A visual sense of number

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

The University of Florence. A visual sense of number. David Burr & John Ross. Burr & Ross Current Biology 2008. Estimation of numerosity in rats. Monkeys: same/different task. C. 30. 4. 20. Mean. 2. SD. 10. 0. 0. 0,30. CV. 0.15. 0. Number of level presses. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

A visual sense of number

David Burr & John Ross

Burr & RossCurrent Biology 2008

The University of Florence

Estimation of numerosity in rats

Monkeys: same/different task

Number production by key-pressC

0

0.15

0,30

CV

10

20

30

0

Mea

n

SD

0

2

4

Number of level presses

Human estimation of pricesF

requ

ency

(%

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 1 2 3

Normal distribution.Log-normal distribution.

Normalized price (linear scale)

D

Brain imagingCS

IPS

Right hemisphereLeft hemisphere

left angular gyrus (AG)

bilateral posterior superior parietal lobe (PSPL)

bilateral horizontal segment of intraparietal sulcus (HIPS)

Top view

A

L

C

B

BTime

N u m b e r o f ite m s

( lo g s c a le )

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

10 0

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

No

rma

liz

ed

re

sp

on

se

(%

)

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

1 2 3 4 5

A C D

Fixation500 ms

Sample800 ms

Delay1000 ms

Test 1200 msMatch

Test 1200 msMatch

Test 1200 msNon-Match

P=0.25

P=0.25

P=0.50

0 500 1000 1500 20000

10

20

30

40

50 1 2 3 4 5

Time

Spi

ke r

ate

(Hz)

0 500 1000 1500 20000

10

20 1 2 3 4 5

Spi

ke r

ate

(Hz)

Neurons in monkey pre-frontal and parietal cortex

Selectivity follows a log scale

Nieder & MertenJ Neuroscience 2007

Number neurons cover a large range

Could numerosity be a visual attribute?

If so it should be subject to adaptation.

Adaptation demo

Adaptation demo

Where did the other dots go? (We’ll come back to that)

Adaptation: 45 sec + 8 sec top-up

Test stimulus (500 ms)

0.5 sec pause

Probe stimulus (500 ms)

Psychometric functions with adaptation

10 100 400

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

P(g

reat

er)

Matched dot number

ControlAdapt to400 dots

Probe

Adaptation vs dot number

3 10 100 3000.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

10 1000.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Pro

port

ion

incr

ease

Probe dot number

DB

JRAdapt to 400 dots

10 1000.3

1

2 DB PB

Pro

po

rtio

n in

cre

ase

Adapt Dot Number

Baselines

Effect of number of adaptor dots

Adaptation: magnitude estimation

0 20 40 60

0

20

40

60

Est

ima

te

Dot Number

JR

0 20 40 60 80

0

20

40

60

80

Est

ima

teDot Number

DB

Adapt 7No adaptAdapt 120

Numerosity or texture?

Size of rectangular elements: paired comparisons

10 100

0.0

0.5

1.0

P(m

ore)

Dot number

Small-small Big-big Big-small Small-big

JB

Adaptation does not depend on element orientation

Control Parallel Orthog0

20

40

60

Mat

ched

dot

num

ber

DB ED PB

Adapt

Effect of the test contrast

2 10 100

1

10P

rop

ort

ion

incr

ea

se

Contrast of test (%)

UnadaptedThreshold

Adaptedthreshold

Effect of adaptor contrast

10 1000.3

1

6 DB PB

Pro

po

rtio

n in

cre

se

Adaptor contrast (%)

No adaptation baselines

detectionthresholds

Numerosity or textureNeither PSE nor Weber fractions depend on:

• Size or shape of elements

• Orientation of elements

• Fourier sprectra of stimuli

• Contrast, or contrast sign

• Chromaticity

Colour-contingency after-effect

Colour-contingency after-effect

Colour-contingency after-effect

0.0 0.5 1.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

Pro

port

ion

"mor

e bl

ue"

Ratio (Blue/Total)

88% Yellow 88% Blue No Adapt

What are the neural mechanisms underlying numerosity adaptation?

BTime

N u m b e r o f ite m s

( lo g s c a le )

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

10 0

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

No

rma

liz

ed

re

sp

on

se

(%

)

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

0

2 5

5 0

7 5

1 0 0

1 2 3 4 5

A C D

Fixation500 ms

Sample800 ms

Delay1000 ms

Test 1200 msMatch

Test 1200 msMatch

Test 1200 msNon-Match

P=0.25

P=0.25

P=0.50

0 500 1000 1500 20000

10

20

30

40

50 1 2 3 4 5

Time

Spi

ke r

ate

(Hz)

0 500 1000 1500 20000

10

20 1 2 3 4 5

Spi

ke r

ate

(Hz)

“Number-neurons” in monkey pre-frontal and parietal cortex

LIP neurons respond in graded fashion to total number in RF

Roitman, Brannon &PlattPLoS 2007

Implications for adaptation

LIP VIP

10 1000.1

1

10

Pre

dict

ed p

ropo

rtio

n in

crea

se

Adapt dot number

Probe 50

VIP

LIP

Data

10 1000.3

1

2 DB PB

Pro

po

rtio

n in

cre

ase

Adapt Dot Number

Baselines

10 1000.1

1

10

Pre

dict

ed p

ropo

rtio

n in

crea

se

Adapt dot number

Probe 50

VIP

LIP

Interim conclusions• The capacity to estimate number is

built into vision. • Numerosity is a primary visual

attribute: a dozen ripe cherries look twelvish, just as they look reddish.

• Like other visual attributes, numerosity obeys Weber’s Law, is subject to spatially local adaptation and contingency aftereffects.

See Burr & Ross Curr Biol 2008 And Butterworth Curr. Biol. 2008

Attention and subitizing

Weber’s law for numerosity

Ross, Perception, 2003

25% Weber fraction explains the subitizing limit of 4

25.0

N

NW

The attentional blink: slow motionGiovanni Anobile

Attention affects subitizing but not estimation

Spatial attention: slow motion demoMarco Turi

Attention affects subitizing but not estimation

Attention affects subitizing but not estimation

Mental abacus represents large exact numerosities using pre-

existing visual resources Frank, M.C.., & Barner, D.

Abacus

Mental abacus