20
Building a Substantive Petition System Fraser Henderson December 2013

Wb petitions fjh_v1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Deploying a substantive petition system

Citation preview

Page 1: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Building a Substantive Petition System

Fraser Henderson

December 2013

Page 2: Wb petitions fjh_v1

“2007: scrap the planned vehicle tracking and road pricing policy”

"whoever came up with this idea might

be a prat"

1.7 million signatures

Formative proposal

Page 3: Wb petitions fjh_v1

“2007: scrap the planned vehicle tracking and road pricing policy”

Response: Email from PM

In his reply, the PM sets out the government's views on national road pricing, stressing that no decision has yet been made. Mr Blair says he sees the petition and his email as "the beginning, not the end" of the debate.

Page 4: Wb petitions fjh_v1

What was wrong?

DISCONNECTED

Bypasses Parliament

No power to rebukeNo power to force response No triggers

COMMUNICATIONS

Planned policy

No plansFactually incorrect

ROLE OF PETITIONS

Constitutional rights

Misleading“Nanny knows best”

Page 5: Wb petitions fjh_v1

“2006: Don’t remove Banksy painting on park street”

“prosecute the artist who has done this

to a listed building"

3187 signatures

Page 6: Wb petitions fjh_v1

“Don’t remove Banksy painting on park street”

Page 7: Wb petitions fjh_v1

What went well?

CONNECTED

Petitions Committee

Petition Scheme

COMMUNICATIONS

Officer

Help with wordingConnect to decision making timetable

SPECIFIC ISSUE

Not complex

LocalEasy decision

Page 8: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Commonalities

•Petitioners of any age

•Official Languages

•Dealt with in open

•Some topic exclusions

•Safeguards (e.g. duplicates)

•Obligation to receive and read petitions

Any language

Duty to respond

Page 9: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Meaningful Petition Systems..

Page 10: Wb petitions fjh_v1

When is participation effective?CLEAR model

Page 11: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Set Realistic Expectations

TOPICS AND EXCLUSIONS

COMMON UNDERSTANDING

Page 12: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Controls

TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT

HEARING PETITIONS

Where do I submit my petition?

What format?

Guides for public and elected members

What to do with repeat petitions?

Who can petition?

CHECKS

Validity

Progress

Page 13: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Well Equipped

POWERS

Call to account

Study Visits

Full debate

Oral evidence…

RESOURCES

Help petition organisers

Pre-petition phase

Page 14: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Good Communications

INFORMED

Outcomes versus output

Petition Progress

Petition Prayer

STRUCTURED TRANSPARENCY

Page 15: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Create Fair Conditions

REQUIREMENTS

Attainable thresholds

Submit without fear

PARTICIPATION

Timetable

Redress

Age

Language

Nationality

REASONABLE

Page 16: Wb petitions fjh_v1

2007 = 1,506 Europetitions

Environmental issues, water, etc 288Fundamental rights 226

Urbanisation 131Education & cultural issues 103

Social Affairs & Discrimination 207Internal Market & Consumers 192

Health 105Justice 99

Transport issues & Infrastructure 88Property & Restitution 72

Are Reflective

Page 17: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Governors and Government must conceptualise petitions as..

Page 18: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Key Questions

•Who can petition (including legal persons, elected representatives)?

•Which tiers of government will accept or be governed by valid petitions?

•How can petitions be submitted?

•Are there any topics to be excluded?

•How will process of hearing petitions be handled?

•What powers will be triggered?

•Extended right to reasonable timeframe and response?

Page 19: Wb petitions fjh_v1

"A successful petition doesn't have to be one that achieves its aim. If people see the issue

is being taken seriously then they will be happy."

- Dr P.Cruickshank (Napier University)

Page 20: Wb petitions fjh_v1

Building a Substantive Petition System

Fraser Henderson

December 2013