Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering SRMIST

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

SRMIST, Kattankulathur

1

WELCOMES

NBA EXPERT COMMITTEE

Presented by Dr.K.Vijayakumar. HOD/EEE

PROGRAMMES OFFERED

• B.Tech - Electrical and Electronics Engineering

• M.Tech - Power Electronics & Drives

- Power Systems

• Ph.D. Program in Electrical Engineering

Department of EEE – A Glance

Faculty Members

70 Faculty Members

71% with PhD

2 with Post Doc

5 Adjunct Faculty Members

Students

853 UG students

26 PG students

125 PhD Scholars

FT: 56

PT: 55

Laboratories

14 Laboratories - UG

4 Industry Supported Laboratories -Renewable Energy Research Lab

NI academy and research centre

e- Mobility Research centre

Wireless power Transfer Lab

Department Library

Books : 2173

e-Journals : 2712

dSpace Institutional Repository:

(Question banks, UG/PG/PhD Thesis)

SFR: 1:18

B.Tech 2003

B.Tech EEE

2001

B.Tech EEE 1992

Madras University

Anna University

SRMIST

The Skill and Personality Development Program Centre (SPDC) is funded by AICTE under the

Scheme of Quality Improvement Scheme (AQIS)-Rs. 19,05,166/-

B.Tech EEE Program Accredited by Engineering

Accreditation Commission (EAC) of Accreditation

Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET)

NBA 2001

Accreditation

AICTE- CII Award (2019)

Award

• Energy audit conducted with

Bureau of Energy Efficiency

• Energy Literacy drive-Energy

Swaraj Foundation

Energy Audit & Awareness

Funding from external agency:

Rs. 1,53,47,662/

Funding from SRM:

Rs. 27,96,259/-

Funded Projects

Number of Industries: 8

No of Faculty Members: 18

Man-days : 227

Faculty Industry Immersion

Programme

Publications and Patents

Publications : 484

Citation: 5292

Average Impact Factor: 2.79

Patents Published: 29

Department Achievements /Recognitions

Paper publication award-IEEE Transaction

Post-Doctoral Research Fellow

.

Gandhi Global Solar Yatra-1000 Students in Solar Ambassador Workshop

.

NPTEL Online course-Elite with Silver medal

1

2 3

4

Faculty Achievements/Recognitions

Rubik's club-

SRMIST India

Book of Records

Mr. Ajith Raj

MTS Under Graduate

Scholarship for 3000 USD

6 students received

scholarship (14, 500 USD)

First place

Mathworks

Minidrone

Competition at

IROS 2019,

China

Mr.Anirudh Ravi

MTS outstanding

student section

award -2019

Mr. Atulya

Kreator 3D Ventilator for

Covid Patients-SIIC

Mr. Shafuel Wara

NASA Human Exploration

Rover Challenge 2018, USA -

Won First prize

Student Achievements/Recognitions

Vision, Mission and its Consistency

Consistency of Mission

Institute Mission Department Mission

MOVE UP through international alliances and

collaborative initiatives to achieve global

excellence.

To educate the student to become better practicing

engineers to meet global excellence

ACCOMPLISH A PROCESS to advance

knowledge in a rigorous academic and research

environment

To provide better environment through latest

developments in electrical engineering involving

problem solving, design, practice and training.

ATTRACTS AND BUILD PEOPLE in a

rewarding and inspiring environment by

fostering freedom, empowerment, creativity and

innovation.

To motivate the graduates to become a good leader,

designer and researcher through industry-oriented

trainings with social and ethical responsibilities

Consistency of Vision

Institute Vision Department Vision

To emerge as a world – class university To impart quality education in the

field of Electrical & Electronics

Engineering

To disseminate knowledge and

providing students a unique learning

experience in Science, Technology,

Medicine, Management and other areas

of scholarship that will best serve the

world and betterment of mankind.

To produce globally competent

engineers to serve the society.

To impart quality education in the field of Electrical and Electronics

Engineering and to produce globally competent engineers to serve the

society

Vision

1. To educate the student to become better practicing engineers to meet global

excellence.

2. To provide better environment through latest developments in electrical

engineering involving problem solving, design, practice and training.

3. To motivate the graduates to become a good leader, designer and researcher

through industry-oriented trainings with social and ethical responsibilities.

Mission

CRITERION 1

Department level

Social Media

Facebook

Faculty/Class/ Lab/ Office Rooms/Notice board

Brochure

Dissemination of Vision, Mission and PEOs

Program Educational Objectives( PEOs)PEO1-Graduates are in a position to apply their knowledge acquired in Mathematics, Basic Sciences and Electrical and Electronics

Engineering courses, to the solution of complex problems encountered in the modern Engineering practice.

PEO2-Graduates learn and adapt themselves to the constantly evolving technology by pursuing higher studies.

PEO3-Graduates are better employable and achieve success in their chosen areas of Electrical and Electronics Engineering and related fields.

PEO4-Graduates are good leaders and managers by effectively communicating at both technical and interpersonal levels.

Institute Brochure

Institute Digital Board

Induction Programme Curriculum

Institute Website

Institute Level

CRITERION 1

8

Process for Defining Vision, Mission and PEOs

Vision and Mission PEOs

CRITERION 1

PEOsMission

1

Mission

2

Mission

3Consistency

PEO1: Graduates are in a position to apply

their knowledge acquired in Mathematics,

Basic Sciences and Electrical and Electronics

Engineering courses, to the solution of

complex problems encountered in the modern

Engineering practice.

H

(3)

M

(2)

L

(1)

1. Students apply their knowledge of basic mathematical and science to solve complex

electrical problems.

2. The syllabus is constantly upgraded to be on par with global excellence which caters

to latest trends in engineering technology and practices.

3. The industrial collaboration in practical technical training elevates the students to

global standards

PEO 2: Graduates learn and adapt themselves

to the constantly evolving technology by

pursuing higher studies. M

(2)

H

(3)

L

(1)

1 Students are exposed to state-of-the-art technology through multi-disciplinary design

projects, technical seminar and industrial training, which supplements in complex

problem solving & design through meticulous practice & training.

2. Students apply the skills and knowledge acquired through these practices in minor &

major projects.

3. The research problem dealt in major projects motivates the students to pursue higher

studies in their respective domain.

PEO3: Graduates are better employable and

achieve success in their chosen areas of

Electrical and Electronics Engineering and

related fields.

M

(2)

M

(2)

L

(1)

1. Knowledge obtained on collaboration with industry through technical seminars,

workshops, laboratory practices, technical internships etc refines the students, thus

empowering them to be employable in core industries in Electrical & Electronics.

2. Software programming skills & hardware development done in major and minor

projects equips the students in the field of Research & Development.

PEO 4: Graduates are good leaders and

managers by effectively communicating at

both technical and interpersonal levels.

L

(1)

L

(1)

H

(3)

1. Communication & interpersonal skills of the students are continuously groomed

through laboratory practices, seminar and project presentations.

2. Active participation and organizing technical and non technical events of Students

equip them to manage and lead organisations in the future.

3. Life skill courses in the curriculum imparts the students the knowledge of ethical

responsibilities. 9

Consistency of PEOs with Mission CRITERION 1

10

PEOMission

StatementMapping Level Justification

PEO1

Mission 1 3 Mapped strongly as all the students gain knowledge on mathematics, basic sciences and electrical engineering

courses which are periodically upgraded to be on par with global standards

Mission 2 2 Mapped moderately as the students gain the ability to design, solve and practice complex engineering problems

through latest developments

Mission 3 1 Mapped as the students collaborate with industries for practical training which makes them a good researcher,

leader and designer

PEO2

Mission 1 2 Mapped moderately as the students learn and adapt themselves to the evolving technologies and practice the

same to meet global standards

Mission 2 3 Mapped strongly as all the students learn and adapt themselves to latest technologies through higher studies

Mission 3 1 Mapped as the students collaborate with industries, adapt the new technologies practiced in industries for

becoming a good researcher

PEO3

Mission 1 2 Mapped moderately as the students practice discipline related concepts for successful employment in global

standard

Mission 2 2 Mapped moderately as the students are provided with better environment employing latest technologies to fetch

better employment and get success

Mission 3 1 Mapped as the students are motivated to take up industry oriented training to get better successful employment

by becoming good designer and researcher

PEO4

Mission 1 1 Mapped as the students practice engineering concepts and communicate the same at both technical and

interpersonal levels to meet global standards

Mission 2 1 Mapped as the students are provided with latest technology based environment so as to enable them in

designing and communicating the same at both technical and interpersonal levels

Mission 3 3 Mapped strongly as all the students intend to take up industry oriented training to become a good leader,

researcher and manager with social and ethical responsibilities by effectively communicating at both technical

and interpersonal levels

Justification of Mapping of PEOs and Mission CRITERION 1

11

Structure of the Curriculum

Category

AICTE 2015 2018

Credits % Credits Credits % Credits Credits %Credits

Humanities and social Sciences

including Management12 7.5 15 8.33 12 7.5

Basic Sciences 25 15.5 39 21.6 36 22.5

Engineering Sciences including

workshop ,drawing, basics of

electrical/mechanical/computer etc.,

24 15 15 8.33 16 10

Professional core subjects 48 30 87 48.33 54 33.75

Professional subjects: Subjects

relevant to chosen

specialisation/branch

18 11.3 18 10 18 11.25

Open subjects: Electives from other

technical and/or emerging subjects18 11.3 6 3.33 9 5.63

Project work, seminar and internship

in industry or elsewhere15 9.4 18 10 15 9.38

Mandatory courses (Environmental

sciences, Induction Program, Indian

Constitution, Essence of Indian

Traditional Knowledge)

Non

credit- - - - -

Total credits 160 180 160

Components of the Curriculum (2015 and 2018) in Compliance with AICTE

Process for designing the program curriculum

CRITERION 2

12

Compliance of the Curriculum for

attaining PO and PSO

CRITERION 2

13

Adherence-Academic Calendar

Academic Calendar

Slot based time table Learning through

Industries

Industrial Training

Industrial visit

Internship

Pedagogical Initiatives

ICT based learning

Moodle based LMS

Google Class Room

Invited Lectures

Massive Open Online Courses

Collaborative Learning

Multidisciplinary Design

Club-Association Activity

Conduct of Lab Courses

Experiments, Record, Viva, Model Exam,

University Practical Exam

Project based Learning

Major Project

Minor Project

Seminar

Monitoring System

Students monitoring

Green Book

Faculty monitoring

Feedback system

HOD monitoring

Teaching Learning Process CRITERION 2

Flipped Classroom

Academic Calendar

Club-Association Activity

Industrial Training Moodle based LMS

Video Lectures

Green Book

Quality Improvement-Student Performance

14

.

Support to the high performers

Semester Abroad Programme

Merit Scholarship Placement training Gate coachingWorkshops/ Conference/

Competitions

Club & Societal activities

Support to Low Performers

Support to High Performers

Support to the low performers

Counselling (Course wise, Counsellors)

Student adoptive scheme (or)

Special coaching classes

Compensatory classes

Letter to parents Assignments

CRITERION 2

15

Process for internal semester question

paper settingQuality of Assignments and its relevance to COs and

POs (Samples)

Process for Internal Semester Question Paper

Setting and Quality of Assignments

CRITERION 2

16

Best Project Attributes Average Project Attributes

• Design and hardware

implementation

• Paper/patent

communicated

• Compliance with POs

• Impact towards social

relevance

• Awards/Recognitions

• Lack of Design

• Partial compliance of

POs

• Partial compliance of

objectives

Quality of Completed Projects CRITERION 2

17

Industry Interaction

Industrial visit

Academic year Number

2017-18 06

2018-19 03

Alumni Talk

Academic year Number

2017-18 06

2018-19 06

2019-20 33

Guest lecture

2019-20 08

Industrial TrainingAcademic year Student strength No of Industries

2017-18 446 230

2018-19 450 222

2019-20 280 95

Number of industries: 36

INDUSTRIES

ABB India LtdL&T Technology

Services Ltd

Alstom National Instruments

Aricent

TechnologiesNelcast Limited

Armstrong Fluid

TechnologiesNIWE

KPITValeo India Private

Limited

CRITERION 2

Industry supported Labs

NI supported Lab

Texas supported Lab

Zigzag Wallvision Lab

18

Impact Analysis of Industries

Register Number Internship Details Placement Details

RA1611005010041 Reliance Industries Limited

(1/6/2019 – 31/7/2019)

Reliance Industries Limited

offer dated 15/1/2021

RA1611005010266 Reliance Industries Limited

(1/6/2019 – 31/7/2019)

Reliance Industries Limited

offer dated 28/8/2019

RA1611005010294 Cue Learn Private Limited

(16/3/2020 – 11/9/2020)

Cue Learn Private Limited

offer dated 8/9/2020

Industry

Supported

Laboratory

Setup

Faculty Industry

Immersion

Program

Industry

collaboration in

Publications

Placement

by AlumniIMPACT

ANALYSIS

Impact Analysis of Industrial Training

Impact Analysis of Industry Interaction

CRITERION 2

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

PO1: Engineering Knowledge

PO2: Problem Analysis

PO3: Design/Development of Solutions

PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems

PO5: Modern Tool Usage

PO6: The Engineer and Society

PO7: Environment and Sustainability

PO8: Ethics

PO9: Individual and Team Work

PO10: Communication

PO11: Project Management and Finance

PO12: Life-long Learning

19

PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES

PSO1: Ability to Perform in a Global & Industrial

Perspective

PSO2: Ability to acquire Skills and are Career ready

PSO3: Ability to Utilize Energy, Safety and Practices

Course Outcomes, Program Outcomes & Program Specific Outcomes

CRITERION 3

20

CO Assessment Process

CO – PO MAPPING IN SYLLABUS

15EE206 Digital System Design

COURSE ARTICULATION MATRIX

PROGRAM ARTICULATION MATRIX

Course

Code

Course

Outcome

(CO)

PO

1

PO

2

PO

3

PO

4

PO

5

PO

6

PO

7

PO

8

PO

9

PO

10

PO

11

PO

12

PS

O1

PS

O2

PS

O3

15

EE

20

6

CO1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

CO2 3 2 2 - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - -

CO3 3 - - - 1 1 1 - - - - - - 2 -

Average 3 2 2 - 1 1 1 - - - - - 1 2 -

Wi = Σ (COj) /No of Mapped COs (i=1 to15 and j= 1 to Max CO)

(where, Wi is the Weight Factor for POs & PSOs)

Course

Code PO

1

PO

2

PO

3

PO

4

PO

5

PO

6

PO

7

PO

8

PO

9

PO

10

PO

11

PO

12

PS

O1

PS

O2

PS

O3

15

EE

20

6

3 2 2 - 1 1 1 - - - - - 1 2 -

CRITERION 3

21

Course Code Course Outcome (CO)

PO

1

PO

2

PO

3

PO

4

PO

5

PO

6

PO

7

PO

8

PO

9

PO

10

PO

11

PO

12

PS

O1

PS

O2

PS

O3

15

EE

206

15EE206.1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

15EE206.2 3 2 2 - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - -

15EE206.3 3 - - - 1 1 1 - - - - - - 2 -

15EE206 Digital System Design

15

EE

20

6

CO

1

PO

1

3Mapped strongly as all the students acquire knowledge on digital logic

circuits

CO

2

PO

1

3Mapped substantially as all the students gain knowledge on combinational

and sequential logic circuits

PO

2

2Mapped moderately as all the students gain ability to solve and formulate

combinational and sequential logic circuits

PO

3

2Mapped moderately as all the students gain ability to design

combinational and sequential logic circuits

PO

6

1Mapped as students obtain the impact of implementation of combinational

and sequential logic circuits in practical uses.

PO

7

1Mapped as the students understand the impact of combinational and

sequential logic circuits in Engineering practice.

CO

3

PO

1

3Mapped substantially as all the students gain knowledge on the concepts

of memory devices and VHDL

PO

5

1 Mapped as students implement modern tools for memory devices

PO

6

1Mapped as the students understand the implementation of memory devices

in Engineering practice.

PO

7

1Mapped as the students understand the impact of digital solution for the

ever-changing environment

CO-PSO JUSTIFICATIONCO-PO JUSTIFICATION

15E

E2

06

CO

1

PS

O1

1

Mapped as all the students

understand the implementation of

digital logic circuits in industry and

practical applications.

CO

2

PS

O1

1

Mapped as all the students gain

knowledge on combinational and

sequential logic circuits in applied

Engineering sectors.

CO

3

PS

O2

1

Mapped as all the students gain

knowledge on memory devices in

applied Engineering sectors.

CO Assessment ProcessCO-PO/PSO Mapping Justification

CRITERION 3

22

CO Assessment ProcessAssessment Tools for Course Outcomes

CRITERION 3

23

CO Assessment Process CO Marks Computation & Attainment Level

Calculation of CO marks for all COs for all students in the respective class is based on the course evaluation plan.

CO Marks = Σ{(Marks Obtained/Maximum Marks) * (Weightage of respective CO)}

Calculate the % of students who scored greater than or equal to set target mark for internal assessment

% of students = {(Number of students scored greater than or equal to set target mark /Total number of students)*100}

where,

To calculate the numerator, the below equation is used

Students scored greater

than or equal to set target mark =

CO Marks Obtained/respective total CO value

from the course evaluation plan* 100 >= Set target

SAMPLE CO MARKS CALCULATION SHEET CO ATTAINMENT LEVEL DEFINITION

The attainment level for each CO is calculated asLevel 0: 0 < = % of stud attained target marks <= 59

Level 1: 60 <= %of stud attained target marks <=69

Level 2: 70 <= %of stud attained target marks <=79

Level 3: 80 <= %of stud attained target marks <=100

CRITERION 3

24

Faculty Assignment by the

Department

Course Coordinator Subject Faculty

Course Committee Meeting

(Start of Course)

Teaching-

Learning Process

Course Design

CO-PO/PSO

Evaluation

Syllabus

Lesson Plan

Course Material

Teaching MethodsAssessment

Methods

Definition of COsMapping of CO-

PO/PSOJustification of

Mapping

CO Gap Analysis

CO-PO attainment

(Previous Batch) Action to

Improve

CO

Set Target

for CO

Conduction of Assessment

Method

CO Attainment Calculation

Academic Activities

Monitoring Committee

CO

Level

Attained

?

Cycle Test

CCM by Academic

Advisor

Guest Lecture/

Workshop/

Seminar PSO

Attainmen

t

End Sem. Exam

Surprise Test

Quiz/Assignment

CCM

(End of

Course)

Faculty Feedback

CO attainment Discuss

Suggestion to Improve

Course Feedback Survey

Increase Set Target &

Attainment Level

Measures

to Improve

YesNo

PSO

Attainmen

t

CO Evaluation Process CRITERION 3

25

CO Attainment CRITERION 3

26

PO Evaluation Process CRITERION 3

27

PO/PSO Attainment Table

PO/PSO Attainment CRITERION 3

PO/PSO Indirect Attainment Table

INDIRECT ASSESSMENT

TOOLPO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PO INDIRECT ATTAINMENT 3 2.86 2.98 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.61 2.35 1.65 2.08 2.59 2.86 2.84 2.86 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO INDIRECT ATTAINMENT

(on PAM base)2.77 2.48 2.62 2.61 2.35 1.65 2.08 2.59 2.86 2.84 2.86 2.7 2.161 2.258 1.929

S.NO.COURSE

CODECOURSE NAME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

1 15EE206 Digital System Design 2.3 1 1 - 1 0.75 0.75 - - - - - 0.65 2 -

2 15EE209L Analog and Digital Circuits Laboratory 3 2.67 2.75 2 - - - - - - - - 2 2 -

3 15EE211 Control Systems 1.09 0.72 1.09 - 0.73 0.36 - - - - - - 1.09 1.16 0.38

4 15EE212L Measurements and Control Systems Laboratory 3 - - 1.67 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2 -

5 15EE301J Power Electronics 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - - 2 2 -

6 15EE303 Discrete Transforms and Signal Processing 2.22 2.13 1.04 - - 0.62 1 - - - - - 1.35 0.74 -

7 15EE305J Microcontrollers 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - - 3 3 -

8 15EE306M Multi-Disciplinary Design 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.5 3 3 3

9 15EE401 Solid State Drives 3 2 2 - - 1 1 - - - - - 2 2 -

10 15EE496L Major Project 3 3 3 - - 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

28

Students Performance

STUDENT SANCTIONED INTAKE

ENROLMENT RATIO

CRITERION 4

29

Success Rate

Success rate: without any backlogs in any semester during the course of study

Success rate: with and without backlogs in any semester during the course of study

CRITERION 4

ItemLYG

2015-2016

LYGm1

2014-2015

LYGm2

2013-2014

Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 408 390 417

No. of students placed in companies or Government Sector (x) 252 242 272

No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid qualifying scores (GATE

or equivalent State or National Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y)45 65 81

No. of students turned entrepreneur in engineering/technology (z) 4 12 13

x + y + z = 301 311 384

Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N P1=0.74 P2=0.82 P3=0.88

Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.81

Assessment Points = 30 × average placement 24.40

30

Placement, Higher studies & Entrepreneurship CRITERION 4

31

Professional Societies and Chapters

No of Students Benefitted

CRITERION 4

32

Publications in Magazines & Newsletter

Details of “EEEA Review” – Magazine Samples

❖ EEEA REVIEW by EEE Association

❖ E=MC2 (e-magazine on computing and conservation of energy) by SRMIST ENFUSE chapter

❖ Publish their minor/ major projects works in refereed National and International Journals

Publication of the Students works in Journals

CRITERION 4

33

Students Awards/Achievements-

Inter Institute Events

International Events National Events

2020 2019 2018 2017 Total

Inter State 77 39 16 31 163

Intra State 27 16 8 10 61

Total 104 55 24 41 224

CRITERION 4

Total Achievements: 29

International: 12

National: 17

34

Student Faculty Ratio (SFR)

For sanctioned intake, Average SFR=18.76

For actual intake, Average SFR = 17.04

SFR Calculation for Sanctioned Intake

No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake +

Actual admitted lateral entry students

(Year)

CAY

2019-2020

CAYm1

2018-2019

CAYm2

2017-2018

U1.1 (II year) 360 310+1 460

U1.2 (III year) 310+1 460 460+3

U1.3 (IV year) 460 460+3 450

UG1(B.Tech. EEE) 1130+1=1131 1230+4=1234 1370+3=1373

P1.1 (PED) 20 30 20

P1.2 (PED) 30 20 20

PG1 (M.Tech. PED) 50 50 40

P2.1 (PS) 20 30 20

P2.2 (PS) 30 20 20

PG2 (M.Tech. PS) 50 50 40

Total No. of Students in the Department

(S)S1=1231 S2=1334 S3= 1453

No. of Faculty in the Department (F) F1=69 F2=73 F3=72

Student Faculty Ration (SFR) SFR1=S1/F1 =17.84 SFR2= S2/F2= 18.27 SFR3= S3/F3= 20.18

Average SFR SFR= (SFR1+SFR2+SFR3)/3=18.76

CRITERION 5

35

Faculty Information

Cadre Ratio Marks = 𝐴𝐹1

𝑅𝐹1+

𝐴𝐹2

𝑅𝐹2∗ 0.6 +

𝐴𝐹3

𝑅𝐹3∗ 0.4 ∗ 10 = (0.38 +0.43+0.52) *10 = 17

Faculty Qualification for Academic year

2020-21

• Total Number of Faculty- 71

• Total Number of Faculty with Ph.D.- 50

• Total Number of Faculty with M. Tech-

21

• Percentage of faculty with Ph.D. = 70.4%

• No. of regular faculty with Ph.D. is

increasing gradually

Academic

Year

No. of regular faculty

with Ph. D

No. of regular

faculty with M. Tech

2020-2021 50 21

2019-2020 30 39

2018-2019 26 47

2017-2018 17 55

Faculty Qualification

Description2018-19

(CAYm1)

2019-20

(CAY)

No of Faculty

Retained65 64

Total No of Faculty 71 71

% of Faculty Retained 92 90

Faculty Retention

Average Faculty Retention : 91%

Faculty Cadre Proportion

Visiting/Adjunct Faculty

CRITERION 5

36

PSO 1: Ability to perform in a Global & Industrial Perspective

PSO 2: Ability to acquire Skills and are Career ready

PSO 3: Ability to apply Energy Safety and Practices

Program Specific Criteria Mapped with Faculty Competencies

18.4%

8%

20.8%22%

20.7%

10.1%

Area of specialization Electronics

Power Systems

Control systems and

robotics

Machines and drives

Sustainable Energy

Resources

AI based Techniques

PSO Elect PS CS&R MD SER AIT

PSO 1 H H H H H H

PSO 2 H H H H H H

PSO 3 -- M L -- M L

Relation between PSO & Area of specialization

Elect: Electronics, PS=Power Systems, CS&R= Control System and Robotics, MD= Machines and Drives, SER= Sustainable Energy Resources,

AIT= Artificial based Techniques

Faculty Competencies in Correlation to

Program Specific Criteria

CRITERION 5

Program Specific Outcomes

➢ ICT course in collaboration with IIT Bombay -Bodhi Tree

➢A SAFE platform for attendance and class test

➢MOODLE platform- SRMIST

37

FIIP

Tamilnadu Cement

Corporation LTD

EDAC Engineering

LTD

NIOT, Chennai

KONE Elevator

India Pvt Ltd, Chennai

National Instruments

Bharathiya Nabhikiya

Vidyut Nigam LTD

ID TECH Solutions PVT LTD

National Institute of

Wind Energy

Totally 19 faculties participated in Faculty Industry

Immersion Program (FIIP) scheme in various

industries.

Innovation Introduced in Classroom Teaching Innovations through Interaction with Industry

Sample of uploaded resources in Moodle Platform

Innovations -Faculty in Teaching and Learning CRITERION 5

Innovation through Organizing/Arranging Workshops/STTP

38

Academic

Year

No. of

STTP/Workshop

organized

No. of Guest

lectures, webinars

arranged

2019-20 5 32

2018-19 4 7

2017-18 3 5

STTP Workshop Webinar

Sample Works available for Peer Review-

Website and Social Media (YouTube)

• The content of the course materials can be assessed by everyone

and can be used for further development.

• Sample courses are 18EES101J - Basic Electrical And Electronics

Engineering, 15EE305J-Microcontrollers, 18EEC205J- Electrical

Machines

• Faculty publications are also available in Research gate.

• Developed the virtual lab for the laboratory “Power system

Simulation Lab” during the academic year 2020-2021, in PALS

IIT VLAB platform.

Innovations in Teaching and Learning CRITERION 5

39

Academic

Year

Number of FDP/STTP

Attended

Number of Days

Attended

Number of Online

Courses Attended

2018-2019 148 411 131

2017-2018 112 822 62

2016-2017 95 298 52

Total: 355 1531 245

Sample FDP and NPTEL Certificates

Types of Program No of Participation

MHRD/AICTE/

SERB /UGC31

Coursera 83

NPTEL 92

Edx 18

Edapt 09

Tata Steel 14

Others 29

Faculty Participation in FDPs CRITERION 5

40

Academic Research

Total Paper Publications

Ph.D. Details

CRITERION 5

• Total No. of papers published during assessment period- 366

• No. of Scopus publications- 256

• No. of SCI publications- 110

• No. of Book chapters- 40

• Highest Scopus citation of the faculty in the Dept- 1330

• Department Total Scopus citation - 5009

• Highest h-index- 16

Research Accomplishment

Assessment Period Current status

No. of Research Supervisor 26 44

No. of Research Scholar 76 125

Ph.D. Awarded 22 45

54

11

8

194

17 30 6

3

37

88

13

1

2017-18 2018-19 2019-20NO

. O

F P

UB

LIC

AT

ION

S

ACADEMIC YEAR

FACULTY PUBLICATION DETAILS

Total SCI Scopus

Teachers Association for Research Excellence

Grant Rs.1830000

Optimal Energy Management in ship microgrid with PV

.

Teachers Association for Research Excellence

Grant Rs.1830000

Design and Development of Resilient building

integrated PV system grid connected system

DST SERB-TARE1

SRMIST2

DST SERB CORE

RESEARCH GRANT3

DST SERB-TARE4

5

IE(I) Project Funding6

7

Project Funding

Rs. 75 L & 27L

1.02C

SRMIST Grant Rs.1599290

Building automation systems in smart building Dr. J.Preetha Roselyn

Associate Prof/EEE

Dr. C.Bharati Raja

Associate Prof/EEE

Core Research Grant Rs.3823732

Development of low cost, Easy to install, high performance

indigenous PV powered IWPT charging system for light duty

electric vehicle

Dr. S.Padmini

Assistant Prof/EEE

SRMIST Grant Rs.318969

SRMEXPLOROVER

Dr. J.Divya Navamani

Assistant Prof/EEE

IE(I) Grant Rs.15000

Microbial fuel cell based large scale

sustainable energy with waste management

SRM Selective excellence

scheme

Dr. M.Jagabar Sathik

Associate Prof/EEE

Dr. R.Sridhar

Associate Prof/EEE

Dr. A.Geetha

Assistant Prof/EEE

SRM Grant Rs.878000

1.Range extended hybrid electric vehicle

2.Design and Development of hybrid PV water pumping system

3.Development of new small scale wind turbine

Sponsored Research CRITERION 5

SRMIST

42

Development Activities

Instructional Materials Research Lab

CRITERION 5

Patent / Product Development Working Models Developed

43

Consultancy Services CRITERION 5

Academic year Project Duration Funding Agency Amount (INR)

2018-19 Efficient Transformerless low-cost

Microgrid inverters with Halide

Perovskite solar panels

1 yearCORRIT Energy and

Infra5,00,000

2018-19 Energy, power quality and thermal audit 6 months Brite Brothers Ltd 60,000

2017-18Temasek polytechnic 1 year

AEC Business school,

Singapore.10,75,000

Advisory Services• Ramco Cement- Conducted energy audit and suggested ECM.

• Kalleswary Refinery Ltd- Power loss detection using fluke 434 series II in UPS

• GE Industrial Bangalore Technology Centre- Conducted energy audit and recommended suitable mitigation

techniques.

• Hablis Hotel-Conducted harmonic analysis and related measurements in the chiller plant.

• Bhavani, IGCAR- Collaboration with scientists at IGCAR in the area of thermography for medical application.

• National Instruments- Signed an MOU with NI systems to carry out research and development activities in

academics

44

Laboratories

Electrical Machines Lab I & II

Measurement and Instruments Lab

Power Electronics Lab

Electronics Lab-I & II

Microcontroller Lab

Special Electrical Machines Lab

Basic Electrical Workshop Lab

Simulation Lab- 1, 2 & 3.

Research Lab

Renewable Energy Research Lab (RERL)

Service report of Special Electrical Machines Lab

Number of laboratories: 14

Number of Qualified Technical staff: 13

Number of attenders: 5

Special Electrical Machines Lab Power Electronics Lab

Electrical Machines Lab-I Electrical Machines Lab-II

Simulation Lab Measurement and

Instrumentation Lab

CRITERION 6

45

Special Laboratories and UtilizationResearch lab

Renewable Energy research Lab

Outcome of Lab Utilized

Major Equipment

CRITERION 6

46

CO, PO & PSO-Evaluation Method

CO-PO-PEO Mapping

CRITERION 7

47

PO and PSO Attainment -Documentation CRITERION 7

Batch (2015-2019)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

Direct Attainment (DA) 2.33 2.06 2.3 2.53 2.24 1.52 1.96 2.24 2.39 2.44 2.39 2.4 1.79 1.94 1.61

Indirect Attainment (IDA) 2.77 2.48 2.62 2.61 2.35 1.65 2.08 2.59 2.86 2.84 2.86 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

Total PO/PSO Attainment

(0.8*DA + 0.2*IDA)2.42 2.14 2.36 2.55 2.26 1.55 1.98 2.31 2.48 2.52 2.48 2.46 1.86 2.00 1.67

Batch (2016-2020)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

Direct Attainment (DA) 2.35 2.11 2.41 2.54 2.38 1.36 1.84 2.18 2.57 2.42 2.05 2.37 1.82 1.95 1.69

Indirect Attainment (IDA) 2.77 2.50 2.59 2.63 2.39 1.60 2.15 2.59 2.87 2.75 2.87 2.61 2.16 2.26 1.93

Total PO/PSO Attainment

(0.8*DA + 0.2*IDA)2.43 2.19 2.45 2.56 2.38 1.41 1.90 2.26 2.63 2.49 2.21 2.42 1.89 2.01 1.74

Batch (2017-2021)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

Direct Attainment (DA) 2.14 1.9 2.3 2.39 2.34 1.49 1.9 2.4 2.69 2.48 2.69 2.42 1.72 1.84 1.73

Indirect Attainment (IDA) 2.68 2.53 2.53 2.45 2.39 1.65 2.15 2.59 2.87 2.84 2.87 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

Total PO/PSO Attainment

(0.8*DA + 0.2*IDA)2.25 2.03 2.35 2.40 2.35 1.52 1.95 2.44 2.73 2.55 2.73 2.48 1.81 1.92 1.77

48

Target for PO Attainment CRITERION 7

Batch (2015-2019)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PAM Average 2.77 2.6 2.64 2.63 2.39 1.65 2.15 2.59 2.87 2.84 2.87 2.7 2.25 2.33 2.16

75 % of PAM 2.07 1.95 1.98 1.97 1.79 1.23 1.61 1.94 2.15 2.13 2.15 2.02 1.68 1.75 1.62

Direct Attainment (DA) 2.33 2.06 2.3 2.53 2.24 1.52 1.96 2.24 2.39 2.44 2.39 2.4 1.79 1.94 1.61

Sample Analysis for PO Attainment

49

Batch (2015-2019)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.61 2.35 1.65 2.08 2.59 2.86 2.84 2.86 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO Attainment 2.33 2.06 2.3 2.53 2.24 1.52 1.96 2.24 2.39 2.44 2.39 2.4 1.79 1.94 1.61

PO Attainment (%) 84.12 79.23 87.12 96.93 95.32 92.12 94.23 86.49 83.57 85.92 83.57 88.89 82.82 85.91 83.48

Batch (2016-2020)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.63 2.39 1.65 2.15 2.59 2.87 2.84 2.87 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO Attainment 2.35 2.11 2.41 2.54 2.38 1.36 1.84 2.18 2.57 2.42 2.05 2.37 1.82 1.95 1.69

PO Attainment (%) 84.84 81.15 91.29 96.58 99.58 82.42 85.58 84.17 89.55 85.21 71.43 87.78 84.21 86.36 87.63

Batch (2017-2021)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.63 2.39 1.65 2.15 2.59 2.87 2.84 2.87 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO Attainment 2.14 1.9 2.3 2.39 2.34 1.49 1.9 2.4 2.69 2.48 2.69 2.42 1.72 1.84 1.73

PO Attainment (%) 77.26 73.08 87.12 90.87 97.91 90.30 88.37 92.66 93.73 87.32 93.73 89.63 79.58 81.49 89.70

PO/PSO Attainment - Index CRITERION 7

50

Identification of Gap Analysis CRITERION 7

S.N

oCourse code Course title

Target Attainment Attainment

Gap

1 15EE204L Electrical Machines Laboratory I 1 1 0

2 15EC204J Linear Integrated Circuits 2 1.54 -0.46

3 15EE206 Digital System Design 1 1 0

4 15EE211 Control Systems 2 0.73 -1.27

5 15EE300 Comprehension 3 3 0

6 15EE305J Microcontrollers 2 2 0

51

Academic audit (Check list) CRITERION 7

52

Qu

esti

on

pap

er s

cru

tin

y

An

swer

scr

ipt

pap

er s

cru

tin

y

Teac

hin

g m

eth

od

olo

gy-E

valu

atio

n

Co

urs

e f

ile E

valu

atio

n

Co

urs

e c

om

mit

tee

mee

tin

g

Stu

den

t fe

edb

ack

Lett

er t

o p

aren

ts

Co

un

selli

ng

Audit formats CRITERION 7

53

Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies

and Entrepreneurship

Year of

graduation

Total

strength

Placed

students

% of

placement

2017 417 272 65

2018 390 242 62

2019 408 252 62

2020 450 288 64

SALARY PACKAGES IN CORE AND IT INDUSTRY

DETAILS OF ENTREPRENEURS

PLACEMENT STATISTICS

CRITERION 7

PLACEMENT RECORD

54

55

PART-B

OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION

Curriculum

Teaching-Learning

Assessment

OBE

Vision

Mission

PEOs

POs

COs

OUTCOMESTEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS

ASSESSMENT METHODS

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Internal

• Cycle test, Assignment, surprise test

• Lab assessment

• Project: Review marks

External• End semester examination

Feed

backs

• Course survey, graduating student survey, Alumni survey, employer survey, Parent survey

Syllabus

Pedagogical initiatives

Collaborative learning

Project based learning

Learning through laboratory

Outcome based Education (OBE)

Monitoring

and

action plan

Quality of learning

Quality of teaching

Learning outcomes

OBE

PEOsMission

1

Mission

2

Mission

3Consistency

PEO1: Graduates are in a position to apply

their knowledge acquired in Mathematics,

Basic Sciences and Electrical and Electronics

Engineering courses, to the solution of

complex problems encountered in the modern

Engineering practice.

H

(3)

M

(2)

L

(1)

1. Students apply their knowledge of basic mathematical and science to solve complex

electrical problems.

2. The syllabus is constantly upgraded to be on par with global excellence which caters

to latest trends in engineering technology and practices.

3. The industrial collaboration in practical technical training elevates the students to

global standards

PEO 2: Graduates learn and adapt themselves

to the constantly evolving technology by

pursuing higher studies.

M

(2)

H

(3)

L

(1)

1 Students are exposed to state-of-the-art technology through multi-disciplinary design

projects, technical seminar and industrial training, which supplements in complex

problem solving & design through meticulous practice & training.

2. Students apply the skills and knowledge acquired through these practices in minor &

major projects.

3. The research problem dealt in major projects motivates the students to pursue higher

studies in their respective domain.

PEO3: Graduates are better employable and

achieve success in their chosen areas of

Electrical and Electronics Engineering and

related fields.

M

(2)

M

(2)

L

(1)

1. Knowledge obtained on collaboration with industry through technical seminars,

workshops, laboratory practices, technical internships etc refines the students, thus

empowering them to be employable in core industries in Electrical & Electronics.

2. Software programming skills & hardware development done in major and minor

projects equips the students in the field of Research & Development.

PEO 4: Graduates are good leaders and

managers by effectively communicating at

both technical and interpersonal levels.

L

(1)

L

(1)

H

(3)

1. Communication & interpersonal skills of the students are continuously groomed

through laboratory practices, seminar and project presentations.

2. Active participation and organizing technical and non technical events of Students

equip them to manage and lead organisations in the future.

3. Life skill courses in the curriculum imparts the students the knowledge of ethical

responsibilities.57

Consistency of PEOs with Mission OBE(Plan)

58

Program Outcomes (POs)

Graduate Attributes (GA) Program Specific

Outcomes (PSOs)

PO

1:E

ng

inee

rin

g

Kn

ow

led

ge

PO

2:

Pro

ble

m

An

aly

sis

PO

3:

Des

ign

&

Dev

elo

pm

ent

PO

4:

An

aly

sis,

Des

ign

, R

esea

rch

PO

5:

Mo

der

n

To

ol

Usa

ge

PO

6:

So

ciet

y &

Cu

ltu

re

PO

7:

En

vir

on

men

t &

Su

sta

ina

bil

ity

PO

8:

Eth

ics

PO

9:

Ind

ivid

ua

l

& T

eam

Wo

rk

PO

10

:

Co

mm

un

ica

tio

n

PO

11

: P

roje

ct

Mg

t. &

Fin

an

ce

PO

12

: L

ife

Lo

ng

Lea

rnin

g

PS

O1

:Glo

ba

l &

Ind

ust

ria

l

Per

spec

tiv

e

PS

O2

: S

kil

ls &

Ca

reer

rea

dy

PS

O3

:En

erg

y,

Sa

fety

a

nd

Pra

ctic

e

PEO - 1 H H H L M M

PEO - 2 H H H H M

PEO - 3 H H M H H M M M H

PEO - 4 H H H L M

Mapping of POs with PEOs

Every course in the curriculum are mapped with COs ,POs and PSOs

OBE(Plan)

Collaborative

learning

Project based

learning

Conduct of

lab courses

Multidisciplinary

design

Club

association

activity

Major project

Minor project

Seminar

Experiment

Record

Viva

Adherence to

Academic

calendar

Academic

calendar

Slot based

timetable Industrial trainingModel exam

University

practical

Teaching-Learning Process OBE(Do)

Pedagogical

Initiatives - Content

Delivery

Google

Class

Room

Bodhi Tree

Safe

platform

Massive Open

Online Courses

(MOOCs)

Moodle

based

LMS

Invited

Lectures

Industrial

Training /

Internship

Pedagogical Initiatives OBE(Do)

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

PO1: Engineering Knowledge

PO2: Problem Analysis

PO3: Design/Development of Solutions

PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems

PO5: Modern Tool Usage

PO6: The Engineer and Society

PO7: Environment and Sustainability

PO8: Ethics

PO9: Individual and Team Work

PO10: Communication

PO11: Project Management and Finance

PO12: Life-long Learning

61

PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES

PSO1: Ability to perform in a Global & Industrial

Perspective

PSO2: Ability to acquire Skills and are Career ready

PSO3: Ability to Utilize Energy, Safety and Practices

Course Outcomes (COs), Program Outcomes (POs) & Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)

SAMPLE COURSE OUTCOME (2015R)

COURSE: DIGITAL SYSTEM DESIGN (15EE206)

CO1: Understand the concept of digital logic circuits

CO2: Design combinational and sequential logic circuits

CO3: Learn the concepts of memory devices, VHDL

OBE(Check)

62

CO – PO MAPPING IN SYLLABUS

15EE206 Digital System Design

COURSE ARTICULATION MATRIX

PROGRAM ARTICULATION MATRIX

Course

Code

Course

Outcome

(CO)

PO

1

PO

2

PO

3

PO

4

PO

5

PO

6

PO

7

PO

8

PO

9

PO

10

PO

11

PO

12

PS

O1

PS

O2

PS

O3

15

EE

20

6

CO1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

CO2 3 2 2 - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - -

CO3 3 - - - 1 1 1 - - - - - - 2 -

Average 3 2 2 - 1 1 1 - - - - - 1 2 -

Wi = Σ (COj) /No of Mapped COs (i=1 to15 and j= 1 to Max CO)

(where, Wi is the Weight Factor for POs & PSOs)

Course

Code PO

1

PO

2

PO

3

PO

4

PO

5

PO

6

PO

7

PO

8

PO

9

PO

1

0

PO

1

1

PO

1

2

PS

O

1

PS

O

2

PS

O

3

15

EE

20

6

3 2 2 - 1 1 1 - - - - - 1 2 -

CO-PO in Syllabus OBE(Check)

63

Program Articulation Matrix (PAM) OBE(Check)

64

Course Articulation Matrix (CAM) OBE(Check)

65

Course Code Course Outcome (CO)

PO

1

PO

2

PO

3

PO

4

PO

5

PO

6

PO

7

PO

8

PO

9

PO

10

PO

11

PO

12

PS

O1

PS

O2

PS

O3

15

EE

20

6 15EE206.1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -

15EE206.2 3 2 2 - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 - -

15EE206.3 3 - - - 1 1 1 - - - - - - 2 -

15EE206 Digital System Design

15

EE

206

CO

1

PO

1

3 Mapped strongly as all the students acquire knowledge on digital logic circuits

CO

2

PO

1

3Mapped substantially as all the students gain knowledge on combinational and sequential logic

circuits

PO

2

2Mapped moderately as all the students gain ability to solve and formulate combinational and

sequential logic circuits

PO

3

2Mapped moderately as all the students gain ability to design combinational and sequential logic

circuits

PO

6

1Mapped as students obtain the impact of implementation of combinational and sequential logic

circuits in practical uses.

PO

7

1Mapped as the students understand the impact of combinational and sequential logic circuits in

Engineering practice.

CO

3

PO

1

3Mapped substantially as all the students gain knowledge on the concepts of memory devices and

VHDL

PO

5

1 Mapped as students implement modern tools for memory devices

PO

6

1 Mapped as the students understand the implementation of memory devices in Engineering practice.

PO

7

1 Mapped as the students understand the impact of digital solution for the ever-changing environment

CO-PSO JUSTIFICATIONCO-PO JUSTIFICATION

15

EE

20

6

CO

1

PS

O1

1

Mapped as all the students understand the

implementation of digital logic circuits in industry

and practical applications.

CO

2

PS

O1

1

Mapped as all the students gain knowledge on

combinational and sequential logic circuits in

applied Engineering sectors.

CO

3

PS

O2

1Mapped as all the students gain knowledge on

memory devices in applied Engineering sectors.

CO-PO/PSO Mapping Justification OBE(Check)

66

Assessment Tools for Course Outcomes (COs) OBE(Check)

67

CO Marks Computation & Attainment Level

Calculation of CO marks for all COs for all students in the respective class is based on the course evaluation plan.

CO marks = Σ{(Marks obtained/Maximum Marks) * (Weightage of respective CO)}

Calculate the % of students who scored greater than or equal to set target mark for internal assessment

% of students = {(Number of students who scored greater than or equal to set target mark /Total number of students)*100}

To calculate the numerator, the below equation is used

Students scored greater

than or equal to set target mark =

CO marks obtained/respective total CO value

from the course evaluation plan* 100 >= set target

SAMPLE CO MARKS CALCULATION SHEET CO ATTAINMENT LEVEL DEFINITION

OBE(Check)

% of students -

Target marks range

Level

0 59 0

60 69 1

70 79 2

80 100 3

68

CO Indirect Assessment –Course Feedback Survey

OBE(Check)

69

CO Attainment Table OBE(Check)

S.NO.COURSE

CODECOURSE NAME CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5

1 15EE206 Digital System Design 2.4 1.5 3 - -

2 15EE209L Analog and Digital Circuits Laboratory 3 3 3 3 -

3 15EE211 Control Systems 0.88 1.2 0.97 1.3 -

4 15EE212L Measurements and Control Systems Laboratory 3 3 3 - -

5 15EE301J Power Electronics 3 3 3 - -

6 15EE303 Discrete Transforms and Signal Processing 1.7 2.7 1.6 2.1 3

7 15EE305J Microcontrollers 3 3 3 - -

8 15EE306M Multi-Disciplinary Design 3 3 3 3 -

9 15EE401 Solid State Drives 3 3 3 - -

10 15EE496L Major Project 3 3 3 3 3

70

PO/PSO Evaluation Process OBE(Check)

71

Questions mapped with POs/PSOs Sample Format

Sample FormatQuestions mapped with POs/PSOs

PO/PSO Indirect Assessment Graduate Exit and Parent Survey

OBE(Check)

72

Questions mapped with POs/PSOs

Alumni Survey

Questions mapped with POs/PSOs

Employer Survey

OBE(Check)PO/PSO Indirect Assessment Alumni and Employer Survey

73

PO/PSO Attainment Table

PO/PSO Indirect Attainment OBE(Check)

S.NO.COURSE

CODECOURSE NAME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

1 15EE206 Digital System Design 2.3 1 1 - 1 0.75 0.75 - - - - - 0.65 2 -

2 15EE209L Analog and Digital Circuits Laboratory 3 2.67 2.75 2 - - - - - - - - 2 2 -

3 15EE211 Control Systems 1.09 0.72 1.09 - 0.73 0.36 - - - - - - 1.09 1.16 0.38

4 15EE212LMeasurements and Control Systems

Laboratory3 - - 1.67 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2 -

5 15EE301J Power Electronics 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - - 2 2 -

6 15EE303 Discrete Transforms and Signal Processing 2.22 2.13 1.04 - - 0.62 1 - - - - - 1.35 0.74 -

7 15EE305J Microcontrollers 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - - 3 3 -

8 15EE306M Multi-Disciplinary Design 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.5 3 3 3

9 15EE401 Solid State Drives 3 2 2 - - 1 1 - - - - - 2 2 -

10 15EE496L Major Project 3 3 3 - - 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

INDIRECT ASSESSMENT

TOOLPO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PO INDIRECT ATTAINMENT 3 2.86 2.98 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.61 2.35 1.65 2.08 2.59 2.86 2.84 2.86 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO INDIRECT ATTAINMENT

(on PAM base)2.77 2.48 2.62 2.61 2.35 1.65 2.08 2.59 2.86 2.84 2.86 2.7 2.161 2.258 1.929

74

Batch (2015-2019)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.61 2.35 1.65 2.08 2.59 2.86 2.84 2.86 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO Attainment 2.33 2.06 2.3 2.53 2.24 1.52 1.96 2.24 2.39 2.44 2.39 2.4 1.79 1.94 1.61

PO Attainment (%) 84.12 79.23 87.12 96.93 95.32 92.12 94.23 86.49 83.57 85.92 83.57 88.89 82.82 85.91 83.48

Batch (2016-2020)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.63 2.39 1.65 2.15 2.59 2.87 2.84 2.87 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO Attainment 2.35 2.11 2.41 2.54 2.38 1.36 1.84 2.18 2.57 2.42 2.05 2.37 1.82 1.95 1.69

PO Attainment (%) 84.84 81.15 91.29 96.58 99.58 82.42 85.58 84.17 89.55 85.21 71.43 87.78 84.21 86.36 87.63

Batch (2017-2021)

Assessment Methods PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

PAM average 2.77 2.60 2.64 2.63 2.39 1.65 2.15 2.59 2.87 2.84 2.87 2.70 2.16 2.26 1.93

PO Attainment 2.14 1.9 2.3 2.39 2.34 1.49 1.9 2.4 2.69 2.48 2.69 2.42 1.72 1.84 1.73

PO Attainment (%) 77.26 73.08 87.12 90.87 97.91 90.30 88.37 92.66 93.73 87.32 93.73 89.63 79.58 81.49 89.70

PO/PSO Attainment - Index OBE(Check)

Process of identification of curriculum gaps

• Mapping of POs and PSOs-Starting of the semester-Course committee meeting.

• Subject handling faculty submits the deficiencies in attainment of PO’s and PSO’s in course

committee meeting at the end of the semester.

• Stake holder’s Survey-Gaps in the teaching learning process is identified.

• In Faculty meeting along with AAMC members, the Consolidated report of gap analysis is

discussed and plan of action is approved.

• Follow-up action is implemented in the next academic year.

Course committee meeting –Planning

Course committee meeting –

attainment analysis

Faculty meeting Gap

analysis discussion

AAMC Approval

Actions implemented

in courses

Next year PO attainment

review

OBE(Act)

76

Course Committee Meeting OBE(Act)

Action taken & Improvement in PO attainment

77

OBE(Act)

Sample Assignment

Gap analysis-Course Committee Meeting OBE(Act)

Plan of Action to Bridge the Gap & its Implementation

Specific assignment, Tutorial classes

Video lectures, Minor projects

Design based competitions

Flipped classroom, NPTEL courses

Infrastructure

Joint courses-

Conduct additional experiments

Industrial visit, Industrial Training

Professional society activities

Seminars, Guest lecture, Alumni talk

79

Video Lecture

Specific assignment

Design based competition

Industrial visit

OBE(Act)

80

Continuous Improvement OBE(Act)

81

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/3/my-drive

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/2/my-drive

Drive link-C and P file

Drive link-C file

Drive link-P file

82