41
Metro vs. Bus Metro vs. Bus

Metro vs. Bus

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Metro versus Bus - comparison of various parameters

Citation preview

Page 1: Metro vs. Bus

Metro vs. BusMetro vs. Bus

Page 2: Metro vs. Bus
Page 3: Metro vs. Bus

EfficiencyEfficiency

Page 4: Metro vs. Bus
Page 5: Metro vs. Bus
Page 6: Metro vs. Bus
Page 7: Metro vs. Bus
Page 8: Metro vs. Bus

CostCost

Page 9: Metro vs. Bus

Rs. 40 Cr. – 100 Cr. / km.

Rs. 60 Cr. – 160 Cr. / km.

Rs. 160 Cr. – 240 Cr. / km.

Rs. 200 Cr. – 400 Cr. / km.

Rs. 200 Cr. – 1200 Cr. / km. Rs. 2 Cr. – 60 Cr. / km.

Page 10: Metro vs. Bus
Page 11: Metro vs. Bus
Page 12: Metro vs. Bus
Page 13: Metro vs. Bus

Time to buildTime to build

Page 14: Metro vs. Bus
Page 15: Metro vs. Bus
Page 16: Metro vs. Bus
Page 17: Metro vs. Bus

FlexibilityFlexibility

Page 18: Metro vs. Bus

Bogota, Columbia

Page 19: Metro vs. Bus

42 stations closed in London underground

ReasonsBuilt too near stations to be usefulToo little used to justify keeping them openLines are rerouted

Page 20: Metro vs. Bus

AestheticsAesthetics

Page 21: Metro vs. Bus
Page 22: Metro vs. Bus

Metro vs. bus in Metro vs. bus in some citiessome cities

Page 23: Metro vs. Bus
Page 24: Metro vs. Bus
Page 25: Metro vs. Bus
Page 26: Metro vs. Bus
Page 27: Metro vs. Bus

Bus transport – how it has evolved

Page 28: Metro vs. Bus
Page 29: Metro vs. Bus

Namma Metro – Namma Metro – the problemsthe problems

Page 30: Metro vs. Bus
Page 31: Metro vs. Bus

Kolkata metro – the verdictChaturvedi, Chief Operations Manager, Kolkata Metro Railway.Has this to say in 2005.

“Where the gross annual income of the Metro is roughly Rs.48 crores, its maintenance cost is a whopping Rs.125 crores.”

“The Metro was designed to decongest the city's roads. I am afraid it has not been able to do that.”

“Even during peak periods, the capacity utilisation of the trains has been around 70 per cent, and only 40 per cent in the early mornings.”

“Unfortunately for the Metro, it has to compete with cheaper modes of public transport such as buses and trams. “

Page 32: Metro vs. Bus

Delhi metro – the present

Capacity 20 Lakh people per day. Actually carrying 6 Lakh.

Cost Rs. 10,500 Cr. for 70 km. Rs. 175 Cr / km.

2004-5 loss : Rs. 76 Cr.

2005-6 : Rs. 296 from property leasing, Rs. 113 Cr. from train operation.

2006-7 : Revenue Rs. 542 Cr. Profit Rs. 23.5 C. mainly from lease rentals and property development. Get subsidized or free land, make money on property development.

Page 33: Metro vs. Bus

ConnectivityWhy would anyone travel 5 km. to get to a Metro station ?

Page 34: Metro vs. Bus

TimePlanned for Phase 1: 2011. Actual : 2015 ?

CostRs. 6400 Cr. for 33 km. Elevated : Rs. 160 Cr. / km.Underground : Rs. 350 Cr. / km.Includes property acquisition, excalation, interest during constrctuin, etc.

Indore BRT : 2010

Indore BRT : Rs. 870 Cr. for 120 km. by 2010

Mass transport systems, comparison

0

50

100

150

200

250

Bangalore Delhi, phase 1 Indore Calcutta

Coverage

Cost/km

Page 35: Metro vs. Bus

MG Road, 2007 MG Road, 2011Artist’s impression of Metro station at same location. Courtesy Deccan Herald.

Businesses on MG Rd. and any other road onwhich the Metro travels will be ruined.

Page 36: Metro vs. Bus

Population : 77 LakhArea : 1570 sq. km.

London vs. Bangalore Metro

Underground400 km.11 lines268 stationsBegan operation 1863

London and BangaloreSame area, same population

London has 400 km. of linesWe hope to achieve the same thing with 33 km. of lines

Page 37: Metro vs. Bus

Bangalore is comparable to Bogota in size and populationBogota opted for the BRT. It has proven to be very successful.Even though Bogota’s per capita income is 4 times Bangalore’s, they felt that the Metro was costly for them.

BogotaPer capita income Rs. 1.7 Lakh.Population : 82 LakhsArea : 740 sq. km.

BangalorePer capita income Rs. 49,000Population : 77 LakhsArea : 1600 sq. km.

Page 38: Metro vs. Bus

The Metro is a bad decision

It has not worked in Delhi and KolkataIt is a failure in many cities around the world.

While it is getting done in BangaloreSome of the key roads are going to be blocked.Traffic is going to be hell.It is supposed to take 3 more years.We can safely assume that it will take 6 more years.

After it is doneThe traffic jams and pollution will remain.The city’s aesthetics will be ruined.Commuting will still be a nightmare.Just like in Delhi and Kolkata.

A good bus system is a better option.

Page 39: Metro vs. Bus

Who are the losers ?The publicStill battling traffic jams, breathing polluted air, living with higher temperatures

The tourism industryTourist traffic drops.

HotelsTourist and business traffic drops.

IndustriesProductivity remains low.

Shops and businessesTourist and business traffic drops.

PoliceStill working killing hours, inhaling polluted air

GovernmentSubsidizing a useless white-elephant transport system.

Page 40: Metro vs. Bus

The way forwardCMH Rd. Assn. is now recommending realigning of Metro line.This is CMH Road’s fight. Nobody else is bothered about the issue.

Common comments:1. Rich shop owners on CMH Road are protesting the issue. Prolonging the Metro project

which is good for Bangalore.2. Only tenants of shops are protesting. Owners are happy with compensation because

they get a very low rent.

Get the whole of Bangalore involved in the problem.Be part of or start a movement against the Metro itself. Serves the same purpose.

A lot of areas are going to be affected, not just CMH Road.Dig up data on larger effect on city:1. How various interest groups are going to be affected.2. How life is going to be hell for the next 10 years.3. How problem will remain even after Metro.4. Effect on government’s finances because of permanent losses.5. Effect on green cover, heritage.

Any court action can have alternate suggestions, expert opinion, failure of Metro projects, successes of Bus systems.

Page 41: Metro vs. Bus

ObjectionsThe Metro is too far advanced. It cannot be stopped at this stage.Much larger projects have been stopped.Nothing much has been done anyway on Metro project.If the public is convinced that it is useless, the government will have to look at alternatives.

It will delay the solution to the traffic problemBus system can be implemented much faster.Will get fully done in 2 years.Bus system is in phases. You can see improvements every month.Metro will involve total disruption of city for 7 more years, then sudden benefit (?).E.g., each month add 500 buses, will displace 30000 cars / 2 wheelers