Action Research and the Micropolitics of School Tor-Vidar Eilertsen

Action Research andthe Micropolitics of School

Tor-Vidar Eilertsen University of Tromsoe, Norway

Tor.Eilertsen@sv.uit.no

Niklas GustafsonMalmö University, Sweden

niklas.gustafson@lut.mah.se

Petri SaloÅbo Academy University, Finland

psalo@abo.fi

AR

CARN 2006

Empowerment ……… (Non) participation

Collaboration….. ..Action ……….. .Change

….Development …….Re – De – liberation

Inclusion /Exclusion ……Emancipation

…..Resistance ….

Critical friend /Uncritical enemy

ACTION RESEARCHAS POLITICS

Micropolitics in Schools

“Power is a property of the system at rest; politics is the study of power in action”

Pfeffer (1981) in Power in organizations

H

TT

T

TT

T

TT

T

Micropolitics in Schools

H

TT

T

TT

T

TT

T(power)

relationshipsin rest

AR

Iniative from outside/above

ACTION RESEARCHMicropolitics

in Schools

H

TT

T

TT

T

TT

AR

Iniative from inside

Micropolitics in Schools

H

TT

T

TT

T

T

T

ARAR

Action research is about

TRUST

AND

POWER

Micropolitics in Schools

H

TT

T

TT

T

T

T

T

Micropolitics in Schools

AR

S

SS

S

S

S

S

SS

CASE: TOR VIDAR

H

T

T

TT

TT

Micropolitics in Schools

TT

T

Action researchBelvedere

(lighthouse)

AR

CASE: NIKLAS

I am a bit hesitant to the prospect of my team leader participating, she has been behind many of the initiatives that I have been questioning at my school. But I don’t think this necessarily will create conflicts between us. (Gustafson, forthcoming)

T

It can be a hornet’s nest among us adults... We have so much, and we must talk to each other. Our team leader conveys important messages to us in the morning. She says for example. Okay, now I have a bomb. Then we become worried like hell, and then it is only one and a half minute left to half nine. And then we must go and put on the teacher’s mask and go teaching, although we just have got to know something really weird. All of us become upset and babble (Gustafson, forthcoming)

T

At times I feel that I talk too much [within the project]. I have a lot of things to say. But I find it very improving to be here. I am able to adopt new perspectives on different matters. My work is a treadmill, it is full speed all the time. One has to solve the everyday problems and do it quickly, solutions has to be found immediately. But during our discussions I am allowed to think in a more general way. I am somehow able to land. ……And then we just sit down and begin to talk about some-thing. I feel that I am able to dissociate myself from the ridiculous sandpit I am playing in at my school. At school we just discuss who should take care of the different duties. But the really interesting and rewarding to talk about the things we might be able to change. But when you return to school you are immediately and intensively drawn into your duties ….. But here one is able to peacefully discuss all the really important things. It is stressful to come here, because there is always have something else to take care of. But when I am here, I feel really good. (Gustafson, forthcoming)

Has this teacher become micropolitically more literate?

T

The Micropolitics ofACTION RESEARCHINITIATIVE – ENGAGEMENT

AIMS (hidden agendas)RESEARCH STRATEGIES

TOOLS (language)

???

The roles and dilemmas of an action researcher

in a school

IS THERE ANY ADDED VALUEIN USING

THE CONCEPT OF MICROPOLITICSFOR THE THEORY AND PRACTICE

OF ACTION RESEARCH IN SCHOOLS?

The private arena“As a teacher one has an immense amount of power, which is a little bit frightening. We maintain that we have high degree pupil participation and all kinds of pupil’s councils, as it should be in a school of the day. But at the end it is always the teacher who makes the decisions. The good thing with the power is that one can affect how the pupils relate to certain things. In the case of fights between pupils one is able dig deeply in to it and affect how the children look upon it. The unfortunate fact that a teacher has a lot of power ends up with something positive, me using my power” (Gustafson, forthcoming).

The arena of interaction“The tradition is vigorously maintained by a handful of teachers in natural sciences. They have been in the school for ages, their teaching is highly instrumental, their approach to knowledge is narrow-minded and they expect the school to reproduce the pupils in a disciplined matter. These teachers have a powerful position amongst the school subject teachers because of the fact of their seniority, their knowledge in their own subject as well as the overall rules and regulations” (Eilertsen 1989)

The public arena“All the important decisions at our school for the moment are made by the Supreme Soviet, an Olympic committee, Mafia, call it whatever” (Salo 2002, 232).

T