View
215
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
1/106
2012 REVIEWER INELECTION LAW
By: Atty. Enrique V. dela Cruz, Jr.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
2/106
GENERAL
PRINCIPLES
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
3/106
What is the right of Suffrage?ANSWER: It is the right to vote in the
election of officers chosen by the people
and in determination of questions
submitted to the people. It includes:
Election Plebiscite Initiative and Referendum
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
4/106
Who may vote? Filipino citizenshipAt least 18 years of age Resident of the Philippines for at least
one year Resident of the place where he
proposes to vote for at least 6 months;
and Not otherwise disqualified by law
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
5/106
Is registration a qualification to vote? No. It is but a condition precedent to the
exercise of the right. The act of registration is an indispensable
precondition to the right of suffrage. For
registration is part and parcel of the right tovote and an indispensable element in the
election process.
Registration is a regulation, not aqua l i f i ca t ion . (Akbayan Youth vs .COMELEC, G.R. No. 147066, 26 March
2001)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
6/106
Is failure to sign an application for registration a validground to cancel a voters registration?
YES. Failure to affix his signature to the application forregistration will necessarily invalidate his application forregistration.
Section 10 of RA 8189, explicitly provides: x x x To registeras a voter, he shall personally accomplish an application
form for registration x x x in three (3) copies x x x Theapplication for registration shall contain three (3) specimensignatures of the applicant x x x .
Gunsis application for registration did not comply with theminimum requirements of RA No. 8189. This leads to onlyone conclusion: that Gunsi, not having demonstrated thathe duly accomplished an application for registration, is not
a registered voter. Gunsi v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 168792,
23 February 2009
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
7/106
Who are disqualified from voting? Persons convicted by final judgment to suffer
imprisonment for not less than 1 year, pardonedor granted amnesty; but right is reacquired after
expiration of 5 years after service of sentence;
Person adjudged by final judgment as havingcommitted any crime against national security;
but right is reacquired upon expiration of 5 years
after service of sentence; and
Insane or incompetent persons as declared bycompetent authority (Sec. 118, OEC)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
8/106
May the conduct of exit pollstransgress the sanctity and the
secrecy of the ballot? NO. In exit polls, the contents of the official ballot are
not actually exposed. Furthermore, the revelation of
whom an elector has voted for is not compulsory, but
voluntary.
Voters may also choose not to reveal their identities.Indeed, narrowly tailored countermeasures may be
prescribed by the Comelec, so as to minimize or suppress
incidental problems in the conduct of exit polls, withouttransgressing the fundamental rights of our people.
(ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation v. COMELEC, G.R.
No. 133486, Jan. 28, 2000)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
9/106
Who are not qualified to vote? Those convicted by final judgment to suffer
imprisonment for not less than one (1) year;unless pardoned or granted amnesty.
Those convicted by final judgment of crimesinvolving disloyalty to government or against
national security.
Note: Right to vote is only reacquired upon the expirationof five (5) years after service of sentence.
Those who are insane or incompetent persons asdeclared by competent authority.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
10/106
Q: What is absentee voting? A: It is a process by which qualified
citizens of the Philippines abroad
exercise their right to vote pursuant to
the consti tut ional mandate that
Congress shall provide a system for
absentee voting by qualified Filipinos
abroad (Sec. 2 , Ar t . V, 1987Constitution).
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
11/106
Who are qualified to vote under theAbsentee Voting Act?
A N S W E R : A l l c i t i zens o f thePhilippines residing abroad, whoare not otherwise disqualified by law,
at least eighteen (18) years of age onthe day of the elections, may vote forpresident, vice-president, senators
and party-list representatives. (Sec. 4,RA 9189)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
12/106
Is an immigrant or permanent residentabroad qualified to vote under the
Absentee Voting Act? GR: An immigrant or permanent resident may
vote if he/she executes, upon registration, anaffidavit prepared for the purpose by the
Commission declaring that he/she shall resumeactual physical permanent residence in the
Philippines not later than three (3) years from
approval of his/her registration under this Act.
Such affidavit shall also state that he/she has notapplied for citizenship in another country.
(Section 5-d, RA 9189)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
13/106
Q: Is Section 5-D of RA 9189 Constitutional? A: Yes. Congress enacted the law prescribing a system of
overseas absentee voting in compliance with theconstitutional mandate.
Such mandate expressly requires that Congress provide asystem of absentee voting that necessarily presupposes
that the "qualified citizen of the Philippines abroad" is not
physically present in the country. He is presumed not tohave lost his domicile by his physical absence from this
country.
His having become an immigrant or permanent resident ofhis host country does not necessarily imply anabandonment of his intention to return to his domicile of
origin, the Philippines. (Macalintal v. Romulo, G.R. No.
157013, July 10, 2003)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
14/106
Who are NOT qualified to vote under theAbsentee Voting Act?
Those who have lost their Filipinocitizenship laws;
Those who have expressly renounced theirPhilippine citizenship and who havepledged allegiance to a foreign country;
Those convicted of an offense punishableby imprisonment of not less than one (1)year, including those found guilty of
Disloyalty as defined under Art. 137 of the
Revised Penal Code.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
15/106
Is an immigrant or permanent residentabroad qualified to vote under the
Absentee Voting Act? GR: An immigrant or permanent resident may
vote if he/she executes, upon registration, anaffidavit prepared for the purpose by the
Commission declaring that he/she shall resumeactual physical permanent residence in the
Philippines not later than three (3) years from
approval of his/her registration under this Act.
Such affidavit shall also state that he/she has notapplied for citizenship in another country.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
16/106
May an immigrant or permanent resident(green card holder) ABROAD be qualified
to run for an elective position in thePhilippines?
ANSWER: NO. Acquisition of a lawfulpermanent resident status abroadamounts to an abandonment andrenunciation of ones status as aresident of the Philippines; it constituted
a change from ones domicile of originto a new domicile of choice. (Ugdoracion v.COMELEC, 18 April 2008 Nachura ponente)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
17/106
PARTY-LIST
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
18/106
What groups are disqualif ied for
registration under the party-list system?
1. Religious denominations or sects.2. Those who seek to achieve their
goals through violence or unlawful
means.
3. Those who refuse to uphold andadhere to the Constitution; and
4. Those suppor ted by fo re igngovernments
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
19/106
What are the grounds for the cancellation
of registration?
1. Accepting financial contributionsfrom foreign governments or
agencies; and2. Failure to obtain at least 10% of
t h e v o t e s c a s t s i n t h e
constituency where the partyfielded candidates.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
20/106
Can major political parties participate in
the party-list elections?
No. It is not open to all but only to the marginalizedand the under represented.
Allowing all individuals and groups, including those
which now dominate district elections, to have the
same opportunity to participate in the party-list
elections would desecrate this lofty objective and
mongrelize the social justice mechanism into an
atrocious veneer for traditional politics. (Ang BagongBayani-OFW Labor Party v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
147589, Jun. 26, 2001)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
21/106
CAN THE LGBT COMMUNITY FORM A PARTY LIST?
Yes. Not only those sectors specifically enumerated in thelaw or related to said sectors (labor, peasant, fisherfolk,
urban poor, indigenous cultural communities, elderly,handicapped, women, youth, veterans, overseas workers,
and professionals) may be registered under the party-listsystem.
The enumeration in the law of marginalized and under-represented sectors is not exclusive.
Morality is not a criterion. The Courts role is not to imposeits own view of acceptable behavior. Rather, it is to apply
the Constitution and laws as best as it can, uninfluenced by
public opinion, and confident in the knowledge that ourdemocracy is resilient enough to withstand vigorous debate.
Ang Ladlad LGBT Party v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 190582,Apr. 8, 2010
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
22/106
What is a political party?
It is an organized group of citizens advocating
ideology or platform, principles andpolicies for the general conduct of
government and which, as the most
immediate means of securing theiradoption, regularly nominates and
supports certain of its leaders and
members as candidate in public office(Bayan Muna v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
147612, Jun. 28, 2001)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
23/106
RULES ON DISTRICT RE-APPORTIONMENT
Elected from legislative districts which are apportioned inaccordance with the number of inhabitants of each areaand on the basis of a uniform and progressive ratio;
UniformEvery representative of Congress shallrepresent a territorial unit with more or less 250,000
population. All the other representatives shall have thesame or nearly the same political constituency so much
so that their votes will constitute the popular majority.
Each city with a population of at least 250,000 or eachprovince shall at least have one representative.
Legislative districts shall be re-apportioned by Congresswithin 3 years after the return of each census.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
24/106
Q: What is gerrymandering?Is it allowed?A: Formation of one legislative
district out of separate
territories for the purpose of
favoring a candidate or a party.
Gerrymandering is not allowed
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
25/106
Guidelines for screening party-list participants
The political party, sector, organization or coalition mustrepresent the marginalized and the underrepresented
groups identified in Sec. 5 of RA 7941. Majority of its
membership should belong to the marginalized and
underrepresented;
While even major political parties are allowed by RA7941 and the Constitution, they must comply with the
declared statutory policy ofFilipino citizens belonging to
the marginalized and underrepresented sectors to beelected to the House of Representatives. Thus, they
must show that they represent the interest of the
marginalized and underrepresented;
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
26/106
Guidelines for screening party-list participants
Religious sector may not be represented in the party-listsystem; except that priests, imams or pastors may beelected should they represent not their religious sects
but the indigenous community sector;
A party or an organization must not fall under thedisqualifications provided for under Sec. 6 of RA 7941
The party or organization must not be an adjunct of, or aproject organized or an entity funded or assisted by the
government;
The party, including its nominees must comply with thequalification requirements of Sec. 9, RA 7941
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
27/106
Is it necessary for a party-list nominee toactually belong to the marginalized sector
that he seeks to represent? Yes. The law requires that the nominees must belong to
the sector that they represent. A representative of the
senior citizen must be a senior citizen; the youth sector
must be represented by a nominee who is not more than30 years old on election day.
Since the party list represent the marginalized andunderrepresented sectors, so also must the nominees
belong to the marginalized and underrepresentedsectors.
(Ang Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party v. COMELEC,G.R. No. 147589, Jun. 26, 2001)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
28/106
Q: In the party-list elections, who are elected intooffice?
A: It is the party-list representatives who are electedinto office, not their parties or organizations. Thus,
the age qualification pertains to them as a person(Amores v. Joel Villanueva CIBAC, G.R. No. 189600,
29 June 2010)
These representatives are elected, however,through that peculiar party-list system that the
Constitution authorized and that Congress by law
established where the voters cast their votes for theorganizations or parties to which such party-list
representatives belong. (Abayon v. HRET, G.R. No.
189466, Feb. 11, 2010)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
29/106
Q: Should the names of nominees bepublished?
YES. There is absolutely nothing in R.A. 7941that prohibits COMELEC from disclosing or evenpublishing through mediums other than the
Certified List the names of the party-list
nominees. As may be noted, the candidates qualifications
are a matter of public concern. The disclosure of
their names is, therefore, mandated by law
(Bantay RA 7941 v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
177271; G.R. No. 177314, May 4, 2007)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
30/106
Q: What is the formula mandated by theConstitution in determining the number of
party-list representatives? A: The House of Representatives shall be
composed of not more than two hundred and
fifty members, unless otherwise fixed by law.(Section 5 (1), Article VI of the 1987
Constitution).
The number of seats available to party-listrepresentatives is based on the ratio of party-listrepresentatives to the total number of
representatives.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
31/106
Number of seats available to legislative districts -------------------------------- x .20 = Number of seats available
.80 to party-list representatives
This formula allows for the corresponding increase in thenumber of seats available for party-list representatives
whenever a legislative district is created by law.
After prescribing the ratio of the number of party-listrepresentatives to the total number of representatives,
the Constitution left the manner of allocating the seatsavailable to party-list representatives to the wisdom of
the legislature. (Barangay Association for National
Advancement and Transparency(BANAT v. COMELEC,
G.R. No. 179271, Apr. 21, 2009)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
32/106
FOUR INVIOLABLE PARAMETERS TO DETERMINEWINNERS IN THE PARTY-LIST ELECTIONS:
(1) 20% al location. The Party-L ist
representatives shall constitute 20% of totalnumber of the members of the House including
those under the Party-List;
(2) 2% threshold. Only those parties garnering
a minimum of 2% of the total valid votes cast forthe Party-List system are qualified to have a seat
in the House of Representatives;
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
33/106
3. Three-seat limit. Each qualified party,regardless of the number of votes itactually obtained, provided that it hassecured more than 2% of the total validvotes cast for party list system, is entitledonly to a maximum of 3 seats; and
4. Proportional representation. The
additional seats which a qualified party is
entitled to shall be computed in
proportion to their total number of votes (Veterans Federation Party v. Comelec, G.R. No.136781, October
6, 2000).
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
34/106
How do we determine the number of seats in theHouse of Representative allotted for party list
representatives?
BANAT V. COMELEC (2009) Party-list representatives constitute 20% of
the total number of members of the House of
Representative. (Total number meansinclusive of those under the party-list). From
there, the following formula is derived:
According to the BANAT Case, there are 55party-list seats available. THIS MUST BEFILLED-UP.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
35/106
BANAT V. COMELEC (2009) Parties receiving at least 2% of the total
votes cast for the party-list system shall beentitled to one seat each (one seat for every
2%);
No party shall be entitled to more than 3seats;
The remaining parties (with less than 2%)will be ranked according to their total votesgarnered and will be entitled to a seat each
until the vacant party-list seats are all filled-
up.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
36/106
INCLUSION &EXCLUSION
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
37/106
Q: Which court has jurisdictionover inclusion and exclusion
proceedings?
A: MTC - original and exclusive RTC - appellate jurisdiction SC - appellate jurisdiction over RTCon question of law
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
38/106
PETITION FOR INCLUSION
Any person whose appl icat ion for
registration has been disapproved by theBoard or whose name has been strickenout from the list may file with the court a
petition to include his name in thepermanent list of voters in his precinct atany time EXCEPT 105 days prior to aregular election or 75 days prior to a
special election. The petition shall bedecided within 15 days after its filing. (Sec.34, RA 8189)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
39/106
PETITION FOR EXCLUSION
Any registered voter, representative of a
political party or the Election Officer, mayfile with the court a sworn petition for theexclusion of a voter f rom thepermanent list of voters giving the name,
address and the precinct of thechallenged voter at any time EXCEPT100 days prior to a regular election or
65 days prior to a special election.The petition shall be decided within 10days from its filing. (Sec. 35, RA 8189)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
40/106
Q: Who may file a petition in an inclusion or exclusionproceedings?
A: Inclusion
Any private person whose application was disapproved bythe Election Registration Board or whose name was
stricken out from the list of voters
COMELEC Exclusion
Any registered voter in the city or municipality Representative of political party Election officer COMELEC (BP 881 Omnibus Election Code)
Q D d i i i i l i l i
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
41/106
Q: Do decisions in an inclusion or exclusionproceedings acquire the nature ofres judicata?
A: No. The proceedings for the exclusion or inclusion ofvoters in the list of voters are summary in character.
Except for the right to remain in the list of voters or for beingexcluded therefrom for the particular election in relation to
which the proceedings had been held, a decision in an
exclusion or inclusion proceeding, even if final andunappealable, does not acquire the nature of res judicata.
In this sense, it does not operate as a bar to any furtheraction that a party may take concerning the subject passed
upon in the proceeding. Thus, a decision in an exclusion
proceeding would neither be conclusive on the voterspolitical status, nor bar subsequent proceedings on his right
to be registered as a voter in any other election. (Domino
vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 134015, July 19, 1999)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
42/106
Q: Can a voter be excluded for stating a fakeaddress?
A: NO. The right to vote is a most precious politicalright, as well as a bounden duty of every citizen,
enabling and requiring him to participate in theprocess of government to ensure that it can truly
be said to derive its power solely from the consentof its constituents.
A citizen cannot be disenfranchised for the flimsiestof reasons. Only on the most serious grounds, and
upon clear and convincing proof, may a citizen bedeemed to have forfeited this precious heritage of
freedom. (Asistio v. Aguirre, G.R. No. 191124, April 27,2010)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
43/106
Q: Can a voter be excluded for stating a fakeaddress?
A: That Asistio allegedly indicated in his Certificate ofCandidacy for Mayor, both for the 2007 and 2010 elections,a non-existent or false address, or that he could not be
physically found in the address he indicated when he
registered as a voter, should not operate to exclude him as
a voter of Caloocan City. These purported misrepresentations in Asistios COC
might serve as basis for an election offense under the
Omnibus Election Code (OEC), or an action to deny due
course to the COC. They do not serve as proof that Asistiohas abandoned his domicile in Caloocan City, or that he
has established residence outside of Caloocan City.
(Asistio v. Aguirre, G.R. No. 191124, April 27, 2010)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
44/106
Q: What is the effect of transfer ofresidence?
A:Any person, who transfers residencesolely by reason of his occupation,
profession or employment in private or
public service, education, etc., shall not
be deemed to have lost his original
residence. (Asistio v. Aguirre, G.R.
No. 191124, April 27, 2010)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
45/106
EFFECTS OFFILING A
CERTIFICATE
OF CANDIDACY
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
46/106
Q. CAN YOU FILE 2 CERTIFICATES OF
CANDIDACY?
A: Filing of two (2) certificates of candidacy,
disqualifies the person to run for both elective
positions.
Q: Can you withdraw the CoC?
A: Yes. A person who has filed a CoC may, prior tothe election, withdraw the same by submitting to the
office concerned (COMELEC) a written declaration
under oath. (Sec. 73, Omnibus Election Code)
Q Wh t i th ff t f fili tifi t f did
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
47/106
Q: What is the effect of filing a certificate of candidacy onthe tenure of incumbent government officials?
A:
Appointive official Sec. 66 of the OEC provides thatany person holding an appointive office or position,
including active members of the Armed Forces of the
Philippines, and officers and employees in GOCCs, shall
be RESIGNED from his office upon the start of thecampaign period. (Quinto v. COMELEC, Feb. 22, 2010,
G.R. 189698)
Elective official No effect. The candidate shall continue
to hold office, whether he is running for the same or a
different position. (Sec. 14, Fair Elections Act expressly
repealed Sec. 67 of BP 881)
Q Wh t i th d t f th COMELEC i i i C C ?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
48/106
Q: What is the duty of the COMELEC in receiving CoCs?
GR: When a candidate files his COC, the COMELEC has a
ministerial duty to receive and acknowledge its receipt pursuantto Section 76, of the Election Code. The COMELEC may not,
by itself, without the proper proceedings, deny due course to or
cancel a COC filed in due form. (Luna vs. COMELEC, G.R. No.
165983, April 24, 2007)
XPN:
(i) Nuisance candidatesSec. 69 of the OEC;
(ii) Petition to deny due course or to cancel a COCSec. 78 ofthe OEC;
(iii) Filing of a disqualification case on any of the grounds
enumerated in Section 68, OEC.
Q Wh b id d did t ?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
49/106
Q: When can a person be considered a candidate?
A: A candidate refers to any person aspiring for or seeking an
elective public office, who has filed a certificate of candidacy by
himself or through an accredited political party, aggroupment orcoalition of parties.
Any person who files his certificate of candidacy withinthe filing period shall only be considered a candidate at
the start of the campaign period for which he filed hiscertificate of candidacy."
Any person may thus file a certificate of candidacy on any day
within the prescribed period for filing a certificate of candidacy
yet that person shall be considered a candidate, for purposesof determining ones possible violations of election laws, only
during the campaign period. (Penera v. COMELEC, G.R. No.
181613, Nov. 25, 2009)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
50/106
SAMPLE TEST QUESTION:
The Vice Mayor of a municipality filed hiscertificate of candidacy for the same office in the
last elections. The Municipal Mayor was also
running for re-election. Both were official
candidates of the same political party. After thelast day for the filing of certificates of candidacy,
the Mayor died. Under these facts -
1. Can the Vice Mayor succeed to the office ofthe deceased Mayor pursuant to the provisionsof the Local Government Code? Explain.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
51/106
2. Assuming that the Vice-Mayor succeeds to
the position of Mayor after the incumbent died,which position is now different from the one for
which he has filed his certificate of candidacy,
can he still continue to run as Vice-Mayor?
Explain.
3. Is there any legal impediment to the Vice
Mayor to substitute for the re-electionist Mayorwho died? Explain.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
52/106
Suggested Answer:
1. Yes, the vice mayor can succeed to
the office of mayor. Under Section 44 ofthe Local Government Code, he stands
next in line to the office of mayor in case
of a permanent vacancy in it.
His filing of a Certificate of Candidacy for
Mayor did not automatically result to hisbeing considered resigned (Sec. 67,
Omnibus Election Code).
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
53/106
2. Assuming that the Vice-Mayor succeeds
to the position of Mayor after the incumbent
died, can he still continue to run as Vice-Mayor? Explain.
Yes, the vice mayor can continue to run
as vice mayor. At the time that he filed hiscertificate of candidacy, the vice mayor ran
for the same office he was holding.
The mere filing of a certificate of
candidacy of an incumbent elective official
does not result to his automatic resignation.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
54/106
3. Can the Vice Mayor substitute for there-electionist Mayor who died? Explain.
YES. Under Section 77 of the Omnibus
Election code, if a candidate dies after the
last day for filing certificates of candidacy, he
may be replaced by a person belonging to hispolitical party.
However, it is required that he should firstwithdraw his Certificate of Candidacy for
Vice-Mayor and file a new Certificate of
Candidacy for Mayor.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
55/106
SAMPLE QUESTION
On 01 December 2009, A City Legal Officer,and B, a City Vice-Mayor, filed certificates ofcandidacy for the position of City Mayor inthe May 11, 2010 elections.
a. Was A ipso facto considered resigned and, ifso, effective on what date?
b. Was B ipso facto considered resigned and, if
so, effective on what date?In both cases, state the reason or reasonsfor your answer.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
56/106
Suggested Answer:
a. No. A was not considered ipso factoresigned upon the filing of his certificate ofcandidacy even if he is an appointive official.
Because it is not yet the start of the
campaign period. (Quinto v. COMELEC, 12/09)
Section 66 of the Omnibus Election Code was
amended by the Automated Elections Law.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
57/106
b. B, on the other hand, is not also
considered ipso facto resigned.
Under the Fair Elections Act, an
incumbent elective official is NOTC O N S I D E R E D I P S O F A C T O
RESIGNED upon his filing of a
certificate of candidacy for anyelective office.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
58/106
SAMPLE QUESTION
a. Pedro Reyes is an incumbent Vice-
Mayor of Quezon City.
He intends to run in the regular
elections for the position of City Mayor
of Quezon City whose incumbentmayor would have fully served three
consecutive terms by 2004.
Would Pedro Reyes have to giveup his position as Vice-Mayor?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
59/106
SHOULD HE RESIGN AS VICE-MAYOR?
1. Once he files his certificate of candidacy;
2. When the campaign period starts; or5. Once and if he is proclaimed winner in the
election; or
6. Upon his assumption to the new elective
office;ANSWER: None of the above. Pedro
Reyes can run for Mayor withoutgiving up his position as Vice-Mayor.He will have to give up his position asVice-Mayor upon expiration of histerm as Vice-Mayor on June 30, 2004.
SUBSTITUTION OF CANDIDATES?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
60/106
SUBSTITUTION OF CANDIDATES?
Ifafter the last day for the filing of certificatesof candidacy, an official candidate of a political
party: (1) dies, (2) withdraws or is (3)
disqualified for any causea personbelonging to, and certified by, the same
political party may file a certificate of
candidacy not later than mid-day of election
day to replace the candidate who died,withdrew or was disqualified.
- Substitute must belong to the same party.
Q: What are the requisites for valid substitution?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
61/106
Q at a e t e equ s tes o a d subst tut o
GR:
The substitute must belong to the same party
The deceased, disqualified or withdrawn candidate must haveduly file a valid certificate of candidacy. (Ibid.)
XPN: This does not include those cases where the certificate
of candidacy of the person to be substituted had been denieddue course and canceled under Section 78 of the OmnibusElection Code. While the law enumerated the occasion where
a candidate may be validly substituted, there is no mention of
the case where a candidate is excluded not only bydisqualification but also by denial and cancellation of his
certificate of candidacy. (Ong v. Alegre & COMELEC, G.R. No.163295, January 23, 2006)
Q: On the last day of filing a CoC March 31
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
62/106
Q: On the last day of filing a CoC, March 31,
Jose Monsale withdrew his CoC. April 1,
campaign period started. On April 2, he
wanted to run again so he filed a written
declaration withdrawing his withdrawal. Is
his act of withdrawing the withdrawal valid?
A: No. The withdrawal of the withdrawal of the
CoC made after the last day of filing is
considered as filing of a new CoC. Hence, itwas not allowed since it was filed out of time.
(Monsale v. Nico, G.R. No. L-2539, May 28,
1949)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
63/106
May a disqualified candidate be substituted?
Q: In the 1998 election, Mayor Mirandaalready served 8 consecutive terms, yet he
still filed a CoC. As a result, Abaya filed a
disqualification case. COMELEC then
disqualified Miranda and cancelled his CoC.
The son of Miranda, Joel, upon nomination of
their political party, filed a certificate of
substitute. Joel Miranda won.
Was the substitution valid?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
64/106
May a disqualified candidate be substituted?
A: There was no valid substitution. COMELECdid not only disqualify Miranda but also cancelled
his CoC. Therefore, he cannot be validly
substituted.
A disqualified candidate may only be substituted
if he had a valid CoC because if the disqualified
candidate did not have a valid and seasonably
filed CoC, he is and was not a candidate at all.(Miranda v. Abaya, G.R. No. 136351, July 28,
1999)
Q: Since there was no valid substitution should
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
65/106
Q: Since there was no valid substitution, shouldthe candidate who obtained the second highest
vote be proclaimed? Who will then assume the
position of mayorship?
A: No. Under the doctrine on the rejection of second
placer, the second placer is just like thatsecondplacer. He was not the choice of the electorate. The
wreath of victory cannot be transferred to the
repudiated loser.
Following the rule on succession, it is the Vice-Mayorwho will assume the position of mayor. (Cayat v.
COMELEC, G.R. No. 163776, Apr. 24, 2010)
Q: Martin de Guzman died while campaigning
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
66/106
Q: Martin de Guzman died while campaigning.His son substituted him. Voters on the day of the
election wrote Martin de Guzman instead of
casting the same in the name of his son, Joel deGuzman. Should the votes be counted in favor of
Joel?
A: Yes. As a general rule, the same will be
considered as stray votes but will not invalidate the
whole ballot.
Exception is when the substitute carries the samefamily name. (Sec. 12, R.A 9006)
Q: May a second placer be declared elected?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
67/106
Q: May a second placer be declared elected?
GR: No.
XPN:
If the one who obtained the highest number of votes
is disqualified and
The electorate is fully aware in fact and in law of the
candidates disqualification so as to bring such
awareness within the realm of notoriety but wouldnonetheless cast their votes in favor of the ineligiblecandidate. (Grego v. COMELEC, G. R. No. 125955,
June 19, 1997)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
68/106
PRE-ELECTIONDISPUTES
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
69/106
What is a petition for disqualification?
It is the remedy against any candidate who does notpossess all the qualifications required by the Constitutionor law, or who commits any act declared by law to be
grounds for disqualification.
Note: A petition fordisqualification must be filed anyday after the last day for filing of certificates ofcandidacy BUT not later than the date of
proclamation.
The petition is heard summarily. However, theCOMELEC cannot disqualify a candidate without hearing
and affording him opportunity to adduce evidence to
support his side and taking into account such evidence
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
70/106
What are the effects of disqualification?
Any candidate who has been declared by final judgmentto be disqualified shall not be voted for. The votes cast inhis favor shall not be counted.
If the candidate is not disqualified by final judgmentbefore the election and receives the highest number of
votes in the election, the court or COMELEC will continue
with the trial and hearing of the action, inquiry or protest.
Upon motion of the complainant or intervenor, the courtor COMELEC may order the suspension of the
proclamation of the candidate whenever the evidence
of guilt is strong.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
71/106
Petition to Declare a Nuisance Candidate
1. The COC has been filed to put the election process inmockery or disrepute;
2. The COC has been filed to cause confusion among
the voters;
3. That the filing of the COC clearly demonstrates thatthe candidate has no bona fide intention to run for office.
Note: The petition may be filed within five (5) days after
the last day of filing of COCs.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
72/106
Petition to Cancel Certificate of Candidacy
A petition to cancel a certificate of candidacymay be filed by any person exclusively on the
ground that any material representationcontained in certificate of candidacy as required
by law is false.
The petition should be filed not later than 25
days from the filing of the certificate of
candidacy.It should be decided not later than 15 days
before the election, after due notice and hearing.
Q: What are the requisites for the grant of a
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
73/106
Q: What are the requisites for the grant of apetition to deny due course to or cancel a
certificate of candidacy?
A:Material misrepresentation in the qualifications forelective office, which includes age, residency,citizenship, and any other legal qualifications
necessary to run for an elective office;
Deliberate attempt to mislead, misinform or hide a
fact which would otherwise render a candidate
ineligible.
Note: These two requirements must concur to
warrant the cancellation of the certificate of
candidacy.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
74/106
Material Misrepresentation
Material misrepresentation in a COC refers to
the qualification for elective office, whichincludes false statement as to age, residency,
citizenship, being a registered voter and any
other legal qualifications necessary to run for an
elective office.
Note: A misrepresentation which does not affect
ones qualification to run or hold public office willnot suffice for the cancellation of a COC.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
75/106
Material Misrepresentation
Actor Daniel Fernando used his screen name in
his certificate of candidacy, instead of his realname Cezar Ramirez. A petition to cancel his
COC was filed on the ground of material
misrepresentation. Will the suit prosper?
Note: The COMELEC en banc dismissed the
petition ruling that a misrepresentation which
does not affect ones qualification to run or holdpublic office will not suffice for the cancellation of
a COC.
May the COMELEC matu proprio deny or cancel a
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
76/106
y p p ycertificate candidacy?
NO. The Commission may not, by itself, without the
proper proceedings, deny due course to or cancel a certificateof candidacy filed in due form. When a candidate files hiscertificate of candidacy, the COMELEC has a ministerialduty to receive and acknowledge its receipt (Sec. 76 of theOEC).
While the Commission may look into patent defects inthe certificates, it may not go into matters not appearing ontheir face. The question of eligibility or ineligibility of acandidate is thus beyond its usual motu propio powers.
Nonetheless, Section 78 of the Omnibus Election Codeallows any person to file before the COMELEC a petition todeny due course to or cancel a certificate of candidacy on theground that any material representation therein is false.
Cipriano v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 158830 (August 10, 2004)
QUESTION:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
77/106
Q. Penera and Andanar ran for mayor of Sta.
Monica, Surigao Del Norte during the May 14, 2007
elections. Peneras political party held a motorcadepreceding the filing of her certificate of candidacy
announcing her candidacy for mayor.
Because of this, Andanar filed a petition to disqualify
Penera for engaging in premature campaigning in
violation of Sec.80 and 68 of the Omnibus Election
Code.
Does the act of campaigning for votes immediatelypreceding the filing of certificate of candidacy violate
the prohibition against premature campaigning?
ANSWER:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
78/106
A. The campaign period for local officials begin on 30
March 2007 and ends on 12 May 2007. Penera filed hercertificate of candidacy on 29 March 2007. Penera was thus a
candidate on 29 March 2009 only for purposes of printing the
ballots under Sec.11 of R.A. 8436.
Penera became a candidate only at the start of the campaign
period on 30 March 2007. Thus, all her actions prior to the start
of the campaign period are not punishable under Section 80 ofthe Omnibus Election Code. Such acts are within the realm of a
citizens protected freedom of expression.
In laymans language, this means that a candidate is liable for
an election offense only for acts done during the campaignperiod, not before. The law is clear as daylight any election
offense that may be committed by a candidate under anyelection law cannot be committed before the start of the
campaign period. (Penera v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 181613, Nov.25 2009
Q: What are pre-proclamation controversies?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
79/106
A: They refer to any question pertaining to or affecting the
proceedings of the board of canvassers, and thepreparation, transmission, receipt, custody and
appreciation of election returns which may be raised by
any candidate or by any registered political party or
coalition of political parties before the board or directlywith the COMELEC. (Sec. 241, B.P. 881 Omnibus
Election Code)
Note: The purpose of this kind of controversy is toascertain winners in the elections on basis of election
returns duly authenticated by board of inspectors and
admitted by the board of canvassers. (Abella v.
Larrazabal, G.R. No. 87721-30, December 21, 1989)
Q: Are pre-proclamation controversies allowed under
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
80/106
the new Automated Elections Law?
A:GR: For purpose of the elections for president, vice
president, senator, and member of the House of
Representatives, no pre-proclamation cases shall be
allowed on matters relating to the preparation,transmission, receipt, custody and appreciation of election
returns or the certificates of canvass, as the case may be.
(Sec. 38, R.A. No. 9369)
XPNS:(i) Illegal composition of the Board of Canvassers (BOC);
(ii) Illegal proceedings of the BOC. (Sec. 1, Rule 3,
COMELEC Resolution No. 8804, March 22, 2010)
Q: Are there pre-proclamation cases in
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
81/106
Q: Are there pre-proclamation cases inelections for President, Vice-president and
Members of the House of Representatives on
matters relat ing to the preparat ion,
t ransmission, receipt , custody, and
appreciation of the election returns or the
certificates of canvass?
A:
GR: No (Sec. 15, Synchronized Election Law).
No pre-proclamation cases are allowed in case of
barangay election. (Sec. 9, R.A. No. 6679)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
82/106
EXCEPTIONS:
(i) Correction of manifest errors
(ii) Questions affecting the composition
or proceedings of the board of
canvassers and
(iii) Determination of the authenticity
and due execution of certificates ofcanvass as provided in Sec. 30 of R.A.
7166, as amended by R.A. 9369.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
83/106
POST ELECTIONREMEDIES
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
84/106
BAR QUESTION 1996 (Q14)
1. As counsel for the protestant, where will you file
an election protest involving a contested electiveposition in:
a. the barangay?
b. the municipality?c. the province?
d. the city?
e. the House of Representatives?
Suggested Answer:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
85/106
1. In accordance with Section 2(2), Article IX-C of theConstitution an election protest involving the
elective position enumerated below should be filedin the following courts or tribunals:
a. Barangay - Metropolitan Trial Court, MunicipalCircuit Trial Court, or Municipal Trial Court
b. Municipality - Regional Trial Court
c. Province - COMELEC
d. City - COMELEC
e. Under Section 17. Article VI of the Constitution,an election protest involving the position of
Member of the House of Representatives shall befiled in the House of Representatives ElectoralTribunal.
ELECTION CONTESTS
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
86/106
ELECTION CONTESTS
An election protest is initiated by filing a protest
containing the following allegations:
a. The protestant is a candidate who duly filed acertificate of candidacy and was voted for in the
election:
b. The protestee has been proclaimed;
c. The date of the proclamation, (Miro vs. COMELEC,121 SCRA 466)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
87/106
The following have jurisdiction over electioncontests:
a. Barangay officials - Inferior Court;
b. Municipal officials -Regional Trial Court;
c. Regional, provincial, and city officials COMELEC
d. Congressman -House of Representatives ElectoralTribunal.
e. Senators - Senate Electoral Tribunal.
f. President and Vice President - Supreme Court
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
88/106
The decision of the inferior court in
election contests involving barangay officialsand of the Regional Trial Court in election
contests involving municipal officials are
appealable to the COMELEC. (Section 2(2).
Article IX-C of the Constitution.)
The decision of the COMELEC may be
brought to the Supreme Court on certiorarion questions of law. (Rivera vs. COMELEC,199 SCRA 178)
The decision of the COMELEC in election
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
89/106
The decision of the COMELEC in election
contests involving regional, provincial and
city officials may be brought to the SupremeCourt on certiorari (Section 7, Article IX-A and
Section 2(2), Article IX-C of the Constitution.)
The decisions of the Senate ElectoralTribunal and of the House of Representatives
Electoral Tribunal may be elevated to theSupreme Court on certiorari if there was grave
abuse of discretion. (Lazatin vs COMELEC 168
SCRA 391)
Q: What are the grounds for the filing of election protests?
A:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
90/106
A:
1. Fraud;
2. Vote-buying;
3. Terrorism;
4. Presence of flying voters;
5. Misreading or misappreciation of ballots;
6. Disenfranchisement of voters;
7. Unqualified members of board of election inspectors; andOther election irregularities.
Note: Pendency of election protest is not sufficient basis toenjoin protestee from assuming office.
A protestant has the right to withdraw his protest or drop pollingplaces from his protest. The protestee, in such cases, has no
cause to complain because the withdrawal is exclusive
prerogative of the protestant.
Q: When the protestant dies during the pendency of his/her election protest may his/her spouse substitute in his/
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
91/106
her election protest, may his/her spouse substitute in his/
her stead to avoid dismissal of the protest?
A: No right of substitution can inure in favor of a surviving
spouse, for the right to hold the disputed public office is a
personal right which cannot be transmitted to the latters legal
heirs.
The rule on substitution as applied to election contest must only
be in favor of a person who is a real party in interest, e.g. the
party who would be benefited or injured by the judgment, and
the party who is entitled to avail of the suit. A wife cannot
substitute for her deceased husbands protest, for she will not,in any way, be directly or substantially affected by the possible
resolution of the protest. (Poe v. Macapagal-Arroyo, PET Case
002, Mar. 29, 2005)
SAMPLE QUESTION:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
92/106
SAMPLE QUESTION:
U n d e r t h e O m n i b u sE l e c t i o n C o d e , b r i e f l ydi f ferent iate an elect ion
protest from a quo warrantocase, as to who can file thecase and the respectivegrounds therefore.
Suggested Answer:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
93/106
An ELECTION PROTEST maybe filed by a losingcandidate for the same office for which the winner filed
his certificate of candidacy. A QUO WARRANTO CASEmay be filed by any voter who is a registered voter in theconstituency where the winning candidate sought to bedisqualified ran for office.
In an election contest, the issues are: (a) whoreceived the majority or plurality of the votes which werelegally cast and (b) whether there were irregularities inthe conduct of the election which affected its results.
In a quo warranto case, the issue is whether thecandidate who was proclaimed elected should bedisqualified because of ineligibility or disloyalty to thePhilippines.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
94/106
SAMPLE QUESTION:
D i s c u s s t h e d i s p u t a b l e
presumptions (a) of conspiracy to
bribe voters and (b) of the involvementof a candidate and of his principal
c a m p a i g n m a n a g e r s i n s u c h
conspiracy.
Suggested Answer:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
95/106
gg
Under Sec. 28 of the Electoral ReformsLaw -- proof that at least one voter indifferent precincts representing at least 20%of the total precincts in any LGU was offered,
promised or given money, valuableconsideration or other expenditure by therelatives, leader or sympathizer of acandidate for the purpose of promoting the
candidacy of such candidate, --- gives rise toa disputable presumption of conspiracy tobribe voters.
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
96/106
Under Sec. 28 --- if the proof
affects at least 20% percent of theprecincts of the LGU to which the
public office aspired for by the favored
candidate relates, this shall constitute a
disputable presumpt ion of the
involvement of the candidate and of his
principal campaign managers in each of
the municipalities concerned, in theconspiracy.
P titi t A l P l ti
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
97/106
Petition to Annul Proclamation
May be filed based on manifest errors in the
transmitted results or variance of results from theelection returns and the COC.
COMELEC is required to hear the petitionimmediately and the ballots may be orderedmanually re-counted to verify the manifest errors
or alleged variance.
Note: This remedy is much faster than an
election protest.
I titi t d l f il f l ti diff t
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
98/106
Is a petition to declare failure of election differentfrom a petition to annul the election results?
Held: A prayer to declare failure of elections
and a prayer to annul the election results x x x
are actually of the same nature. Whether an
action is for declaration of failure of elections orfor annulment of election results, based on
allegations of fraud, terrorism, violence or
analogous, the Omnibus Election Code
denominates them similarly. (Banaga, Jr. v.COMELEC, 336 SCRA 701, July 31, 2000, En Banc
[Quisumbing])
What conditions must concur before the Comelec can
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
99/106
act on a verified petition seeking to declare a failure of
election? Is low turn-out of voters enough basis to
grant the petition?
Held: Before COMELEC can act on a verified petition seeking to
declare a failure of election, two (2) conditions must concur: first, no
voting has taken place in the precinct or precincts on the date fixed by
law or, even if there was voting, the election nevertheless results in
failure to elect; and, second, the votes not cast would affect the result of
the election. All the law requires is that a winning candidate must be
elected by a plurality of valid votes, regardless of the actual number of
ballots cast.
Thus, even if less than 25% of the electorate in the questioned precincts
cast their votes, the same must still be respected. (Mitmug v. COMELEC,230 SCRA 54, Feb. 10, 1994, En Banc [Bellosillo])
What are the two conditions that must concur before
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
100/106
the COMELEC can act on a verified petition seeking to
declare a afailure of election?
Held: Before the COMELEC can act on a verifiedpetition seeking to declare a failure of election two
conditions must concur, namely: (1) no voting took
place in the precinct or precincts on the date fixed by
law, or even if there was voting, the election resulted ina failure to elect; and
(2) the votes not cast would have affected the result of
the election. Note that the cause of such failure of
election could only be any of the following: force
majeure, violence, terrorism, fraud or other analogous
causes. Banaga, Jr. v. COMELEC(336 SCRA 701)
SUSPECTED QUESTION:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
101/106
SUSPECTED QUESTION:
LOREN filed a protest questioning the
election of NOLI as Vice President. While thecase was pending, LOREN won as senator.
May LOREN continue with her electionprotest in order to determine the real winner in
the said elections?ANSWER: The purpose of the protest issimply to seek the removal of NOLI from office.LOREN forfeited her claim to the position by
filing her certificate of candidacy for senator.The protest has become moot. Nothing will begained by resolving it. (Legarda v. De Castro,18 January 2008)
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
102/106
PROSECUTION
OF ELECTIONOFFENSES
Q: Who has the authority to prosecute election
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
103/106
yoffenses?
A: The COMELEC is vested with the power of a publicprosecutor with the exclusive authority to conduct the
preliminary investigation and prosecution of election
offenses punishable under the Omnibus Election Code.
(Sec. 265, B.P. 881 Omnibus Election Code)
Q: May the COMELEC delegate such authority?
A: Yes. The COMELEC en banc may delegate such
authority to any public prosecutor but always subject to thecontrol and supervision of the COMELEC. (People v.
Delgado, G.R. No. Nos. 93419-32, September 18, 1990)
Q: In cases where the prosecutor exercises delegated
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
104/106
authority to conduct preliminary investigation of
election offenses and such officer, after investigation,
already resolves the issue of probable cause, whereshould one appeal the resolution?
A: From such resolution, appeal to the COMELEC lies, and
the latters ruling on the appeal would be immediately finaland executory. However, if the preliminary investigation is
conducted by the COMELEC itself, appeal to the
COMELEC is unavailing, but the respondent may file a
motion for reconsideration of the resolution of theCOMELEC en banc finding probable cause. (Faelnar v.People, G.R. Nos. 140850-51. May 4, 2000)
Q: What are the election offenses?
A:
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
105/106
A:
1. Vote buying and vote selling;
2. Conspiracy to bribe voters;3. Wagering upon result of election;
4. Coercion of subordinates;
5. Threats, intimidation, terrorism, use of fraudulent device or
other forms of coercion;6. Coercion of election officials and employees;
7. Appointment of new employees, creation of new position,
promotion, giving of salary increases;
8. Intervention of public officers and employees;
9. Undue influence;
10. Unlawful electioneering;
11. Others. (Sec. 261, B.P. 881 Omnibus Election Code)
Q: What is the prescriptive period of election offenses?
7/28/2019 2012 Notes on Election Law
106/106
A: 5 years from the date of their commission. (Sec. 267, B.P.
881 Omnibus Election Code)
Q: Which court has jurisdiction to hear and decideelection offenses?
A:
GR: The RTC has the exclusive and original jurisdiction to
hear and decide any criminal action or proceedings for
violation of the OEC.
XPN: The MTC has jurisdiction over offenses relating to failure
Recommended