View
219
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Speaking Anxiety, Mindfulness and
Willingness to Communicate
Abbas Ali Zarei
Associate professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Zahra Haji Agha Mohammadi
MA, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
1
Table of Contents
Chapter One: Introduction .. 3
1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Statement of the Problem ................................................................................ 4
1.3 Purpose of the Study ....................................................................................... 5
1.4 Research Questions ......................................................................................... 5
1.5 Null Hypotheses .............................................................................................. 5
1.6 Definition of the Key Terms ........................................................................... 6
1.6.1 Mindfulness .............................................................................................. 6
1.6.2 Speaking Anxiety ..................................................................................... 7
1.6.3 Willingness to Communicate (WTC) ...................................................... 8
1.7. Significance of the Study ............................................................................... 8
1.8 Limitations and Delimitations ......................................................................... 9
Chapter Two: Review of the Related Literature ..................................................... 11
2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 11
2.2. Mindfulness .................................................................................................. 11
2.3. Speaking Anxiety ......................................................................................... 18
2.4. Willingness to Communicate (WTC) .......................................................... 23
Chapter Three: Methodology .................................................................................. 33
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 33
3.2 Participants .................................................................................................... 33
3.3 Instruments .................................................................................................... 33
3.4 Procedure ....................................................................................................... 34
3.5 Data analysis ................................................................................................. 35
Chapter Four: Results and Discussion .................................................................... 37
2
4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 37
4.2. Results .......................................................................................................... 37
4.3 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 41
Chapter Five: Conclusion and Implication Suggestions ......................................... 45
5.1 Summery of findings ..................................................................................... 45
5.3 Implications of the study ............................................................................... 47
5.4 Suggestions for further research.................................................................... 47
References ................................................................................................................................. 48
Appendix A: Speaking Anxiety Questionnaire ......................................................................... 66
Appendix B. Willingness to Communicate Questionnaire 70
Appendix C: Mindfulness questionnaire ................................................................................... 73
Appendix D: Reliability of speaking anxiety questionnaire .................................................... 75
Appendix E: Reliability of WTC questionnaire ....................................................................... 76
Appendix F: Reliability of Mindfulness questionnaire ............................................................. 77
3
1.1 Background
Nowadays, a new language is regarded as a new world for learners. Among the language
skills, speaking has a significant role. Horwitz (1986) believes that the speaking skill is
essential for individuals who need to learn a second/foreign language. Hamzehnejad and
Shariati (2014) maintain that one of the first problems of the early man was the need to
communicate. After evolution, man learned to communicate with the individuals who did
not speak in their mother tongue.
According to Young (1990), speaking in a foreign language is a stressful task for a
large number of students. As a matter of fact, anxiety is a very crucial element which may
have negative impact on second and foreign language learning. Muris (2002) notes that
individuals become anxious as they view themselves not skillful enough to cope with
challenging conditions.
Anxiety experienced in conversation in English can be exhausting and can affect
academic aims (Woodrow, 2006). Horwitz (1986) assumes that when learners use the target
language for communicating in second language/foreign language classrooms, they are not
anxious any more. All individuals often encounter anxiety inducing situations in their lives,
but they differ in their potentiality to cope with them (Muris, 2002).
Many studies have focused on the investigation of the elements that can help to
2014; Yousefi
Azarfam & Baki, 2012, etc.). At the same time, willingness to communicate (WTC) seems
MacIntyre, Clément, Dörnyei & Noels, 1998, p.
547). ire toward taking part in communication
4
while they are free to select (McCroskey & Baer, 1985). MacIntyre (2004) describes
with communication competencies and perceived self-
Another variable which seems to have a crucial effect on speaking anxiety is
mindfulness, which was originally practiced in Buddhism (Ludwig & Kabat-Zinn, 2008).
The concept of mindfulness has been expanded into several studies such as medicine
psychology, neuroscience, and education (Meiklejohn, Phillips, Freedman, Griffin, Biegel,
Roach, Frank, Burke, Pinger, Soloway, Isberg, Sibinga, Grossman & Saltzman, 2012). The
practice of mindfulness helps individuals to experience more appropriate social relations.
Also, it inspires people to change annoying habits and results in decreasing need of medical
care (Ludwig & Kabat-Zinn, 2008; Ruff & Mackenzie, 2009). It also enhances happiness
and healthiness through decreasing anxiety, incr
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Among all language skills, speaking seems to play a crucial role in effective
communication. Speaking, as one of the four major skills, which is necessary for effective
communication, needs to be improved along with other skills (Morozova, 2013). Ur (1996)
believes that speaking is the most significant skill for foreign language learners who are
keen on becoming real speakers of a second or foreign language. Nunan (1991) asserts that
success is measured in terms of the ability to carry out a conversation in the (target)
Zhang (2001) claims that FL learners usually have little chance to speak
English outside the classroom setting. Perhaps this situation for foreign language learners
causes them to feel anxious and to remain silent in the classroom.
Horwitz and Cope (1986) hold that learners tend to experience more panic in
speaking than in any other task. Accordingly, anxiety has a
ability to achieve academic objectives (Chowdhury, 2014). According to Horwitz and Cope
(1986), the fear of having communication with other individuals in foreign/second language
causes anxiety; so reducing this anxiety should be regarded as a prime concern. One of the
most powerful ramifications of communication anxiety is a dwindled desire to
communicate (Beatty, 1987). An individual may not be willing to communicate because of
5
correlation with willingness to communicate (Burgoon, 1976; McCroskey & Richmond,
1991; McCroskey, Richmond & McCroskey, 1987).
Mindfulness has also been shown to be strongly related to developing mental
2003). Baer (2003) -based interventions may help to alleviate a
The paucity of research on speaking anxiety and its relationship with Iranian
light on the potential obstacles that students face in learning a foreign language. The
mindfulness, willingness to communicate and speaking anxiety.
1.3 Purpose of the Study
The
speaking anxiety and to suggest ways to help students get rid of it efficiently.The present
study is an attempt to investigate the relationship between Iranian EFL learners'
mindfulness, willingness to communicate (WTC) and speaking anxiety.
1.4 Research Questions
To achieve the purpose of this study, the following research questions are proposed:
Q1: Is there any statistically significant relationship between Iranian EFL
mindfulness and speaking anxiety?
Q2:
mindfulness and willingness to communicate?
Q3: Is there any statistically significant relationship between Iranian EFL learne
willingness to communicate and speaking anxiety?
1.5 Null Hypotheses
In response to the above research questions, the following null hypotheses are formulated:
6
H1:
mindfulness and speaking anxiety.
H2:
mindfulness and willingness to communicate.
H3:
willingness to communicate and speaking anxiety.
1.6 Definition of the Key Terms
In the present study, the important terms are explained as follows:
1.6.1 Mindfulness
Mindfulness, which has its origin in Buddhism, is concentrating on the current time
intentionally and with no judgment (Kabat-
awareness at the present moment (Burnett, 2011).
Eastern philosophies stress the importance of the mind/body connection in
mindfulness. Kabat-Zinn (1994) points out that mindfulness has relation to other
philosophies such as Judaism, Islam, Christianity and Hinduism. As pointed out by Baer
ticular qualities of attention and awareness that can
p. 145).
Burnett (2011) implies that it is mindfulness that recalls us what, why and where
we are doing it in the process. Kabat-Zinn (1994) points out
4).Flook, Goldberg, Pinger, Bonus, and Davidson (2013) assert that Mindfulness-Based
Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a widely known form of mindfulness, instructing that has been
shown to decrease stress, apprehension, and anxiety.
the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) questionnaire designed by Brown and
Ryan (2003). Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer and Toney (2006) state that MAAS is an
instrument which assesses our tendency to be attentive and aware of current- moment in our
every-day life.
7
1.6.2 Speaking Anxiety
nervousness when we are anxious (Tobias, 1986). Anxiety disorders, as an umbrella term,
may exist in almost every field of learning. As a sort of anxiety, language anxiety is the
feeling of being anxious particularly in relation to second language contexts. (MacIntyre &
Gardner, 1994). MacIntyre and Gardner (1994) identify two forms of anxiety: general
anxiety and communicative anxiety.
Researchers have identified several types of anxiety. Dörnyei (2005), for instance,
and
taken as an intrinsic feature of individuals, whereas state anxiety is detrimental to learners.
Lately,
unified together that students experience while in classrooms. MacIntyre and Gardner
(1994) state that students experience anxiety while utilizing/learning a foreign language.
Many studies have shown that foreign language learners usually have some degree
of anxiety, specifically speaking anxiety (e.g., Fariadian, Azizifar, & Gowhary, 2014).
- provok
(Horwitz, Horwitz & Cope, 1986; Palacios, 1998).The students who feel anxious think that
not a surprising reaction since most of us are used to becoming less talkative in new
Basic, 2011, p. 2).
According to Abdullah and Abdullah Rahman (2009), students who believe that one
should say nothing in English till it can be said accurately may never speak. In addition,
Young (1990) acknowledges that speaking anxiety is connected to social anxiety and self-
esteem. According to Basic (2011):
Students who have speech anxiety are often very calm and passive and can, therefore,
receive less attention from teachers in comparison with noisy and aggressive
children. These students usually give up very early and continue to be quiet
throughout their years in school (p.10).
8
an affective filter
results in low or even non-
matter of fact, speaking in a foreign language may be acquired efficiently if students get rid
of their anxiety. For the purpose of this study, speaking anxiety was measured through a
questionnaire developed by Chowdhury (2014).
1.6.3 Willingness to Communicate (WTC)
WTC was initially utilized by McCroskey and his partners in connection to
key & Richmond, 1990).
The concept of willingness to communicate (WTC) was first introduced to first language
- -
(McCroskey & Richmond, 1990). McCroskey and Richmond (1990) regard WTC as a
personality quality and describe it as variability in talking conduct. According to
(1990) consider WTC as an
Intyre
a higher level of perceived communicative competence and a lower level of communication
was
operationally measured through a WTC questionnaire developed by MacIntyre, Baker,
Clement and Conrod (2001).
1.7. Significance of the Study
them.This desire is an affair of personal disposition 30). In English
foreign language research, learner variables have been focused on recently because learners
are recognized as active participants in foreign language acquisition process in cognitive
theory (Dornyei, 2005). Although teachers face the dilemma
9
speak in EFL classrooms, for most foreign/ second language learners, using target language
for the purpose of communication is one of the primary concerns (Tousi & Khalaji, 2014).
Moreover, Woodrow (2006) claims that anxiety involved in communication can be
reduce their anxiety in classroom settings and to create a more stress-free atmosphere for
better communication. Therefore, studies which examine the techniques of reducing anxiety
in classrooms are needed. In spite of the growing number of investigations into mindfulness
(e.g., Bishop et al., 2004; Chang, Palesh, Caldwell, Glasgow, Abramson, Luskin et al.,
2004; Harnett, Reid, Loxton, & Lee, 2016; Kabat-Zinn, 1994, etc.) and on willingness to
communicate (MacIntyre, 1994, 1998, 2007; MacIntyre, Clément, Dörnyei & Noels, 1998;
Morozova, 2013, etc.), there is a paucity of research on the relationship between
mindfulness, WTC and speaking anxiety.
- -
nship
between mindfulness and depression (Coffey, Hartman & Fredrickson, 2010). Also, since
research on the relationship between willingness to communicate, mindfulness and
speaking apprehension is relatively rare, studies that scrutinize this relationship are needed.
and decreasing speaking anxiety, the findings of the present study can be helpful for them.
Furthermore, the concept of mindfulness and its effect on reducing speaking anxiety might
make Iranian EFL learners more willing to communicate.
The findings of the present study may also provide useful information for teachers,
solicitors and authorities to help students control their anxiety during speaking activity. The
purpose of the present research is, therefore, to investigate the relationship between Iranian
EFL learners' mindfulness, willingness to communicate (WTC) and speaking anxiety.
1.8 Limitations and Delimitations
There were several limitations and delimitations in the present study. The first challenge
was finding learners at the same level of proficiency. Therefore, they had to be
homogenized in terms of their scores on a proficiency test. In addition, only EFL students
10
took part and was limited in terms of cluster sampling, due to the time at the researche
disposal and number of participants available to the research for data collection in the
present study. It is essential to mention that the age and sex of the participants were not
taken into account because the learners were both males and females at different age levels.
So, factors of age and sex were not considered as variables in the present research. The
focus of the present study was only on intermediate level students, so the results of the
present research cannot be generalized to all learners.
11
Chapter Two: Review of the Related Literature
2.1. Introduction
In this chapter, the theoretical bases of the present study are discussed in detail. First,
mindfulness, as a vital way to achieve concentration and awareness to reduce anxiety, is
described. Second, speaking anxiety, as a crucial factor inhibiting the participation of EFL
learners in academic settings, is examined. Third,
the number of times that students choose to speak in English classrooms is discussed.
Eventually, the ways to facilitate academic accomplishments in an EFL setting are
explained.
2.2. Mindfulness
Nyanaponika Thera (1972) believed that the physical suffering, in the old metaphor, is the
(1990) states that avoiding the first arrow (made by unwanted situations) may not be
Nowadays stress and depression are progressively felt around the world. The issue
of anxiety may lead to problems of alcohol or drug abuse and committing suicide, if it is
considered unimportant (Albrecht, Albrecht & Cohen, 2012). McEwen (2003) states that
although stress is helpful for organizing energy for some goals, extended stress is harmful
for both health and academic accomplishments. Andersen and Teicher (2008) claim that
memory and brain function in learning new subjects may be lost because of prolonged
Liehr
and Diaz (2010) propose that mindfulness may act as a gifted approach to removing
12
anxious thoughts. Dane (2010) believes that the ancient construct of mindfulness seems to
rise attention nowadays, and its crucial outcome is evident in contemporary life.
In modern psychology, mindfulness has been used as a technique for improving
awareness so as to obtain skillful ability to react toward deficient behavior as depression
(Bishop et al., 2004). Woodruff, Arnkoff, Glass, and Hindman (2014) state that the
cultivation of studies related to mindfulness may help the reduction of negative
psychological symptoms. Mindfulness is an old instrument which improves our life by
Brown and Ryan (2003) believe that
mindfulness is a technique that is being utilized increasingly around the world as a means
Modern clinical investigators and meditation teachers have offered different
explanations of mindfulness (Baer, 2003; Bishop et al., 2004; Kabat-Zinn, 2003b; Salzberg
& Goldstein, 2001). Baer (2003) believes that mindfulness is all about awareness, which
-being. if
we are aware of the requirement to be sensitive to and considerate of the alikeness among
cultures, we will be more hopeful to accomplish the crucial movements to achieve the
-
present moment, non-
Allport (1988) proposed that three situations must be considered in order for an
cognitive change should be demonstrated. Second, the person should mention that he/she
was aware of the experience at the moment it happened. And third, the person should be
capable to depict the experience. Nyanaponika Thera (1972) considered mindfulness as
-minded awareness of what actually happens to us and in us at the
s
-by-
moment expe -Zinn, 1990). Mindful awareness is non-judged awareness
focusing at the present time associated with tranquility and kindness (Kabat-Zinn, 2003b;
Roeser, 2013). Rix and Bernay (2014) define mindfulness as the exercise of entire
13
concentration on what is happening inside and around us physically/mentally.According to
attending in an open, ki Bishop et al. (2004) suggested a two-
part model of mindfulness, consisting of (1) attention and awareness and (2) acceptance.
Brown and Ryan (2004) define awareness as the experience of within and outside world;
awareness is the genuine comprehension of the field of happenings that surrounds our real
world at any time. On the other hand, Brown and Ryan (2004) add that the concentration of
awareness in order to focus on selected facets of environment is attention. Kabat-Zinn
(1990) states that acceptance refers to positively observing things as they really are at the
current moment. Nowadays, the notion of awareness and attention are associated with each
other (Brown & Ryan, 2004).
Mindfulness is recognized as a focused attention to and awareness of present
happening. However, attention and awareness have almost natural functioning
characteristics (Brown & Ryan, 2003). Leary and Tate (2007) also refer to mindfulness as a
present-focused awareness and claim that it can help us in many different ways: (1) by
focusing on the present moment, it
-
can enhance positive feelings by offering more effective ways of communicating with other
people. (4) It can prevent the debilitation of energy. Brown and Ryan (2003) also assert that
fearful thoughts about future and past can draw individuals away from present awareness.
Brown, Ryan and Creswell (2007) state that -
exhibit what is occurring at the present moment with no judgment. Many studies have
remove their depression, anxiety and suffering (Arias, Steinberg, Banga, & Trestman, 2006;
Kabat-Zinn, 2003a).
Empirical/theoretical studies suggest that there is a relationship between
mindfulness and psychological welfare (e.g. Baer, 2003; Broderick & Metz, 2009). Many
studies have shown the influence of mindfulness on reduction of anxiety (Ludwig & Kabat-
Zinn, 2008; Siegel, 2010; Willis, 2007); the effect of mindfulness on the enhancement of
sleep problems (Britton, Haynes, Fridel, & Bootzin, 2010; Ludwig & Kabat-Zinn, 2008;
14
Yook, Lee, Ryi, Kim, Bhoi,., Suh, & Kim, 2008); the effect of mindfulness on the
development of concentration (Jha, Krompinger & Baime, 2007; Semple & Lee, 2008;
Tang, Ma, Wang, Fan, Feng, Lu & Posner, 2007); the effect of mindfulness on the
improvement of psychological attitude (Brown & Langer, 1990; WenkSormaz, 2005); and
the effect of mindfulness on education, consciousness, concentration, compassion and
decreased apprehension (Mental Health Foundation, 2011).
It has also been suggested that mindfulness is strongly associated with different
types of coping resources such as self-efficacy for bearing alcohol deterioration and
husbanding pain/suffering (Chang et al., 2004). Several studies have shown that a
mindfulness-
Schmidt & Walach, 2004; Shapiro & Carlson, 2009).
Blair and Diamond (2008) believe that the practice of attentive awareness in
Learning to Breathe (L2B) program results in
(EF), increasing the feeling of love of self/others and, eventually, enhancing educational
accomplishments. Mindfulness programs
accomplishments. Parker and Kupersmidt (2016) acknowledge that inadequate academic
results in classroom settings perhaps are because of inability of concentrating or attending
properly.
Many studies have shown that teaching mindfulness to adults may develop their
regulation (Chiesa, Calati, & Serretti, 2011; Jha, Stanley, Kiyonaga, Wong, & Gelfand,
2010) and may improve social relationship (Condon, Desbordes, Miller, DeSteno &
Hospital, 2013). Shapiro, Rechtschaffen and Sousa (2016) believe that teachers should
self-
becoming thoughtful teachers, 3
establishing mindfulness teaching.
Dickinson, Friary and McCann (2016) state that Kabat-
Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program is connected to mindfulness. Bishop
15
et al (2004) claim that suggesting Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) as a means
Kabat-Zinn (2011) explains that MBSR program is related to instruction of
Buddhist philosophy without Buddhist wording to being reachable for a non- religious
audience. Furthermore, Hozel et al. (2011) showed that four or five days of twenty minute
mindfulness meditation in adults decreases depression, improves immune-system and
enhance -
Meanwhile, in both kids and adults, meditative mindfulness practicing in educational
contexts have been useful in dwindling depression and developing psychological health
(e.g. Baer, 2003; Broderick & Metz, 2009).
It has also been found that various forms of psychiatric disorders are associated
with self-noticed levels of mindfulness (Brown & Ryan, 2003). Mindfulness may have
Ryan and Deci (2000) believe that involving in mindfulness practices can assist
unhealthy demeanor so as to foster their welfare augmentation. Brown and Ryan (2003)
indicate that mindfulness is a reliably and validly measured feature that plays a key role in
different aspects of psychological health. Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer and Toney
(2006) scrutinized the surface structure of mindfulness by utilizing five recently developed
mindfulness questionnaires. Their findings suggest that theses questionnaires are a promise
psychometrically, which shows fine internal unity and anticipated correlations with several
to predict psychological symptoms.
mindfulness and stress responding (evaluated by the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale
(MAAS) designed by Brown & Ryan, 2003), they proposed that mindful participants may
show lower agoraphobia and anxiety. Beauchemin, Hutchins and Patterson (2008) carried
out a study on learning disabled participants in a private school. In their study, students
minutes per day for several weeks.
mindfulness, nervousness and conscientiousness.
16
Smalley et al., (2009) found that mindfulness practices can be a new tool for
developing Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Their results suggest that
inconsistency in trait mindfulness can be shown by ADHD status and personality traits of
-di - . In another study, Flook et al. (2010) asserted
executive functioning results would be improved. Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, and Oh (2010)
explored meta-analytically the influence of mindfulness-based treatment on anxiety and
-based treatment. As
Mueller (2011) asserts, mindful learners can concentrate more efficiently on their learning
self-reported levels of mindfulness. Gethin (2011) proposed that mindfulness, as a
one has the ability to ponder his/her own immediate actions without the interference of
thoughts and perceptions.
Sedaghat, Mohammadi, Alizadeh and
MBSR program reduce anxiety without any effects on mental and social welfare.
Meiklejohn et al. (2012) made an attempt to investigate the effect of mindfulness on
ing in mindfulness techniques can
Meiklejohn et al. (2012) explain that mindfulness programs have been planned based on
mindfulness structure and mindfulness educators
mindfulness curricula have
acts, body movements and some practices for increasing their attention/awareness. The
lessons of the programs are designed for school settings, home settings and society. The
-being. However, Albrecht, Albrecht and Cohen
-esteem and decrease their
stress. Weare (2013) also believes that training mindfulness frequently makes both teachers
-
17
academic learning. Molavi, Vardanjani and Yahya Zade (2013) studied the effect of
to learning situation and result in educational
improvements. as the first
investigation on the relationship between mindfulness and fear of negative evaluation. They
showed that fear of negative evaluation of 65 social anxiety disorder patients decreased by
utilizing a course of cognitive behavioral therapy accompanying mindfulness treatment.
-
empirically, as two factors of disposing of anxiety (Brown & Ryan, 2003; Chesney,
Neilands, Chambers, Taylor, & Folkman, 2006).
Flook, Goldberg, Pinger, Bonus, and Davidson (2013) reported that mindfulness
claimed that the notion of stress and coping with it are two aspects that mindfulness can
operate on efficiently. Further, Luberto, Cotton, McLeish, Mingione and (2013)
-
conditions among psychology students. They also found that those with high levels of
mindfulness had less problems in organizing their feelings.
In another study, Ostafin, Brooks and Laitem (2013) found that mindfulness is
associated with less emotional sensitivity and that this variable somewhat moderated a
negative relationship between mindfulness and apprehension, which humans experience in
everyday life.
Khany and Babanezhad Kafshgar (2013) studied the network of relationships
utilized Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis and found that all of three basic
variables are related to each other. Furthermore, Bergen-Cico, Possemato and Cheon (2013)
state that short programs of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) may develop
avior; however, students may need longer MBSR programs to
boost their psychological anxiety (e.g., trait anxiety). Furthermore, in Greeson, Juberg,
remove their anxiety, self-kindness and sleep difficulties.
18
improvements in students because of utilizing mindfulness practices. They found that
mindfulness programs may alleviate the influences of solit
accomplishments. In the same vein, Harnett, Reid, Loxton, and Lee (2016) found that
higher levels of mindfulness resulted in lower levels of anxiety. Beshai, McAlpine, Weare
results indicate that a - made for
teachers is an encouraging way to reduce stress and enhance welfare and self-kindness
among secondary school instructors.
Recently, studies on mindfulness have increased, and it has been paid attention to
in both clinical and empirical spheres. Brown and Ryan (2004) state that the effect of
mindfulness is spread in various domains such as sport, health care, job and relationship.
However, in spite of the broadly reported effects of mindfulness on individual behavior,
there is an obvious gap on mindfulness research in EFL contexts. The purpose of this study
is to address part of this gap. It is an attempt to explore the relationship between
mindfulness with speaking anxiety and willingness to communicate, variables that are
briefly discussed below.
2.3. Speaking Anxiety
Anxiety reflects human emotions in a negative way. We experience worry, fear and
nervousness when we are anxious (Tobias, 1986). Shankar and model
(Figure1) suggests that stress has effects
apprehension. As a sort of anxiety, language anxiety is the feeling of being anxious,
particularly related to second language contexts. (MacIntyre & Gardner, 1994). Brown
(2007b) defines language anxiety as a feeling of anxiety or worry in utilizing second
language which affects second language acquisition. In addition, for foreign language
learners in classroom setting encounter levels of harmful foreign language anxiety. Horwitz
et al. (2009) claimed that making mistakes eventuates apprehension in students who think
that every mistake in public eye is the sign of a failure.
20
study. He claimed that the tasks which are needed to be done directly in
front of other individuals in the classroom can induce the highest level of anxiety.
MacIntyre and Gardner (1994) state that students
experience anxiety while utilizing/learning a FL. Dörnyei (2005) identifies two kinds of
anxiety is helpful while debilitating anxiety is harmful and hinders individ
accomplishments. Trait anxiety happens only in special situations and is taken to be an
intrinsic feature of individuals, whereas state anxiety is detrimental to learners. Meanwhile,
Woodrow (2006) believes that anxiety is obviously an issue in language learning which has
a harmful effect on speaking English for some learners. Woodrow (2006) found a
significant negative relationship between second language speaking anxiety and oral
performance. Woodrow (2006) agrees that the notion of second language speaking anxiety,
based on in- and out-of-class communication, characterizes learners in an English as a
second language setting. Woodrow (2006) claimed that a two factor model best matched
the data of the study with the observed variables charging the hid -class
-of-
22
The ability to communicate fluently in FL/SL contexts has a crucial role in
language learning. According to Riazi and Khodadadi (2007), one of the most challenging
tasks for language learners is producing the target language. Cassady (2010) used the term
in classrooms.
relationships among FL anxiety, oral and written language skills were investigated. They
found that the amount of FL anxiety that college students experience are different in terms
of presenting oral activity and written activities.
ed speaking in front of
others is estimated as a
Awan, et al., (2010)
assert that all learners should be aware that making mistakes in a foreign language is a
common phenome
Basic (2011) believes that speaking anxiety is considered not only a language teaching
difficulty but also a social problem.
In addition, the results of study show that
cannot be achieved as their anxiety increases. Bachrach and
with high school students and college undergraduates showed a
findings suggest that anxiety can be derived from
apprehension of being negatively judged.
Suleimenova (2013) states that anxiety awakening at the output level can have a negative
impact on the quality of FL conversation. Therefore, individuals may have the knowledge,
but it does not come to their mind. However, the occurrence of anxiety acts as an inhibiting
(Suleimenova, 2013, p. 1862).
Fariadian, Azizifar, and Gowhary (2014) note that a capable speaker requires
enough knowledge about the topic and information about context in which he/she wants to
23
speak, but -confidence and eagerness.
Chowdhury (2014) found that both students and teachers may have a role in reducing
speaking anxiety in English classrooms.
In another study, Rafek, Ramli, Iksan, Harith and Abas (2014) studied
communication apprehension across genders. They found that most males and females of
the study had a high level of anxiety. However, females suffered higher anxiety level in
comparison to male students. Rafieyan (2016) found that speaking activity assessment
would lead to anxiety in classroom, and if teachers made classroom atmosphere funny,
students could cope with this anxiety.
2.4. Willingness to Communicate (WTC)
Ellis (2008) asserts that research on WTC is in their infancy. MacIntyre, Clément, Dörnyei
and Noels (1998) believe that concentration on grammar not on genuine use of language in
the past generated individuals with only high linguistic competence. Littlewood (1981)
states that the rise of the communicative language teaching (CLT) changed the focus of
language teaching and learning toward communication and the real use of language
tendency towards speaking. Peng (2006) believes that people act differently in
communicating with other individuals. Some individuals are not interested to speak if they
are not asked to do so, while some people are enthusiastic interlocutors. This shows that
communicating activity differs in various situations. MacIntyre, Clément, Dörnyei and
Noels (1998) assert that in cosmopolitan communities, individuals tend to learn the L2
since they need to adjust to the new cultures and are more willing to have relationships with
new people. The social and political aim of language teaching, which is bringing nations
together, may be achieved by developing willingness to communicate (MacIntyre, Clément,
Dörnyei & Noels, 1998). The first investigation in the field of WTC was conducted by
-esteem and anxiety affect their willingness to
communicate.
24
Also, many studies have shown that anxiety about speaking a FL would be
negatively correlated with scores on WTC (e.g., Chu, 2008; MacIntyre, 1994; McCroskey
& Richmond, 1987; Wu & Lin, 2014). Mortensen, Arnston and Lustig (1977) constructed a
the next model referred to in WTC. The shyness model was established by McCroskey and
Richmond (1982). They explained that due to this model, individuals tend to be shy and
particularly silent. In addition, Horwitz et al. (1986) add that shyness and anxiousness are
associated together; shy people usually experience the fear of communicating with other
individuals. WTC is th
obliged to do so (McCroskey & Richmond, 1982, 1987, 1990; Mortensen et al., 1977).
-
first time, McCros
(1980).Social Context Model, he described the correlations among intergroup contact, L2
confidence, L2 competence, and L2 identity. The model suggested that the frequency and
characteristic of relationships with the L2 setting would ultimately cause alterations in L2
confidence, which Clement (1980) observed as communicative competence and lower
language usage.
Ferguson (1994) asserted that communicative situations are specific in conditions
which are related to language use/structure by repeating regularly in a particular context of
son they are
talking to and the place where communication is taking place. According to McCroskey
and Beatty (1987), communication apprehension is the level of fear that one may
experience while communicating with other individuals in real/academic community. The
found to be associated with their concept of communicative competence. In addition, Chan
and McCroskey (1987) found that learners who scored high on the WTC scale were more
willing to take part orally in class than those who scored low on WTC.
McCroskey and Beatty (1987) introduced four different types of communication
- -
26
& McIntyre 2000; McIntyre 1994; McIntyre et al., 2001; McCroskey & Richmond, 1991).
Unlike McCroskey and Richmon (1990), MacIntyre, Clement, Dornyei, and Noels
-
two elements have impact on WTC a) immediate situation factors which have transitory
characteristics based on communication situation, and b) enduring factors which have
stable characteristics and are nearly related to any situation. McIntyre, et al. (1998) used a
pyramid figure (Figure 4) to show the WTC model which elaborates the possible reason of
willingness to communicate in second language. Similarly, MacIntyre et al (1998) believe
explain that their model has six layers which are divided into two distinct groups: stable
factors (layers IV, V and VI) and unstable factors (layers I, II and III). They state that the
moment of second language (L2) communication that anticipates real communication
behavior and is followed by WTC is shown on the top of the pyramid. In their figure,
willingness to communicate with a -
the
- s
-
shown in intermediate layers. MacIntyre et al.,
that the top layers are based on situation while the bottom layers are more stable. Cetinkaya
(2005) hypothesizes that the bottom layers have weaker effect on willingness to
communicate than the top layers of the pyramid.
28
related to improvements in communicative competence in second language, identification
with the second language setting, and assimilation incentive (Clement, Baker & MacIntyre,
2003; Noels & Clement, 1996; Noels, Pon, & Clement, 1996). The basic communication
channels in language are speaking and writing. Based on MacIntyre et al. (1998), they all
depend on particular series of figures and the lexicon which might have an effect on the
Dornyei and Kormos (2000) showed that Hungarian student
-
another study, MacIntyre, Baker, Clément and Conrod (2001) examined the effect of
language learning beliefs and social endorsement on individuals
et al., (2001) investigated willingness to
communicate and found that it can predict social suppor
learning habits. Yashima (2002) examined the effects of various variables, such as attitude,
English learning motivation, and English communication confidence on WTC in English in
the Japanese community.
Yashima's (2002) willingness to communicate model shows that greater
willingness to communicate is related to lower anxiety and higher consciousness of
universal attitude and feeling of confidence in SL oral activity can have an impact on
willingness to communicate. Dornyei and Kormos (2000
involvement in speaking activities correlated significantly with their mental outlook
towards the language tasks that they were required to do. According to Goshi (2005), the
Matsuoka (2004)
studied WTC among college students in Japan both in L1 and L2. Matsuoka and Evans
(2005) asserted that willingness to communicate in L2 has a crucial impact on developing
learning has been concentrated on recently (Brown, 2007a). Therefore, considering the
notion of WTC has become more vital in L2 settings (Matsuoka & Evans, 2005). Kang
(2005) conducted a qualitative study of the situated WTC of four adult male Korean
29
learners of English in the United States. Kang believes that for the purpose of reducing
anxiety in L2, teachers should create a friendly environment in classrooms. The situated
nature of WTC also has been researched by Cao and Philp (2006). They concluded that
there is no statistically significant relationship between the eight adult learners of English
self-reported WTC and their actual WTC as evidenced through observation of three
investigated the relationship betw
study showed that, among a sample of college students participating an intensive language
ree elements, motivation was the significant predictor of second
language WTC, followed by integrativeness. Attitudes toward the learning situation did not
appear to prognosticate second language WTC.
Birjandi and Amiri (2011) utilized a modified version of WTC to study the notion
meetings. They reported that familiar situations with familiar people can make Iranian
students more willing to talk in a FL setting. Research on WTC is not confined to EFL
-
English major university students. The participants of their study were selected from
students of humanities (Arabic language and literature, social sciences, and geography) and
Engineering students (computer, electronic, mechanic, industrial, and chemistry
engineering). They concluded that two predictors of L2 WTC in Iranian community are
self-confidence and attitudes toward international society. Maftoon and Amiri (2012)
studied the notion of willingness to communicate among Iranian kids. They believe that in
an EFL situation like Iran teaching English to kids is so hard to manipulate. Pourjafarian
(2012) investigated the relationship between socio-economic factors, i.e. parental
occupations, cultural capital, and willingness to communicate in Iranian English teaching
classrooms. She applied various quantitative and qualitative analyses to analyze the data.
The results showed remarkable evidence that there was a strong relationship between
willingness to communicate in English and socio-economic orientation and language
accomplishments.
30
In another study, Riasati and Noordin (2011
perception of elements that affect their willingness to speak English in language
classrooms. They found that variables such as topic of discussion, interlocutor, teacher,
class atmosphere, personality, and self-
willingness to communicate.
The results of show that the main cause of poor speaking
skills of Russian students is their unwillingness to communicate. Due to many factors,
Morozova (2013) concludes that WTC needs to be a significant element of SLA. He
believes that the basic proposition is to reduce the language obstacle and build a powerful
WTC. Only then, will it be imaginable for students to be fluent speakers and not to be
afraid of communicating in any conditions.
language barrier and develop a durable willingness to communicate.
In addition, in another study, Fallah (2013) found that
study. She concluded that among all types of motivation, intrinsic
motivation is the most significant indicator for learners to talk in classroom settings.
Fatemipour and Shirmohamadzadeh (2014) state that if communication apprehension in
EFL contexts increases, willingness to communicate will decrease. They found a significant
relationsh
(2014) investigated five reasons of learning a foreign language: personal knowledge, school
achievement, travel, friendship and job related. Their findings showed that the function of
all five variables was correlated with WTC.
the application of all
and speaking fluency and concluded that both students and teachers can utilize WTC as an
instrument to improve fluency level in speaking. Mahmoodi and Moazam (2014) found that
FL Arabic students who were more willing to communicate were rather good at L2
31
talk. The goal of study
willingness to communicate when they had a chance and whether WTC pattern could
indicate the relations among communication, social-psychological and linguistic variables.
The findings of his study showed that WTC is
-
with their WTC. ) study showed that shyness has a relationship with
language learning motivation. But motivation does not have a relationship with willingness
to communicate. Besides, shyness does not have a relationship with willingness to
communicate either. The results of the t-test analysis of study
showed that shy and non-shy learners demonstrate various kinds of motivation, but they do
not reveal various levels of willingness to communicate.
intrinsic and extrinsic
-
dwindle WTC (MacIntyre, 2007). Furthermore, Naderifar and Esfandiari (2016) found that
have a positive correlation with their willingness
statistically correlated. Aliakbari, Kamangar and Khany (2016) examined the impact of
several variables such as anxiety, self-confidence, communicative competence and
ward the international community, their perceived
linguistic competence and self-
communicate. Aliakbari and Mahjoob (2016) studied 30 upper intermediate learners from
an English language Institute.
willingness to communicate are not related meaningfully.
In short, as the review of the related literature in the above sections indicated, the
l, and willingness to
communicate have been investigated in relation with some variables such as the
improvement of education and speaking anxiety. However, in none of the studies reported,
all these variables have been explored in one single research in an effort to find any
32
significant relationship among the variables. So, the present study was aimed to investigate
such relationships.
33
Chapter Three: Methodology
3.1 Introduction
This chapter aims to explain the methodology, the participants, the instruments and the
procedure which were employed for data collection and analysis.
3.2 Participants
The participants of the present study included 120 intermediate Iranian EFL learners who
studied English as a foreign language in English Language Institutes of Qazvin (Kish
Mehr,Safir,Tolo Mehr). All of the participants( 40 males and 80) females were native
speakers of Persian, and their age ranged from 19 to 30 years old. The participants were
selected through cluster sampling based on availability. All of the participants were
homogenized by institute authorities in terms of their English language proficiency level.
3.3 Instruments
In order to collect data and answer the research question of the present study, the following
three instruments were used:
1. The first instrument utilized in this study was a speaking anxiety questionnaire
developed by Chowdhury (2014). This questionnaire is a 25-item scale in which each item
is scored on a 5 point scale where 1=Entirely disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Not sure, 4=Agree
and 5=Entirely agree. The participants had to choose the suitable number based on their
opinion for each item. The reliability index of the questionnaire was estimated,using
Chronbac .88.A copy of the questionnaire is given in Appendix D.
34
2. The original framework of the Willingness to Communicate Questionnaire was
from MacIntyre et al,. (2001). A modified version of the Likert-type questionnaire
communicate inside classroom. According to MacIntyre et al. (2001), the questionnaire is
he scale comprises 25 items on a Likert type scale which range
from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) .The learners were asked to indicate how
eager they are to communicate in English classes.The reliability of the translated version of
questionn .013.A copy of
the questionnaire is given in Appendix E.
3. Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) (designed by Brown & Ryan,
2003), which is a noticeable scale amongst the most prevalent measures of Mindfulness,
comprises 15-items. Earlier studies have shown that this scale has a high reliability index
s (Khojaste, Fallah, & Shahraki, 2014). The participants react to
each item on a 6-point Likert scale from "almost always" to "almost never". It covers two
subscales which contain consideration (10 items) and awareness (5 items). This scale was
translated into Persian and was adjusted to our par
particular necessities. The reliability of the translated version of the questionnaire was
.752. A copy of the questionnaire
is given in Appendix F.
3.4 Procedure
The following procedure was followed to achieve the goal of the present research.
First, 120 EFL intermediate language learners who studied English in Qazvin language
institutes were selected through cluster sampling and largely based on availability. In order
to remove probable anxiety, all the individuals were informed of the purpose of the study.
The participants were also selected based on their OPT scores which had been administered
earlier by the institutes. Then, the participants were asked to fill out the speaking anxiety
questionnaire of Chowdhury (2014), the Willingness to Communicate Questionnaire of
MacIntyre, Baker, Clement, and Conrod (2001) and Mindfulness Attention Awareness
Scale (MAAS) of Brown and Rayn (2003). The researcher collected the three
questionnaires filled out by the participants to consider the extent of students' degree of
35
mindfulness, willingness to communicate and speaking anxiety. The participants had 20
stions about the items
were answered.
3.5 Data analysis
To analyze the obtained data and to answer research questions, Pearson correlation was
used.
36
37
Chapter Four: Results and Discussion
4.1. Introduction
The present study aimed at determining the relationship between
mindfulness, willingness to communicate and speaking anxiety. So, the scores of the
questionnaires were tabulated and subjected to a series of statistical analyses (Pearson
correlation) to provide answers to the research questions formulated previously in chapter
one. The findings are reported and discussed in this chapter.
4.2. Results
The Participants of the present study were supposed to fill out three questionnaires of
speaking anxiety and mindfulness as well as willingness to communicate. Before using
Pearson correlation, the researchers checked the assumptions of linearity. With regard to
the first research question (whether there is any statistically significant relationship between
speaking anxiety), Pearson correlation was run.
Table 1 and Graph 1 below show the correlation between the two variables. It is evident
statistically significant but negative (r = -0.39, p < .0005). The results of the analysis show
s, their speaking anxiety decreases.
38
Table 4.1: Pearson Correlation between Mindfulness and Speaking Anxiety
mindfulness Speaking
anxiety
mindfulness Pearson Correlation 1 -.39
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 120
Figure 4.1: The Graphic Representation of the Relationship between Mindfulness and Speaking
Anxiety
With regard to the second research question (whether there is any statistically
39
communicate), Pearson correlation was used. Table 2 shows the correlation coefficient
between the two variables. Table 2 makes it clear that the correlation between mindfulness
and willingness to communicate is very low and statistically insignificant (r = .01, p > .05).
The graphic representation of the relationship between the two variables is also shown in
Graph 2.
Table 4.2: Pearson Correlation between Mindfulness and Willingness to Communicate
mindfulness wtc
mindfulness Pearson Correlation 1 .01
Sig. (2-tailed) .86
N 120
Figure 4.2: The Graphic Representation of the Relationship between Mindfulness and WTC
40
The third research question aimed to investigate the relationship between Iranian
correlation was used. Table 3 shows the correlation coefficient between the two variables.
Table 3 shows a low, negative, and statistically insignificant relationship between speaking
anxiety and willingness to communicate (r = -.10, p > .05). The graphic distribution of the
scores is also shown in Graph 3.
Table 4.3:
Communicate
wtc Speaking anxiety
wtc Pearson correlation 1 -.10
Sig. (2-tailed) .21
N 120
Figure 4.3: The Graphic Representation of the Relationship between Speaking Anxiety and
WTC
41
4.3 Discussion
With regard to the first research question, (whether there is any statistically significant
the result of
the data analysis showed a statistically significant negative relationship between the two
variables.This finding of the present study is in line with the outcomes of Kabat-
s (2006) study, which
support the idea that mindfulness has the capacity to remove indi
depression.
In addition, the result of the present study is in line with that of Ludwig and Kabat-
Zinn (2008), Siegel (2010) and Willis (2007), who showed the effect of mindfulness on the
reduction of anxiety. Also, this finding seems to accord with that of Vujanovic, Zvolensky,
Bernstein, Feldner and McLeish (2007), who concluded that mindful participants may show
lower agoraphobia and anxiety. The finding of the present study is also in line with that of
Flook, Goldberg, Pinger, Bonus, and Davidson (2013), who reported that mindfulness can
findings are in line with the finding of the present study. They reported that higher levels of
mindfulness resulted in lower levels of anxiety. In addition, Brown and Ryan (2003) found
that self-noticed levels of mindfulness can have an impact on various forms of psychiatric
disorders.
-based treatment.
The findings of the present research support previous research indicating negative
associations between mindfulness and psychological distress (e.g. Brown & Ryan, 2003;
Burton et al., 2013; Mueller, 2011). In addition, Coffey, Hartman and Fredrickson (2010)
believe that mindfulness c
more capable of tolerating harsh states (Borkovec, 2002). In addition, this finding is in line
with that of , who reported that anxiety can be assuaged through
the mechanism of mindfulness,
feelings. Furthermore, this study is in line with that of Mental Health Foundation of New
Zealand (2012), which suggest that mindfulness practices can decrease the harsh effect of
rning area.
42
Anti-procrastination is another consequence of being mindful. Mindfulness has a positive
(Sheikholeslami, Dortaj, Delavar & Ebrahimi Ghavam,
2014).
According to Drost (2012), procrastination can induce weak performance. It can
cause procrastinated decision- making and decrease well-being as well. Mindfulness can
decrease anxiety and depression; therefore, it can reduce procrastination and increase
willingness to talk indirectly.
As another finding of the present study, there was no significant relationship
This finding is
in contradiction with that of Dane (2010), who reported that mindfulness has a positive
association with task performance and
This finding is also contrary to the finding of
-esteem and decrease
-esteem increases, they become more willing to
communicate with others. This finding is also incompatible with that of Luberto et al.
-
in challenging conditions. This finding is also in contradiction with that of Beshai,
McAlpine, Weare and Kuyken (2016) indicating tha - made
for teachers is an encouraging way to reduce stress and enhance welfare and self-kindness
among secondary school instructors. Furthermore, in terms of the third research question,
the findings of this study showed that willingness to communicate is not related to speaking
anxiety. This finding does not support the outcomes of many studies which showed that
speaking anxiety is negatively correlated with scores on WTC (e.g., Chu, 2008; MacIntyre,
1994; McCroskey & Richmond, 1987; Wu & Lin, 2014). In addition, this result of the
present study is not in line with Yashima's (2002) willingness to communicate model,
which shows that greater willingness to communicate is related to lower anxiety and higher
study seems not to accord with that of Fatemipour and Shirmohamadzadeh (2014) and
Aliakbari, Kamangar and Khany (2016), who reported that the relationship between
communication apprehension and willingness to communicate is significantly meaningful.
43
Furthermore, Dornyei and Kormos (2000) showed positive correlations between a
measure of WTC and the level of English exhibited while presenting a communicative
activity by learners with high task attitude; however, there was a near zero correlation in the
learners with low task attitudes. In addition, the relationship between communication
apprehension, which is directly related to oral communication anxiety, and WTC has been
investigated in many studies, and all of them have shown a negative relationship between
second language WTC and anxiety (Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993; Ghonsooly, Khajavy &
Asadpour, 2012; Hashimoto, 2002; MacIntyre & Clément, 1996; Yashima, 2002).
The reason that the findings of the present study are not in line with that of
Albrecht, Albrecht et al., (2012) findings and findings maybe
Luberto et al. (2013)
carried out their study with teachers and psychology students who were more mature than
the participants of the present study who were students of institutes. As
(1996) finding showed, foreign language anxiety increases enormously as students proceed
to higher educational levels. Occhipinti (2009) believes that most adult learners are aware
of the significant role of speaking in learning a language. That is why fear of making
mistakes forces them to be silent or reserved. I may also have
affected the findings of the present study. As McCroskey and Richmond (1982) explained
in their shyness model, individuals who are shy tend to be silent and unwilling to
communicate. Another reason might be the idea th may have affected
their willingness to communicate and made them orally inactive. The participants of the
present study were all native students of Persian. Levine (2003) suggests that monolingual
background students experience more anxiety than bi-or multilingual background students.
Therefore, cultural differences may be considered as a factor contributing to such
differences in the findings. The reason that the findings of the present study are not in line
with that of Ghonsooly, Khajavy and Asadpour (2012) and also Hashimoto (2002) may be
because of the , the participants were all
college students but in the present study, the participants were students of institutes.
According to Mahmoodzadeh (2012), come
more knowledgeable in areas of grammar, vocabulary and other language components.
44
However, they might also become more anxious in producing oral output in classrooms
than less proficient students.
effect of their gender. Rafek, Ramli, Iksan, Harith and Abas (2014) found that females
suffer higher anxiety levels in comparison to male students. Also, Mahmoodzadeh (2012)
interlanguage system and speaking
anxiety. He found that students relate their speaking anxiety experienced in the classroom
setting to their interlanguage meaning system, not interlanguage grammar or phonology
system. He also reported that female participants experience more FL speaking anxiety than
males. Therefore, gender differences may be considered as a factor contributing to such
differences in the findings. However, in the prese
gender. Perhaps that is why the effect of speaking anxiety on willingness to communicate
has been neutralized.
45
Chapter Five: Conclusion and Implications
5.1 Summery of the findings
The results of the study can be summarized as follows:
1. Three questionnaires were given to the intermediate EFL participants of
the study. After scoring, Descriptive Statistics was run. Thus the first null hypothesis
ness have negative
relationship.
2. Concerning the second null hypothesis, the results also indicated that
mindfulness and WTC have positive relationship. So, the second null hypothesis was
rejected.
3. Concerning the third null hypothesis, the findings of the study showed
that willingness to communicate is not related to speaking anxiety. So, the third null
hypothesis was rejected.
5.2. Conclusion
The present study sought to investigate the relationship between Iranian intermediate EFL
mindfulness, willingness to communicate (WTC) and speaking anxiety. Based on
the findings, it may be concluded that
mindfulness treatment can be useful in classroom settings. The finding of the present study
reinforces Kabat- -based Stress Reduction (MBSR)
program, which highlights the effect of mindfulness on the reduction of anxiety. However,
level of WTC was insignificant. In the present study, mindfulness was not viewed as
46
positively as it was claimed for persuading students to communicate in classroom settings.
With regard to this finding, it may be concluded that if we want to persuade students to
communicate, it is better not to pay attention to mindfulness a lot, and we had better use
other techniques that are more conducive to
practices of attentive awareness in mindfulness programs have an impact on reducing
sed on the present study,
mindfulness was not related to individu As
In this study, may be associated with
many other elements. According to
toward
in different social situations. In addition, McIntyre et al,. (1998) believe that situational
elements
MacIntyre et al. (1998) point out that WTC is under the effect of some social situations
and interpersonal relationships. As Barjesteh, Vaseghi and Neissi (2012) reported, familiar
situations with familiar people can make Iranian students more willing to talk in a FL
setting. Furthermore s (2014) findings suggest that the
function of all five variables as personal knowledge, school achievement, travel, friendship
and job related was correlated with WTC. Based on the above, it is concluded that, in order
in addition to mindfulness we can pay more
attention to other elements mentioned in the literature review section.
As mentioned earlier, the findings have shown an insignificant relationship
. So, it seems that speaking anxiety is not the
communicate, speaking anxiety is one such factor. For instance, the statistical analysis of
and Naderifar and
According to Riasati
and Noordin (2011 f elements that affect their
47
willingness to speak English in language classrooms include teachers, interlocutors, topic
of discussion, class atmosphere, personality, and self-perceived speaking skill. Students
may not be willing to communicate partially due to the teacher-centered environment in
Iranian EFL context. As Chowdhury (2014) claims, teachers are able to alleviate the
pressure of anxiety during oral-
5.3 Implications of the study
The findings of the present study may have implications for learners, teachers and material
developers. The findings of the present study highlight the importance of the formal and
informal assessment of students in ELT contexts since teachers might use inappropriate
teaching programs,
communicate and academic achievements as well.
Teachers can play a crucial role in helping students to control their speaking anxiety
and in concentrating on their activities in classrooms. Furthermore, the concept of
mindfulness can provide useful information for instructors, testing agencies and syllabus
and material designers. They can utilize the findings to develop materials and course books
ntion and awareness and to reduce their anxiety in classrooms.
5.4 Suggestions for further research
For those who are interested in conducting research in the same area, the following points
are suggested:
1. This study was the first to investigate the relationship between mindfulness,
. Furthermore, the participants
were institute students only; therefore its generalizability is limited. Replications of this
research could target other communities for providing stronger relationships among
variables investigated in this research.
2. This study did not aim to examine the age and sex of the participants. Therefore,
other studies might take these variables into consideration.
3. This study was examined with intermediate level students; other studies can be
48
done with advanced level students as well as school students.
4. This study was done with a relatively small group of students. Further research
can be done in the same area with larger samples.
References
Abdullah, K.I., & Abdul Rahman, N. L. BT. (2009). A Study on second language speaking
anxiety among UTM students. A report submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Science with Education
(TESL). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia,1-6.
Albrecht, N. J., Albrecht, P.M ,& cohen,M. (2012). Mindfully teaching in the classroom: A
Literature review. Australian Journal of Education, 37(12), 1-14.
Aliakbari, M., & Mahjoob, E. (2016). The relationship between age and willingness to
communicate in an Iranian EFL context. Journal of Applied Linguistics and
Language Research, 3(1), 54-65.
Aliakbari, M., Kamangar, M., & Khany, R. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English
among Iranian EFL students. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 9(5), 33-
45.
Allport, A. (1988). What concept of consciousness? In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.),
Consciousness in Contemporary Science (pp.159-182). London: Clarendon Press.
Andersen, S. L., & Teicher, M. H. (2008). Stress, sensitive periods and maturational events
in adolescent depression. Trends in Neuroscience, 31(4), 183 191.
Arias, A. J., Steinberg, K., Banga, A., & Trestman, R. L. (2006). Systematic review of the
efficacy of meditation techniques as treatments for medical illness. Journal of
Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 12(8), 817 832.
Awan, R., Azhar, M., Anwar, M. N., & Naz, A. (2010). An investigation of foreign
language classr Journal
of College Teaching & Learning, 7(11), 33-40.
49
Communicate, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, and Self-Esteem. Journal of
Students In Learning and Teaching English, 2(6),1-23.
Bachrach, R. L., & Read, J. P. (2012). The role of posttraumatic stress and problem alcohol
involvement in university academic performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology,
68(7), 843 859.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G.T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-
report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27-
45.
Baer, R.A. (2003).Mindfulness Training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and
empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125-143.
Bailey, K. M. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning:
Looking at and through the diary studies. Classroom oriented research in second
language acquisition, 67-102.
Baker, S. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in
communication and second language orientations . Language learning, 50(2), 311-
341.
Barjesteh, H., Vaseghi, R., & Neissi, S. (2012). Iranian EFL
communicate across different context-and receiver-types. International Journal of
English Linguistics, 2(1), 47-54.
Basic, L. (2011). Speaking anxiety: An obstacle to second language learning? University of
Gavle. Faculty of Education and Business Studies, 11, 1-25.
Beatty, M. J. (1987). Communication apprehension as a determinant of avoidance,
withdrawal and performance anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 35, 202-217.
Beauchemin, J., Hutchins, T. L., & Patterson, F. (2008). Mindfulness meditation may
lessen anxiety, promote social skills, and improve academic performance among
adolescents with learning disabilities. Complementary Health Practice Review, 13(1),
34 45.
Bergen-Cico, D., Possemato, K., & Cheon, S. (2013). Examining the efficacy of a brief
mindfulness-based stress reduction (brief MBSR) program on psychological health.
Journal of American College Health, 61(6), 348 360.
50
Beshai, S., McAlpine, L., Weare, K., & Kuyken, W. (2016). A non- randomised feasibility
trial assessing the efficacy of a mindfulness- based intervention for teachers to reduce
stress and improve well- being. Mindfulness, 7(1), 198 208.
Birjandi, P., & Amiri, M. (2011). Willingness to communicate in the first language
acquisition: A case study on Iranian 2-year old kids. European Journal of Social
Sciences, 23(1), 41-52.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., ... &
Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical
Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3),230-241.
Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The
promotion of self- regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development
and Psychopathology, 20(3), 899 911.
Borkovec, T. D. (2002). Life in the future versus life in the present. Clinical Psychology:
Science and Practice, 9(1), 76 80.
Britton, W. B., Haynes, P.L., Fridel, K.W., & Bootzin, R. R. (2010). Polysomnographic and
subjective profiles of sleep continuity before and after mindfulness-based cognitive
therapy in partially remitted depression. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(6), 539-548.
Broderick, P. C., & Metz, S. (2009). Learning to breathe: A pilot trial of a mindfulness
curriculum for adolescents. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 2(1), 35
46.
Brown, H. D. (2007a). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language
pedagogy (3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, H.D. (2007b). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). New York:
Pearson education, Inc.
Brown, J. & Langer, E. (1990). Mindfulness and intelligence: A Comparison Educational
psychologist, 25(3-4), 305-335. Retrieved from http://www.erlbaum.com
/Journals/journals/EP/ep.htm.foundation and evidence for its salutary effects.
Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211-237.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its
role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
84(4), 822 848.
51
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundation
and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211-237.
Brown, K.W., & Ryan, R.M. (2004). Perils and promise in defining and measuring
mindfulness: Observations from experience clinical psychology: Science and
practice, 11(3), 242-248.
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness to communicate scale: Development and
validation. Communication Monographs, 43(1), 60-69. 10.1080/03637757609375916
Burnett, R. (2011). Mindfulness in Schools: Learning Lesson from the Adults, Secular and
Buddhist. Buddhist Studies Review, 28(1), 79-120.
Burton, M., Schmertz, S. K., Price, M., Masuda, A., & Anderson, P. L. (2013). The relation
between mindfulness and fear of negative evaluation over the course of cognitive
behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(3),
222 228.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). International context and willingness to communicate: a
comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4),
480-493.
Cassady, J. C. (2010). Anxiety in schools: The causes, consequences, and solutions for
academic anxieties, 2. New York: Peter Lang.
Cetinkaya, Y.B
as a foreign language. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16-25.
Chan, B., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The WTC scale as a predictor of classroom
participation. Communication Research Reports, 4(2), 47-50.
Chang, V. Y., Palesh, O., Caldwell, R., Glasgow, N., Abramson, M., Luskin, F., ... &
Koopman, C. (2004). The effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program on
stress, mindfulness self-efficacy, and positive states of mind. Stress and Health:
Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 20, 141 147.
Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006). A
validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. British Journal of
Health Psychology, 11(3), 421 437.
52
Chiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive
abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clinical Psychology
Review, 31, 449 464.
scenario in EFL class. A thesis submitted to the department of English and
Humanities of BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Chu, H. R. (2008). Shyness and EFL learning in Taiwan: A study of shy and non-shy
college students' use of strategies, foreign language anxiety, motivation, and
willingness to communicate.Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Texas,
Austin.
Clement, R. (1980). Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second
language. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social
psychological Perspectives, (pp.147-154), Oxford: Pergamon.
Clement, R., & Kruidenier, B. G. (1985). Aptitude, attitude and motivation in second
Journal of Language and Social
Psychology, 4(1), 21-37.
Clement, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a
second language: The effect of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and
Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209.
Coffey, K. A., Hartman, M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2010). Deconstructing mindfulness and
constructing mental health: understanding mindfulness and its mechanisms of action.
Mindfulness, 1(4), 235 253.
Condon, P., Desbordes, G., Miller, W., DeSteno, D., & Hospital, M. G. (2013). Meditation
increases compassionate responses to suffering. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2125
2127.
Daly, J. A. (1978). The assessment of social-communicative anxiety via self-reports: A
comparison of measures. Communication Monographs, 45(3), 204-218.
Daly, J. A., & Buss, A. (1983). Audience anxiety. Communication, 12, 27-35.
Daly, J. A., & Buss, A. (1984). The transitory causes of audience anxiety. In J. A. Daly & J.
C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and
communication apprehension, (pp.67-78). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53
Dane, E. (2010). Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the
workplace. Journal of Management, 20, 10, 1-22.
Dewey J. (1933). How We Think. A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to
the Educative process (Revised edn.), Boston: D. C. Heath.
Dickinson, J., Friary, P., & McCann, C. M. (2016). The influence of mindfulness
meditation on communication and anxiety: A case study of a person with aphasia.
Aphasiology, 1-15.
Dornyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances
in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(1), 3 32.
Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner. Individual differences in
Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, N.J. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 275 300.
Drost, w. (2012). The influence of entrepreneurial intent, nonlinear thinking, mindfulness
and neuroticism & conscientiousness on procrastination
of Twente.
Ekstorm, (2013). Foreign language communication anxiety in correlation to the
sociolinguistic variables gender, age, performance and multilingual competence.
Södertörns högskola. Institutionen för kultur och lärande Examensarbete 15 hp |
Engelska med didaktisk inriktning Vårterminen
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford. Oxford
University Press.
Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence,
motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major under
graduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual
Differences, 30 , 140-147.
Faridian, E., Azizifar, A., & Gowhary, H. (2014). The Effect of anxiety on Iranian EFL
learners speaking skill. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic
Sciences, 8 (10), 1747-1754 .
Fatemipour, H. R., & Shirmohamadzadeh, V. (2014). The Relationship between
communication apprehensi
54
International Journal of Language
Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(4), 112-122.
Ferguson, C. A. (1994). Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about
conventionalization. In D. Biber and E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives
on register, (pp.15-30). New York: Oxford University Press.
Flammia, M. & Sadri, H.A. (2011). Intercultural communication from an interdisciplinary
perspective. US-China Education Review, ISSN 1548-6613 January 2011, 8(1), 103-
109.
Flook, L., Goldberg, S.B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K., Davidson, R. (2013). Mindfulness for
Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(7), 182-195.
Flook, L., Smalley, S. L., Kitil, J., Galla, B. M., Kaiser-Greenland, S.,Locke, J., ... &
Kasari, C.. (2010). Effects of mindful awareness practices on executive functions in
elementary school children. Journalnof Applied School Psychology, 26(1), 70 95.
doi:10.1080/
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Anderson, R., Javorshy, J., Skinner, S., & Patton, J. (1994).
Differences in language performance among high-, average-, and low-anxious college
foreign language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (1), 41-55.
Gardner, R. C.
learning: Part II, affective factors. Language Teaching, 26(1), 1-11.
Gethin, R. (2011). On some definitions of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism 12(1),
263279.doi:101080/14639947.2011.564843.
Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G.H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in
English among Iranian non-English major university students. Journal of Language
and Social Psychology, 31(2), 197-211.
Giluk, T. L. (2009). Mindfulness, Big Five personality, and affect: A meta-analysis.
Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 805 811.
Goshi, M. (2005). Foreign language classroom anxiety: How should the classroom teacher
deal with it? Journal of the School of Marine Science and Technology, 3(2), 61-66.
55
Greeson, J. M., Juberg, M. K., Maytan, M., James, K., & Rogers, H. (2014). A randomized
controlled trial of Koru: A mindfulness program for college students and other
emerging adults. Journal of American College Health, 62, 222 233.
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress
reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research,
57, 35 43.
Hamzehnejad, F., & Shariati, M. (2014). The comparison of willingness to communicate
and the preferred contexts between the M.A students of Kerman Azad University and
Kerman institute of Higher Education. International Journal of Language Learning
and Applied Linguistics World, 6(2), 371-380.
Hanh, T. N. (1976). Miracle of mindfulness. : A Manual on Meditation Boston: Beacon.
Harnett, P.H., Reid, N., Loxton, N.J., & Lee, N. (2016). The relationship between trait
mindfulness, personality and psychological distress: A revised reinforcement
sensitivity theory perspective. Personality and Individual Difference, 99, 100-105.
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of
reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29-70.
Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-
based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of
Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 78, 169 183.
Holland, V. (2012). Mindfulness with children and adolescents: current research and future
directions University of Southampton, Psychology, Doctoral Thesis, (1-125).
Hölzel, B.K. Carmody, J. Vangel, M. Congleton, C. Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar,
S. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter
density. Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, 191 (1), 36-50.
Horwitz, E. K., M. Tallon & H. Luo (2009). Foreign language anxiety. In J. C. Cassady
(Ed.), Anxiety in schools: Thecauses, consequences, and solutions for academic
anxieties. New York: Peter Lang.
Horwitz, E.K, Horwitz, M.B. & Cope, J. (1986).Foreign language classroom anxiety.
Modern language journal, 70,125-132.
Horwitz, E.K. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign
language anxiety scale. Tesol Quarterly, 20, 559-562.
56
Jha, A. P., Krompinger, J., & Baime, M. J. (2007). Mindfulness training modifies
subsystems of attention. Cognitive. Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 109-
119.
Jha, A.P., Stanley, E.S., Kiyonaga, A., Wong, L., Gelfand, L. (2010). Examining the
protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective
experience. Emotion, 10, 54 64.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to
face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Delta.
Kabat-Zinn, J. University of Massachusetts Medical Center/Worcester.(1991). Full
catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and
illness. New York, NY: Pub. by Dell Pub., a division of Bantam Doubleday Dell
Pub. Group.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are:Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday
Life New York: Hyperion.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003a). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Constructivism in the
Human Sciences, 8, 73-83.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003b). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and
future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144 156.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the
trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12, 281 306.
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a
second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.
Khaki, Sh. (2013). The relationship between learner autonomy and willingness to
communicate (WTC) in Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics & English Literature, 2(5), 98-109.
Khany, R., & Babanezhad Kafshgar, N. (2013). On the network of associations among EFL
learners' language learning strategies, mindfulness and personality traits: A structural
equation modeling approach. European Online Journal of Natural and Social
Sciences. www.european-science.com. 2(2) ,584.
Khojaste, S. N., Fallah, N., & Shahraki, A. (2014). The relationship between trilingualism
and attention span. Iranian EFL Journal, 10, 42 62.
57
Kleinmann, H. (1977). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language
learning 27, 93-107.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language learning. NY: Pergamon.
Leary, M. R., & Tate, E. B. (2007). The multi-faceted nature of mindfulness. Psychological
Inquiry, 18(4), 251 255.
Levine, G. S. (2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes about target language use,
first language use, and anxiety: Report of a questionnaire survey. Modern Language
Journal, 87(3), 343-364.
Liehr, p. & Diaz, N. (2010). A Pilot study examining the effect of mindfulness on
depression and anxiety for minority children. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 24(1),
69 71.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
(2013).
Mindfulness skills and emotion regulation: The mediating role of coping self-
efficacy. Mindfulness, 5, 373 380.
Ludwig, D. S., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2008). Mindfulness in medicine. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 300(11), 1350 1352.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1998). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers.
In D. J. young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning,(pp.
24 45). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2004). Volition and personality: Bringing motivational tendencies to life.
Paper presented at the 9th International Congress of Language and Social
Psychology, State College PA.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in a second language: Individual
decision making in a social context. Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 564 576.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Clément, R. (1996). A model of willingness to communicate in a
second language: The concept, its antecedents and implications. Paper presented at
the World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Jyväskylä, Finland.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on
cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283 305.
58
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to
communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion
students. Studies in second language acquisition, 23(3), 369-388.
MacIntyre, P., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of
second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1),
3-26.
MacIntyre, P.D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K.A. (1998).Conceptualizing
willingness to communicate in a second language: A situational model of second
language confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
Maclntyre, P.D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal
analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2),135-142.
Maftoon, P., & Amiri, M. (2012). Willingness to communicate in the second language
acquisition: A case study on Iranian 2-year old kids. Journal of Studies in Learning
and Teaching English, 1(1), 135-160.
Mahmoodi, M. H., & Moazam, I. (2014). Willingness to communicate (WTC) and L2
achievement: The case of Arabic language learners. Procedia- Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 98, 1069-1076.
Mahmoodzadeh, M. (2012). Investigating foreign language speaking anxiety within the
EFL learner's interlanguage system: The Case of Iranian Learners. Journal of
Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 466-476.
Matsuoka, R. (2004). Willingness to communicate among Japanese college students.
Journal of Nurse Studies, 2, 151-160.
Matsuoka, R., & Evans, D.R. (2005).Willingness to communicate in the second language.
Journal of Nursing Studies, 4(1), 3-12.
McCroskey, j. C, & Richmond, V.P. (1987).Willingness to Communicate. In J. C
McCroskey and J.A Daly (Eds), Personality and interpersonal communication,
Newbury Park, CA: Sage, (pp. 129-156).
McCroskey, J. C. (1978). Validity of the PRCA as an index of oral communication
apprehension. Communication Monographs, 45(3), 192-203.
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale.
Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25.
59
McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Oral communication apprehension. A summary of recent theory
and research. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 78-96.
McCroskey, J. C. and Beatty, M. J. (1987). Oral communication apprehension. Emotions,
Personality, and Psychotherapy. 279-293.USA: Springer.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1982). Communication apprehension and shyness:
Conceptual and operational distinctions. Central States Speech Journal, 33(2), 458-
468.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing
cultural perspectives. The Southern Communication Journal, 56 (1), 70-77.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive
view. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(2), 19-37.
McCroskey, J.C. & Baer, J. E. (1985).Willingness to communicate: The construct and its
measurement (Non Journal Document No. 1985-11-00).Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (71st, Denver, CO, November 7-
10, 1985). Denver, CO. (ERIC Document Service No. ED265604)
McCroskey, J.C., Gudykunst, W.B., & Nishida, T. (1985). Communication apprehension
among Japanese students in native and second langue. Communication Research
Reports, 2(1), 11-15.
McEwen, B. S. (2003). Mood disorders and allosteric load. Biological Psychiatry, 54(3),
200 207.
Meiklejohn, J., Phillips, C., Freedman, M. L., Griffin, M. L., Biegel, G., Roach, A, &
Isberg, R. . (2012) Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: Fostering
the resilience of teachers and student. Mindfulness 3(4), 291 307. Springer
Science+Business Media, LLC .
Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand (2011). An overview of mindfulness-based
interventions and their evidence base. Mental Health Foundation. Retrieved 30
September 2013 from: http://www.mentalhealth.org.nz/home/site-search/?query=
overview+of+mindfulness &x=0&y=0.
Modirkhameneh, S., & Firouzmand, A. (2014). I
Communicate and Language Learning Orientations. Procedia- Social and Behavioral
Science, 98, 1134-1139.
60
Mohammadian, T. (2013).
learning motivation and willingness to communicate. Theory and Practice in
Language Studies, 3(11), 2036-2045. Academy Publisher Manufactured in Finland.
Molavi, M., Vardanjani, A., & Yahya Zade, A. (2013). Exploring the possibilities and
perspectives of mindfulness to improve learning abilities of EFL students.
International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 7(9), 558-564 .
Morozova, Y. (2013). Methods of enhancing speaking skills of elementary level students.
Translation Journal, 7(1), 31-49.
Mortensen, C. D., Arntson, P. H., & Lustig, M. (1977). The measurement of verbal
predispositions: Scale development and application. Human Communication
Research, 3(2), 146-158.
Mueller, K. R. (2011). Mindfulness and communication apprehension: Examining the
relationship between the FFMQ and the PRCA-24. San Diego, CA: San Diego State
University.
Muris, P. (2002). Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders
and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual
Differences, 32, 337 348.
Naderifar, A. A., & Esfandiari, R. (2016). Relationships between Iranian intermediate EFL
tolerance. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Special Issue,
932-952.
Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1996). Communicating across cultures: Social determinants
and acculturative consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 28, 214-
228.
Noels, K. A., Pon, G., & Clement, R. (1996). Language, identity and adjustment: the role of
linguistic self-confidence in the adjustment process. Journal of Language and Social
Psychology, 15, 246-264.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology series: A textbook for teachers. New
York: Prentice Hall.
Nyanaponika Thera, V. (1972). The power of mindfulness. San Francisco, CA: Unity Press.
61
Occhipinti, A. (2009). Foreign language anxiety in in-class speaking activities: two
learning contexts in comparison(Master's thesis).
Ostafin, B. D., Brooks, J. J., & Laitem, M. (2013). Affective reactivity mediates an inverse
relation between mindfulness and anxiety. Mindfulness, 4(1). doi:10.1007/s12671-
013-0206-x
Palacios, L. M. (1998). Foreign language anxiety and classroom environment: A study of
Spanish university students. Dissertation. Texas. The University of Texas at Austin.
Parker, A. E. & Kupersmidt, J. B. (2016). Two universal mindfulness education programs
for elementary and middle-school students: master mind and moment. Springer-
Verlag: New York. K.A. Schonert-Reichl, R.W. Roeser (eds.), Handbook of
Mindfulness in Education, Mindfulness in Behavioral Health (pp.335-354).
Peng, J. E. (2006). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among
college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of
Sydney Papers in TESOL, 2, 33-59.
t, socio-economic
orientations and willingness to communicate in English in Iranian context.
th Ed.).
Rafek, M. B., Ramli N. H., Iksan, H. B., Harith, N. M., & Abas, A. L. (2014). Gender and
language: Communication apprehension in second language learning. Social and
Behavioral Science, 23, 90-96.
Rafieyan, V. (2016). Discovering factors of foreign language speaking anxiety and coping
strategies. Macro think Institute. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 4(1),
111-125.
communication skills in English as a second language. International Journal of
Research in Social Science and Humanities, 2(vi), 1-7.
Reyhan Ebrahimi, H. R. (2013). Anxiety as a deterring element in learning English for oral
communication among EFL students. International Journal of Language Learning
and Applied Linguistics World, 4(3), November 2013, 179-196.
Riasati, M. J., & Noordin N. (2011). Antecedents of Willingness to Communicate. Studies
in Literature and Language, 3(2), 74 80.
62
gender on their use of speaking strategies. TEFL, Shiraz University, 1(2), 99-115.
Rix, G., & Bernay, R. (2014). A study of the effects of mindfulness in five primary schools
in New Zealand. 11(2), 201-220.
Roeser, R. W. (2013). Mindfulness and human development: A commentary on the special
issue. Research in Human Development, 10, 273 283.
Rosenstreich, E., & Margalit, M. (2015). Loneliness, mindfulness, and academic
achievements: A moderation effect among first-year college students. The Open
Psychology Journal, 8(1), 138-145.
Ruff, K., & Mackenzie, E.R. (2009). The role of mindfulness in healthcare reform: A
policy paper. Explore, The Journal of Science and Healing, 5(6), 313-323.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,
55(1), 68 78
Saito, Y., & Samimy, K. K. (1996). Foreign language anxiety and language performance: A
study of learner anxiety in beginning, intermediate, and advanced-level college
students of Japanese. Foreign Language Annals, 29(2), 239-251.
Salzberg, S., & Goldstein, J. (2001). Insight meditation. Boulder, CO: Sounds True
Sedaghat, M., Mohammadi, R., Alizadeh, K., & Imani, A. H. (2011). The effect of
mindfulness-based stress reduction on mindfulness, stress level, psychological and
emotional well-being in Iranian sample. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
30, 929 934.
Semple, R.J. & Lee, J. (2008). Treating anxiety with mindfulness: Mindfulness-based
cognitive therapy for children. Acceptance and mindfulness treatments for children &
-87). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger
Publications.
Shankar, N. L. & Park, C. L. (2016) Effects of stress on students' physical and mental
health and academic success. International Journal of School & Educational
Psychology, 4(1), 5-9.
63
Shapiro, S. L., & Carlson, L. E. (2009). The art and science of mindfulness: Integrating
mindfulness into psychology and the helping professions. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Shapiro, S., Rechtschaffen, D., & Sousa, S. D. (2016). Mindfulness training for teachers. ©
Springer-Verlag. New York. K.A. Schonert-Reichl, R.W. Roeser (Eds.), Handbook of
Mindfulness in Education, Mindfulness in Behavioral Health.
Sheikholeslami, A., Dortaj, F., Delavar, A., & Ebrahimi Ghavam, S. (2014). Tasir
amoozesh-e barname-ye kahesh stress mobtani bar zehn agahi bar taallolvarzi danesh
amoozan. Faslname-ye Ravanshenasi Tarbiati, 34(10), 94-109.
Siegel, D. J. (2010). Mind sight: The new science of personal transformation. New York,
NY: Bantam Books.
Smalley, S.L., Loo, S.K., Hale, T.S., Shrestha, A., McGough, J., Flook, L., & Reise, S.
(2009). Mindfulness and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical
Psychology, 65(10), 1087 1098.
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety i -
. California: Consulting Psychology Press.
Steinberg, F. S. (1982). The relationship between anxiety and oral performance in a foreign
language.
Suleimenova, Z. (2013). Speaking anxiety in a foreign language classroom in Kazakhstan.
3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership (WCLTA-
2012). Procedia, Social and Behavorial Sciences, 93, 1860-1868.
Tang, Y., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Fan, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Q., ...& Posner, M.I. (2007). Short-term
meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, Pnas, 104, 17152-17156.
The Mindfulness in Schools Project. (2011). The MiSP team. In the mindfulness in schools
project. Retrieved from: http://mindfulnessinschools.org/about.
Tobias, S. (1986). Anxiety and cognitive processing of instruction. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.),
Self-related cognition in anxiety and motivation (pp. 35- 54). Hillsdale, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaulm Associates.
64
Tousi, S.M., & Khalaji, H. (2014). The impact of willingness to communicate on Iranian
EFL learners speaking ability. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic
Sciences 8(11), 1866.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Vujanovic, A. A., Zvolensky, M. J., Bernstein, A., Feldner, M. T., & McLeish, A. C.
(2007). A test of the interactive effects of anxiety sensitivity and mindfulness in the
prediction of anxious arousal, agoraphobic cognitions, and body vigilance. Behavior
Research and Therapy, 45, 1393 1400.
Weare, K. (2013). Developing mindfulness with children and young people: a review of the
evidence and policy context. Journal of Children's Services, 8(2), 141 -153.
Wenk-Sormaz, H. (2005). Meditation and habitual responding. Alternative therapies in
health and medicine 11(2), 42-58.
Willis, J. (2007). Introduction to ME: Mindfulness Education program. Vancouver,
Canada: Goldie Hawn Foundation.
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. University of
Sydney, Australia.
Woodruff, S. C., Arnkoff, D. B., Glass, C. R., & Hindman, R. K. (2014). Mindfulness and
anxiety. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness, A. Ie, C.T. Ngnoumen, and
Ellen J. Langer. (Eds), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester,UK.
Wu, c. & Lin, H. (2014). Anxiety about speaking a foreign language as a meditator of the
relation between motivation and willingness to communicate. Perceptual & Motor
Skills: Learning & Memory, 119(3), 785-798.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: the Japanese EFL
context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 54 - 66.
Yeganeh, B. & Kolb, D. (2009). Mindfulness and experiential learning. OD Practitioner,
41(3), 8-14. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Yook, K., Lee, S.-H., Ryi, M., Kim, K.-H, Bhoi, T. I., Suh, S. Y., ...Kim, M. J. (2008).
Usefulness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for treating insomnia in patients
with anxiety disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 196(6), 501-503.
65
Young, D. J. (1990). An investigation of students' perspectives on anxiety and
speaking. Foreign Language Annals, 23(6), 539-553.
Foreign Language Annals, 23(6), 539-553.
Yousef Azarfam, A. A., & Baki, R. (2012). Exploring Language Anxiety Regarding
Speaking Skill in Iranian EFL Learners in an Academic Site in Malaysia.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(2), 150-168.
Yousefi, M. & Kasaian, S. A. (2014). Relationship between willingness to communicate
Journal of Advances in
English Language Teaching; www.european-science.com/jaelt 61. 2(6), 61-72.
Zarrinabadi, Z. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the Effect of
System, 42(1), 288-295.
Zhang, L. J. (2001). Exploring variability in language anxiety: Two groups of PRC students
learning ESL in Singapore. RELC journal, 32(1), 73-91.
66
Appendix A: Speaking Anxiety Questionnaire
Instruction: Each of the items has 5 points scale where 1= Entirely disagree, 2= Disagree, 3=
Not sure, 4= Agree, 5= Entirely agree. Tick the appropriate number for your opinion
about each statement.
No. Statements
En
tire
ly d
isagre
e
Dis
agre
e
Not
sure
Agre
e
En
tire
ly a
gre
e
I feel anxious to speak in English because
(1-13)
1. My pronunciation is not good. 1 2 3 4 5
2. My knowledge of English vocabulary is inadequate. 1 2 3 4 5
3. My knowledge of English grammar is inadequate. 1 2 3 4 5
4. I believe making mistake or error while speaking will
make me look funny or inferior to others. 1 2 3 4 5
5. I have a fear of failing in my speaking test. 1 2 3 4 5
6. I face difficulties to speak on something in English
during test that I have not practiced before. 1 2 3 4 5
7. I try to memorize my presentation script and
sometime I get stuck or forget word. 1 2 3 4 5
8. I believe that my peers are more fluent in speaking in
English than me. 1 2 3 4 5
9. I have a fear of speaking with someone whose English
is better than mine. 1 2 3 4 5
10. I think speaking in front of people will make me
prominent among others. 1 2 3 4 5
11. I do not get enough chance to practice English outside
my classroom. 1 2 3 4 5
12. My parents expect me to be proficient in the language,
which creates a huge pressure on me. 1 2 3 4 5
13. I feel uncomfortable to communicate with someone
from opposite sex. 1 2 3 4 5
(14-17)
14. My teacher interrupts me while speaking in English to
correct my errors instantly. 1 2 3 4 5
67
15. I cannot communicate with others in English because
I did not get chance to practice speaking in English in
my previous school/college.
1 2 3 4 5
16. I cannot continue my speaking in English on a topic
because of my lack of knowledge about that particular
topic.
1 2 3 4 5
17. I try to speak in English perfectly like native speakers
but in reality I cannot do so. 1 2 3 4 5
18. Due to the effect of language anxiety, I cannot
continue speaking activities in English in class. 1 2 3 4 5
19. Due to speaking anxiety, sometime I suffer from
embarrassment, feelings of helplessness, fear, going
blank etc.
1 2 3 4 5
20. Due to speaking anxiety, sometime I suffer from
excessive perspiration, rapid heartbeat, muscle
tension, dry mouth etc.
1 2 3 4 5
21. Due to language anxiety I do not like to communicate
with others in English. As a result I remain silent and
isolated in class.
1 2 3 4 5
22. I feel less anxious to communicate with others in
English when my teacher is patient, facilitative,
friendly and use positive attitude towards learners.
1 2 3 4 5
23. I feel less anxious to communicate with others in
English when my teacher uses warm up activities like
song, games etc in class.
1 2 3 4 5
24. I feel less anxious to speak in English when my
teacher uses group or pair activities in class. 1 2 3 4 5
25. I feel less anxious when I find the opportunity to make
friendship with classmates, share my feelings of
anxiety and practice speaking activities in English
with them.
1 2 3 4 5
68
Speaking Anxiety Questionnaire (The Persian Version)
69
70
Appendix B: Willingness to Communicate Questionnaire
The following questions ask about your willingness to communicate in learning the
English language. Remember,
There is no right or wrong answers, just answer as accurately as possible. Use the scale
below to answer the questions.
1= strongly disagree (SD) 2=disagree (D) 3=no idea (NI) 4=agree (A) 5=strongly agree
(SA)
No. Questionnaire Strongly
disagree
Disag
ree
No
idea
agree Strongly
agree
1. Learning English is really interesting for me.
2. I wish I could speak many foreign languages.
3. Studying English is important; because I could understand the
new world better.
4. I would like to go abroad and learn more about foreign
countries and cultures.
5. The more I learn English, the more I want to study it.
6. I desire to learn an L2 in order to take part in the social
community of L2-users.
7. Speaking and communicating in English with others is not
difficult.
8. I keep up to date with English by working on it almost every
day.
9. I think learning English is not just grammar and vocabulary.
10. I do not prefer an English class which is teacher-centered and
student are silent.
11. In order to improve my English, I am willing to talk in English
with my classmate inside the class.
12. In order to practice my English, I am interesting in
communicating with others outside the class.
13. Learning of English provides opportunities to introduce
Iranian rich culture to foreign countries.
14. I prefer to be silent in classes, because talk in English in class
makes me anxious.
15. When I am studying English, I ignore distractions and pay
attention to my task.
16. I am willing to ask and answer questions in English in the
class.
17. I would like to participate in class discussions to show my
English competence.
18. I am relaxed to give presentation in English in front of my
71
classmates.
19. I am willing to express my opinions and feeling in English in
private and public occasions.
20 I send message and email in English to my friends and
teachers.
21. When talking in English in class, I lose my confidence and
concentration.
22. I have a strong desire to know all aspects of the English
language.
23. I watch and listen to English music, films and news.
24. If I encounter native and non-native English speakers, I
hope an opportunity would arise and they
would talk to me.
25. If I encounter native and non-native English speakers, I
would find and excuse and talk to them.
Willingness to communicate questionnaire (Persian version)
72
73
Appendix C: Mindfulness questionnaire
Day-to-Day Experiences Instructions: Below is a collection of statements about your everyday experience. Using the
1-6 scale below, please indicate how frequently or infrequently you currently have each
experience. Please answer according to what really reflects your experience rather than
what you think your experience should be. Please treat each item separately from every
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
74
Mindfulness questionnaire (Persian Version)
75
Appendix D: Reliability of speaking anxiety questionnaire
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 101 84.2
Excludeda
19 15.8
Total 120 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.088 26
76
Appendix E: Reliability of WTC questionnaire
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 98 81.7
Excludeda
22 18.3
Total 120 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.013 26
77
Appendix F: Reliability of Mindfulness questionnaire
Reliability
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 106 88.3
Excludeda
14 11.7
Total 120 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.752 15
Recommended