36
1 Maximizing Revenue with a Leg Revenue Management System E. Andrew Boyd Vice President, Research and Design PROS Revenue Management

Leg Revenue Management System

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Leg Revenue Management System

1

Maximizing Revenuewith a

Leg Revenue Management System

Maximizing Revenuewith a

Leg Revenue Management System

E. Andrew BoydVice President, Research and Design

PROS Revenue Management

Page 2: Leg Revenue Management System

2

Revenue Management GoalRevenue Management Goal

To achieve the goal of increased revenues, the value of each ticket sold must be known with some certainty

Generate increased revenues by seeking to accept the highest paying mix of passengers

Generate increased revenues by seeking to accept the highest paying mix of passengers

Page 3: Leg Revenue Management System

3

A Perfect WorldA Perfect World

One flight leg One fare per booking class

Y = 800 M = 600 B = 500 Q = 350

Page 4: Leg Revenue Management System

4

Perfect FaresPerfect FaresFareFare

ClassClassYY MM BB QQ

200200

400400

600600

800800

10001000

800800

600600500500

350350

Page 5: Leg Revenue Management System

5

Fares in RealityFares in RealityFareFare

ClassClassYY MM BB QQ

200200

400400

600600

800800

10001000

FareRangeFare

Range

Page 6: Leg Revenue Management System

6

Where Does Fare Variation Come From?

Where Does Fare Variation Come From?

Source 1: Distribution Channel

Page 7: Leg Revenue Management System

7

Where Does Fare Variation Come From?Where Does Fare Variation Come From? Source 1: Distribution Channel

Y class tickets on flight 111 may sell for different fares because of distribution channel

InventoryInventory

TravelAgencies

TravelAgencies

TourOperators

TourOperators

CorporateAccountsCorporateAccounts

Code ShareArrangementsCode Share

Arrangements

InternetSales

InternetSales

InternetAuctionInternetAuction

FrequentFlier Programs

FrequentFlier Programs

AlliancesAlliances

Page 8: Leg Revenue Management System

8

Distribution Channels:Front End or Back End Fare Control?

Distribution Channels:Front End or Back End Fare Control?

Front End Fare Control Make sure fares align

across distribution channels when they are established

Back End Fare Control Assume fares will not be

aligned, and account for differences when a purchase request arrives

Front EndFront End

Back EndBack End

Page 9: Leg Revenue Management System

9

Front End Fare ControlFront End Fare Control

Good front end control is extremely difficult to achieve, but is the only alternative for carriers in a non-seamless / leg environment How to assure that all Y class tickets on flight

111 sell for approximately the same price?

Page 10: Leg Revenue Management System

10

Back End Fare ControlBack End Fare Control

Seamless availability / O&D provides the opportunity to address many distribution channel issues from the back end Dynamic fare calculation at time of request:

assigning the right fare to each transaction

Page 11: Leg Revenue Management System

11

The Value of Back End Fare ControlThe Value of Back End Fare Control

The worse fair alignment is on the front end, the greater the impact of back end fare control

Back end fair control can have a major revenue impact-16.00%

-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%

-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%

Bad Poor Okay Good

With Back End Fare ControlWith No Back End Fare Control

% B

elo

w U

pp

er B

ou

nd

% B

elo

w U

pp

er B

ou

nd

Quality of Front End Fare AlignmentQuality of Front End Fare Alignment

Page 12: Leg Revenue Management System

13

Where Does Fare Variation Come From?

Where Does Fare Variation Come From?

Source 2: Leg Control

Page 13: Leg Revenue Management System

14

Where Does Fare Variation Come From?Where Does Fare Variation Come From? Source 2: Leg Control

Fares are provided at the O&D level, but availability is controlled at the leg fare class level Flight networks greatly complicate the

process of defining leg fare class fares

Page 14: Leg Revenue Management System

15

ELP IAH

STL

MSY

400400

800800

700700

Leg Control Fare Variation:The ProblemLeg Control Fare Variation:The Problem Example Y class fares on a simple network

Page 15: Leg Revenue Management System

16

Leg Control Fare Variation:The ProblemLeg Control Fare Variation:The Problem

Y fare tickets on the leg ELP-IAH take on the values 400, 700, and 800 – a wide fare variation

Should these fares all be assigned to Y class? Should these fares be reassigned to different

classes that reduce the fare variation?

Should these fares all be assigned to Y class? Should these fares be reassigned to different

classes that reduce the fare variation?

Page 16: Leg Revenue Management System

17

ELP IAH

STL

MSY

400400

800800

700700

Leg Control Fare Variation:The ProblemLeg Control Fare Variation:The Problem Fare class realignment may be required

Reassign to M ClassReassign to M Class

Reassign to B ClassReassign to B Class

Leave in Y ClassLeave in Y Class

Page 17: Leg Revenue Management System

18

Fare Class RationalizationFare Class Rationalization

Very Important Fact:Fares throughout the network must be aligned within fare classes if leg control revenue management systems are to function properly

Very Important Fact:Fares throughout the network must be aligned within fare classes if leg control revenue management systems are to function properly

How can this be achieved?

Page 18: Leg Revenue Management System

19

Network Optimizationfor Fare Class RationalizationNetwork Optimizationfor Fare Class Rationalization Assign O&D fares to fare classes so that a

leg control revenue management system generates maximum revenue

Determine leg fare class fares for leg optimization algorithms

Adhere to all business constraints

Page 19: Leg Revenue Management System

20

ObservationsObservations

The myriad of business constraints leads to an extremely challenging problem that is not easily handled by an optimization algorithm alone

If fare class rationalization is not addressed, even a good leg revenue management system can be severely compromised

Fare class rationalization is an important aspect of aligning fare classes within an alliance

Page 20: Leg Revenue Management System

21

Fare Class Rationalization:The Wrong WayFare Class Rationalization:The Wrong Way Ordering O&D values from highest to

lowest fare value and clustering to form fare classes is a poor idea

Page 21: Leg Revenue Management System

22

Fare Class Rationalization:The Right WayFare Class Rationalization:The Right Way O&D valuation should incorporate some

measure of displacement cost Good leg fare class fares must be

determined

Page 22: Leg Revenue Management System

25

800800

200200 600600

800800

300300 700700

A True Proration

A Pseudo-Proration

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares Important Fact:

There are mathematically based ways to prorate itinerary fares into leg fares; itinerary fares can then be treated as consisting of leg fares for purposes of fare class rationalization

Important Fact:There are mathematically based ways to prorate itinerary fares into leg fares; itinerary fares can then be treated as consisting of leg fares for purposes of fare class rationalization

Page 23: Leg Revenue Management System

26

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares With fares prorated to legs, it is possible to

determine good leg fare class fares by taking a weighted average of the prorated fares within the fare class

Prorated fares still have the likely problem of being poorly rationalized at the leg level

Page 24: Leg Revenue Management System

27

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares Proration alone does not solve the problem of

fare class rationalization

Itinerary Y FareProrated Fare for

ELP-IAH Leg

ELP-IAH 400 400

ELP-IAH-STL 800 100

ELP-IAH-MSY 700 425

Itineraries ELP-IAH and ELP-IAH-MSY align well onleg ELP-IAH-MSY, while itinerary ELP-IAH-STLdoes not

Page 25: Leg Revenue Management System

28

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares Proration does suggest how fare class

rationalization might be achieved

Itinerary Y FareProrated Fare for

ELP-IAH Leg

ELP-IAH 400 400

ELP-IAH-STL 800 100

ELP-IAH-MSY 700 425

Y Class: ELP-IAH and ELP-IAH-MSY M Class: ELP-IAH-STL

Page 26: Leg Revenue Management System

29

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization: Getting to Leg Class Fares The problem with rationalizing fare

classes on one leg is that the rationalization may not make sense for other legs

Page 27: Leg Revenue Management System

30

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofares

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofares Pseudofares are one method of prorating

itinerary fares to leg fares

Pseudofarek(1,2,…,k,…,m) =

Fare(1,2,…,k,…,m) –

Displacement Cost (1,2,…,k,…,m) +

Displacement Cost (k)

Page 28: Leg Revenue Management System

31

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofare Example

A Process For Fare Class Rationalization:Pseudofare Example

800800

300300 700700

100100 500500

Displacement CostsDisplacement Costs

800 – 600 + 500800 – 600 + 500800 – 600 + 100800 – 600 + 100

Page 29: Leg Revenue Management System

32

A Process For Fare Class RationalizationA Process For Fare Class Rationalization Pseudofares provide a good alternative for

performing fare class rationalization at the leg level

Itinerary Y FareDisplacement

Cost AdjustmentPseudofare for ELP-IAH Leg

ELP-IAH 400 0 400

ELP-IAH-STL 800 700 100

ELP-IAH-MSY 700 275 425

Page 30: Leg Revenue Management System

33

A Process For Fare Class RationalizationA Process For Fare Class Rationalization

Important Fact:Pseudofares have the special property that they preserve order under fare proration to different legs

Important Fact:Pseudofares have the special property that they preserve order under fare proration to different legs

This special property of pseudofares makes them ideal for the purpose of fare class rationalization

Page 31: Leg Revenue Management System

34

Ultimate Fare Class RationalizationUltimate Fare Class Rationalization Fare class rationalization is a front end

fare control solution Seeks to align fares so that the allocation of

inventory through leg fare class limits yields revenue maximizing decisions

Can leg fare classes ever be fully rationalized?

Is it possible to achieve a perfect world in which every ticket sold in a leg class has the same fare?

Page 32: Leg Revenue Management System

35

Ultimate Fare Class RationalizationUltimate Fare Class Rationalization The Bad News

Restricting inventory control to availability in leg fare classes, the answer is no;a perfect world cannot be achieved

Fare class rationalization is necessary to get the most from a leg control system, but there are inherent limitations

Page 33: Leg Revenue Management System

36

Ultimate Fare Class RationalizationUltimate Fare Class Rationalization The Good News

Stepping outside of leg fare class control to O&D control, a perfect world can be achieved

Leg level Displacement Adjusted Virtual Nesting, for example, is the obvious and inevitable resolution of the problem of trying to rationalize fare classes

Fare class rationalization is simply thrown out the window and replaced by leg value buckets

Bid price methods achieve the same goal in a more sophisticated fashion

Page 34: Leg Revenue Management System

37

Conclusions: Distribution ChannelConclusions: Distribution Channel Fare variation as a result of different fares

in different distribution channels is a huge problem that must be addressed

The move to seamless availability / O&D control opens up substantial opportunities for revenue improvement through back end inventory control

Without seamless availability / O&D control, airlines must be diligent in aligning fares onthe front end

Page 35: Leg Revenue Management System

38

Conclusions: Leg ControlConclusions: Leg Control

In a leg control environment, it is vital to have fare classes rationalized at the network level in order to achieve maximum revenue gains from a leg control revenue management system

Good fare class rationalization is difficult and has inherent limitations

O&D control overcomes the limitations inherent in a leg control revenue management system

Page 36: Leg Revenue Management System

39

Maximizing Revenuewith a

Leg Revenue Management System

Maximizing Revenuewith a

Leg Revenue Management System

E. Andrew BoydVice President, Research and Design

PROS Revenue Management