ARCHDES 701 | ADVANCED DESIGN 2 | TOPIC OUTLINE | SEM 2 … › blogs.auckland.ac.nz › dist › 1...

ARCHDES701|ADVANCEDDESIGN2|TOPICOUTLINE|SEM22019

TheAdvancedDesign2topicsarestructuredaroundthethemeof‘urbanpatterns’.Attheirbroadest,thetopicsforegroundlarge-scaleurban

investigationsconcerninginfrastructure,context,landscape,architecture,relationshipsbetweenthesefactorsandpatternsofinhabitationthus

supported.Craftedpropositionsaretobedevelopedthatdemonstrateanexplorationoftheurbanpatternsthemeacrossarangeofscales.

OCEANICCONTROVERSIES:Connectingarchitectureto

issuesofconcern

The controversial Makoko Floating School in Lagos by NLE

NICKSARGENTNickSargentisaresearcher,educatoranddesignerwhohaspreviouslytaughtatUTSandtheUniversityofSydneyand

workedforTheFestivalofTransitionalArchitecture(Festa),FIELDStudioandMelling:MorseArchitects.Hecurrentlyresearcheshowarchitecturalpracticeandeducationparticipateinsocial

change.

GENERALCOURSEINFORMATIONCourse: AdvancedDesign2ARCHDES701 PointsValue: 30pointsCourseDirector: AndrewDouglasandrew.douglas@auckland.ac.nzCourseCo-ordinator: UweRiegeru.rieger@auckland.ac.nzStudioTeacher: NickSargentContact: N.Sargent@auckland.ac.nz

niksgt@gmail.com(emergencies)Location: TBCHours: TuesdayandFriday1:00-5:00pmForallfurthergeneralcourseinformationseetheARCHDES701COURSEOUTLINEintheFILESfolderonCANVAS.

OCEANICCONTROVERSIESStudentsjoiningthisstudioshouldhaveaninterestinsocialchange,architecturalandpoliticaltheory,andadesiretotranslatethisintodesign.Thisstudiooperatesasakindofmini-thesisprojectinwhichstudentswillbesupportedinlearningtodeveloparesearchinquiry,aprojectbrief,apoliticalintentandadesignproposition.Wewillforegroundamassiveandcomplexissueofconcern—theurbanproblemofsealevelrisecausedbyclimatechange—andhelpstudentstoorientthemselveswithinthisfieldbyconsideringideasfromcontemporarytheoristsandarchitectstobetterformulatehowarchitecturemightparticipateinsocialissues.Thisisabroad(ratherthandeep)studiointhatitwillquicklycoverawiderangeofskills:Research:Howdowemakealargeandcomplexresearchtopicmanageable?Design:Howdoweconnectdesignpracticesacrossscales(trans-scalarity)toissueswe’reinterestedinorareconcernedabout?Communications:Whatisitthatarchitectsandarchitecturalpropositionsactuallydointheworld,andhowdowedesignfortheseperformativeeffects?

Wewillapplythisapproachtotheproblemofsealevelrise(SLR)asitactsonadiverserangeofsitesinAuckland.IncoastalcitiestheissueofSLRwillalmostcertainlybecomeoneofthemajorchallengesforarchitectsandurbandesignersasbuildings,infrastructureandecosystemsareincreasinglyfloodedbytheocean.However,thisisn’tjustatechnicalproblemtobesolvedbyexperts;itissociallycontroversialwithavarietyofcontestorybeliefsandarguments.Forinstance:willSLRactuallyoccurand,ifso,howmuch?;whoistoblame?;whowillbeaffected?;isthisaproblemforgovernments,corporationsorprivateindividualstofix?;shouldwefocusonadaptationormitigationstrategies?;shouldweproceedquicklyorcautiously?;shouldcitiesretreat,defendorfloat?;whoshouldbeallowedtoparticipateinthesedebates?Therearemanymorequestionswecouldalsoask—noneofwhichhavestraightforwardanswers.Whattheyhighlightisthedeepuncertaintiesatthecoreofthisissue.Thisiswhatacontroversylookslike:adynamicandcontestedsitewherepeoplecometogether,oftenthroughdisagreement.Herewecanwitnessandparticipateinthevariousways–architectureisone-thesocialworldisconstructed.FollowingtheoristslikeBrunoLatour,IsabelleStengersandJaneBennett,whoincludenon-humanentitiesasactiveparticipantsinsocialcollectives,wewilltestarchitectureasatypeofsocialconnectorthatcangiveavoicetotheoceanasaparticipantinthecontroversyofSLRinAuckland.Wewillthusfocusourarchitecturalskillsanddevicesonadeceptivelysimplequestion:whatsocialrelationshipshouldwehavewiththeoceanintheeraofclimatechange?Iftheeraofmodernityhastreatedthethresholdbetweenoceanandcityasasitetobeexploitedforleisure,privilege,circulationorshipping,whatarchitecturemightbeappropriatefortheocean’sedgeinaneraofclimatechange?And,asweexplorethesequestionsandpositionourselvesinrelationtothiscontroversy,howcanwe,asarchitects,haveaninfluence?

AndresJaqueArchitects,“COSMO.”

AndresJaqueArchitects,“SuperpowersofTen.”

TOPICSTRUCTUREANDCONTENT

Thisstudioisstructuredbythreeinquiriesthatactasascaffoldsupportingstudentstolearnhowtodeveloptheirownresearchanddesigntrajectories.Studentswillbeencouragedtotakeownershipoverthisstructurewiththetutoractingprimarilyasaneventmanagerkeepingthingsrunningsmoothly.Inquiry1focusesonresearchandorientation;Inquiry2ondesigning;and,Inquiry3ontheoreticalfundamentals.Inquiry1:ResearchingSLRinAucklandThestudiowilloperateasaresearchlabexploringthedynamicsocialconstructionofSLRasanurbancontroversyconnectedtospecificsitesinAuckland.Inquiry1willarticulateasocio-materialassemblageintowhichInquiry2willbeembedded.In‘sitegroups’of3-4,studentswillselectaspecificsitewithaspecificspatialproblematicthatwillformthebasisfortheirresearchandindividualdesignproposition.Siteoptionswillbesuppliedonceconfirmed.

Tocreateaclassdatabaseofsharedresearchinformationwewillbeginbyworkingfortwoweeksinverticalresearchgroups(1studentfromeachgroupabove)toexploreSLRatdifferentscales:

-GlobalScale-NationalScale-UrbanScale-ArchitecturalandHumanScales

Ateachofthesescalesresearchgroupswillneedtoask:

-Whoarethekeyhumanandnonhumanactors?-WhateffectswillSLRhave?-Whatactorsarenotabletoparticipateinthecontroversy?-Whatarethepotentialdesignopportunitiesforarchitects?

Oncethisinformationiscompiled,studentswillworkintheirsitegroupstosynthesisethistothespecificsoftheirdesignsite.Eachgroupwillproducea3-4minutefilmthatwillbescreenedpriortotheirindividualdesignpresentationsandsummarisetheirsiteproblematicintonarrativeform.

Inquiry2:DesigningoceanicarchitecturalpropositionsThroughthreestageseachstudentwillindividuallydesignaninventivearchitecturalpropositionthatexplorestheimplicationsofthequestion:whatsocialrelationshipshouldwehavewiththeoceanintheeraofclimatechange?

2a:MaterialinventionsThefirststageofdesignwillbetodevelopamaterialartefactthatcreatesaspatialandaestheticrelationshipbetweenhumansandtheocean.Startingpointscouldbeideasofretreat,resistance,flotation,submersion,caring,repairing,utilisingandsoon.Thesecouldbeconceivedasarchitecturaldetailsorobject-design.Wewillconceptualisethisobjectasbeinganonhumanentitythathasaparticulartypeofpoliticalinfluenceontheworld.Theonlyrulesare:

-youwillhavetophysicallyexperimentwithmaterials-buildtheobject,orapieceofit,at1:1-fullyintegratetheobjectintoyourarchitecturalpropositionanddemonstrateitsperformanceatreviews

2b:SpatialinventionsConnectingthesmallscaleof2atothelargescale,thissecondstagewillbethedesignofanarchitecturalpropositionthatrespondstothespecificSLRproblematicofyourchosensite.Questioningthecertaintyandauthorityofa‘masterordirectionalplan,’wewillcollectivelyexplorewaystorepresentandchoreographthetemporality,materialityandspatialityacrossarangeofscales(thedetail,building,site,urbanandplanetaryscales).Eachstudentwillproducearchitecturaldrawingsandmodelsthatoperateinatrans-scalarwayandshowhowsmallthings,likeanarchitecturaldetailorspatialmoment,areconnectedtobigthingsliketheglobalproblemofSLR.Briefspecificswillberefinedonanindividualbasisinconversationwithyourtutor.2c:CommunicativeinventionsWorkingfromthepremisethatarchitectureissocial,eachstudentwillbeaskedtoquestionthepoliticalneutralityofstandardpin-ups.Howdoarchitectspersuadeothers?Howdoarchitectsencouragedebateorcontroversy?Howdoarchitectsantagoniseopponents?Howdoarchitectscommunicatetransparentlyoropaquely?Whatrolecandrawings,modelsandotherarchitecturaldevicesplayinsocial

controversies?Withthesequestionsinmind,studentswillbeaskedtoconsiderarangeofperformativeeffectsarchitecturaldevicesmighthave.Todothisstudentswilldesignafictitiousscenariothattheirprojectistobepresentedwithinandtreattheirfinalpresentationasacommunicativeevent.Thiswillbeintroducedanddevelopedthroughastudioworkshopinweek7.Note:Donotforgettodocumentyourindividualdesignprocessforyourprocessdocument.Makenotesoftutorialconversations,takephotographs,saveprogressimagesetc.

Inquiry3:SupplementaryconceptualtoolsResearchanddesignwillbesupplementedbyfourmodulesthatintroduceusefulconceptsforworkingwithcomplexanddynamicsituations.Thesewillbebasedonthewritingofcontemporaryarchitectsandtheoristsandwillbepresentedin2hourtutorledworkshops.Module1–Controversyandthesocial–Whyarewelookingatcontroversies?Whogetstoparticipateinthese?Module2–Narrativetechniques–Howtoturncomplexinformationintoagoodstory?(PresentedbyScripttoScreen’sEloiseVeber)Module3–Trans-scalarity–Howdoweworkwiththeinterconnectednessofdifferentthingsanddifferentscales?Module4–Architecturalcosmopolitics–Inwhatwayscanarchitecturehavepoliticaleffects?Studentswillbesuppliedwithasmallamountoftargetedreadingspriortothesemodules.

RevitalCohenandTuurvanBalen,“SenseiIchi-go(MixingUnit)”

RevitalCohenandTuurvanBalen,“FromBelow(YearRoundAmbient)”

SPECIALNOTE:MypartnerisexpectingababyAugust21.Duedatesareunpredictablebuttherewilllikelybeanunexpectedrearrangementofaclasswhenthishappens!

Week1 M22/7 Studioballot

T23/7 IntroduceInquiry1instudio,formgroups,selectsites,startresearch

F26/7 IntroduceInquiry2@KellyTarlton’s$15.50 Week2 T30/7 Inquiry1–Researchworkshop F2/8 ResearchpresentationsWeek3 T6/8 Module1+visittoStPaulStGallery F9/8 Inquiry2a–presentation,Introduce2bWeek4 T13/8 Module2(EloiseVeber),storyboards F16/8 Inquiry2-deskcritsWeek5 T20/8 Inquiry1–roughcutfilmscreeninganddeskcrits F23/8 Module3+Inquiry2deskcritsWeek6 T27/8 Studentdirectedworkingsession

F1/9 Mid-semestercrit–Inquiry1filmscreeningandInquiry2aand2b

MID-SEMESTERBREAK–developinquiries1,2aand2bfurtherWeek7 T17/9 Module4+Introduce2c

F20/92cpresentationWeek8 T24/9 Cross-critTBD

F27/9Inquiry2–deskcrits,engineerinputtbd

Week9 T1/10 Inquiry2–deskcrits F4/10 Inquiry2–deskcritsWeek10T8/10 Inquiry2–deskcrits F11/10 PrefinalrehearsalWeek11T15/10 Inquiry1+2–deskcrits F18/10 Inquiry1+2–deskcritsWeek12T22/10 Optionaldeskcrits W23/10 AD2FinalReviews

ArminLinke,“NorwegianUniversityofScienceandTechnology.”

ArminLinke,“ISA,XXIIAssemblyoftheInternationalSeabedAuthority.”

RESOURCESBennett,Jane.VibrantMatter:APoliticalEcologyofThings.Durham,NorthCarolina:DukeUniversityPress,2010.Fallan,Kjetil."ArchitectureinAction:TravelingwithActor-NetworkTheoryintheLandofArchitecturalResearch."ArchitecturalTheoryReview16,no.2(2011):184-200.Latour, Bruno. "Politics of Nature: East and West Perspectives." Ethics & Global Politics 4, no. 1 (2011): 1-10. Paglen,Trevor.“SomeSketchesonVerticalGeographies.”2016,accessed17July2019,https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/superhumanity/68726/some-sketches-on-vertical-geographies/Stengers, Isabelle. "The Cosmopolitical Proposal." In Making Things Public : Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by Bruno; Weibel Latour, Peter. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005. ARCHITECTUREAwan,Nishat,TatjanaSchneider,andJeremyTill.SpatialAgency:OtherWaysofDoingArchitecture.Abingdon,Oxon:Routledge,2011.Modelling Kivalina. "The Coming Storm and the Changing Shoreline of Kivalina." In Forensis, edited by Forensic Architecture, 700-11. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2014.Easterling,Keller.Extrastatecraft:ThePowerofInfrastructureSpace.Brooklyn,NY:Verso,2014. Gaestel,Allyn."Things Fall Apart." 2018, accessed 17 July 2019, https://magazine.atavist.com/things-fall-apart-makoko-floating-school Moore, Jacob, ed. Climates : Architecture and the Planetary Imaginary. New York: Columbia Books on Architecture and the City, 2016.

Obrist,HansUlrich."AndresJaqueInterviewed."InAndresJaque:Phantom.MiesasRenderedSociety,editedbyAndresJaque,22-29.Barcelona,Spain:FundacióMiesvanderRohe,2013.Till,Jeremy.ArchitectureDepends.Cambridge,Mass.:MITPress,2009.Yaneva,Albena,andAlejandroZaera-Polo.WhatIsCosmopoliticalDesign?:Design,NatureandtheBuiltEnvironment.Burlington:Ashgate,2015.CLIMATECHANGEDemos,TJ.“AgainsttheAnthropocene.” Demos, T. J. Against the Anthropocene : Visual Culture and Environment Today. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2017. Edwards, Paul N. A Vast Machine : Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2010. Morton, Oliver. Eating the Sun : How Plants Power the Planet. London: Fourth Estate, 2007. Morton, Timothy. Being Ecological. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2018. Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011. Oreskes, Naomi. Merchants of Doubt : How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2010. OCEANS/SEALEVELRISEAucklandCouncil.ClimateChangeRisksinAuckland.TechnicalReport.Auckland:AucklandCouncil,2019.http://www.knowledgeauckland.org.nz/assets/publications/TR2019-019-Climate-change-risks-in-Auckland-Arup-March-2019-final.pdfHelmreich,Stefan.AlienOcean.Oakland:UniversityofCaliforniaPress,2009.

TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange. The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Forthcoming Report. 2019. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/srocc/

MinistryfortheEnvironment.PreparingforCoastalChange.Report.Wellington:MinistryfortheEnvironment,2017.https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Climate%20Change/coastal-hazards-summary.pdfNationalInstituteofWaterandAtmosphericResearch.“SeaLevelsandSea-levelRise.”Accessed17July2019,https://www.niwa.co.nz/natural-hazards/hazards/sea-levels-and-sea-level-riseGolubiewski,NancyE.KyleBalderston,ChadHuandJamieBoyle.Auckland’sExposuretoSeaLevelRise:Part1–RegionalInventory.TechnicalReport.Auckland:AucklandCouncil,2019.http://www.knowledgeauckland.org.nz/assets/publications/TR2019-017-Aucklands-exposure-to-sea-level-rise-part-1-regional-inventory-final.pdfFoley,MelissaM.andMeganCarbines.ClimateChangeRiskAssessmentforAuckland’sMarineandFreshwaterEcosystems.TechnicalReport.Auckland:AucklandCouncil,2019.http://www.knowledgeauckland.org.nz/assets/publications/TR2019-015-Climate-change-risk-marine-freshwater-final.pdfCONTROVERSIESCallon,Michel,PierreLascoumes,andYannickBarthe.ActinginanUncertainWorld:AnEssayonTechnicalDemocracy.InsideTechnology.Cambridge,MA:MITPress,2009.Venturini, Tommaso. "Diving in Magma: How to Explore Controversies with Actor-Network Theory." Public Understanding of Science 19, no. 3 (2010): 258-73. FILMSLee,Spike,dir.WhenTheLeveesBroke.ARequieminFourActs.2006;USA:HBO

Castaing-Taylor,Lucien&VerenaParavel,dirs.Leviathan.2013.Fothergill,Alastair,dir.OurPlanet.2019.ARTISTSRevitalCohenandTuurvanBalen,seeSenseiIchi-goArminLinke,seeProspectingOceanPierreHuyghe,seeUnpredictableEcosystemsSarahSzeJoanJonas,seeMovingofftheLandForensicOceanography,seeTheLeft-to-dieBoatOlafurEliasson,seeGreenRiverProjectamongothersTheDistancePlan,seeClimateandInfrastructure,HumanResourcesREQUIREDPRODUCTIONPerresearchgroup:A 3-4min film that presents the reviewers to the problematic ofyour site based research challenge, introduces key actors, andconveysasenseofplace.Perindividual:Apresentationofyourdesignpropositionincluding:-architecturaldrawingsandmodels-1:1prototypeofamaterialinventionthatparticipatesintheproposition-acommunicationstrategyforafictitiousscenariothatoperatesasameta-propositionabouttherolearchitectsplayinrelationtocontroversies-anA5sizeprocessdocumentDESIGNREPORTAdvancedDesign2requiresthepreparationofaDesignReport.In2019thiswillbepreparedinaworkshopaspartofthecorecoursetaughtcon-currentlywithstudio,ARCHGEN703DesignasResearch,whereitwillaccountfor%40ofthegrade.WhileassessedaspartoftheDesignasResearchcourseitwillbefocussedonthestudioprojectandshouldberefinedandre-submittedtoyourstudioteacherinweek10sothatitcanbe

circulatedtothecriticsallowingthemtoprepareaheadofthefinalreview.ASSESSMENT&FEEDBACKThiscourseisassessedas100%coursework.Conversationalfeedbackisgiventhroughoutthesemester.Writtenfeedback,withindicativegrading,isgivenatadatearoundthemid-pointofthesemester.AllfurtherinformationregardingassessmentisavailableintheARCHDES701AdvancedDesign2CourseOutline(onCanvas).

CNN,HurricaneKatrina

CNN,prisonersbeingguardedduringHurricaneKatrina

LEARNINGOUTCOMES

GeneralCourseOutcomes&SpecificOutcomesforthisBriefOnsuccessfulcompletionofthiscoursestudentsshouldbeableto:• Theory:Showevidenceofdevelopmentofcriticalthinkingand

conceptualconsistencythroughoutthedesignprocess.Theory:Contributetoclassdiscussionsandresearch,andexperimentwithtranslatingtheoreticalconceptsintomakingbothadesignpropositionandameta-propositionabouttheroleofarchitects/architectureinrelationtoissuesofconcern.

• Architectonics:Demonstrateabilitiestoadvanceconceptual

thinkinganddesignpropositionsthroughidentifyingandaddressingissuesofmateriality,structureandconstruction.Architectonics:Demonstratehowmaterialinventionsandarchitecturalpropositionperformtemporallyandspatiallyandwhattheirmateriality,structure,temporalityandconstructionhasforissuesofconcern.

• Performance:Showabilitiestoadvanceconceptualthinking

anddesignpropositionsthroughinterrogatingandaddressingindepththenaturalenvironmental,contextual,andprogrammaticfactorsunderlyingtheproject.Performance:Showabilitiestoadvanceconceptualthinkinganddesignpropositionsthroughconsiderationoftheinterrelationshipsbetweennatural,socialandprogrammaticfactorsunderlyingtheproject.

• FormandSpace:Demonstrateskillinthedevelopmentof

threedimensionalarchitecturalformandspace,bothexteriorandinterior.Formandspace:Showanunderstandingofhoworganizationofformandspacerelatestocriticalpositionsunderpinningdesign.

• Media:Displayskillinthecommunicationanddevelopmentof

conceptual,preliminaryanddevelopeddesignpropositionsthroughthestrategicuseofarchitecturalmedia.Media:Workcollaborativelytoproducequalitycommunicationsshapedbynarrativesynthesises.Work

individuallytopresentarchitecturalpropositionsexpressedthroughinventivecommunicationstrategies.