http://www.prav-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/web-2-sites.jpg
13. The term web-log, or blog, refers to a simple webpage
consistingof brief paragraphs of opinion, information, personal
diaryentries, or links, called posts, arranged chronologically with
themost recent first, in the style of an online journal (Doctorow
etal., 2002). (Anderson, 2007, p.7)Image from
http://kathybackus.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/blog-2.jpg 14. A
wiki is a webpage or set of webpages that can be easily edited
byanyone who is allowed access(Ebersbach et al., 2006, cited in
Anderson, 2007, p.8) Image from
http://uwstoutinnovations.wikispaces.com/file/view/wiki.gif/81914965/484x335/wiki.gif
15. A tag is a keyword that is added to a digital object to
describe it, butnot as part of a formal classification
system.Social bookmarking systems allow users tocreate lists of
bookmarks orfavorites, to store these centrally on aremote service
and to share them withother users of the system.(Anderson, 2007,
p.9)Image from
http://batya150.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/free-social-media-iconset-price-tag-style.jpg
16. Podcasts are audio recordings, usually in MP3 format, oftalks,
interviews and lectures, which can be played either on adesktop
computer or on a wide range of handheld MP3 devices.(Anderson,
2007, p.10)Image from
http://www.indiana.edu/~icy/images/itunes_podcast_icon.jpg 17. RSS
is a family of formats which allowusers to find out about updates
to thecontent of RSS-enabled websites, blogsor podcasts without
actually having to goand visit the site.(Anderson, 2007, p.10)Image
from
http://www.deviantart.com/download/51752520/Transparent_PNG_RSS_logo_by_TarnicDotCom.png
18. Professional and social networkingsites that facilitate
meetingpeople, finding like minds, sharingcontentuses ideas
fromharnessing thepower of thecrowd, networkeffect andindividual
production/usergenerated content. (Anderson, 2007, p.13)Image from
http://snowkiwi.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/sns10_1.jpg
19. Aggregation services Data mash-ups Tracking and filtering
content Collaborating(Anderson, 2007)Image from
http://img.scoop.it/6baiker4xkR_1_BwxKnp-Tl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVaiQDB_Rd1H6kmuBWtceBJ
20. Aggregation services gatherinformation from diverse
sourcesacross the Web and publish in oneplace (e.g.
Google)(Anderson, 2007)Image from
http://diversegy.com/img/aggregation_img.jpg 21. Web services that
pull together data from different sources to create anew service
(i.e. aggregation and recombination). (Anderson, 2007)Image from
http://www.lgeoresearch.com/img/MashupHandshake.jpg 22. Services
that keep track of, filter, analyse and allow search of thegrowing
amounts of Web 2.0 content from blogs, multimedia sharingservices
etc.(Anderson, 2007, p.13)Image from
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRc1ly-Ow6Jx0qoSee5gLp6Bkg59zGamz2lpcr-lDEbFDf1wxu-
6h9TmSjl 23. Collaborativereferenceworks (like Wikipedia) that are
built using wiki-like software tools. Uses ideas from harnessing
the powerof thecrowd and architecture of participation. (Anderson,
2007)Image from
http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/resources/C3DBF366-7292-40EF-8D5E-63D292701E2F/global_collaboration.jpg
24. Security risks Social risksImage from
http://www.tina-george.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/risks.jpg 25.
Media, marketing and the lack of controlWeb 2.0 = More content,
Less control, More uncertainly Data privacyWeb 2.0 = a Personal
Data Explosion(Bartkiewicz, 2008, p.17 & 23) Image
fromhttp://www.artistsvalley.com/images/icons/Network%20Security%20Icons%20Var/Hyperlink%20Security%20Risk/256x256/Hyperlink%20Security%20Risk.jpg
26. Many of the Web 2.0 applications contain no provision for
monitoringcontent or traffic to ensure that sensitive information
is not beingtransmitted inappropriately.(Cunningham, 2009)Image
from
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSwJR2DsolE-IaQbj0iGqeEw8j42fYYKX1aDsceJU7k61VASNN80Q
27. SOCIAL FREELOADERS SOCIAL A LISTERS SOCIAL NON-TRANSPARENCY
SOCIAL GOSSIP SOCIAL DEVIANCY(Bogatin, 2006)Image from
http://k02.kn3.net/6F91E571B.jpg 28. Loss of information Release of
confidential information Disreputable behaviour Public negative
comments Accessibility Lack of engagement (Briggs, 2008)Image from
http://www.dunwebcarts.com/images/OSC/risk-icon.jpg 29. Image from
http://www.wiikno.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/people-jumping-web.gif
30. Image from
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9UXgxLiQ27w/T32vuRN4jCI/AAAAAAAAATk/10jhQWOMDbU/s1600/thank-
31. Anderson, P. (2007) What is web 2.0? ideas, technologies and
implications for education.JISC Technology and Standards Watch.
Retrieved
fromhttp://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
Bartkiewicz,
2008.http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/16/The%20Emerging%20Business%20Risks%20of%20Web%202_0%20Models%20Presentation.pdf
Bogatin, D. (2006). Web 2.0: Top five social risks list. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/micro-markets/web-20-top-five-social-risks-list/288
Briggs, D. (2008). The risks and opportunities of web 2.0.
Retrieved
fromhttp://www.slideshare.net/davebriggs/risk-opportunities-of-web-20
Chua, A.Y.K. (2010). A study of Web 2.0 applications in library
websites. Library &information science research, 32 (3), 203.
32. Coombs, K.A. (2007). Building a library web site on the pillars
of Web 2.0. Computersin Libraries, 27 (1), 16-19. Cunningham, P.
(2009). Web 2.0: Issues & risks. Information ManagementJournal,
43(1), 28. Retrieved
fromhttp://web.ebscohost.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=698fd342-3627-44a0-92d5-dd0426b36b5d%40sessionmgr114&vid=2&hid=113
Doctorow, C., Dornfest, F., Johnson, J. Scott, Powers, S. (2002).
Essential Blogging.OReilly. Ebersbach, A., Glaser, M., Heigl, R.
2006. Wiki: Web Collaboration. Springer-Verlag:Germany. Harris, C.
(2008). WEB 2.0. Canadian Underwriter, 75(2), 10. Retrieved
fromhttp://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/224940145/fulltextPDF?accountid=13380
Laningham, S (ed.) 2006. Tim Berners-Lee. Podcast, developerWorks
Interviews, 22ndAugust, IBM website. Available online at:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/ [last accessed
17/01/07]. 33. Lawton, G. (2007). Web 2.0 creates security
challenges. Computer, 40(10), 13-16.doi:10.1109/MC.2007.367
McDermott, I. E. (2007). All A-Twitter about Web 2.0: What does it
offer libraries?.Searcher, 15(9), 3439. O Reilly, T. (2006). Web
2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again. Retrieved
fromhttp://radar.oreilly.com/2006/12/web-20-compact-definition-tryi.html
O Reilly, T. (2007). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business
Models for the NextGeneration of Software. Communication &
Strategies 65(1), 17-37. Retrieved
fromhttp://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4578/
