APS1015H Class 4 - Business Model Validation

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Students will be exposed to methods for evaluating the “business potential” of their entrepreneurial idea, and evaluate some of the challenges associated with synthesizing market data and applying this data to business decisions

Citation preview

APS 1015: Social Entrepreneurship

Class 4: Business Model Validation

Saturday, October 13, 2012

1

Instructors: Norm Tasevski (norm@socialentrepreneurship.ca) Karim Harji (karim@socialentrepreneurship.ca)

© Norm Tasevski

© Norm Tasevski

Agenda

•  B Corporation •  How do we assess the business potential for social

enterprise? •  How do we assess the “impact” potential for social

enterprise? •  Next Week

3

Assessing Social Enterprise Business Potential…

4

© Norm Tasevski

Our Approach

•  Assess Business Potential 1st

•  Assess Impact Potential 2nd

5

Why?

© Norm Tasevski

It Answers the Key Question…

Will you still be competitive in the marketplace after infusing

social mission?

© Norm Tasevski

Remember This?

7

© Norm Tasevski

Step 1: Identify Cost Drivers and Revenue Sources!

8

How would you assess the business potential of a…

9

Product-based Social Business…!

Tethered Social Enterprise…!

Employment-Based Social Business…!

Accessibility-Based Platform…!

© Norm Tasevski

A business/business model that provides products or services with social benefit.

1. Product-Based

© Norm Tasevski

2. Employment-Based

 

A business that hires marginalized people in good employment opportunities.

© Norm Tasevski

3. Tethered An enterprise started by a charity or non-profit that

generates revenue for the organization.

© Norm Tasevski

 

A business that maintains a purposely low profit margin to make their products accessible.

4. Accessibility-Based

© Norm Tasevski

Value Proposition

14

-Procurement!-Receiving!-Warehousing!-Inventory control!-Product/service design!-Product/service manufacture/development!-Product packaging!-Technology support!-etc.!

-Licensing fees!-Donated products/services!

© Norm Tasevski

Customer Segments

15

-Research costs (surveying, interviewing, etc)!!

-Payments!-(Viral marketing of products)!

© Norm Tasevski

Channels

16

-Warehousing!-Product packaging (in delivery boxes, etc)!-Product/service delivery (transportation, etc)!! -Co-branding!

-Rental fees!-”Concession stand” type contracts!

© Norm Tasevski

Relationships

17

-Hard marketing costs (billboard advertising, etc)!-Soft marketing costs (website, etc)!-Customer service!-Relationship management personnel!

-3rd Party advertisers!-Co-branding!-Referral fees!

© Norm Tasevski

Key Resources

18

-Employees (management, staff)!-Brand!-Other assets (buildings, IP, software, etc)! !

-Licensing fees!

© Norm Tasevski

Key Activities

19

-Service activities!-Sales activities!-Client engagement activities!-Events !!!

-Fees (e.g. ticket sales at events!

© Norm Tasevski

Key Partnerships

20

-Partnership management costs (relationship building, contract management, etc)!

-Investment!-Loans!-Grants/donations!

Break

21

© Norm Tasevski

Step 2: Calculate your margin!

22

-???!-???!

© Norm Tasevski

What Do You Need To Calculate Your Margin?

23

Data!!!!

© Norm Tasevski

Data Sources

24

Call key industry players (suppliers, competitors, etc)

Search databases (industry, scholastic, etc)

Conduct web search (Google, etc)

Ask people!!! (friends, potential customers, etc)

Assessing the “Impact” Potential of Social Enterprise…

25

© Norm Tasevski

Exercise: From Intentions to Impact

26

When  did  you  volunteer?  

© Norm Tasevski

Exercise: From Intentions to Impact

How do you know you made an impact?

27

© Norm Tasevski

Impact vs Net Impact

Is your effort better than what would have happened anyways?

28

© Norm Tasevski

Impact vs Net Impact

Is your effort better than what would have happened anyways?

NET IMPACT is what matters

29

© Norm Tasevski

Achieving Social Goals !

30 30

1.  Identify your social goals –  Theory of Change (defining your social value) –  Embed them within/across your operations

2.  Measure the social value created –  How do you measure your goals? –  Address the common challenges in measurement

3.  Communicate your impact –  Know what to say and who your audience is –  Be creative around your message

© Norm Tasevski

Step 1: ID Your Social Goals !

31 31

•  What Social Benefit are you creating?

•  How do you decide?

© Norm Tasevski

32

© Norm Tasevski

Embedding “Social” across the Business Model

33 33

© Norm Tasevski

Cautionary Tale

34

© Norm Tasevski

Exercise: Balancing social & financial value

35

+  

+  

-­‐  

-­‐  

$  

© Norm Tasevski

Step 2: Measure the Social Value Created !

36 36

Why Measure, and for Whom? •  Management

–  Performance management (meeting needs/objectives)

–  Organizational sustainability, attract new investment –  Demonstrate the value created by organization

•  Social Investors (inc. funders) –  Impact of grants, mission alignment –  Accountability measures –  Assess organization value, relate to risk/return (of

investment) •  Government Programs/Policy

–  Make the case for investment in organization/approach

–  Accountability measures

© Norm Tasevski

Why is Measurement Important? !

37 37

“Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted”

“You can’t manage what you can’t measure”

© Norm Tasevski

Challenges in Measurement !

38 38

•  Outputs vs. Outcomes •  Attribution vs. Contribution •  Qualitative vs. Quantitative •  Prove vs. Improve •  Rigour vs. feasibility

“Metrics and evaluation are to development programs as autopsies are to health care: too late

to help, intrusive, and often inconclusive.” (Trelsad)

© Norm Tasevski

A Note on SROI!

39 39

•  Discounted, monetized value of the social value that has been created, relative to the value of the investment.

•  Pioneered by Roberts Enterprise Development Fund (REDF) and Jed Emerson

•  Various uses for, and approaches to, SROI

•  Despite “hype” around SROI, it can be resource-intensive, and issues around feasibility, replication, reporting still remain.

© Norm Tasevski

SROI Snapshot: TurnAround Couriers!

Avg  Change  in  Societal  Contribu3on    (Target  Employees):   $9,391

Average  Number  of  Target  Employees: 10

Current  Year  Cost  Savings  to  Society:   $93,910

Cumula3ve  Cost  Savings  (prior  to  Y5): $191,170

Total  Cost  Savings  to  Date: $285,080 Cumula3ve  Societal  Payback  Period: 1.8    years

Cumula3ve  SROI: 285%         Note:  ini3al  SCP  investment  =  $100,000  

40

Overview  of  Target  Popula;on  (sample)  • 38%  recruited  directly  from  shelters  • 23%  female  • Average  age:  21  • 100%  unemployed  at  3me  of  hire  • 54%  receiving  social  assistance  at  hire  • 54%  been  involved  with  jus3ce  system  • 54%  did  not  complete  high  school  

 

Employment  Outcomes  (sample)  • Increased  target/non-­‐target  staff  ra3o  to  83%    • 69%  con3nue  to  work  at  TAC  (9)  • 15%  moved  onto  mainstream  employment  in  window  cleaning  industry  (2)  

• 8%  went  on  to  post  secondary  educa3on  (1)  

Sustainable  Livelihood  Outcomes  (sample)  • 89    youth  in  total  have  been  hired  over  5  years  

• 100%  target  popula3on  recruited  from  shelters  able  to  get  out  of  shelter  system  and  secure  independent  housing  within  6  months  of  employment  at  TAC  

• 85%  who  relied  on  income  support  through  social  assistance  at  3me  of  hire  able  to  get  off  and  stay  off    

© Norm Tasevski

Acumen Fund: social performance measurement in the investment process!•  Due Diligence

–  Literature review: state of practice

–  Estimate # of people served over the life of the investment

–  Assess how delivery of those “outputs” compare (more or less favorably) to the “best alternative charitable option”

•  During Deal Structuring –  Conversations on how to think about performance management

over the life of the investment, not just “mandatory reports”

•  Post-Investment –  Quarterly reporting – performance, capacity, strengths/weaknesses

–  Semi-annual “forced ranking” across portfolio against investment criteria - financial sustainability, social impact at scale, breakthrough insights, and high-quality leadership - as well as actual performance to date and the investment’s potential for impact in the future

•  Closed Investments –  Short “exit memo” looking at results generated, financial return, and

lessons learned

41

© Norm Tasevski

Simple Measures for Social Enterprise: Lessons from the Acumen Fund!

42

•  Culture matters far more than systems –  Tolerance for / learning from failure

•  If you build systems, start with a pencil and paper –  Start simple; technology is an enabler not the solution

•  Think on the margin –  Performance is always relative to what you had been doing

before (past), to what your competition did over the same time period (peers), and to what you should have done (projections)

•  Count outputs and then worry about outcomes –  “the conclusions you can draw from these outputs may not be

made with scientific rigor, but they can inform businesslike decisions and raise important policy questions”

•  Don’t confuse information with judgment –  Balance qualitative and quantitative –  Use informed judgment, hold oneself accountable (to them)

© Norm Tasevski

Step 3: Communicating Your Social Impact!

43 43

How?

© Norm Tasevski

What did we learn?

44

Recommended