Upload
nirmala-last
View
1.472
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
1
Maximizing Revenuewith a
Leg Revenue Management System
Maximizing Revenuewith a
Leg Revenue Management System
E. Andrew BoydVice President, Research and Design
PROS Revenue Management
2
Revenue Management GoalRevenue Management Goal
To achieve the goal of increased revenues, the value of each ticket sold must be known with some certainty
Generate increased revenues by seeking to accept the highest paying mix of passengers
Generate increased revenues by seeking to accept the highest paying mix of passengers
3
A Perfect WorldA Perfect World
One flight leg One fare per booking class
Y = 800 M = 600 B = 500 Q = 350
4
Perfect FaresPerfect FaresFareFare
ClassClassYY MM BB QQ
200200
400400
600600
800800
10001000
800800
600600500500
350350
5
Fares in RealityFares in RealityFareFare
ClassClassYY MM BB QQ
200200
400400
600600
800800
10001000
FareRangeFare
Range
6
Where Does Fare Variation Come From?
Where Does Fare Variation Come From?
Source 1: Distribution Channel
7
Where Does Fare Variation Come From?Where Does Fare Variation Come From? Source 1: Distribution Channel
Y class tickets on flight 111 may sell for different fares because of distribution channel
InventoryInventory
TravelAgencies
TravelAgencies
TourOperators
TourOperators
CorporateAccountsCorporateAccounts
Code ShareArrangementsCode Share
Arrangements
InternetSales
InternetSales
InternetAuctionInternetAuction
FrequentFlier Programs
FrequentFlier Programs
AlliancesAlliances
8
Distribution Channels:Front End or Back End Fare Control?
Distribution Channels:Front End or Back End Fare Control?
Front End Fare Control Make sure fares align
across distribution channels when they are established
Back End Fare Control Assume fares will not be
aligned, and account for differences when a purchase request arrives
Front EndFront End
Back EndBack End
9
Front End Fare ControlFront End Fare Control
Good front end control is extremely difficult to achieve, but is the only alternative for carriers in a non-seamless / leg environment How to assure that all Y class tickets on flight
111 sell for approximately the same price?
10
Back End Fare ControlBack End Fare Control
Seamless availability / O&D provides the opportunity to address many distribution channel issues from the back end Dynamic fare calculation at time of request:
assigning the right fare to each transaction
11
The Value of Back End Fare ControlThe Value of Back End Fare Control
The worse fair alignment is on the front end, the greater the impact of back end fare control
Back end fair control can have a major revenue impact-16.00%
-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%
-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%
Bad Poor Okay Good
With Back End Fare ControlWith No Back End Fare Control
% B
elo
w U
pp
er B
ou
nd
% B
elo
w U
pp
er B
ou
nd
Quality of Front End Fare AlignmentQuality of Front End Fare Alignment
13
Where Does Fare Variation Come From?
Where Does Fare Variation Come From?
Source 2: Leg Control
14
Where Does Fare Variation Come From?Where Does Fare Variation Come From? Source 2: Leg Control
Fares are provided at the O&D level, but availability is controlled at the leg fare class level Flight networks greatly complicate the
process of defining leg fare class fares
15
ELP IAH
STL
MSY
400400
800800
700700
Leg Control Fare Variation:The ProblemLeg Control Fare Variation:The Problem Example Y class fares on a simple network
16
Leg Control Fare Variation:The ProblemLeg Control Fare Variation:The Problem
Y fare tickets on the leg ELP-IAH take on the values 400, 700, and 800 – a wide fare variation
Should these fares all be assigned to Y class? Should these fares be reassigned to different
classes that reduce the fare variation?
Should these fares all be assigned to Y class? Should these fares be reassigned to different
classes that reduce the fare variation?
17
ELP IAH
STL
MSY
400400
800800
700700
Leg Control Fare Variation:The ProblemLeg Control Fare Variation:The Problem Fare class realignment may be required
Reassign to M ClassReassign to M Class
Reassign to B ClassReassign to B Class
Leave in Y ClassLeave in Y Class
18
Fare Class RationalizationFare Class Rationalization
Very Important Fact:Fares throughout the network must be aligned within fare classes if leg control revenue management systems are to function properly
Very Important Fact:Fares throughout the network must be aligned within fare classes if leg control revenue management systems are to function properly
How can this be achieved?
19
Network Optimizationfor Fare Class RationalizationNetwork Optimizationfor Fare Class Rationalization Assign O&D fares to fare classes so that a
leg control revenue management system generates maximum revenue
Determine leg fare class fares for leg optimization algorithms
Adhere to all business constraints
20
ObservationsObservations
The myriad of business constraints leads to an extremely challenging problem that is not easily handled by an optimization algorithm alone
If fare class rationalization is not addressed, even a good leg revenue management system can be severely compromised
Fare class rationalization is an important aspect of aligning fare classes within an alliance
21
Fare Class Rationalization:The Wrong WayFare Class Rationalization:The Wrong Way Ordering O&D values from highest to
lowest fare value and clustering to form fare classes is a poor idea
22
Fare Class Rationalization:The Right WayFare Class Rationalization:The Right Way O&D valuation should incorporate some
measure of displacement cost Good leg fare class fares must be
determined
25
800800
200200 600600
800800
300300 700700
A True Proration
A Pseudo-Proration
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares Important Fact:
There are mathematically based ways to prorate itinerary fares into leg fares; itinerary fares can then be treated as consisting of leg fares for purposes of fare class rationalization
Important Fact:There are mathematically based ways to prorate itinerary fares into leg fares; itinerary fares can then be treated as consisting of leg fares for purposes of fare class rationalization
26
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares With fares prorated to legs, it is possible to
determine good leg fare class fares by taking a weighted average of the prorated fares within the fare class
Prorated fares still have the likely problem of being poorly rationalized at the leg level
27
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares Proration alone does not solve the problem of
fare class rationalization
Itinerary Y FareProrated Fare for
ELP-IAH Leg
ELP-IAH 400 400
ELP-IAH-STL 800 100
ELP-IAH-MSY 700 425
Itineraries ELP-IAH and ELP-IAH-MSY align well onleg ELP-IAH-MSY, while itinerary ELP-IAH-STLdoes not
28
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares Proration does suggest how fare class
rationalization might be achieved
Itinerary Y FareProrated Fare for
ELP-IAH Leg
ELP-IAH 400 400
ELP-IAH-STL 800 100
ELP-IAH-MSY 700 425
Y Class: ELP-IAH and ELP-IAH-MSY M Class: ELP-IAH-STL
29
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares The problem with rationalizing fare
classes on one leg is that the rationalization may not make sense for other legs
30
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofares
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofares Pseudofares are one method of prorating
itinerary fares to leg fares
Pseudofarek(1,2,…,k,…,m) =
Fare(1,2,…,k,…,m) –
Displacement Cost (1,2,…,k,…,m) +
Displacement Cost (k)
31
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofare Example
A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofare Example
800800
300300 700700
100100 500500
Displacement CostsDisplacement Costs
800 – 600 + 500800 – 600 + 500800 – 600 + 100800 – 600 + 100
32
A Process For Fare Class RationalizationA Process For Fare Class Rationalization Pseudofares provide a good alternative for
performing fare class rationalization at the leg level
Itinerary Y FareDisplacement
Cost AdjustmentPseudofare for ELP-IAH Leg
ELP-IAH 400 0 400
ELP-IAH-STL 800 700 100
ELP-IAH-MSY 700 275 425
33
A Process For Fare Class RationalizationA Process For Fare Class Rationalization
Important Fact:Pseudofares have the special property that they preserve order under fare proration to different legs
Important Fact:Pseudofares have the special property that they preserve order under fare proration to different legs
This special property of pseudofares makes them ideal for the purpose of fare class rationalization
34
Ultimate Fare Class RationalizationUltimate Fare Class Rationalization Fare class rationalization is a front end
fare control solution Seeks to align fares so that the allocation of
inventory through leg fare class limits yields revenue maximizing decisions
Can leg fare classes ever be fully rationalized?
Is it possible to achieve a perfect world in which every ticket sold in a leg class has the same fare?
35
Ultimate Fare Class RationalizationUltimate Fare Class Rationalization The Bad News
Restricting inventory control to availability in leg fare classes, the answer is no;a perfect world cannot be achieved
Fare class rationalization is necessary to get the most from a leg control system, but there are inherent limitations
36
Ultimate Fare Class RationalizationUltimate Fare Class Rationalization The Good News
Stepping outside of leg fare class control to O&D control, a perfect world can be achieved
Leg level Displacement Adjusted Virtual Nesting, for example, is the obvious and inevitable resolution of the problem of trying to rationalize fare classes
Fare class rationalization is simply thrown out the window and replaced by leg value buckets
Bid price methods achieve the same goal in a more sophisticated fashion
37
Conclusions: Distribution ChannelConclusions: Distribution Channel Fare variation as a result of different fares
in different distribution channels is a huge problem that must be addressed
The move to seamless availability / O&D control opens up substantial opportunities for revenue improvement through back end inventory control
Without seamless availability / O&D control, airlines must be diligent in aligning fares onthe front end
38
Conclusions: Leg ControlConclusions: Leg Control
In a leg control environment, it is vital to have fare classes rationalized at the network level in order to achieve maximum revenue gains from a leg control revenue management system
Good fare class rationalization is difficult and has inherent limitations
O&D control overcomes the limitations inherent in a leg control revenue management system
39
Maximizing Revenuewith a
Leg Revenue Management System
Maximizing Revenuewith a
Leg Revenue Management System
E. Andrew BoydVice President, Research and Design
PROS Revenue Management