27
Net Neutrality: why it matters Dr Chris Marsden School of Law, University of Essex SCRIPT 10 th Anniversary, Edinburgh 8 June 2012

Why net neutrality matters

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Script 8 June 2012

Citation preview

Page 1: Why net neutrality matters

Net Neutrality: why it mattersDr Chris MarsdenSchool of Law, University of EssexSCRIPT 10th Anniversary, Edinburgh 8 June 2012

Page 2: Why net neutrality matters

Internet and the University of Essex Universities invented Internet in 1968UK (UCL) early partner of US institutionsThough Norway was first international link

Essex 9th in UK for Research (2001-8 RAE)Top 20 global ‘universities under 50’ With UEA, Sussex etc.A Robbins university founded 1964Wivenhoe just outside ColchesterSignificant interaction with BT Labs (nearby)Notably on computing, telecoms and users

Page 3: Why net neutrality matters

Where? Wivenhoe near Colchester

Page 4: Why net neutrality matters

Wivenhoe Park painted by Constable

Page 5: Why net neutrality matters

Essex as a European University

Stansted Airport 33 milesLondon by train 47 minutes

Page 6: Why net neutrality matters

• The future of the Internet• The future of European

communications policy• European consumers and citizens• Monopoly and protection of

fundamental rights• Competition

What matters?

Page 7: Why net neutrality matters

Back in 2007…

Page 8: Why net neutrality matters

04/09/20238

Page 9: Why net neutrality matters

04/09/20239

‘Negative neutrality’

or

Net neutrality ‘lite’

Page 10: Why net neutrality matters

Because we get it wrong on all these levels:1. We generalize from the particular2. We pretend competition solves the problem3. We pretend to be technologically neutral4. We regulate asymmetrically5. We don’t provide effective protection for

consumers6. We don’t protect freedom of expression7. We don’t understand Internet innovation

NN as microcosm of European telecoms policy failures

Page 11: Why net neutrality matters

• Standard 1990s answer to 1980s monopoly problem

• We are still in some Chicago School fantasy• ‘American problem’ – so why US solution;-)• All ISPs have incentives to block • file-sharing and VOIP• Naked DSL anyone?• Why do we still have voice telephony?

Competition is not the answer

Page 12: Why net neutrality matters

Playing together?

Page 13: Why net neutrality matters

Ofcom: ‘no formal complaints’

• BEREC (2010) Response to the • European Commission’s consultation on the open

Internet and net neutrality in Europe, • BoR (10)42 • Charlie Dunstone, Chairman, TalkTalk:• “We shape traffic to restrict P2P users.

I get hate mail at home from people when that means we restrict their ability to play games.”

Page 14: Why net neutrality matters
Page 15: Why net neutrality matters

Ofcom International Conference, Nov 2006

“I’ve got 2 people that have said they’re going to kill me as a result of not allowingthem to play certain games. From our point of view, it’s not about security, it’s about trying to figure out what type of traffic it is.”

Page 16: Why net neutrality matters

• Generalising from the particular• Five MNOs in UK – one of which (3) acts for

consumer interest• Swedish mobile cartels• Berlusconi created specific Italian issues• Romania has fibre and 450MHz 4G• UK has no 4G nor any sign of it!

One size does not fit all

Page 17: Why net neutrality matters

• Mobile is not fixed!• Cable is not DSL• Why pretend that we can solve this in

a platform-neutral manner• Architecture matters!

Technological neutrality?

Page 18: Why net neutrality matters

• In whose definition?• Third pipe• Or as Martin Cave explained in 2009, 1.5 pipes!• Two competing wholesale fixed

networks

Competition as solution

Page 19: Why net neutrality matters

Or in a picture…

Page 20: Why net neutrality matters

• Fixed incumbent regulated as SMP• But problem is not retailers of that

wholesale network• Why don’t we ex ante regulate?• NOT cable monopolist• NOR satellite/ISP combine• Must carry• Due prominence

Asymmetrical regulation

Page 21: Why net neutrality matters

• What’s the problem?• ‘Anecdote’ is not evidence• Nor is ex post an effective remedy• Ofcom in trouble on transparency and

switching• Transparency like mobile pricing?• Switching like: let them eat cake?

Consumer law and redress

Page 22: Why net neutrality matters

• I have made an extended argument for prosumers to be protected

• Paper at ECPR Regulation & Governance

• Exeter 27 June• Book MIT Press 2013, with Ian Brown

Prosumer Law

Page 23: Why net neutrality matters
Page 24: Why net neutrality matters

04/09/202324

ISPs as police?

Page 25: Why net neutrality matters

• Value chain analysis• Problem – innovation at content-app-

services level• Providing fibre is not innovation by ISPs!• So whole basis of policy is flawed• Do telecoms regulators understand the Internet?• Are politicians ignorami?

What innovation?

Page 26: Why net neutrality matters

• ‘Internet’ is unrestricted• Restriction is censorship• Ed Vaizey’s nonsense comments• Tim Berners Lee tells the truth• La Rue (UNHRC) and Akdeniz (OSCE)• It’s the right to communicate

Citizens’ rights

Page 27: Why net neutrality matters

27 Check against delivery participants only

Book launched February 2010

100,000 downloads first 2 months

Second paperback edition 2015