View
227
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Antenna design and optimisationTest-bed of mechanical tilt
CSEM
2
Document Properties
Document Title Antenna design and optimisation Test-bed of mechanical tilt
Document Number CAP-0322
Author (s) Q. Xu
Date 07.07.2005
Participant (s) (short names) P. Spanoudakis, E. Onillon
Workpackage(s) WP3.2
Total number of slides (including title and this slide)
21
Security level (PUB, RES, CON)
Internal confidential
Description / Abstract
- Array design and optimisation: grating lobe issue and gain
enhancement - Meander-line polarizer - Test-bed specification of mechanical tilt
3
Reminder: antenna specification
Frequency range and BW:down link 27.5-28.35 GHz, up link 31-31.3 GHz -> 13% BW
Half power beam width (HPBW): 5° (best result 2°)
Gain:30 dBi
Polarisation: circular polarisation (CP)
Size: 25255 cm
Scan angle and speed:180° semi-sphere by mechanical steering system0.4°/s for train running at 500 Km/h
Scan angle precision0.8° for 5° HPBW0.32° for 2° HPBW
4
Array factor (1)
Angle referred to far field observation point
Normalized Array Factor (AF) of a 8-element linear array with spacing d = 2
= 90° = -90°
= 0°
x
y
z
array
dxdy
-100 -50 0 50 100-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
theta [°]
Nor
mal
ize
d A
F [
dB
]
Array Factor, N= 8 elements and d = 2*lambda
N
n
kdnjeAF
1
)2
cos()1(
Nearest grating lobes at 30°
5
Array factor (2)
Non-uniformly spaced array reduces side lobes when d /2
Non-uniform power distribution reduces side lobes but not grating lobes
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
theta [°]
Nor
mal
ize
d A
rra
y F
act
or
[dB
]
N= 8elements and d = 2*lambda
UniformDolph-TschebyscheffBinomial
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
theta [°]
Nor
mal
ize
d A
F [
dB
]
N= 24 elements and d = 0.5*lambda
Uniform spacingcase B
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
theta [°]
Nor
mal
ize
d A
F [
dB
]
N= 24 elements and d = 1*lambda
Uniform spacingcase B
dn =
(n/2
+
n)d
6
Single element design (1)
Technology giving large bandwidth
SSFIP – Strip Slot Foam Inverted Patch antenna
Substrate
Inverted patchFoam
Slot
Strip
Substrate
BW achieved with one patch was as large as 14% and can be improved to 33% with stacked patches.
Gain for single element is about 8 dBi.
(Reference: J.-F. Zürcher, F. E. Gardiol, “Broadband Patch Antennas”,Artech House,1995)
7
Single element design (2)
ADS simulation resultsSSFIP with fundamental mode: patch size /2
Zin = 100
Substrates:
- RT/Duroid 5870 (for strip and slot layers)
r = 2.33, tan = 0.0012, h = 0.254 mm
- Foam Rohacell (spacer)
r = 1.07, tan = 0.001, h = 1 mm
- Kapton (for patch layer)
r = 3.2, tan = 0.005, h = 0.1 mm
8
Single element design (3)
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150-200 200
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
-50
10
THETA
Mag
. [dB
]
Gain Directivity
Key results (not optimised)
f0 = 29 GHz
BW > 27.6%
Gain = 5.2 dBi
HPBW = 66°
9
Single element optimisation (1)
SSFIP with high-order mode: patch size 3/2
Zin =
50
Modelling by Ansoft Designer
10
Single element optimisation (2)
Key results
f0 = 28.5 GHz
BW = 10.9%
Gain = -5.7 dBi (broadside)
HPBW: -
Conclusion
Not a good solution
11
HPBW=0° = 40°HPBW=90° = 90°
f0 = 29.9 GHz
Single element optimisation (3)
SSFIP with gap-coupled patches: patch size /2
Asymmetricalradiation pattern
12
Single element optimisation (4)
SSFIP with gap-coupled patches: patch size /2
f1 = 29.75 GHz
BW = 30.7%
13
Single element optimisation (5)
Key resultsf1 = 29.75 GHz
BW =30.7%Gain = 9.8 dBiHPBW=0° = 40°, HPBW=90° = 50 °
ConclusionProbably a good solution but need more refinement to improve the gain
14
Radiation of the array
+
=
There should be a way to do better…
Element radiation: EM simulation
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
theta [°]
Gai
n [
dB]
Simulated single element radiation pattern
phi=90°phi=0°
AF: theoretical computation
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
theta [°]
Fie
ld i
nte
nsit
y [d
B]
Non-uniform spacing, N= 8 elements and d = 2*lambda
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
theta [°]
Gai
n [
dB]
Array radiation pattern, N= 8 elements and d = 2*lambda
phi=90°
15
PrincipleArray of structures which appears to be predominantlyinductive to one polarization and predominantly capacitive tothe orthogonal polarization. (Ref. L. Young, L. A. Robinson and C. A. Hacking, “Meander-line Polarizer”,
IEEE Trans. on Antenna and Propagation, pp. 376-378, May, 1973)
Meander-line polarizer (1)
Kapton & meander line
Rohacell
Layer 1
Layer 2
Layer 3
Layer 4
AdvantagesHigh polarization puritycompact size at Ka bandLow complexitylow cost
16
Meander-line polarizer (2)
Layer 1 & 4
Layer 2 & 3
Zoom
17
Antenna test-bed description
Fixed transmitterAntennaSignal generator
Mobile platformPan-tilt unitAntenna & supportRF detectorLow frequency amplifierPC with DAQ card running tracking algorithm
Power Lines
RxMotor/
encoder
RyMotor/
encoder
RF detector
BF amplifier
PCLabview
DAQCard-1200Control Alg.
Perturbations generation
RSSI
AxeControl
AxeControl
3D accelero
meter
Transmitter
Receiver
Antenna
Antenna
Mobile platform
PAN-Tilt Unit
37°
Signal Generator
18
Antenna test-bed signal acquisition
In order to see a significant power change, a filtered white noise perturbation is injected, amplitude 5° on the pan and tilt angles.
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Opening angle
Atte
nu
atio
n [d
B]
Attenuation diagram
Transmitter a
ttenuatio
n
19
Tracking algorithm description
To find an RF signal, the pan-tilt mechanism will follows a spiral trajectory
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Pan angle [deg]
Tilt
ang
le [d
eg]
Tracking trajectory
Nominal Pos0, power P0
Move to Pos1, power P1
Move to Pos2, power P2
Move to Pos3, power P3
Move to Pos4, power P4
Pmax = max(P0, P1, P2, P3, P4)
Pos0 = corresponding position
Move to Pos0,
Maximum found using the algorithm
To determine the algorithm performances, a trajectory perturbation is added on the pan and tilt angle commands.
20
Pan-Tilt mechanism requirements
Item Specification Comment
Payload
Antenna size 250mm x 250mm x 50 mm
Mass 1 kg
Scan angles
Azimuth ±180°
Elevation 0-90° (15°-90°)
Angular speed 0.4°/sec 4°/sec
20 km high balloon tracking by high-speed train Tilting speed of high-speed train
Pointing angle precision
HPBW 5° ±0.8° 5dB loss of signal
HPBW 2° ±0.32°
Pan-Tilt mechanism specifications
Payload 1.8 kg
Max speed 300°/sec
Resolution 0.05°
Tilt range 111°
Pan range 360°
Market survey performed to identify available mechanisms:
High-speed pan-tilt unit identified
21
Pan-Tilt mechanism
Commercial off-the-shell motor units
Algorithm to be developed to provide the tracking error
Mechanical mount for antenna support
Preliminary tests with horn antennaFinal configuration with flat antenna
Material needed for the test-bedRF detector and amplifierPC with acquisition card
Recommended