View
216
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
1/58
Learning the Life Issues
A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in
Catholic Secondary schools
Action Life Ottawa
309-376 Churchill Avenue N.
Ottawa, On, K1Z 5C3
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
2/58
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
3/58
Dear Reader:
This manual covering the topics of abortion, euthanasia, stem cell research andpersonhood is intended for high school teachers, youth group leaders and churchgroups.
Action Life is an educational pro-life organization founded in Ottawa in 1971.We operate a speakers bureau, a lending library and provide other educational and
research material. Educational aids such as brochures, books, videocassettes areavailable to the public free of charge. Our speakers have been making presentationsin Catholic high schools for over thirty years. If you wish to obtain additionalcopies of this manual or to request a speaker to address your class, please call theoffice at 798-4494. You may visit our website at www.actionlife.org.
We hope that you will find this resource manual a useful tool in teaching the lifeissues.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
4/58
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
5/58
Table of contents
PagePrenatal development.................................................................. 6When does human life begin............................................................ 4
AbortionIn defence of human life................................................................ 15Questions and answers................................................................... 17Profile Tasha Danvers-Smith............................................................ 22History of abortion law................................................................... 25Abortion statistics......................................................................... 27Abortion - Physical complications...................................................... 29
PersonhoodPersons day................................................................................. 31Personhood denied........................................................................ 32History of personhood discrimination.................................................. 33
Stem cell researchQuestions and answers.................................................................... 38
Assisted suicide and euthanasiaQuestions and answers..................................................................... 43Profile of Mark Pickup...................................................................... 47A disabled mans perspective
Working to build a community of love and respect for humanlife from conception to natural death through education.
Adult stem cells successes................................................................ 41
Prenatal development. 6When.does.human.life.begin. 4
AbortionIn.defence.of.human.life..15
Questions.and.answers..17
Prole Tasha Danvers-Smith..22
History.of.abortion.law..25
Abortion.statistics..27
Abortion - Physical complications..29
PersonhoodPersons.day..31
Personhood.denied.32
History of personhood discrimination. .33
Stem cell researchQuestions.and.answers..38
Adult.stem.cells.successes..41
Assisted suicide and euthanasiaQuestions.and.answers.43
Prole of Mark Pickup..47A disabled mans perspective..
Table of contents
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
6/58
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
7/58
4
When
?
does life begin
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
8/58
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
9/58
5
Life begins at conception
I have learned from my earliest medical educationthat human life begins at the time of conception.
I submit that human life is present throughout
this entire sequence from conception to
adulthood and any interruption at any pointconstitutes a termination of a human life.
Dr. Jrome Lejeune, genetics professor at the University of
Descartes in Paris ( discoverer of the Down Syndrome
chromosome )
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
10/58
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
11/58
6
7 weeks from conception
Grade 9: Milestones of early life
_____________________________________________________________________________
Expectations:
To understand the stages of development of the unborn.
To familiarize students with various research tools to find important facts surrounding
pre-natal life and abortion.
_______________________________
ilestones of Early Life
Our first nine months of life must have been the most eventful we have ever experienced. Here
are the major milestones of that life before birth - the chapter in your own biography.
Conception: The fathers sperm penetrates the mothers egg. Genetic instructions from both
parents interact to begin a new and unique individual - no bigger than a grain of sugar. Your sex
is already determined as is the colour of your eyes, your hair and your skin.
1st Day: Therstcelldividesintotwo,thetwointofour,andsoon.
1 Week: Thenewindividualburrowsintothewallofthewomb.
2 Weeks: Mothersmenstrualperiodissuppressedbyahormoneproducedbyherchild.
3 Weeks: Heartisforming.Eyesbegintodevelop.
Foundationsofbrain,spinalcordandnervoussystemarelaid.
4 Weeks: Heartstartstobeataroundthe21stto24thday.Beatssteadilyat25days.
Musclesaredevelopingalongthefuturespine.Tinyarmandlegbudsare
forming.
5 Weeks: Childhasgrown10,000timesto6-7mm(1/4)long.
Brainhashumanproportions. Bloodowsinveins(butstaysseparatefrom
mothersblood).
Pituitaryglandinbrainisforming.Mouth,earsand
nosearetakingshape.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
12/58
7
8 weeks after conception
20 weeks after conception
6 Weeks: Heartsenergyoutputis20percentofadults.
Skeletonisformed.Braincoordinatesmovementofmusclesandorgans.
Reexresponseshavebegun.Penisisforminginboys.(Mothermisses
secondperiod).
Brainwavescanberecorded.Tinyngersappear,followeddayslaterbytoes.
Spontaneousmovementshavebegun.Budsofmilkteethhaveappeared.
7 Weeks: Lipsaresensitivetotouch.Earsmayresemblefamilypattern.
8 Weeks: Childiswellproportioned.Isasmallscalebaby,3cm(1and1/8inch)long
andweighingagram.Everyorganispresent.
Heartbeatssturdily.Stomachproduces
digestivejuices.
Livermakesbloodcells.Kidneysbeginto
function.Tastebudsareforming.Finger-
printsarebeingengraved.Eyes,lidsand
palmsofhandsaresensitivetotouch.Babyisalsoreferredtoasfetus,aLatinword,
meaningyoungoneoroffspring.
9 Weeks: Childcanhiccupandturnitshead.Fingernailsarenowforming.
10 Weeks: Bodyissensitivetotouch.Childsquints,swallowsamnioticuid,puckersup
browandfrowns.Canmoveitsarms.
11 Weeks: Babycangraspanobjectplacedinitshand.Canurinate.Nowabout6.35cm
(2inches)longandweighs14.17g(oz).
3 Months: Vigorousactivityshowsdistinctindividuality.Bytheendofthemonth,child
cankick,turnfeet,curlandfantoes,makeast,movethumbs.Bendwrists,
openmouthandpresslipstightlytogether.Breathingispracticed.Faceis
prettier,facialfeaturesmayresembleparents.Movementsaregraceful,reexes
vigorous.Vocalchordsareformed(butwithoutair,babycannotcry).Sexorgans
areapparent.Thumbsuckingoccurs.
4 Months: Childcangraspwithhands,swimandturnsomersaults.
4-5 Months: Motherrstfeelsbabysmovements
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
13/58
8
20 weeks after conception
5 Months: Sleepinghabitsappear,butaslammeddoorwill
provokeactivity.Childrespondstosoundsin
frequenciestoohighorlowforadultstohear.
6 Months: Finehairgrowsoneyebrowsandhead.Eyelash
fringeappears.Weightisabout640g(22oz),height
23cm(9).Babiesbornatthisagecansurvive.
7 Months: Eyesandteetharepresent.Eyelidsopenandclose,
eyeslookaround.Handsgripstrongly.Mothers
voiceisheardandrecognized.
8 Months: Weightincreasesby1kg.(over2lbs)andbabysquartersgetcramped.
9 Months: Childtriggerslabourandbirthoccurs,usually255-275daysafter
conception.Of45generationsofcelldivisionsbeforeadulthood,41havetakenplace.Fo
morewillcomeduringtherestofchildhoodandadolescence.
ActivitiesforStudents
Usingtheinternetandvariousmagazinesandnewspapers,completethefollowingresearch.
1.Createapictorialjourneyofthelifeofthechildwithinthewombtocorrespondwiththefactsgiven
MilestonesofEarlyLife.
A)Estimatetheactualsizeofthechildateachstageofdevelopment.
B)Describethephysicalattributesoftheunbornchildat6weeks,8weeks,12
weeks,6monthsandbirth.
2.Abortiontakesthelifeofthechildstillinthewomb.Wherewouldyougotoresearchthefollowing
information:
A)HowmanyabortionsareperformedinCanadaeachyear?
B)WhenwasabortionrstlegalizedinCanada?
C)WhatdoestheCatholicChurchsayaboutabortion?
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
14/58
9
HelpfulHints
1. Familiarizeyourselfwiththevarioustoolsforndinginformation.Lifemagazinehas
beautifulimagesofprenatallifeasdomanyscienticanduniversitywebsites.
2. A)StatisticsCanadawillhaveinformationonthenumberofabortions.Payattention
tothefactthatsomeregionsdontreporttheirnumbers.Lookbackatpaststatistics
andaddinanestimatednumberofabortionsforthatparticulararea.
Howmanyabortionshavetherebeensince1969?
B)viewthewebsite:www.justthefacts.org.Forbeautifulimagesoflifebeforebirth.
C)DontforgettheCatechismoftheCatholicChurchortheVaticanWebsiteat
www.vatican.va.
Source:Flanagan,GeraldineLux.Therstninemonthsoflife.NewYork:Simon
Schuster,c1962.
Flanagan,G.BeginningLife.FireyBooks,1996.
Ababysrstmonths.NationalrighttoLifeEducationCommittee.
www.nrlc.org.
LennartNilsson.Achildisborn.5thedition.DellPublishing,1993,c1990.
HumanDevelopmentResourceCouncilInc.Whattheynevertoldyouaboutthefactsoflife,
2005,c1989.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
15/58
10
Who says life begins at conception?
At the moment the sperm cell of the human male meets the ovum of the female and theunion results in a fertilized ovum (zygote) a new life has begun....
(Considine, Douglas (ed.). Van Nostrands Scientific Encyclopedia. 5th edition. New York: Van
Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1976, p.943)
Zygote: This cell results from the union of an oocyte and a sperm. A zygote is the
beginning of a new human being.
Moore, Keith L. and Persaud, T.V.N. The Developing Human, 6th ed.; W.B. Saunders Company,
Philadelphia, 1998, p.2)
The development of a human being begins with fertilization, a process by which two
highly specialized cells, the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female,
unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote.(Langman, Jan. Medical Embryology. 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1975, p.3.
... The time of fertilization represents the starting point in the life history, or ontogeny, of
the individual.
(Carlson, Bruce M. Pattens Foundation of Embryology. 6th edition. New York: Mc Graw-Hill,
1996, p.3).
Overwhelmingly, embryology textbooks agree that fertilization/conception marks the beginning
of a new human life.
By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of
conception.
- Dr. Hymie Gordon, Chairman of the Department of Genetics at the Mayo Clinic.
Each individual has a very neat beginning at the moment of conception.
I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of
conception. I submit that human life is present throughout this entire sequence from
conception to adulthood and any interruption at any point constitutes a termination of a
human life.
- Dr. Jrome Lejeune, genetics professor at the University of Descartes in Paris (discoverer ofthe Down Syndrome chromosome).
- Prof. Micheline Matthews-Roth, Harvard University Medical School.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
16/58
11
One incredible photo! Grade 9: Prenatal Development
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
17/58
12
Grade 9: Prenatal Development
The commentary accompanying the photograph on the previous page
was made by:Dr. Paul E. Rockwell, Director of Anesthesiology, Leonard Hospital,
Troy, New York: Letter to the Editor, Albany, Times Union, 10 th March 1970.
The preceding award winning photograph was taken by Robert Wolfe, medical photographer at
the University of Minnesota. This tiny unborn child was still alive at this moment, only 6-7
weeks after the first day of the last menstrual period: a just removed tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Visit the website: www.justthefacts.org for beautiful images of life before birth.
Note: In an ectopic pregnancy, the developing baby lodges in the fallopian tube and cannot
survive in that location. The ectopic pregnancy endangers the womans life. The intervention
required to save the mothers life is not an abortion.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
18/58
13
Wow! Amazing Photo and Story!AsaveteranphotojournalistinNashville,Tennessee,IwashiredbyUSATodaynewspaperto
photographaspinabidacorrectivesurgicalprocedure.Itwastobeperformedonatwenty-oneweek
oldfetusinuteroatVanderbiltUniversityMedicalCenter.Atthattime,in1999,twenty-oneweeksin
uterowastheearliestthatthesurgicalteamwouldconsiderforsurgery.Theworstpossibleoutcomewouldbethatthesurgerywouldcauseprematuredelivery,andnochildbornearlierthantwenty-three
weekshadsurvived.
Thetensioncouldbefeltintheoperating
roomasthesurgerybegan.AtypicalC-section
incisionwasmadetoaccesstheuterus,which
wasthenliftedoutandlaidatthejunction
ofthemothersthighs.Theentireprocedure
wouldtakeplacewithintheuterus,andno
partofthechildwastobreachthesurgical
opening.Duringtheprocedure,thepositionof
thefetuswasadjustedbygentlymanipulatingtheoutsideoftheuterus.Theentiresurgical
procedureonthechildwascompletedinone
hourandthirteenminutes.Whenitwasover,
thesurgicalteambreathedasighofrelief,as
didI.
AsadoctoraskedmewhatspeedoflmIwasusing,outofthecornerofmyeyeIsawthe
uterusshake,butnooneshandswerenearit.Itwasshakingfromwithin.Suddenly,anentirearm
thrustoutoftheopening,thenpulledbackuntiljustalittlehandwasshowing.Thedoctorreached
overandliftedthehand,whichreactedandsqueezedthedoctorsnger.Asiftestingforstrength,
thedoctorshookthetinyst.Samuelheldrm.Itookthepicture!Wow!Ithappenedsofastthatthe
nursestandingnexttomeasked,Whathappened?Thechildreachedout,Isaid.Oh.Theydothatallthetime,sheresponded.
Thesurgicalopeningtotheuteruswasclosedandtheuteruswasthenputbackintothemother
andtheC-sectionopeningwasclosed.
ItwastendaysbeforeIknewifthepicturewaseveninfocus.Toensurenodigital
manipulationofimagesbeforetheyseethem,USATodayrequiresthatlmbesubmitted
unprocessed.Whenthephotoeditornallyphonedmehesaid,ItsthemostincrediblepictureIve
everseen.
-MichaelClancy
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
19/58
14
Home | Story of the Photo | Mission Statement | Order a Print | E-mail MichaelClancy
http://www.michaelclancy.com copyright 2001, Michael Clancy
Reprinted with permission in Action Life News
Activities
____________________________Unborn children have been operated on while still in the womb. Research one of these incrediblepre-natal surgeries and report your findings to the class.
Include the following in your report:
A) Age of the child.
B) Medical condition that mother and / or child are suffering.
C) Type of surgery that was performed.
D) Effects of the surgery on the mother and the child.
E) Immediate and long term results of the surgery.
F) Images of the surgery.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
20/58
15
Grade 10: Pro-Life Apologetics
_________________________________
To inform, prepare and equip students with the tools necessary to articulate the pro-lifeposition.
To allow students to know the main arguments of the pro-abortion position and
understand where they fall short.
The Pro-Life Position
____________________
IN DEFENCE OF HUMAN LIFE
Abortion takes the life of a defenceless human being; therefore abortion is a moral wrong. Many
people are confused about abortion because they think that the issue is complex. Actually it isnot. Since science proves that the unborn child is a human being, then elective abortion is
clearly a moral wrong. We are called to defend ALL human life.
What is the unborn?
Human life is a continuum beginning at conception and ending at natural death. You did
not come from a zygote, you once were a zygote. You did not evolve from a fetus, you once
were a fetus. This position is both scientifically and philosophically sound.
1) The unborn human is genetically distinct from its parents. It is distinct from itsmother and fully alive. Unlike sperm and ovum, the zygote possesses the active
(inherent) capacity to develop itself into an embryo, fetus, infant, child and adult.
All genetic material needed to drive the unborns development is there. The
unborn, therefore, is not a potential human, but a human with great potential.
2) The unborn entity has human parents. The principle of biogenesis states that each
living thing reproduces after its own kind. That is to say, dogs beget dogs, cats
beget cats, etc. Human parents can only produce human offspring.
3) Although the unborns humanity does not depend on its level of development, itsrapid growth does point to its status as a genetically complete, self-integrating
organism. In fact, prenatal development is so explosive that by day 25, the
measured on an electroencephalogram.
unborn human has a heart that is beating and by day 43 brain wave activity can be
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
21/58
16
Theunborndiffersfromthenewborninfourways,noneofwhicharerelevanttoitsstatusasa
humanbeing.
1)Size: Theunbornaresmallerthannewborns,butwhenhassizehadanythingtodowiththe
rightsthatpeoplehave?
2)Level of development:True,theunbornarelessdevelopedthannewborns,butthistoo
ismorallyirrelevant.Anewbornislessdevelopedthanatoddler,atoddlerlessthanan
adolescent,anadolescentlessthananadult.Butwespeakofallasequallyhuman.
3)Environment:True,theunbornislocatedinadifferentplace,buthowdoesachangein
locationsuddenlychangeanon-humanentityintoahumanone.Clearly,whereoneishasno
bearingonwhooneis.Achildintheincubatorofhermotherswombisnolessachildthan
theonebeingsustainedbyneonataltechnology.
4)Degree of dependency:Ifviabilityorindependenceiswhatmakesonehumanthenall
thosedependentonkidneymachines,heartpace-makers,andrespiratorswouldhavetobe
declarednon-persons.Thereisnoethicaldifferencebetweenanunbornchildwhoisplugged
intoanddependentuponitsmotherandakidneypatientwhoispluggedintoanddependentuponakidneymachine.
AdaptedfromPro-Life101byScottKlusendorf
Considerthefollowing:
Oncigarettepackages,Health Canadagivesthefollowingwarningtopregnantwomen:
WARNING -Cigaretteshurtbabies.Tobaccouseduringpregnancyreducesthegrowthof
babiesduringpregnancy.Thesesmallerbabiesmaynotcatchupingrowthafterbirthandthe
risksofinfantillness,disabilityanddeathareincreased.
Activity:
Havestudentsreectandanswerthisquestion:
Whyistheunbornbabyshumanityrecognizedinsomecasesand
ignoredordeniedinothercases?
Canadianhealthcaredollarspayforthedestruction(byabortion)
ofover100,000*unbornchildrenannually.Asasocietywhich
pridesitselfonitssenseofequalrights,whynotprotectallunborn
children?_______________________________________
*StatisticsCanada
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
22/58
17
The Pro-Abortion Position
Advocates for abortion say that a woman has the right to choose whether or not she will
terminate her pregnancy, thus ending the life of her child.
1. Every woman has the right to control her own body.
Fact: Yes, but only her body, not that of her child who while
developing inside her body is completely distinct from it, the only
organic link between the two being the umbilical cord. Any remaining
doubt about the separate identities of the pregnant woman and her
child have been put to rest with the advent of in-vitro fertilization
procedures, in which the earliest stages of new life take place outside the
mothers body.
Williams Obstetrics, 16 th Edition 1980, a standard obstetrics textbook in
medical schools throughout North America states: Happily, we have
entered an era in which the fetus can be rightfully considered and
treated as our second patient...Who would have dreamed, even a few
years ago, that we could serve the fetus as physician?
Any persons right are limited by the rights of others. A womans
proclaimed right to control her own body does not include a right to
have her unborn child killed by abortion. Her child has just as much
right to life has any other human being.
There are no other circumstances, other than abortion, in which a person is allowed to kill aninnocent, defenceless human being. The exception accorded the act of abortion is
unwarranted and totally illogical. Abortion cures no disease. Pregnancy is not a disease.
The fetus is not really a person.
Fact: Words such as embryo or fetus serve the same purpose as calling human beings
infants, children, adolescents or adults at other stages of their lives. They are simply
scientific terms used to indicate where a person is in his or her development: in no way do
they mean the unborn child is not human.
Personhood does not begin at a specific point in time. It belongs to a being of human
origin - a being who has a human father and mother. A human being is always a person at
every stage of life.
Some advocates of abortion claim that the unborn child is a mere clump of cells. But the
scientific facts are that a living, unmistakably human organism exists from the moment the ovum
The Pro-Abortion Position
Advocatesforabortionsaythatawomanhastherighttochoosewhetherornotshewillterminate
herpregnancy,thusendingthelifeofherchild.
1. Every woman has the right to control her own body.
Fact: Yes,butonlyherbody,notthatofherchildwhowhiledevelopinginsideherbodyis
completelydistinctfromit,theonlyorganiclinkbetweenthetwo
beingtheumbilicalcord.Anyremainingdoubtabouttheseparate
identitiesofthepregnantwomanandherchildhavebeenputtorest
withtheadventofin-vitrofertilizationprocedures,inwhichthe
earlieststagesofnewlifetakeplaceoutsidethemothersbody.
WilliamsObstetrics,16thEdition1980,astandardobstetrics
textbookinmedicalschoolsthroughoutNorthAmericastates:
Happily,wehaveenteredanerainwhichthefetuscanbe
rightfullyconsideredandtreatedasoursecondpatient...Whowould
havedreamed,evenafewyearsaago,thatwecouldservethefetus
asphysician?
Anypersonsrightsarelimitedbytherightsofothers.Awomans
proclaimedrighttocontrolherownbodydoesnotincludearight
tohaveherunbornchildkilledbyabortion.Herchildhasjustas
muchrighttolifeasanyotherhumanbeing.
Therearenoothercircumstances,otherthanabortion,inwhichapersonisallowedtokillan
innocent,defencelesshumanbeing.Theexceptionaccordedtheactofabortionisunwarrantedandtotallyillogical.Abortioncuresnodisease.Pregnancyisnotadisease.
2. The fetus is not really a person.
Fact:Wordssuchasembryoorfetusservethesamepurposeascallinghumanbeings
infants,children,adolescentsoradultsatotherstagesoftheirlives.Theyaresimply
scientictermsusedtoindicatewhereapersonisinhisorherdevelopment:innowaydothey
meantheunbornchildisnothuman.
Personhood does not begin at a specic point in time. It belongs to a being of human origin
- a being who has a human father and mother. A human being is always a person
at every stage of life.
Someadvocatesofabortionclaimthattheunbornchildisamereclumpofcells.Butthe
scienticfactsarethataliving,unmistakablyhumanorganismexistsfromthemomenttheovum
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
23/58
18
is fertilized: it will not develop into a cat or a plant - only a human being, because it is
already a human being.
The unborn child while still in the womb can now be viewed by ultrasound and have many of
its functions monitored by various sophisticated techniques. He or she can receive bloodtransfusions and medications and even be treated surgically.
An editorial in the September 1970 issue of California Medicine, the official publication of
the California Medical Association, mentions the scientific fact,
which everyone really knows that human life begins at conception
and is continuous, whether intra- or extra-uterine, until death. In the
Van Nostrands Scientific Encyclopedia, Fifth Edition, one can read:
from a purely scientific standpoint, there is no question but that
abortion represents the cessation of a human life.
Finally, personhood is not something which is awarded to you by others.
Simply put, you are a person because you are a human being.
3. Abortion is basically a private matter.
Fact: Not really. Abortion involves more than a woman and her doctor. Even more directly
and intimately involved is a third human being: the mothers unborn child; the doctors unborn
patient. And the father? Presently, he has no say in the fate of his offspring.
Abortion has broad consequences for the whole of society. How can we pretend that the very
acceptance of the large scale killing of innocent defenceless human beings through abortion
does not foster the creation of a psychological climate favourable to the development of otherforms of violence which are becoming a characteristic trait of our times (child abuse,
infanticide and physician assisted death)? The most current statistics for Canada record the
death of 103,768 unborn babies by induced abortion. Privacy is important but do we allow
parents to abuse their children as long as they do so in the privacy of their own home?
4. You cannot impose your morality on others.
Some people who oppose abortion do so on religious grounds but
the right to life is the first and most important right of all. Religion
didnt discover when human life begins, science did. Opposing abortion
is not a religious issue but a matter of human rights. Actions can be
judged objectively right or wrong. That is the very basis of law. This iswhy we have laws against stealing, abuse, murder and so on.
isfertilized:itwillnotdevelopintoacatoraplant-onlyahumanbeing,becauseitis
alreadyahumanbeing.
Theunbornchildwhilestillinthewombcannowbeviewedbyultrasoundandhavemany
ofitsfunctionsmonitoredbyvarioussophisticatedtechniques.Heorshecanreceiveblood
transfusionsandmedicationsandevenbetreatedsurgically.
AneditorialintheSeptember1970issueofCaliforniaMedicine,theofcialpublication
oftheCaliforniaMedicalAssociation,mentionsthescienticfact,whicheveryonereally
knowsthathumanlifebeginsatconceptionandiscontinuous,whether
intra-orextra-uterine,untildeath.IntheVanNostrandsScientic
Encyclopedia,FifthEdition,onecanread:fromapurely
scienticstandpoint,thereisnoquestionbutthatabortion
representsthecessationofahumanlife.
Finally,personhoodisnotsomethingwhichisawardedto
youbyothers.Simplyput,youareapersonbecauseyouarea
humanbeing.
3. Abortion is basically a private matter.
Fact: Notreally.Abortioninvolvesmorethanawomanandherdoctor.Evenmoredirectly
andintimatelyinvolvedisathirdhumanbeing:themothersunbornchild;thedoctors
unbornpatient.Andthefather?Presently,hehasnosayinthefateofhisoffspring.
Abortionhasbroadconsequencesforthewholeofsociety.Howcanwepretendthatthevery
acceptanceofthelargescalekillingofinnocentdefencelesshumanbeingsthroughabortion
doesnotfosterthecreationofapsychologicalclimatefavourabletothedevelopmentofotherformsofviolencewhicharebecomingacharacteristictraitofourtimes(childabuse,
infanticideandphysicianassisteddeath)?ThemostcurrentstatisticsforCanadarecordthe
deathof103,768unbornbabiesbyinducedabortion.Privacyisimportantbutdoweallow
parentstoabusetheirchildrenaslongastheydosointheprivacyoftheirownhome?
4. You cannot impose your morality on others.
Somepeoplewhoopposeabortiondosoonreligious
groundsbuttherighttolifeistherstandmostimportant
rightofall.Religiondidntdiscoverwhenhumanlife
begins,sciencedid.Opposingabortionisnotareligiousissuebutamatterofhumanrights.Actionscanbejudged
objectivelyrightorwrong.Thatistheverybasisoflaw.
Thisiswhywehavelawsagainststealing,abuse,murder
andsoon.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
24/58
19
Rebecca Kiessling
5. Every child should be a wanted child.
This slogan is not as loving as it sounds as it reduces children to
objects with a right to exist only if someone wants them more than
they desire other things. It also fails to take into account the fact thatthe feelings of a woman toward her pregnancy during the early
months differ markedly from what they will be at later stages of her
pregnancy or after the birth of her child.
On the other hand, while there may be parents who do not want
children, there really are no unwanted children: witness the
countless and often desperate couples who have to wait years before they are able to adopt a
child. Human life has an intrinsic value which has nothing to do with the fact that this tiny
human may or may not be wanted. The idea that the unwanted may be eliminated is a most
dangerous concept. Once we accept the ethic that every child must be wanted before it can live,
our society may also decide that every grandparent or every mentally or physically handicapped
person should also be wanted in order that they may be permitted to continue living. Askyourself, when people such as the homeless are unwanted may we kill them?
6. What about rape?
Rape is an abhorrent, violent crime. The woman who has been raped has undergone a terrible
trauma and her well-being is very much our concern. Abortion cannot change the fact that the
woman was raped and it certainly cannot heal the pain. Women pregnant from rape have
reported negative attitudes to the pregnancy from those around them and often abortion is
presented to the rape victim as the best solution. In almost all cases where the mother has given
birth to the child, it has evoked over time feelings of acceptance of the pregnancy, helping to
bring healing to what began as a horrible and violentexperience.* Some women place the child for adoption
because although they can accept the pregnancy, they cannot
accept the child or believe it best if someone else raises the
child. Others decide to raise the baby.
People who were conceived in rape, like Rebecca Kiessling,
are saddened that people think abortion should be permitted in
cases of rape. Rebecca is not responsible for the crime of her
father. Was her life then not worth protecting just as much
as anyone elses? Rebecca has been upset by those who have told
her that she should be dead. Rebecca is the mother of four children and a
former lawyer. Read Rebeccas story online at: www.rebeccakiessling.com.
Can a horrible act of violence (rape) on an innocent woman be redeemed by performing another
act of violence on an innocent person (abortion)? Can you think of any other instance where we
would kill one innocent human being for the benefit of another? The child conceived in rape
5. Every child should be a wanted child.
Thissloganisnotaslovingasitsoundsasitreduceschildrentoobjectswitharighttoexist
onlyifsomeonewantsthemmorethantheydesireotherthings.Italsofailstotakeinto
accountthefactthatthefeelingsofawomantowardherpregnancyduringtheearlymonths
differmarkedlyfromwhattheywillbeatlaterstagesofher
pregnancyorafterthebirthofherchild.
Ontheotherhand,whiletheremaybeparentswhodonotwant
children,therereallyarenounwantedchildren:witnessthe
countlessandoftendesperatecoupleswhohavetowaityears
beforetheyareabletoadoptachild.Humanlifehasanintrinsic
valuewhichhasnothingtodowiththefactthatthistinyhuman
mayormaynotbewanted.Theideathattheunwantedmaybe
eliminatedisamostdangerousconcept.Onceweacceptthe
ethicthateverychildmustbewantedbeforeitcanlive,oursocietymayalsodecidethatevery
grandparentoreverymentallyorphysicallyhandicappedpersonshouldalsobewantedin
orderthattheymaybepermittedtocontinueliving.Askyourself,whenpeoplesuchasthe
homelessareunwantedmaywekillthem?
6. What about rape?
Rapeisanabhorrent,violentcrime.Thewomanwhohasbeenrapedhasundergoneaterrible
traumaandherwell-beingisverymuchourconcern.Abortioncannotchangethefactthat
thewomanwasrapedanditcertainlycannothealthepain.Womenpregnantfromrapehave
reportednegativeattitudestothepregnancyfromthosearoundthemandoftenabortionis
presentedtotherapevictimasthebestsolution.Inalmostallcaseswherethemotherhas
givenbirthtothechild,ithasevokedovertimefeelingsof
acceptanceofthepregnancy,helpingtobringhealingtowhat
beganasahorribleandviolentexperience.*Somewomen
placethechildforadoptionbecausealthoughtheycanacceptthepregnancy,theycannotacceptthechildorbelieveitbestif
someoneelseraisesthechild.Othersdecidetoraisethebaby.
Peoplewhowereconceivedinrape,likeRebeccaKiessling,
aresaddenedthatpeoplethinkabortionshouldbepermitted
incasesofrape.Rebeccaisnotresponsibleforthecrimeof
herfather.Washerlifethennotworthprotectingjustasmuch
asanyoneelses?Rebeccahasbeenupsetbythosewhohave
toldherthatsheshouldbedead.Rebeccaisthemotheroffour
childrenandaformerlawyer.ReadRebeccasstoryonlineat:
www.rebeccakiessling.com.
Canahorribleactofviolence(rape)onaninnocentwomanberedeemedbyperforminganother
actofviolenceonaninnocentperson(abortion)?Canyouthinkofanyotherinstancewherewe
wouldkilloneinnocenthumanbeingforthebenetofanother?Thechildconceivedinrape
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
25/58
20
rapeisnottheaggressor,therapistis.Itistherapistwhomustbepunishedforhiscrimenotthe
womanandtheunbornchild.Compassionateassistance,lovingcareandlong-termcounsellingare
availabletothevictim.Letusbeconcernedforthelife,welfareandfutureofboththewomanand
herchild.
*Dr.DavidC.Reardon,JulieMakimaa,AmySobie.VictimsandVictors:Speakingoutabouttheir
pregnancies,abortionsandchildrenresultingfromsexualassault.AcornBooks,2000.
Other concerns raised by pro-abortion advocates:
Ifabortionisillegal,womenwilldiefrombackalleyabortions:
A) InCanadain1969,theyearabortionwaslegalized,therewere11casesofmaternaldeath
causedbyillegalabortionasrecordedingovernmentstatistics,yetthemediareporteddeaths
wereinthethousands.
B) Dr.BernardNathanson,formerabortionistwhofoughttolegalizeabortionintheUnitedStates
hadthistosay:Howmanydeathswerewetalkingaboutwhenabortionwasillegal?Itwas
always5,000to10,000deathsayear.IconfessthatIknewtheguresweretotallyfalse...It
wasausefulgure,widelyaccepted,whygooutofourwaytocorrectitwithhoneststatistics.
BernardNathanson,M.D.,Aborting America.(NewYork:Doubleday,1979),p.193.
C) AccordingtotheU.S.BureauofStatistics,therewere39womenwhodiedfromillegalabortions
in1972,theyearbeforeRoev.Wadelegalizedabortion,incomparisontothefalseguresused
byDr.Nathansonandothers.
D) Womenhavediedfromlegalabortions.Isthedeathofawomanfromalegalabortionlesstragicthanadeathfromanillegalabortion?
E) In1960,abortionswerestillillegalintheUnitedStates.IntheJuly1960editionoftheAmerican
JournalofPublicHealth,anarticlebyDr. Mary Calderone, then medical director of Planned
parenthood,stated:90%ofillegalabortionsarestillbeingdonebyphysicians.Callthemwhat
youwill,abortionistoranythingelse,theystillarephysicians,trainedassuch;...Theymustdoa
prettygoodjobifthedeathrateisaslowasitis...Abortionwhethertherapeuticorillegal,isno
longerdangerous,becauseitisbeingdonewellbyphysicians.
Abortions are done to preserve the physical health of the mother.
Response:Dr.HenryMorgentaler,anabortionist,haswrittenthatmedicinehasoverthelastfew
yearsmadesomuchprogressthatitisnowpossibleforaverysickwomantocompleteapregnancyandgivebirthinspiteofseriousillness.Whenthemotherslifeisindangerasinthecaseofan
ectopicpregnancy,inwhichthechildcannotsurviveinthefallopiantube,theinterventionrequired
isnotanabortion.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
26/58
21
Some people say Im personally opposed to abortion, but it should be up to the
mother to decide.
Response: Why are you personally opposed to abortion? If it is not wrong, if it does not take
the life of an unborn child, why be opposed at all? Women should be able to have as many as
they want. It is illogical to recognize the taking of an innocent human life, claim to be opposed
and support its legality. Would you say Im personally opposed to child abuse or slavery, but
it should be up to the individual to decide, a mother or father should be free to abuse their child
if they want to?
Above all, the common outcry, which is justly made on behalf of human rights -for example, the right to health, to home, to work, to family, to culture - is false
and illusory if the right to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the
condition for all other personal rights is not defended with maximum
determination.
Pope John Paul II, Christifideles Laici (On the Vocation and the Mission of the Lay Faithful
in the Church and the World), no. 38
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
27/58
22
Tasha Danvers-Smith
Grade 10: Story of Tasha Danvers-Smith
___________________________________________________________________________
Expectations
Forstudentstoseethehopeandjoythatcomesfromdoingwhatisrightdespitethe
costs.
Studentsshouldconsidertheeffectsofarightactionthatcanbringjoyeveninthe
midstofsuffering.
___________________________________
UKAthleteGivesUpOlympicHopeforUnexpectedChild
OneofBritainsbrightestOlympichopes,the400metreshurdlerTasha
Danvers-Smith,spokeofbothherjoyanddevastationafteranunplanned
pregnancythathasdashedherchancesofanOlympicmedalatAthens.
Thenewly-marriedsouthLondonathlete,whonowlivesinLosAngeles
admittedthatshewassoshockedthatsheevenbrieyconsideredanabortion,
beforedecidingshecouldnotterminatethepregnancy.Ihadhighhopes.I
thoughtIhadagoodchanceofgettingamedal,ifnotagoldone.Soitwas
quitedevastatingformetondoutIwaspregnantshesaid.ButnowIfeelsohappy,addedthe26-yearoldathlete,whomarriedherAmericancoachDarrellSmith,33,inNovember.
Now10weekspregnant,MrsDanvers-Smith,fromCamberwell,SouthLondon,whowasranked
sixthintheworldlastyear,saidallherhopeshadbeencenteredonthe2004Olympics.Iwasinthe
shapeofmylife.Iwasmorefocusedthaneverbefore,shesaid.Thenthingsdidntquitefeelright.I
wasfeelingtiredallthetime,feelingatfornoreason.Pregnancyneveroccurredtoherbecauseher
lifecycleseemednormal,shesaidandshesufferednomorningsickness.Iwasstilltrainingformy
life.
Thetimingcouldnothavebeenworse.IfIhadrunatAthensitwouldhavemeantgreaternancial
security,morerecognition.Thereisnothingnegativethatcanhappenwhenyouhaveashotatan
Olympicmedal.Icannotlie,Iconsideredanabortion.Ontheonehandyoulookatthesituationand
say,Icanhaveababyandincurmorecosts,moreproblems.Wedontevenhaveahouseyet;weare
stillstayingwithDarrellsparents.AndIamthemajorbreadwinner.Whenmybodyismybusiness,
thenifImnotfunctioning,thereisnobusiness.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
28/58
23
So the thought did cross our minds as an option. But this line from the Scriptures kept
coming into my head: For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world and
lose his own soul?.
For me the whole world was the Olympics. At the same time, I felt I would be losing my
soul. It just wouldnt fit well. It would be a forced decision. I would have forced myself to do
something I didnt want to do. Even though as much as I would love to go to the Olympics and
everything, it would be something that wouldnt make me happy at all.
Even the thought of it depressed me. I cried thinking about it as I tried to convince myself this
is what I should do because it wasnt the right time, and we didnt have the finances. It just
made me so upset.
So then I knew. For me, it was not going to be an option. And as soon as I decided that I felt
so happy. Even though I knew it was going to be a struggle financially and that I am sacrificing
my medal hopes.
Her son Jaden Wayde Smith was born December 8, 2004
Reprinted from: Life Issues Connector, Life Issues Institute Newsletter,
Cincinnati Ohio, 2004.
______________________________________________________________________________
Questions for Students
1. Research the lives of people that have made sacrifices for a just cause. What did they do?
Were they successful?
2. Consider a time in your life when you made the right decision, even though it was very
difficult and it caused you to suffer. How did you know that it was in fact the right one?
3. Consider a time when you made the wrong decision, but it was the easier choice at that
time. How did you feel? What were the consequences if any? Would you have done things
differently given a second chance?
4. Who are the role models in your life and why do you look to them as an example oran inspiration?
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
29/58
24
Unborn child twenty weeks from conception
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
30/58
25
Abortion Law in Canada
With the passage of the Omnibus Bill C-150 on May 14, 1969, the
Criminal Code of Canada was amended to allow abortions done in a
hospital by a physician if a panel of three doctors (a Therapeutic AbortionCommittee) judged that continuation of the pregnancy would or would
be likely to endanger a womans life or health. The word health was never defined. It was
subsequently given unlimited interpretation including emotional and socio-economic health of
the mother*. This law opened the door to abortion on demand. The 1969 law (Section 251 of the
Criminal Code) set no time limits on the gestational period at which induced abortions could be
performed. It was illegal to perform the procedure in a clinic setting. Dr. Henry Morgentaler
challenged the law by opening abortion clinics in Qubec in the 1970's and later in Toronto and
Winnipeg in 1982. No obligation exists for either doctors or hospitals to participate in abortion.
On January 28, 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down section 251 of the Criminal Code
in a split decision. The January 28th decision marked the end of a legal battle which began in
November 1984 when a jury acquitted Henry Morgentaler, Leslie Smoling and Robert Scott oncharges of procuring illegal abortions at 85 Harbord Street, Toronto. The acquittal was appealed
by the Crown and in 1985 a new trial was ordered on the same charges. Morgentalers lawyer,
Morris Manning appealed the decision and appeared before the Supreme Court of Canada in
October 1986.
In the 1988 Morgentaler decision unlike the Roe v. Wade 1973 ruling in the United states, the
Court does not find a constitutional right to abortion. Section 251 of the Criminal Code was struck
down for procedural reasons. The Court found that since some women did not have access to
Therapeutic Abortion Committees in their area, the delay caused by the process for procuring an
abortion threatened a womans bodily security. Read the ruling at:
http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1988/1988scc.2html.
The Supreme Court said it was up to Parliament to enact a new law on abortion. In fact,
Canada can have a law restricting abortion. At present, there is still no law on abortion in Canada
and in the absence of any legislation, abortion is legal throughout all nine months of pregnancy, up
until the moment of delivery for no reason or any reason at all. There is no age limit and no
parental consent is required to obtain an abortion.
Quick Facts for Canada
____________________________________
There is no constitutional right or charter right to abortion in Canada.
3 million abortions since 1969.
300 abortions a day.
Over 100,000 abortions annually.
No law since 1988. Abortion is legal throughout all nine months.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
31/58
26
Induced abortions continue to be most common among women in their twenties.
53% of women obtaining an abortion in 2003 were in their twenties.
The leading cause of death in Canada is induced abortion...over 100,000 abortions are
performed annually = 100,000 unborn babies dead by abortion. The number of repeat
abortions that is a second, third or fourth abortion for the same person continues to rise.
Badgley report 1977- Committee on the operation of the Abortion Law.
In 1975, a survey was commissioned by the Privy Council to determine and report upon
whether the procedure provided in the Criminal Code for obtaining therapeutic abortionsis operating equitably across Canada.... Appointed to this Committee on the Operation
of the Abortion law on September 29, 1975 were Robin Badgley, chairman, Dr. Marion
Powell, an abortion advocate, and lawyer Denyse Fortin Caron. In January 1977, the
committee issued its report. Here are some highlights:
Abortions for health reasons
* ...in terms of their physical health, most women who had abortions in Canadian
Hospitals were considered by their physicians to be in good physical health...Many
physicians whom the Committee met on its visits to hospitals across Canada openly
acknowledged that their diagnoses for mental health were given for purposes ofexpediency and could not be considered as a valid assessment of an abortion patients
mental health.
P. 211-212
In other words, most women were in good health so reasons of mental health were falsely
attributed to obtain abortions.
How many deaths from illegal abortions prior to 1969?
The number of deaths of women in Canada resulting from attempted self-induced or
criminal (illegal**) abortions which averaged 12.3 each year between 1958 and 1969...
P.29
** word illegal is our addition.
The Bagdley report mentions that on average, there were about 12 deaths a year from
illegal abortion each year in the time period 1958-1969. Further evidence that deaths
from illegal abortions were not in the thousands each year as claimed by abortions
advocates.
Repeat abortions increased from 35.2% in 2002 to 38.3 % in 2003. 25.2% of women
undergoing abortion in 2003 had had one previous abortion.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
32/58
27
CANADIAN ABORTION STATISTICS FOR 2003
Ten provinces, the Yukon, the Northwest Territories and some American States
reported to CIHI that there were 103,768 abortions performed on Canadian women
in the year 2003. The number of induced abortions recorded for every 100 live
births was 31.0% .
ANNUAL THERAPEUTIC ABORTIONS AND ABORTION RATES FOR
CANADIAN WOMEN FROM 1970 - 2003 AS REPORTED BY STATISTICS
CANADA AND THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH INFORMATION
(CIHI) *
Number Rate per 100 live birthsYear Hospital Clinic From Total Hospital Clinic From Total
events events U.S.A. events events U.S.A.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______1970 11,152 -- 11,152 3.0 -- 3.01971 30.923 -- 6,309 37,232 8.5 -- 1.7 10.2
1972 38,853 -- 6,573 45,426 11.2 -- 1.9 13.11973 43,201 -- 5,501 48,702 12.6 -- 1.6 14.2
1974 48,136 -- 4,299 52,435 13.7 -- 1.2 14.91975 49,311 -- 4,394 53,705 13.7 -- 1.2 14.9
1976 54,478 -- 4,234 58,712 15.1 -- 1.2 16.31977 57,564 -- 2,300 59,864 15.9 -- 0.6 16.5
1978 62,290 2,618 1,802 66,710 17.4 0.7 0.5 18.61979 65,043 3,629 1,073 69,745 17.8 1.0 0.3 19.1
1980 65,751 4,704 1,644 72,099 17.7 1.3 0.4 19.41981 65,053 4,207 2,651 71,911 17.5 1.1 0.7 19.3
1982 66,254 4,506 4,311 75,071 17.8 1.2 1.2 20.2
1983 61,750 3,635 3,983 69,368 16.5 1.0 1.1 18.61984 62,247 3,571 3,631 69,449 16.5 0.9 1.0 18.4
1985 62,712 3,706 2,798 69,216 16.7 1.0 0.7 18.41986 63,462 3,498 2,612 69,572 17.0 0.9 0.7 18.6
1987 63,585 3,681 2,757 70,023 17.2 1.0 0.7 18.91988 66,137 4,617 1,939 72,693 17.6 1.2 0.5 19.3
1989 70,705 7,059 1,551 79,315 18.0 1.8 0.4 20.21990 71,092 20,236 1,573 92,901 17.5 5.0 0.4 22.9
1991 70,277 23,343 1,439 95,059 17.5 5.8 0.3 23.61992 70,408 31,151 526 102,085 17.7 7.8 0.1 25.6
1993 72,434 31,508 461 104,403 18.7 8.1 0.1 26.91994 71,630 34,287 338 106,255 18.6 8.9 0.1 27.6
1995 70,549 35,650 459 106,658 18.7 9.4 0.1 28.6
1996 74,579 36,877 301 111,757 30.51997 71,845 39,681 293 111,819 32.0
1998 68,290 41,933 297 110,520 32.21999 63,832 41,799 231 105,862 31.3
2000 63,535 41,919 215 105,669 32.2
2001 61,227 45,016 175 106,418 31.9
2002 58,254 46,748 152 105,154 32.12003 56,089 47,679 149 103,768 31.0
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
33/58
28
*Induced abortions were classified as therapeutic beginning in 1969 when the first
survey, the collection of legally induced abortion data was taken. Statistics Canada says
"the term therapeutic remains in the title of the survey for the sake of historical
consistency". As of 1995, therapeutic abortion data are collected from reporting areas
within and outside the country by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI).The data is then transferred to Statistics Canada for analysis and publication. The
catalogue number for 2003 is 82-223-XIE, Induced Abortion Statistics 2003.
Since 1970 abortion figures have been compiled for hospital abortions. In 1978 Quebec
began to report some figures for clinic abortions. In 1990 the clinic figures reported
related to Quebec, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Manitoba and British Columbia.
In 1991 published clinic data included figures reported from Alberta. In 1994 clinic data
included figures from New Brunswick.
An examination of the figures shows that there were 11, 152 abortions in 1970, the first
year following the amendment to the Criminal Code. The numbers increased each year.
By 1987, the numbers had risen to 70, 023 abortions for that year according to figures
from Statistics Canada. By 2003, Statistics Canada recorded 103,768 abortions for the
year. Following the Supreme Court decision in the Morgentaler case in 1988, clinics
began operating in areas of Canada, other than Qubec. Prior to1988, abortions were
1970's which was against the law. He was however acquitted by juries and was able to
continue his business. Later, Morgentaler, Leslie Smoling and Robert Scott began to
their appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
legal only in a hospital setting if approved by an accredited Therapeutic Abortion
perform abortions in a clinic in Ontario in contravention of the 1969 law which lead to
Committee. Dr. Morgentaler had been operating an abortion clinic in Qubec since the
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
34/58
29
Abortion's Physical Complications
Abortion's Effects:Reproductive SystemPhysical Damage
Surgical abortion may harm a woman's reproductive system, damaging her uterus or cervix andleading to future reproductive problems.Chemical abortions (using RU486, etc.) are bloody, painful, and dangerous, and the long term effectson the body are unknown.Future InfertilityWomen having abortions face more than a doubled risk of future sterility. A 1995 Swedish study found45.8 percent of women who had abortions later tested positive for organisms causing pelvicinflammatory disease, one of the leading contributors to female sterility. When a woman's firstpregnancy ends in abortion, the risk of complications leading to sterility is greatly increased.Later Ectopic PregnancyEctopic pregnancies have been called a worldwide epidemic. A study appearing in the AmericanJournal of Public Health in 1998 found women who had an abortion faced a 50% increased risk ofhaving a subsequent ectopic or tubal pregnancy. The risk was nearly twice as high (90%) for women
having two or more abortions.Future PrematurityPremature birth is the leading cause of infant mortality. A study from Denmark in 1999 found womenwere 89% more likely to have a premature birth after having an abortion. After two abortions, the riskincreased to 166%. Multiple international studies support these results.Later Infant DisabilityPre-term birth is associated with lower birth weight and higher rates of cerebral palsy, often leading tophysical and mental disability.Abortion's Link to Breast Cancer:Pregnancy and Normal Breast DevelopmentA full term pregnancy is known to lower a woman's long term risk of breast cancer. In pregnancy, asestrogen levels elevate, immature milk glands, or lobules, begin to grow and differentiate, reachingmaturity around 32 weeks. By birth, the lobules are fully formed and ready for milk production.
Abortion Interrupts Breast DevelopmentAbortions, which typically occur in the first or early second trimester, interrupt the process of breastdevelopment while estrogen is still surging but before full differentiation has taken place. Thus, therisk-lowering effect of full term pregnancy is lost. Even worse, lobules interrupted in this growth stageare susceptible to replication defects, which may eventually manifest as cancers.Scientific Evidence of Abortion's ImpactOut of a total of 70 studies worldwide on breast cancer and abortion, 80% have found evidence linkingabortion to the development of breast cancer. A 1996 meta-analysis of all published reports on theincidence of induced abortion and breast cancer appearing in the Journal of Epidemiology andCommunity Health found, on average, a 30% increased risk of breast cancer following an abortion,and a 50% increase when the first pregnancy was aborted.Link to Other CancersAbortion has been associated with higher rates of cervical and ovarian cancer.Post Abortion SyndromePost Abortion Syndrome affects women in the years following an abortion, appearing as unexplaineddepression, mental flashbacks and suicidal impulses, among other symptoms.A 2003 study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal found women who had anabortion were 2.6 times more likely to be hospitalized for psychiatric problems than women whocarried their babies to term. Substance abuse has also been linked to abortion in recent studies.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
35/58
30
Pain
Abortion is painful for 97% of women, according toCanadian and U.S. studies despite the use of local
anesthesia.More than a third of women rated the pain level ofabortion as intense, severe or very severe.Chemical abortions cause higher levels of pain,including severe nausea and cramping. While painmay be a side effect of surgery or the chemicalabortion process, it can also indicate infection, cervicalor uterine damage, or the presence of an ectopicpregnancy.
With files from National Right to Life.
For an analysis of studies on the effect of abortion on
womens health, consult also:Womens Health after abortion: The Medical and
Psychological Evidence by Elizabeth Ring-Cassidy andIan Gentles. The deVeber Institute for Bioethics andSocial Research, Toronto, c2003.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
36/58
31
OCTOBEROCTOBER 1818THTH -- PERSONS DAY IN CANADAPERSONS DAY IN CANADA
1928 2006
Not a person
Not a person
Canadian women were notconsidered persons until the famous
Persons Case in 1929. Prior to this women
were not considered eligible for
appointment to the Senate. A
constitutional challenge was launched on
behalf of five women: Nellie McClung,
Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louise C.
McKinney, Irene Parlby and Emily F.
Murphy. While recognizing women as
human beings, the Supreme Court of
Canada declared that women were not
persons within the meaning of the BritishNorth America Act of 1867. This decision
was appealed and judgement was
rendered on October 18th, 1929 by the
Privy Council in England affirming that
women were indeed persons. Were
women persons prior to this
judgement? Of course, they were! The
decision of the Privy Council only
marked the moment in history when
women were granted legal recognition of
their personhood.
It is incredible that, in the 21st
century, the child in the womb still does not
have the status of personhood under the
Criminal Code of Canada. In fact, according
to Section 223, the unborn child is not even
legally recognized as a human being until
it has completely proceeded, in a living state,
from the body of the mother whether or not
(a) it has breathed (b) it has an independent
circulation (c) the navel string is severed.
Therefore, two months, two weeks, two
seconds before birth, the preborn child is
considered a non-human and consequentlycannot be legally recognized as a person.
As a result, this child receives no protection
whatsoever under criminal law.
Given all the technological and
scientific advances, such as ultrasound and
intrauterine photography, which gives a clear
picture of life before birth, is it not just as
absurd in 2007 to deprive the baby awaiting
birth status of personhood as it was in 1928 to
deny personhood to women?
Isnt it time to update Section 223 of the Criminal Code to reflect the scientific knowledge of this
century?
Action Life (Ottawa) Inc.
309-376 Churchill Ave. N., Ottawa, ON, K1Z 5C3 Tel: 798-4494 * Website: www.actionlife.org
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
37/58
32
PERSONHOOD DENIED
Black Americans were not
considered persons 200 years
ago. As slaves they had
absolutely no rights.
PERSONHOOD DENIED
persons until the famous Persons case in
1929. Prior to this, women were not eligible
for appointment to the Canadian Senate.
Were they persons prior to obtaining this legal
recognition?
Of course, they were!
PERSONHOOD DENIED
Is it not just as absurd in our time to deprive the baby awaiting birth
status of personhood as it was to deny personhood to Canadian women
and black Americans?
It is incredible that, in the 21st century, the child
in the womb still does not have the status of
personhood under the Criminal Code of Canada.
As a result, he/she can be killed at any time, by
any means, and for any reason, right up to and
during his/her birth.
Canadian women were not fully considered
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
38/58
33
Yesterday Today
Canadian Women Preborn Children
1876 1990
The law allows a preborn child to inherit
property and sue for damages, however it isdenied the right to life so receives no benefit
1984
An Ontario Court denies a father the right and
privilege to protect his preborn child from being
destroyed despite his willingness to share
responsibility for care and education. The
mother has sole control of the child's destiny.
1916
Defence lawyer Eardley Jackson yells at policemagistrate Emily Murphy, "You have no right
to be holding court. You're not even a person!"
1983
Laura Sabia shouts at Canadians, "It's a fetuswith no rights in law. It is not a person!"
1928
Although women are human the Supreme Court
of Canada declares that women are not
"persons" within the meaning of the BNA Act.
1989, 1991
The Supreme Court of Canada declares that the
preborn child is not a person in law and that the
humanity of the preborn child is irrelevant.
Personhood and Discrimination.
Even a brief overview of history reveals that its darkest moments have occurred when people
failed to recognize other human beings as persons and, therefore, as equals. This denial of
personhood to particular members or classes within the human family is traditionally associated
with attempts to deprive them of their fundamental rights and privileges. Who would deny that itis flagrant discrimination to arbitrarily strip certain human beings of the right to be deemed
persons? Take, for instance...
Discrimination in recent history.
In North America, Native Americans were considered non-persons, referred to as savages, in
order to provide justification for the appropriation of their land. We see this again in the slavery
issue, when slaves were considered to be property, to be disposed of or used as the slave owner
wished. When the injustice of this was taken to court, the Dred Scott decision was handed down.
It recognized that the slaves were indeed human beings, but denied that they were persons. Yet it
was this "personhood" upon which their legal rights depended.
During the Third Reich, the personhood of an entire group was questioned. Sociologist Irving
Louis Horowitz summed up the plight of Jews in that era by saying, "The Jew as a nationalquestion; the Jew as a cultural question; the Jew as an economic question, never a person."1 In
May 1923, Adolph Hitler asserted, "The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but not human."2
According to Ernst Fraenkel, a German legal scholar, the Reichsgericht, the highest court in
Germany, was instrumental in depriving Jewish people of their legal rights. "The Reichsgericht
refused to recognize Jews living in Germany as persons in the legal sense."3
Discrimination - Yesterday and Today.
from these privileges.
Britishcommonlawisusedtoupholdthe
notionthatwomenare...notpersonsinthematterofrightsandprivileges.While
theyhavetherighttolifetheycannotinherit
propertyorsuefordamagessoastobenet
theirlives.
Prior to 1884
B.C.Provinciallawdeniedmothersanyrights
andprivilegeswithrespecttothedisposition,
managementandeducationoftheirchildren.
Thefatherhadsolecontrolofachildsdestiny.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
39/58
34
Discrimination in Canada.
Canada too has been historically guilty of discrimination; discrimination which in hindsight is
recognized as oppressive and arbitrary. Canadian women were not considered persons until
October 18th, 1929 when the "Five Persons," Nellie McClung, Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louise
C. McKinney, Irene Parlby and Emily F. Murphy, finally won a judgement in the famous
Persons Case. This decision obtained for Canadian women legal recognition of their personhood.
Emily Murphy, a police magistrate, had constantly heard in her court that, "women are personsin matters of pain and penalties, but not persons in matters of rights and privileges."4 As
examples, Mabel French of New Brunswick5 and Annie Langstaff of Quebec6 could not practise
as barristers because they were not persons. A defence lawyer once yelled at Emily Murphy,
"You're not even a person! You have no right to be holding court."7
In 1928, a constitutional reference was launched on behalf of the five women. The question
considered was,
"Does the word 'person' in section 24 of the British North American Act (BNA), 1867, include
females...?
The decision handed down by the Supreme Court of Canada was unanimously answered in the
negative. Women were not persons within the meaning of the Act.8
This decision was appealedand on October 18th, 1929, the Privy Council in England declared,
"The word person' in Section 24 of the BNA Act,1867 includes members of either sex. "9
Modern Discrimination.
In their efforts to depersonalize the human being in the womb, feminists like Michele Landsberg
refer to "fertilized eggs" and "to the cult of worship of fertilized eggs."10 A statement of
Concerned Citizens for Choice holds that "a pregnant woman has a group of cells growing
within her body."11 Mary Anne Warren, a feminist philosopher, speaks of the preborn child as
"an entity far below the threshold of personhood."12 Doris Anderson and the National Advisory
Council on the Status of Women lobbied vigorously to have the new Charter of Rights omit the
preborn child. In 1980 the Status of Women attempted to have the wording of the Constitution
changed so that the Charter could not be interpreted as applying to preborn children.13 The
Canadian Abortion Rights Action League (CARAL) argued that under the Criminal Code a fetus
does not become a person until it is born. And Laura Sabia, like the defence lawyer of
yesteryear, bellows, "It's a fetus with no right in law. It is not a person.'' 14
The advent of modern medical technology demonstrates how specious these arguments are. In
vitro fertilization has allowed us to witness with our own eyes the beginning of human life.
During "out of the womb" surgery, legally the preborn baby becomes a person; yet when the
child is returned to the womb it loses its legal personhood. Such legal fiction is intolerable.
The past tyranny of some men against women's legitimate rights in order to maintain power for
their own convenience has given way to tyranny by some women over the child in the womb for
much the same reasons. These women choose to regard the preborn baby as undeserving of
doesn't have rights" claims Judy Rebick, then of the National Action Committee on the Status of
Women. "I don't think you can talk about rights when you're talking about an entity that isn't an
independent being.''15
personhood - to do so would, of course, interfere with permissive abortion. "Legally, a fetus
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
40/58
35
Others refuse to grant personhood to the preborn because they wish to maintain the status quo,
much like the Supreme Court of Canada did when it reaffirmed that women were not persons.
Had it not been for the enlightened and progressive thinking of the Privy Council, the status quo
would have won the day.
Today, there exists a deliberate refusal to recognize the child in the womb as a person despite
certain knowledge that it is a human being, the youngest member of the human family. Even
though a preborn child can sue for damages suffered while in utero (under civil law) it has beenconsistently refused the right to live (under criminal law) that it needs in order to exercise its
rights. InDaigle v. Tremblay, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that "a fetus is treated as a
person only where it is necessary to do so in order to protect its interests after it is born. "16
Why? The Court did not explain. In 1991, the Supreme Court carried this legal absurdity to
greater lengths when it declared in the "Midwives' Case" that a nine-month-old baby in the
process of birth (its head had emerged from the birth canal) was not a person within the meaning
of the Criminal Code. This decision was hailed by radical feminists.
Were women not persons until the Privy Council declared them to be so? Of course not; they
were always persons. Society simply refused to grant them legal recognition. Is the child in the
womb a person? Of course! Yet once again personhood is being used as a device to create a class
of human beings who may be discriminated against and thereby deprived of their fundamental
Conclusion.
In deciding the "Persons Case" the Privy Council explained:
"The exclusion of women from all public office is a relic of days more barbarous than ours, and
to those who ask why the word person should not include females, the obvious answer is, why
should it not?9
Denying personhood to the preborn child places us in a time of barbarism. To those who ask
why human rights should not be granted to the preborn, the obvious answer is, why not?
The court transcript of the Privy Council's decision in the "Persons Case" reads in part,"The Constitution is a living tree capable of growth and expansion within its natural limits."9
The Canadian Constitution must grow with human understanding. Our knowledge of the prebornhuman person has grown to the point that we can no longer refuse to graft these persons upon the
living tree described by the Privy Council in 1929.
References.
1.Irving Louis Horowitz, Book Review ofJudenat: The Jewish Councils in Eastern Europe
Under Nazi Occupation, Commonweal, April 13,1973, p. 139.
2.C.C. Aronsfeld, The Nazi Design Was Extermination, Not Emigration," Patterns of
Prejudice 9, May-June 1975:22.
3.Ernst Fraenkel, The Dual State; A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship , trans. E.A.Shils with Edith Lowenstein and Klaus Knorr (New York; Oxford University Press,
1941), p. 95.
rights; in this case, the most fundamental of rights, the right to life.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
41/58
36
4.Grant MacEwan...and mighty women too, (Saskatoon: Western Producer Prairie Books,
1975), p. 133.
5.(1905) 37, N.B.R. 359, at 371, Re Mabel French (1912)1 WWR 488 (B.C.C.A.) and S.B.
1912, 0. 18.
6.(1915)470.S.C. 131,at 142. Affirmed at (1915) 16Q.K.B. 11.
8.C.J.C. Anglin, Reference as to the meaning of the word `Persons' in Sec. 24 of the BNA
Act, 1867, (1928), 5.CR. 276-304.
9.Edwards v AG. Canada, (1930), Appeal Cases, 124-143.
10.Michele Landsberg, Toronto Star, May 17, 1983.
11.Concerned Citizens for Choice on Abortion,A Woman's Choice - A Strategy for the
Abortion Rights Movement, Feb. 1982, p. 47.
12.Mary Anne Warren, Commentary on "Can the Fetus Be an Organ Farm?",HastingsCenter Report, October 1978, p. 23.
13.Doris Anderson, Globe and Mail, Nov. 15, 1980.
14.Laura Sabia, Toronto Sun, May 17,1983.
15.Globe & Mail, April 29,1991.
16.Daigle v. Tremblay, p. 29.
Acknowledgment: cAlliance Action, 1992.
Personhood
Look at examples throughout history where governments and societies have not properly
understood what a human person is:
Dred Scott Case
Canadian Supreme Court Decision, Winnipeg Child and Family Services Case , 1997
At certain times in history, the word person was defined in a limited way to exclude groups of
people. Those excluded were deemed non-persons and were denied certain human rights.
Human rights are inalienable and fundamental. The right to life is the most basic right of all.
Without the right to life no other rights can exist. In the case of slavery in America the right to
own property was placed above the right to freedom of Black Americans. In the abortion issue,
Canadian courts argued that the right to privacy and security of the mother was morefundamental than the right to life of her child. The right to life however always comes before
matters of personal choice or privacy, just as freedom comes before ownership rights.
7.Isabel Bassett, The Parlous Rebellion, (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1975), p. 165.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
42/58
37
In the eyes of the law...the slave is not a person.Virginia Supreme Court Decision, 1858.
An indian is not a person within the meaning of
the Constitution.George Canfield, American Law Review, 1881.
The statutory word person did not in these
circumstances include women.British Voting Rights case, 1909.
The Reichsgericht itself refused to recognize Jews...as
persons in the legal sense.German supreme Court Decision, 1936.
The law of Canada does not recognize the unbornchild as a legal person possessing rights.
Canadian Supreme Court
Winnipeg Child and Family Services Case, 1997.
Sometimes the most important
lessons take the longest to learn.
Activities for research:
1. What was the basis in law for enslaving Black Americans?
2. What was the basis in law for not allowing women to hold a seat in the Canadian Senate?
3. What section of the Criminal Code of Canada deals with the status and humanity of the
child in the womb? What does it say?
Write a short essay using the following ideas:
Personhood does not begin: It belongs to all human beings.
The definition of person must be grounded in nature not opinion. What happens in a society where some rights are declared arbitrary and are
subject to the whims of elected representatives, judges or ethicists?
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
43/58
38
Stem cell research
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
44/58
39
Expectations For students to know about the difference between adult and embryonic stem
cells.
Students should learn about the very real successes of adult stem cell research and
treatments.
Students should consider the ethics of good medicine and appreciate why medical
advances that occur at the expense of others is unethical.
WHAT IS A STEM CELL?A stem cell is a master cell capable of becoming another cell type in the body such as skin, muscle, heart
or nerve cell. These cells make up the organs of the body. There is much confusion surrounding the area
of stem cell research, and clarity and morality must be brought to bear when discussing the two types of
research, embryonic and adult stem cell research.
Embryonic Stem Cell Research - Is It Ethical?
Human Embryonic Stem Cell research is Unacceptable
Life begins at conception
the human embryo is a human life
Removal of stem cells kills the embryo
Obtaining and researching stem cells from a human embryo is
unethical and immoral.
Research on stem cells from the adult human being, from the placenta and the umbilical cord is harmless and is to be
encouraged
THE HUMAN EMBRYO - A HUMAN BEINGLiving human embryos must be destroyed in the process of taking their stem cells, hence the killing of a
human life at its earliest stage for the sake of scientific experimentation. It is never acceptable tointentionally kill an innocent human being, no matter how small. It is a scientific fact that human life
begins at conception/ fertilization not a faith position or belief.(2) Science reveals to us that the human
embryo has from the moment of fertilization the complete genetic makeup of a new human life distinct frommother or father. A human embryo is not a potential human being. It is a human being. Our society has become
so accustomed to the taking of human life through abortion and euthanasia that the killing of human embryos for
research is but one more step down the slippery slope of the culture of death. We must remember that we are
stewards, not masters of human life. Scripture tells us that every individual from the very beginning is part of
Gods plan ; Truly, You formed my inmost being : You knit me in my mothers womb. I give you thanks that I
am fearfully, wonderfully made : Wonderful are your works - Psalm 139:
Myth: Embryonic stem cells are the most effective for treating diseases
Reality: In fact, theyre not. Embryonic stem cells have not helped a single human patient or shown any
patients. New clinical uses are being discovered almost weekly around the world.
(1)
therapeutic benefit. However, adult stem cells and other ethical alternatives have already helped thousands of
Myth:Embryonicstemcellsarethemosteffectivefortreatingdiseases
Reality:Infact,theyrenot.Embryonicstemcellshavenothelpedasinglehumanpatient
orshownanytherapeuticbenet.However,adultstemcellsandotherethicalalternativeshavealreadyhelpedthousandsofpatients.Newclinicalusesarebeingdiscoveredalmost
weeklyaroundtheworld.
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
45/58
40
What of surplus embryos?
anyway, so why not use them for research? Terminally ill patients will die as well, may we kill them
for scientific research? An evil action is never justified by some promised good that might result from
ADULT STEM CELL RESEARCH - ETHICAL ALTERNATIVE
Adult stem cell research does not require the destruction of a human embryo. These stem cells
can be found in adult blood, bone marrow, nerve tissue, umbilical cords, placentas, fat and skin
to name a few. Adult stem cells offer great hope. Since they are taken from the patient for his
own use, adult stem cells are not prone to immune rejection. Medical treatments with adult stem
cell research are plentiful and have produced significant results. They have proven benefits in
clinical trials for: Multiple sclerosis, lupus, juvenile and other rheumatoid arthritis, stroke,
immunodeficiencies, anemia, Epstein Barr virus, cancer treatments in combination with
chemotherapy and or/ radiation, leukemias, ovarian cancer, brain tumours, testicular cancer,
etc., blood and liver diseases, cardiac repair and too many more to mention
.
The baby who gave her mother the gift of life
Patrizia Durante learned she was suffering from leukemia when she was 26
weeks pregnant with her daughter Victoria. It was terrifying, she recounted to
the media. I was afraid for the baby. I was afraid of dying and not being there
for my daughter. It was very difficult and stressful for my family.
While Patrizia was still pregnant she was treated with moderate doses of
chemotherapy. The treatments were not successful. Doctors decided to deliver
the baby prematurely so they could treat Patrizia with higher doses of
chemotherapy drugs. On Sept. 2, 2001, Victoria was born two months ahead of
time, weighing 31/2 pounds. While waiting for a bone marrow transplant, Patrizia became severely ill .
Victorias umbilical cord blood had been frozen in liquid nitrogen and oncologist, Dr. Laneuville decided
to transplant the stem cells from the cord blood into Patrizias body. What is circulating in Patrizia veins
now is actually her babys blood. Stem cells derived from Victorias umbilical cord helped treat her
mothers cancer. Mrs. Durante, now in complete remission counts herself as a leukemia survivor. Were
elated Dr. Laneuville told The Post This is the best case scenario we could possible have
imagined...From a doctors point of view, the chances are shes cured. The gift of life from an ethical
source of stem cells - stem cells from umbilical cord blood. No embryos were harmed by this procedure.
She saved her mommy, Durante told CTV News. Shes a little miracle. Thats why we named her
Victoria Angel. Shes my little angel. In Mrs. Durantes words I gave my daughter life and then she
gave mine back.
(1) Manitoba Physicians for Life
(2)Canadian Physicians for Life
it. Use stem cells? Yes, but we need not destroy human life to do so.
Some say that embryos left in cold storage after an in-vitro fertilization procedure will be destroyed
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
46/58
41
Proponents of embryonic stem cell research have created a false impression that these cells
have a proven therapeutic use. In fact the embryonic cells have never helped a single human
patient; any claim that they may someday do so is guesswork.
Adult stem cells have proven benefits, and new uses are constantly being found:
Autoimmune diseases
Multiple Sclerosis
Lupus
Juvenile and other
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Crohns Disease
Scleroderma
Cardiac repair after
heart attack (clinical trials
announced Spring 2001)
Immunodeficiencies,
including a new treatment
for severe combined
immune deficiency (when
used with gene therapy)Anemia /Blood
conditions
Sickle cell Anemia
Aplastic Anemia
Epstein- Barr Infection
Fanconis Anemia
Red cell aplasia
Thalassemia Major
Corneal damage (full
vision restored in most
patients treated in clinical
trials)
Cancer treatment (in
combination with
chemotherapy and/or
radiation)Brain tumors
Retinoblastoma
Ovarian cancer
Solid tumors
Testicular cancer
Multiple myeloma,
Leukemias
Breast cancer
Neuroblastoma
Non-Hodgkins
lymphoma
Cartilage and bone
damage
Neural Degenerative
Disease
Parkinsons Disease
Stroke
Other metabolic
disorders
Osteogenesis imperfecta
Renal cell carcinoma
List of Conditions for which Embryonic Stem Cells have helped
Human Patients: There is no list. These cells have never helped a human patient.
Current Clinical Use of Adult Stem Cells to Help Human Patients
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
47/58
42
Marcus Grompe, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon
Health Sciences University B an expert in cell transplantation to repair damaged livers says,
"there is no evidence of therapeutic benefit from embryonic stem cells."
Bert Vogelstein, Professor of Oncology and Pathology at John Hopkins University and
Chairman of the Institute of Medicines committee studying stem cell research described all
claims of therapeutic benefit from embryonic stem cells as "conjectural."
Right to Life News Canada Bwinter 2004 edition
Questions
cell applications. List one having taken place here in Ottawa at the Ottawa Hospital in the
treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis.
www.ottawahospital.on.ca/about/reports/ar05-06.epdf
www.ohri.ca/corporate/ohri_ar_04-05_e.pdf
Helpful Hint
Two excellent sources of information on stem cell research are: www.stemcellresearch.org
1. What are the two main types of stem cells?
2. Research some of the successful treatments achieved through the use of adult stem cells.
ww.nccb.org (National Conference of Catholic Bishops-United States)
3. Have there been any successful therapies using embryonic stem cells?
4. Find other news stories dealing with a patient benefitting through the use of adult stem
w
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
48/58
43
ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA
7/31/2019 A Pro-Life Resource manual for use in Catholic Secondary schools
49/58
44
What is meant by assisted suicide?
Assisted suicide is a self-induced death where the means ( drugs or other devices) which
cause such a death are provided by a second agent. It could be a doctor or another individual.
Although a legal distinction is made between euthanasia and assisted suicide, there is no
ethical difference.
It remains a criminal act to counsel, aid or abet a suicide because historically it was
recognized that those who consider suicide are especially vulnerable to those who could take
advantage of them. It was also recognized that it was impossible to enforce any kind of
limited assisted suicide and euthanasia, without opening the door to all kinds of abuse.
What is euthanasia?
Euthanasia means acting or failing to act in such a way as to cause the death of another
human being, where the primary intention is to kill, supposedly for his or her own good. No
matter what the reason or method, killing is killing. Euthanasia and assisted suicide is saying:
We think you would be better off dead.
What about pain?
We must kill the pain not the patient. Palliative care and pain specialists
have at their disposal a vast array of medications to alleviate physical
pain in the patient. They inform us that it is possible today to substantially
relieve pain in almost all circumstances. Breakthroughs in pain
management ensure that patients can be made comfortable.
Suffering and pain wear many faces and require different treatments.
Palliative care seeks to answer all the needs of the patient:
Recommended