행정용어 사용에 대한 정책적 개입 현황과...

Preview:

Citation preview

  • 57 2012.12.

    *1)

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    1.

    .

    .1)

    * / : hwangyongju@korea.kr

    2011

    ,

    . .

    1) (2011) .

  • .

    .2)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    2.

    2.1.

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    , .

    .3)

    .

    2) , , , , ,

    .

  • 2.2.

    4)

    .

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    2009 .

    (2009:85~86) .

    , ,

    , .

    (2010:392) (2009) , ,

    , ,

    .

    (2010:392~393)

    ,

    ,

    3)

    .

    4) (2010:119) ()

    .

  • . ,

    ( 2009:254),

    .

    .

    .

    , ,

    ,

    .

    (2010)

    .

    (2009) (2009)

    .

    , ,

    . (2010)

    .5)

    5) (2010)

    ,

    . .

    .

  • ,

    .

    (2010:399) .6)

    3.

    .

    .

    .

    3.1.

    3.1.1.

    1948

    6 .

    .

    6)

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    . ()

    . (2010:399)

  • . ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    , 1968 .7)

    .

    .

    .

    . 1991 12 11

    1992 .

    8) ,

    , .9)

    7) 5338 (70. 9. 18) 1991 12 31

    .

    8)

    .

    9) 2000 10 19 .

  • . ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    3.1.2.

    . .10)

    4 ( )

    .

    10 ( )

    .

    14 ( )

    10)

    , 1 14 1

    . , , ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    .(, 2010)

  • . ,

    .

    15 ( )

    .

    17 ( )

    .

    18 ( )

    29

    ,

    .

    14

    .

    . 2009

    8 . 2005

    . (2011:32~34)

    11)

    11) (2010)

    66.5% 1.85

    170 .

    114

    .

    ((mom)

    (entrepreneur) ) .

    4,500 6

  • .

    OSMU(One Source Multi Use) (Killer Contents)

    (Indi Musicion) (Sin Tax)

    (Micro Credit) (Micro Insurance)

    (Bad Bank) (Privite Free workout)

    (Fast Track) (Job Fair)

    (Senior ) (Food Bank)

    (Food Market) (Voucher)

    (U-Care) (Day-Care Center)

    ( Incubating) (New Start Project)

    (Job Sharing) WEE (WEE Project)

    ( Cashbag) (Licensing Fair)

    2009 8 ,

    ,

    .

    . 150

    .

    12)

    .

    2011 4 6 , ,

    , , , .

    4,500 1 2,303,

    2,046, 4,336 .(

    2011:32~33 )

    12) (2010) ,

    . , , ,

    .

  • : Happy , , (loan),

    , C/S , 3 ,

    , , ,

    , ,

    : Heli-EMS,

    : Walking School Bus(), , Safe

    ,

    : (MotherSafe) , , UHealth(),

    , (Dream Start), e, e,

    : nara,

    : , , u-Health, u-medical, ,

    , (Global Fashion Leading Brand,

    GFLB) , , , ,

    ICT , ICT (Outlook) , ,

    , (uni-material), , qwl, ,

    , , , SESE /

    : Me First , , , ,

    , PM(Project Manager), Eco-,

    Top , Eco-Innovation, ,

    /

    . Happy, C/S, Heli-EMS, Walking School

    Bus, Safe, UHealth, u-medical, qwl, SESE, Me First, PM, Eco, Top, Eco-Innovation .

    ( )

    .

    .

    , ,

    .

  • -nara .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    : (golden seed)13), FFK, 2011 ,

    Rural-20 , , Green & Life Technology

    : (Job world)

    : STOP! , gogo , RESCUE

    . (Job world)

    .

    .14)

    .

    ,

    .15)

    13) (Golden seed)'

    2020 2

    .

    14) 70%

    . .

    15)

  • 3.2.

    3.2.1.

    ,

    . 1970

    .

    1976 8208

    , , 11 9 . 1115

    8279

    . 1977 1980 . 5 1982 .

    1981 , 1,035

    . 1982 1,238 . 1984 4,909 .

    1992 1981 1991 92 .

    ,

    . 9,219,

    ( ) 8,673

    1993 .

    .16) .

    . 2011

    /

    62.1%, 32.9%.

    71.5%, 23.3%.

    16) 1993 2 23.

    .

  • ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    () ()

    () ()

    () ()

    ()

    ()

    ,

    ,

    ,

    .

  • ,

    1995 3 635

    . .

    -> ->

    ->

    -> ->

    -> ->

    ->,

    1995 10 710 .

    .

  • ()

    ()

    () ()

    () ()

    () ()

    () ()

    () ()

    (LPG)

    .

    ,

    .17)

    .

    .

    17)

    (2003) .

    .

  • 3.2.2.

    , , .

    .

    (2009)

    .

    .(2011:36)

    ,

    .

    .

    2009

    2010~2012 .

    , .

    ,

    .

    .18)

    , 2010se

    .

    , 320

    .

    . ,

    , 680 .

    18) 1996 .

  • ,

    ,

    ,

    , ,

    , , ,

    4.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    19) .

    19)

    .

    ,

    .

  • 4.1.

    . (2010)

    .

    1.

    1.1

    1.1.1 ?

    1.1.2 ?

    1.1.3 ?

    1.2

    1.2.1 ?

    1.2.2 ?

    1.2.3 ?

    2.

    2.1

    2.1.1 ?

    2.1.2 ?2.1.3 ?

    2.2

    2.2.1 ?

    2.2.2 ?

    2.2.3 ?

    2.3

    2.3.1 ?

    2.3.2 ?

    2.3.3 ?

    .

    .

  • .

    .

    2009

    .

    .

    4.2.

    .

    .

    .

    .20) .

    . (2011)

    20) .

    , ,

    .

  • ()

    , , , ,

    .21)

    100 20 4 100*4 400

    1101900 10

    105 110*5 550

    250 1000 1

    25,000 250 1 250 250

    100 (5/100) 5 100*5 500

    100 20

    80 3 300 300

    660 2,000

    4.3.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    2011

    21) () .

    .

    .

    (2011) .

  • .

    .

    .

    .

    5.

    ,

    .

    .

    () .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    , , , ,

  • (2011). . : . (2010). . : . (1989). , .

    . : (2009). , 24, 241-265.

    : .

    (2010). , 20 2, 117-131. : .

    (2010). , 27, 379-405. : .

    (2003). , :(2009), , ,

    , 85-93. : . (2011). , 50, 342-374.

    : .

    (2011). , 50 ().

    Spolsky, B.(2009). Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Spolsky, B.(2010). , 20 , 20~51. : .

  • : 2012 11 10

    : 2012 11 24 ~ 12 7

    : 2012 12 12 ()

    Policy intervention status and challenges for

    administrative terms

    Hwang, Yong-Ju

    In this paper were classified as direct intervention and indirect

    intervention on the administrative terminology use. And in this paper

    discussed the enactment of pre-and post-intervention status that

    Framework Act on the Korean language established a new turning point

    in the Korean policy. Also a way to reduce the current administrative

    term used for the problem was presented.

    Not directly intervene in the administrative term used for primarily take

    issue foreign language is the use of foreign characters (Roman) and difficult

    to use. Policy makers, however, be taken seriously on this issue is.

    Part of the Nation to intervene in the use of language is in the public

    sphere. Administrative term public domain because it will be less side

    effects, according to the Nation's use of language intervention. Rather a

    term for an administrative policy interventions can help people's

    understanding. Public language that can be easily and accurately

    understand the rights of the citizens.

    Key word:

    Administrative terms, Korean language policy, Framework Act on the

    Korean Language, Intervention, Public language

Recommended